Mama Buggers

Islam is a criminal organisation. So why not criminalise it?

UK Moves to Criminalize Islam(ism)

99902897-david-cameronIt’s easy to slam all the nonsense about Islamic extremism as willful denial and the notion that Islamism is something separate from Islam, rather than the political implementation of Islam through Islamization, as delusional.–Story at FrontPage Magazine


Submit, submit, submit:

Do young Australian Muslims have to choose between being Muslim or being Australian?

Hell no. We all know that they did not come here to become Australian; they came here to make Australia Islamic.

“Women who wear the hijab, the headscarf, they say that they are the ones who are facing resistance at workplaces”,  says Dr Nahid Kabir.–Did anyone ever check where “Dr” Kabir got his doctor title?  ( SBS)

UK: “Islamophobia” monitoring group claims government crackdown on “Islamist extremists” will lead to violence against Muslims

Yesyesyes. And  telling the truth about Islam will  make 1.5 gazillion Muselmaniacs hate us so much that they really, really must kill us?

Fiyaz-Mughal_2578959b.jpgFiyaz Mughal

This is extraordinary: according to the dogmas that we all must accept on pain of charges of “Islamophobia” and “bigotry,” the vast majority of peaceful Muslims abhors and rejects the twisted, hijacked version of Islam represented by Osama bin Laden, Anjem Choudary and the like. Thus since the Cameron government is being careful to distinguish the “Islamist extremists” it is fighting from the genuine practitioners of authentic Islam, “moderate Muslim” groups such as Tell Mama should welcome this new initiative and support it 100%.

Instead, Fiyal Mughal, who heads up Tell Mama, is now hysterically claiming that even to fight against “Islamist Extremists Who Have Nothing To Do With Real Islam will lead to violence against Muslims. He thereby reveals his belief that essentially any and every form of resistance to jihad terror and Islamic supremacism is to be classified as “Islamophobic” and thus rejected — unless equal the British government spends equal time and resources on “right-wing extremists,” who have not committed an act of terror remotely comparable to the July 7, 2005 jihad attacks in London, and who have not threatened to conquer Britain and subjugate non-right-wing-extremists, and who are not part of an international network of groups holding the same ideology and at war with governments that do not hold it.

In other words, Tell Mama wants Britain to surrender to jihad terror. And it is well on the way.

Tell Mama is dedicated to tracking “Islamophobia.” Tell Mama lost its UK government funding in June 2013 after making false claims of waves of attacks ‘Islamophobic incidents.'” Why is anyone still listening to this group?

“Government crackdown on radicals ‘will lead to attacks on Muslims,'” by Oliver Wright and Nigel Morris for the Independent, December 4 (thanks to JW):

A fresh crackdown on Islamist extremism risks backfiring by fuelling anti-Muslim prejudice and driving hardliners underground, the Government was warned last night.A group that monitors attacks on Muslims said it was preparing for an upsurge of violence as a result of the moves being announced today by David Cameron.

Under the Prime Minister’s proposals, Islamist radicals face being expelled from mosques, Muslim community groups and universities in a fight-back against fundamentalism.

The courts would be given new civil powers – similar to Asbos – to ban suspected extremists from preaching or indoctrinating others.

At the same time internet companies have been asked to block terrorist material from overseas being accessed in this country.

The measures were proposed by the Prime Minister’s extremism task force – which included ministers, community groups, the police and the security services – set up after the killing of Lee Rigby.

Last night Fiyaz Mughal, the director of Tell Mama, which records anti-Muslim incidents, said he feared Mr Cameron’s announcements would reinforce negative perceptions of Muslims.

Mr Mughal said he had asked extra staff to be on standby because of an anticipated surge in hate attacks. He added that the new rules should cover all forms of extremism, including the activities of the far right.

“There has to be parity and not a feeling that Muslims are being singled out,” he said.

Chris Allen, an expert on Islamophobia at Birmingham University, said: “The more the lens is turned on the Muslim community, the more society begins to think, ‘There’s no smoke without fire’.”

