Willary Clitman: We Must Protect Our Diversity, Never Mind That Huma Abedin is a MuBro Mole!

Protecting her lesbian lover is more important than the security of the nation.

As General George Casey Jr., the Army chief of staff, famously said  after the jihad massacre by Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan at Fort Hood in November 2009:

“It would be a shame — as great a tragedy as this was — it would be a shame if our diversity became a casualty as well.” 

Hillary Clinton denounces Bachmann’s calls for an investigation 

So in the oxymoronic obscenity of Hillary Clinton’s liberal logic, national diversity trumps national security.

There is ample evidence that Abedin is not to be trusted.  As far as Clinton’s assertion that there is no place for an investigation of Islamist influence in the government, that is utter hogwash, and her characterization of the calls for an investigation as “assaults” is simply demagoguing the issue.

Investigations are not assaults, and for the very woman who dismissed the allegations against Bill Clinton in the Monica Lewinsky affair as a “vast right-wing conspiracy” and then revived the phrase in the 2008 campaign to protest a legitimate investigation is laughable.

But Islamist moles in the government are no laughing matter.

Update:

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) on Friday defended Michele Bachmann and other GOP representatives who have called for an investigation into whether the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the United States.

Breitbart

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has finally responded to the request by five House Republicans for an investigation into the Islamist links to Clinton’s long-time aide Huma Abedin. Clinton tried to take the moral high ground, saying there is “no place in our politics” for such “assaults” and continuing:

“Leaders have to be active in stepping in and sending messages about protecting the diversity within their countries. We did see some of that in our own country. We saw Republicans stepping up and standing up against the kind of assaults that really have no place in our politics.”

State Department spokesman Philippe Reines has hysterically denounced the calls for an investigation as “nothing but vicious and disgusting lies  … anyone who traffics in them should be ashamed of themselves.”

But the House members who called for an investigation, Reps. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), Tom Rooney (R-Fla.), Lynn Westmoreland (R-Ga.) and Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) have not capitulated to their critics, and instead have pointed out that their calls for an investigation into Abedin are part of a larger investigation into any Islamist infiltration in the federal government. They justifiably claim that the media has focused on Abedin, and missed the larger point.

Clinton’s claim of Republicans stepping up was a clear reference to John McCain, who called the accusations against Abedin “specious and degrading attacks,” as well as House Speaker John Boehner, who also criticized the five House members.

But there is ample evidence that Abedin is not to be trusted.  As far as Clinton’s assertion that there is no place for an investigation of Islamist influence in the government, that is utter hogwash, and her characterization of the calls for an investigation as “assaults” is simply demagoguing the issue.

Investigations are not assaults, and for the very woman who dismissed the allegations against Bill Clinton in the Monica Lewinsky affair as a “vast right-wing conspiracy” and then revived the phrase in the 2008 campaign to protest a legitimate investigation is laughable.

But Islamist moles in the government are no laughing matter.

4 thoughts on “Willary Clitman: We Must Protect Our Diversity, Never Mind That Huma Abedin is a MuBro Mole!”

  1. GOP leaders ignorant of Muslim Brotherhood’s American influence
    Over at Breitbart today, John Guandolo exposes the dangerous willful ignorance of McCain, Boehner, and the others who have criticized Michele Bachmann for calling for an investigation of Muslim Brotherhood influence in government:

    It has been said that the truth offends those who don’t have it. It would appear Senator John McCain and Speaker John Boehner do not have the truth and the facts showing the danger the Muslim Brotherhood’s Movement in America’s government poses today. Americans should be very concerned about this.
    In letters dated June 13, 2012, five Members of Congress – Representatives Michele Bachmann (R-MN), Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Tom Rooney (R-FL), Trent Franks (R-AZ), and Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA) — requested that Inspector Generals from the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, as well as the IG from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, investigate the penetration of senior Muslim Brotherhood operatives into our national security decision-making apparatus in America.

    This is a reasonable request, since a massive amount of factual evidence exists which specifically identifies individuals and organizations which are a part of the Muslim Brotherhood Movement in America directly involved in key positions inside our security agencies.

    Yet, American political leaders from both parties continue to disparage this request in personal terms, giving clear indication they are completely ignorant of the facts in this matter. The latest blast came from leaders in the GOP, publicly defending a senior advisor and Deputy Chief of Staff to the U.S. Secretary of State, Huma Abedin. This individual’s immediate family founded a Muslim Brotherhood front group which, at a minimum, raises questions about Abedin’s position inside the government. If her parents were in leadership positions in organizations the U.S. government knew were fronts for the KGB or Chinese Intelligence, we would not be having this discussion. But because it is the Muslim Brotherhood, which many American leaders have either coddled, worked with, or ignored, these five Members of Congress who are abiding by their oaths of office and asking for a legitimate investigation into this potentially damaging espionage issue, are being attacked by Senator McCain and Speaker Boehner. Shoot the messenger.

    As a point of reference, three years ago Congresswoman Sue Myrick (R-NC) called on the Department of Justice to brief all members of Congress on the implications of the US v. Holy Land Foundation trial, which revealed many of the prominent Islamic organization in America today, including the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), are a part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Jihad here. DOJ never fulfilled this request.

    Speaker Boehner said in defense of Abedin, “From everything that I do know of her, she has a sterling character. Accusations like this being thrown around are pretty dangerous.” What is actually dangerous is that the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives remains so grossly ignorant about a threat inside our nation nearly eleven years after 9/11.

    For his part, Senator McCain came to Abedin’s aide by saying that the comments made about her “rest solely on a few unspecified and unsubstantiated associations of members of Huma’s family.” This necessarily means that Mr. McCain did no study at all of the facts of the matter, because they clearly and specifically reveal the organizations in which her parents and family are involved and their ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. He also criticized the Congressional letter for lacking any “instance of an action, a decision or a public position that Huma has taken while at the State Department or as a member of then-Sen. Clinton’s staff that would lend credence to the charge that she is promoting anti-American activities within our government.” This will require a lengthier retort.

    Are Senator McCain and Speaker Boehner aware of the following facts?

    The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) is the largest Muslim Brotherhood (MB) organization in North America, created to be the “nucleus” for the Islamic Movement, according to MB documents seized by the FBI in Annandale, Virginia in 2004.
    Because of the evidence ISNA is a Brotherhood front, as well as the numerous financial documents detailing money going directly from ISNA and their banks to Hamas entities overseas, ISNA is an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest Hamas trial ever successfully prosecuted in U.S. history (US v. Holy Land Foundation), which was adjudicated in 2008 in Dallas, Texas.
    When ISNA filed a motion with the federal court to have their name removed from the unindicted co-conspirator list, the government stated that ISNA exists to be a financial support entity for Hamas. The federal judge agreed stating the government provided “ample evidence” and left ISNA on the list. A three-judge appellate panel unanimously agreed and left ISNA on the unindicted co-conspirator list.
    ISNA’s two key directors and its President, Mohamed Magid…, all work with Secretary Clinton and her office. So, the leaders of a Hamas-supporting entity are advising the U.S. Secretary of State.
    Read it all.

Comments are closed.