Obama's Plot Against the Right to Bear Arms

Infringed: Second Amendment in the Crosshairs



Those are Obama’s own words — exactly as he spoke them on ABC-TV. He firmly believes government can restrict or repeal your liberties if they get in his way — which is why the Obama administration regime is so intent on shredding as much as they can of the Bill of Rights — including the Second Amendment.

In 1996, Australia imposed some of the world’s most severe gun bans and restrictions. The only problem: no criminals heeded the policy. Now, says New South Wales Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione, “Guns have fallen into the hands of organized crime, outlaw motorcycle gangs, mid-level crime groups and petty thieves.” The lesson? Gun controls weaken law-abiding citizens—while empowering crime.

The Second Amendment to the Constitution guarantees that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Yet today there’s a gun rights debate—pitting the legal owners of firearms and those who wish to preserve their Constitutional rights against politicians who wish to infringe upon or revoke those liberties. Conservative filmmaker Peter Jay Gould is now developing INFRINGED: Second Amendment in the Crosshairs, a new feature-length documentary designed to separate fact from fiction in today’s gun rights debate. “Our plan is to create a captivating, compelling, feature-length film comprised of dramatic historical reenactments, including a passionate presentation of the Founding Fathers’ original debate over the Bill of Rights,” said Gould. “We’ll track through the years, right on up to today, showing how the Second Amendment has served as the linchpin protecting all our other liberties.”


Expect insightful interviews with leading Constitutional scholars—including Independent Institute Research Fellow Stephen P. Halbrook, author of the acclaimed forthcoming book, Gun Control in the Third Reich: Disarming the Jews and “Enemies of the State”—as well as revealing TV news clips and crime re-creations. Gould and his crew plan to interview police, victims of crime and fact-check talking points on both sides of today’s gun control debate. “We’ll show which are based in reality and which on politically-inflamed emotion,” Gould continued. All historical re-creations will be shot on location and feature actors speaking dialogue adapted from the Founding Fathers’ own personal writings.

A Kickstarter campaign has begun to raise at least $200,000 in production funding for Infringed: Second Amendment In The Crosshairs. Details can be found on the Infringed website or Facebook page.

2 thoughts on “Obama's Plot Against the Right to Bear Arms”

  1. FIRST QUESTION: How on earth could registering law-abiding citizen’s (or even criminals’) firearms ever prevent even a single gun-related crime?!

    Either they catch the criminal with the gun before they use it, or they don’t! Where it came from is irrelevant!


    “You aren’t allowed self defense because this sign will protect you!”

    Gun control “laws” embody typical backwards liberalism: “Guns cause violence, not criminals, so we must take the guns away from the law-abiders who will willingly give them up, in order to be safe from the criminals who won’t give them up.”

    Makes perfect sense – in an asylum!

    THIRD (and final) point:

    All any of these so-called “gun control laws” can ever do, is to slander the whole population as guilty until never proven innocent; i.e: “SINCE you have guns, therefore you WILL use them to commit crimes, and NOT to defend yourselves and innocent others, SO we have to take them all away from you first, you criminals!”

    Since these slanderous laws accuse everyone without proof, they are by definition also prejudicial frauds, and as such, are illegal crimes in themselves, not valid laws at all.

    Guns exist. They will never again not-exist. More laws do not equal order. In general, no force or police or laws are necessary among free citizens who can and will govern themselves, while the opposite is: no amount of force or police or laws are enough for a people who CANNOT – or will not – govern themselves.

    1. Spot on, uncle Vladdi. I have had well educated libtards at my dinner table say exactly that:

      ” “SINCE you have guns, therefore you WILL use them to commit crimes, and NOT to defend yourselves and innocent others, SO we have to take them all away from you first, you criminals!”

      Laughable, ridiculous and patently absurd. But that is the mindset of libtards.

Comments are closed.