Isabella Sankey, the director of policy at Liberty, said it was important to confront “ugly ideologies across the spectrum”. But she added: “Driving those who despise diversity further underground does nothing to expose their beliefs and only acts as another recruitment tool. You cannot protect our democracy by shutting down the very freedoms that sustain it.”

Speaking in China, Mr Cameron defended the proposals. “In light of the dreadful events in Woolwich, I thought it was very important to have a proper look through all of the UK’s institutions to make sure we really are doing everything we can to drive out radicalisation,” he said.

“This is not just about violent extremism, this is about extremism that leads to radicalisation and particularly Islamist extremism.”

Mr Cameron said there were “just too many people” who had been radicalised at Islamic centres or who had been in contact with extremist preachers, who had “not been sufficiently challenged”.

“I want to make sure in our country that we do this effectively. But we need to go further than that and realise that some institutions have wanted to get rid of radicalisers but have not had the means to do so – so we want to help Islamic centres and mosques to expel the extremists.”

The report includes a definition of Islamist extremism as a distinct ideology which, it says, should not be confused with traditional religious practice. It describes it as an ideology which is based on a “distorted interpretation of Islam, which betrays Islam’s peaceful principles”.

The report says Islamist extremists seek to impose a global Islamic state governed by their interpretation of sharia as state law, rejecting liberal values such as democracy, the rule of law and equality. Their ideology also includes the uncompromising belief that people cannot be Muslim and British

11 thoughts on “Mama Buggers”

  1. As I have been posting for a while now – once our troops are out of Afghanistan, the focus of the war on Terror, is going to move home. We see indications of this in France, Netherlands, Italy, and the UK.
    Since 9/11, under one guise or another, the West has destabilised virtually the entire Muslim world. The only exceptions are Saudi Arabia and its satellites. The ME is now a ungovernable, with multiple militias, each certain that they are the true Islam, wreaking havoc in their countries. The infrastructure and the economy, what there was of it, is destroyed. This must shake the confidence of 80% of Muslims, who just want to earn a living, and feed their families. The minds of Muslims in the West, who just work here, must also be in turmoil. They know they are at the mercy of the authorities and under its protection. They must question what Islam is about, and what their future is in the West.

    As I’ve said before, the West, particularly the US and the UK, and the Anglo part of the West, has never been satisfied in simply defeating the enemy. They will not rest till the ideology itself is destroyed. Thus Muslim violence in the West, beating up Christian demonstrators in Cologne, rapes etc etc, have been allowed to happen, to show the public that, when the time comes, they have ample reason to do what they must,

    Also note that commentators are being given far more leeway when criticising Islam, even in major newspapers.

    Its my hope that Muslims will abandon Islam, as they must by now, realize that Islam is a destroyer of nations, cultures and people ie families.. Pray that they will find Jesus Christ.

    1. Interesting point of view, DP111.

      How about we turn your theory on its head? You could just as well say the ummah has destabilised the entire western world. Many western countries (Greece, Italy, Ireland, Spain, Portugal etc) are in deep trouble and might become ungovernable in the near future; the 50 million Muslims in EUrabia are working towards the demise of the infidel nation states (so does the EU, the UN and the OIC) and there is absolutely no sprit to defeat Islam or to even do the absolute minimum necessary to halt the Mohammedan invasion and the Islamic expansion project.

      Your “hope that muslims will abandon Islam” is based on wishful thinking.

      If you have large numbers of fanatics prepared to kill and die for their cause, and you let them lose among unmotivated, divided westerners that cling to treacherous illusions of security, totally unwilling to even do the minimum to defend themselves, chances are that the aggressors will take it all and the invaded party will lose everything.

      That seems to be the much more likely scenario here.

  2. Airhead Cameron, what is ” IslamISM?”

    Coward (8:17, 9:14-15) sadist (e.g. 4:46), fascist (98:6 vs. 98:7), and terrorist#1 (3:151, 59:2, 8:12, 8:59/60) Allah, Q9:111 “slay (8:55, 98:6) and are slain (98:7, 3:110) for promised paradise “… that is the achievement supreme.” (ALL sins are forgiven, except dept to Bukhari)
    … which fulfills 9:5 “Kill the unbelievers (‘in the ONEness of Allah’, ‘mushrikun’) wherever ye find them” + 9:29 “Fight those (sword-jihad, 2:216) who believe not in Allah”

  3. Islam is only an ancient, ongoing criminal extortion racket and crime-gang which blames “god” for its members criminal desires.

