“When a universityÂ abuses its power to stifle and punish speech offensive to Muslims, singling out Islam for special treatment while allowing other religions to be lampooned, the school is effectively enforcing Sharia (Islamic law) blasphemy codes, which have no place in free society.
Dr. Mark Durie
Dr. Mark Durie, author ofÂ Â The Third Choice: Islam Dhimmitude and Freedom,Â has more background on theÂ Islamophobia capitulationÂ at the Australian National University in Canberra in this Gatestonearticle, “Islamophobia comes to Canberra”.Â Durie is an Anglican pastor and an associate Fellow at the Middle East Forum.Â See ourÂ NER intervewÂ with Dr. Durie, “Imperialist Islam Unveiled”Â in our collection,Â The West Speaks.
Here are someÂ perceptiveÂ comments by Durie about this latest capitulation to Islamic Blasphemy codes:
The university cited anÂ ugly demonstration by MuslimsÂ which took place in Sydney on September 15, 2012, and the Jyllands-Posten cartoon controversy.
The Sydney demonstration involved protestors displaying placards such as “Behead all those who insult the prophet” and “Sharia will dominate the world.”
Baxendale reported that one of theÂ WoroniÂ editors was told by a complainant: “I don’t think you understand the seriousness of this. In Pakistan, people get shot for this kind of thing.”
This logic is terrifying. People can get shot for many things in Pakistan: for gay sex or for belonging to the wrong Muslim sect. Are we in Australia to let our freedoms be shaped by the worst kinds of intolerance found in the sharia badlands?
Australian National University was motivated by raw fear — of Islam. They virtually admitted as much. They did not bat an eyelid when diverse religions were mocked week after week in the pages ofÂ Woroni, but Islam is different. It seems the university did not even go through the motions of pretending they were acting to protect Muslims: they just didn’t want to get hurt.
This is a real example of true Islamophobia, in which an individual or organization discriminates between religions on the basis of the degree to which they fear Islam. The Australian National University has shown itself to be genuinely Islamophobic, yet at the same time, sharia-friendly.
This is the surrender of fear, which aligns with Muhammad’s call to non-Muslims toÂ aslim taslam: “Surrender and you will be safe.” The Australian National University has acted to secure its safety, but at a great price.
This university could dig deeper and consider two implications of their actions.
One is: Why is it they have such fear of Islam? Do their actions show that they agree with Geert Wilders that “Islam is the problem”? Do they agree that it is Islam’s own theological characteristics that have caused Australia’s leading university to threaten its students with expulsion, simply for doing what students have always done?
The second question is: How will discrimination among religions based upon the criterion of fear distort human rights and the very fabric of the society in which we live? Are we to bow down before Islamic dogmas in every domain of life, out of the fear of being shot “as in Pakistan”? Will the demands of Islamic sharia determine the boundaries of human safety in every corner of the globe, as the September 2012 Sydney protestors so brazenly demanded?