ACLU Muslima Hina Shamsi whines about Obama's targeted killings

Needless to mention that Hina Shamsi is also a “UN advisor”

(and we all know that the UN is controlled by the OIC and the Muslim Brotherhood)

Com­plete video at: fora.​tv Hina Sham­si, a se­nior UN ad­vi­sor on ex­tra­ju­di­cial ex­e­cu­tions, dis­cuss­es the es­ca­la­tion of US drone at­tacks in Pak­istan from 2008 to pre­sent day.

More below the fold.

Judge, Justice & Executioner:

Read Some of the Best Parts of the New York Times Expose on Obama‘s ’Kill List’

• Secret “nominations” process

• Obama insists on approving every name

• His evolving philosophy

• The willingness to stretch legal precedent to justify his actions

Read More »

 Obama’s targeted killings brings  yuman rites shysters out in droves:

• Massimino Questions Legality of Obama’s Targeted Killing Strategy
• Why Obama’s ‘targeted killing’ is worse than Bush’s torture/ Guardian
•  The NYT worries about the  “just trust me” approach to targeted killings 

Judge, Justice & Executioner

ACLU Muslima Hina Shamsi has a problem with Obama’s targeted killings.

Sheik yer’mami sees a big problem with Islamic agit-props like Hina Shamsi acting as moral guardians.America is  being undermined on every level: Infiltration and subversion on an unprecedented scale:

Nancy Pelousi Hires Former Terrorist Fundraiser | FrontPage Magazine by Daniel Greenfield:   What Faiz Shakir’s powerful new post says about Democratic Party anti-Semitism..

Some of Hina Shamsi’s ‘advice:

• DHS Should Focus on Criminal Activity, Not Beliefs
• The Legacy of 9/11: Endless War Without Oversight  (no   projection to see here …)
• High-Stakes Absurdity in Guantánamo  (Gitmo & ‘Abu Ghraib’, a mohammedan obsession)

Continued: Shamsi, senior UN advisor:

She also ad­dress­es the dis­put­ed num­ber of civil­ian ca­su­al­ties from the at­tacks. “It’s in­dis­putable that these causal­i­ties have deeply neg­a­tive con­se­quences for US pol­i­cy in Pak­istan,” she says. —– This panel will ex­plore the deep and per­sis­tent chal­lenges fac­ing NATO and Amer­i­can forces op­er­at­ing in Afghanistan and Pak­istan, gen­er­at­ing in­sights into the ca­pac­i­ty of in­ter­na­tion­al hu­man­i­tar­i­an law to limit suf­fer­ing in coun­terin­sur­gen­cy war­fare and the ex­tent to which forces are, in fact, meet­ing their obli­ga­tions under the law. Mod­er­a­tor: Mary Ellen O’Con­nell, Uni­ver­si­ty of Notre Dame Law School Pan­elists: Paul Pil­lar, Cen­ter for Peace and Se­cu­ri­ty Stud­ies, George­town Uni­ver­si­ty John Rad­san, William Mitchell Col­lege of Law Hina Sham­si, New York Uni­ver­si­ty School of Law Ganesh Sitara­man, Har­vard Law School Ms. Hina Sham­si is Se­nior Ad­vi­sor to the UN Spe­cial Rap­por­teur on Ex­tra­ju­di­cial Ex­e­cu­tions at NYU School of Law. Pre­vi­ous­ly, Ms. Sham­si was a Staff At­tor­ney with the Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Pro­ject, Amer­i­can Civil Lib­er­ties Union Na­tion­al Of­fice.