    Unlike our Golden Rule-based West, in which we all agree to NOT do things either to or “for” each other, unasked, islam insists we DO things, (like: Submit, convert or die!”), and thus it asserts it has both the right and duty to always attack all the non-members of their crime-gang first.

    By agreeing to not attack first, we enable trust, progress, and civilization.

    By demanding they attack first, they inflict distrust, stagnation, and barbarism.

  4. To elaborate, elucidate and otherwise attempt to clarify:

    Sharia “law” (crime) differs from our laws in that it is the exact opposite of real LAW.

    Our Law is, as I noted above, based on negative rights; on the Golden Rule of Law’s simple “Do Not Attack First” principle.

    Islam’s sharia is based on the exact opposite – on what I call the brazen rule of chaos, or basically “It is our holy right and duty to our god to always attack all the infidels first!”

    From this “THOU SHALT KILL!” credo, they inflict distrust, stagnation, and barbarism on them selves and on everyone else.

    Our laws are based on “Everything is forbidden, except that which is specifically agreed to” (between individual humans); while theirs is based on the exact opposite, on “Everything is allowed, except that which is specifically forbidden” i.e: I can take all your stuff if you don’t notice &/or don’t have the force-of-numbers gangster strength to stop me; it’s all us-versus-them, and group-might-made “rights!” And extortion is always a crime.

    Islam’s Sharia is either compatable with our Western, morality-based law (in which case it is superfluous) or it is not (in which case it is illegal).

    There is only one universally accepted version of sharia crime (‘law’) and that is the original, Haneefite version as recorded in The Hedaya and used by the Ottoman Empire to rule all of islam for centuries; all moslems in all their countries are very aware of its simple might-makes-right and us-versus-them tenets and strictures.

    There is really only one Qur’an, one islam, and one sharia.

    And islam is inherently against ALL sovereign national countries (which it regards as only temporary man-made false idols, to be eventually destroyed and replaced by the global muslim Ummah, ruled by their theocratic Caliphate government) because since the Qur’an and subsequent sharia elaborations embody “god’s” perfect laws which are to apply to all mankind everywhere, why would anyone ever need any merely human legislators (even ‘democratically elected’ ones)?!

    So, since islam is a subversive anti-national and anti-legal entity, why on earth are any of its “muslim” members ever afforded any legal standing to promote their criminal treasonous sedition, before any of our courts of law?!

    Allowing foreign (sharia “law”) courts to exist in your country is to enable those foreign governments to govern in your country; it’s obviously TREASON.

  5. @stephanie,

    Please just stop, Lol. You saying, “Muhammad (aka Allah)” shows you don’t know what you’re talking about, or have any knowledge about Islam. C’mon now, at least don’t make yourself look ridiculous.

    Muhammad(PBUH) was a prophet. Allah is not a human-like creature, he is God. The creator of the Heavens and the Universe. The biggest sin a Muslim can commit, is performing shirk. Which is the “sin of practicing idolatry or polytheism, i.e. the deification or worship of anyone or anything other than the singular God. Literally, it means the establishment of “partners” placed beside God.”

    Therefore, if you actually knew Islam, you’d know the basics.

  6. @Sorry about that.

    Stephanie was simply underlining the point that Mo became a self-appointed spokeperson for ‘Allah’ – the arabian deity who conveniently granted Mo permission to do and take whatever he wanted.

    In the same way that deluded fools in psych hospitals around the world claim special privileges on account of their high religious standing.

    “…sin of practicing idolatry or polytheism, i.e. the deification or worship of anyone or anything other than the singular God. …”

    That should include ideas, no?

    Ideas such as anti-semitism, islamic supremacism, the ‘caliphate’ are worshipped more than ‘allah’ .

    Not realising that this ‘god’ is inside every human being as a potential of consciousness is the biggest error that muslims continuously commit.

