“If Christianity and Judaism cannot be mentioned with terrorism,” Turkish Deputy Prime MinisterÂ BÃ¼lent ArinÃ§Â seconded in his remarks, “then our noble religion Islam cannot be defamed this way either.”
Objective observers should be rightfully concerned by the “International Conference on Islamophobia: Law & Media” held by the Turkish government’sÂ Directorate General of Press and InformationÂ (DGPI orÂ BYGEMÂ in Turkish) and theÂ Organization of Islamic CooperationÂ (OIC) this past September 12-13 in Istanbul’sÂ Grand Tarabya Hotel. Conference participants substantiated all too many threats emanating from various Muslims and their allies, calling into question their respect for free speech and freedom of expression.
The conference website defined “Islamophobia” according to the Greek suffixÂ phobiaÂ as a “groundless fear and intolerance of Islam and Muslims.” By “culminating in hate speech and attitudes towards Muslims,” thisÂ phobiaÂ is “detrimental to international peace.” There should be “recognition of Islamophobia as a hate crime and Islamophobic attitudes as human rights violations.”
In Istanbul, Turkish Prime MinisterÂ Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸanÂ reiterated his well-known meme (seeÂ hereÂ andÂ here) that “Islamophobia” as a “kind of racism” is a “crime against humanity.” “No monotheistic religion,” ErdoÄŸan elaborated, “adopts, supports, permits or leads terror.”
No religion? Except one: Islam. Â Islam does! ‘Monotheistic’ or not. Islam is entirely based on the annihilation of the other. The cat is out of the bag, Mr Erdogan. The lies and the deceit will no longer do. We will shine a lightÂ on your blood-cult.
“If Christianity and Judaism cannot be mentioned with terrorism,” Turkish Deputy Prime MinisterÂ BÃ¼lent ArinÃ§Â seconded in his remarks, “then our noble religion Islam cannot be defamed this way either.” ArinÃ§ discerned the main cause of “Islamophobia” in the belief that “Islam and democracy are not compatible,” yet “Muslims are democrats in essence.”
Representing the OIC’s 57 Muslim-majority states (including “Palestine”), a fellow Turk, OIC Secretary General Dr.Â Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, reprised themes from the OIC’slongstanding attempts to restrict criticism of Islam. Ihsanoglu decried the “exploitation….of freedom of speech.”
The conference’s first session featured internationally renowned Islam scholar and regular Islamist apologistÂ John Esposito. Esposito cited “irrational fear” being behind “anti-Sharia legislations” in the United States. Turning toward Egypt, Esposito criticized those who “think it is legitimate to overthrow a democratically elected government.”
Joining Esposito on the panel to compare anti-Semitism with “Islamophobia” wasNorman Gary Finkelstein. The Jewish child of Holocaust survivors, Finkelstein has a long record of comparing Israel to Nazism and supporting groups such as Hezbollah while having his views of fellow Jews celebrated among anti-Semites.
Nathan LeanÂ appeared at the conference as well. Pulitzer Prize-winning criticÂ Jeffrey TaylorÂ hasÂ criticizedÂ Lean’s recent “maladroit, bunglingÂ critique” of atheistÂ Richard DawkinsÂ as an “Islamophobe.” BÃªte noir among Lean’s ilk,Â Islam scholar Robert SpencerÂ has likewise condemned various sloppy errors in Lean’s public correspondence. Spencer has also condemned Lean as a “stalker” for tweeting an article with pictures supposedly of Spencer’s home and family.
Joining Lean on a panel were American and Iranian professorsÂ Stephen SheehiÂ and Saied Reza Ameli. During aÂ 2011 visit to the University of Florida, Sheehi had defined “Islamophobia” as merely being a “hatred of brown people.” Ameli, meanwhile, was afounderÂ andÂ leading memberÂ of the United Kingdom’sÂ Islamic Human Rights Commission(IHRC), a “radical Islamist organization” in the assessment of Israel’sÂ Stephen Roth Institute for the Study of Contemporary Anti-Semitism and Racism.
The self-proclaimed Turkish “Marxist academic” Ali Murat Yel and his American colleagueÂ Hatem Al BazianÂ were also in Istanbul. Yel has praised ErdoÄŸan’s ruling AKP party for having “paved the way for…a democratic society” in Turkey despite Islamist concerns. “The West,” Yel has alsoÂ opined, “may come to appreciate the Muslim experience of both Andalusia and the Ottoman past in dealing with their religious minorities.” The “outspoken anti-Zionist” Bazian, meanwhile, has in the past stated notoriously genocidal Islamic hadith against the Jews.
Turkish academicÂ BÃ¼lent ÅženayÂ oversaw the conference declaration drafting. In aÂ 2010 presentationÂ to theÂ Organization on Security and Cooperation in EuropeÂ (OSCE), Senay deemed “Islamophobia” as “today…the strongest form of hate crime,” extending to the “psychological terror” of “cultural terrorists.” Åženay condemned “hate speech…targeting all the tenets and adherents of Islam…under the banner of the freedom of expression.” Additionally, “hate crimes originate from hate speeches,” Åženay argued inÂ another 2010 OSCE presentation. Åženay is the founder of theÂ European Muslim Initiative for Social CohesionÂ (EMISCO), an entity prominent in the past for seeking OSCE opposition to “Islamophobia” speech (seeÂ here,Â here, andÂ here).
Dahlia MogahedÂ rounded out the conference participants. This Esposito protÃ©gÃ© and Obama Administration appointee has had numerous associations with MB-linked groups in the United States. She has also downplayed the extent of violent extremism among Islamists globally as well as the dangers of sharia.
Distinguishing between “legitimate criticisms…and hate-filled or irrational criticisms” was for BYEGM Director General Murat Karakaya in the conference final statement a “fundamental question.” Yet the conference did not inspire the confidence that freedom of expression was a consideration in the discussion, particularly in light of host country Turkey’s own harsh treatment of irreverence towards freedom of expression (seeÂ hereandÂ here). The Istanbul agenda is yet another example of Islamists seeking to internally codify blasphemy under Sharia.