    Every day in the middle east and elsewhere insanely cruel , barbaric acts are carried out by subhuman thugs under the auspices of islam.

    Muslim actions belie their words. Why are so many muslims worshipping at the altar of Moloch , the god of destruction?

    It’s not just myself saying this – Ask a Copt for a second opinion for example – or Christian in Maloula, Syria.

    You, as a ‘revert’ should look more closely at what muslims say and what actually happens on the ground. Rather than enjoying an intellectual wank of how wonderful islam is as you smilingly greet your fellow mosqueteers who are allowed to dress up in costumes in the safety of a liberal Western democracy which allows you true freedom of religion (and to hold fascist philosophies).

    What are you as a ‘revert’ actually doing to stem the tide of suffering caused by your more dedicated coreligionists? Have you done something simple like set up a website strongly admonishing their acts and criminality? Are you fair-minded enough to have pointed out to your more devoted coreligionists the positive things that Israelis are continuously doing in so many fields of endeavour in the only true liberal democracy in the Middle East?

  7. Dear Sheikh

    I’m looking at the war on Terror with a different perspective.

    What is curious is that the interventions in Afghanistan and then Iraq, were undertaken by virtually all Western countries.

    In Afghanistan for instance, even stoutly neutral Sweden, and initially Switzerland, sent troops to Afghanistan. This is so out of keeping, that one must ask a few questions. Second, all Western leaders sang from the same hymn book – Islam the RoP, tiny minority etc. For all Western leaders, no exception, to sing the same lyrics, and to stick with it for over ten years, even when governments changed, is unheard of. This did not happen even when we were in conflict with the USSR.

    So one has to come to the conclusion that there is a coordinated policy, and even Obama cannot change it. In fact he tried to, but was quickly slapped down by his own Chief of Staff. Note, that it is under Obama that the drone war has escalated. It is under Obama’s stewardship, that we are using even al Qaeda to destabilise and destroy the Islamic world, once the excuses of WMDs or bringing democracy to Islamic nations didn’t wash.

    The media in the meantime has been kept on a tight leash. Once the leash is off, things can change dramatically.

    I wonder of Snowden has something that could put the strategy at risk.

  8. Meanwhile
    The Most Despised People in the World
    The most persecuted group in the world today is Christians. Christians in Nigeria, Egypt, Syria, Sudan, and other nations are murdered, raped, kidnapped, enslaved and persecuted on a daily basis. The reason for the vast majority of all of this violence is that they are Christian among Muslims.

    But their abuse does not stop with the violence. The perpetrators of violence are measured in the thousands, but the greatest abuse is at the hands of those who should demand that the violence stop. The silence in the face this persecution is denial and justification. The persecutors are few, but the deniers are in the billions.

    Christians are enjoined to care for all persecuted people, but in particular, they are to care for their own brothers and sisters. They manage to ignore the persecution by doing good works, such as care for the poor. Christians have compassion but no courage to face the enemy who kills them.

    Read it all

  9. Who is this “Mo” you keep speaking of? I know Muhammad(Pbuh), don’t know any “Mo”. This person, “Mo” might be a “self appointed spokesperson for ‘Allah’ – the arabian deity who conveniently granted Mo permission to do and take whatever he wanted” but Muhammad(Pbuh), wasn’t.

    Firstly, the acronym “Aka” stands for “Also known as”. Muhammad(Pbuh), is not ‘also known as’ Allah. This is how misconception is built. You say something, but mean something completely different. Allah is the God of everything. Muhammad(PBUH) just spread his message of Islam.

    Second, Muhammad(PBUH) was chosen to be the Prophet by God. He spread only the truth and message of Islam, for Allah had commanded him to do so.

    Third, Allah simply means “God” in arabic. So before you start saying “Allah is fake” or a “arabian deity”, you might want to learn what Allah means. It literally means God. The same God of Adam & Eve, Noah, Abraham, Moses, David and Jesus(peace be upon them all).

    How can caliphates be worshiped more than Allah, if Muslims only worship Allah(God)?

Comments are closed.