The Abolition of the Nation States is a Done Deal

This article is  from 2012. The frightening part is that everything this UN apparatchik talked about has happened and is now happening with lightening speed.

EU should ‘undermine national homogeneity’ says UN migration chief
Peter Sutherland
Peter Sutherland’s global migration forum brings together 160 nations to discuss policy

The EU should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states, the UN’s special representative for migration has said.

Peter Sutherland told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.

He also suggested the UK government’s immigration policy had no basis in international law.

“International law” is an euphemism for shari’a. (SY)

He was being quizzed by the Lords EU home affairs sub-committee which is investigating global migration.

Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the  Global Forum on Migration and Development , which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas.

He told the House of Lords committee migration was a “crucial dynamic for economic growth” in some EU nations “however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states”.

Occupy the lands of the infidels, oh soldiers of allah! No need to ask the dumb kafirs for consent.

‘More open’

An ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the “key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states”, he added.

So the Europeans are going to die out anyway? Why bother with them:

“It’s impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated.”

The UN special representative on migration was also quizzed about what the EU should do about evidence from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that employment rates among migrants were higher in the US and Australia than EU countries.

The problems are the same everywhere. Primitive, uneducated Mohammedans have no intention, motivation or skills to lead productive lives.

He told the committee: “The United States, or Australia and New Zealand, are migrant societies and therefore they accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others.

“And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.”

European nation states have to undermine this agenda, otherwise they’re history.

Mr Sutherland recently argued, in a lecture to the London School of Economics, of which he is chairman, that there was a “shift from states selecting migrants to migrants selecting states” and the EU’s ability to compete at a “global level” was at risk.

Europe can ONLY compete on a global level when there are no Mohammedans breathing down their necks.

‘No justification’

In evidence to the Lords committee, he urged EU member states to work together more closely on migration policy and advocated a global approach to the issue – criticising the UK government’s attempt to cut net migration from its current level to “tens of thousands” a year through visa restrictions.

We can see the effects of unhindered migration already. Its a festering wound and its getting worse by the day.

British higher education chiefs want non-EU overseas students to be exempted from migration statistics and say visa restrictions brought in to help the government meet its target will damage Britain’s economic competitiveness.

“Non EU-overseas students” sounds good. The problem here is that it applies to Mohammedans, who never return from whence they came.

But immigration minister Damian Green has said exempting foreign students would amount to “fiddling” the figures and the current method of counting was approved by the UN.

Committee chairman Lord Hannay, a crossbench peer and a former British ambassador to the UN, said Mr Green’s claim of UN backing for including students in migration figures “frankly doesn’t hold water – this is not a piece of international law”.

Sharia again.

Mr Sutherland, a former Attorney General of Ireland, agreed, saying: “Absolutely not. it provides absolutely no justification at all for the position they are talking about.”

‘UK support’

He said the policy risked Britain’s traditional status as “tolerant, open society” and would be “massively damaging” to its higher education sector both financially and intellectually.

Mohammedan settlement behind enemy lines is far more damaging than anything else.

“It’s very important that we should not send a signal from this country, either to potential students of the highest quality, or to academic staff, that this is in some way an unsympathetic environment in which to seek visas or whatever other permissions are required… and I would be fearful that that could be a signal.”

Fear Mohammedanism. Don’t fear anything else!

Mr Sutherland, who has attended meetings of  The Bilderberg Group , a top level international networking organisation often criticised for its alleged secrecy, called on EU states to stop targeting “highly skilled” migrants, arguing that “at the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice” about whether to come and study or work in another country.

Mr Sutherland also briefed the peers on plans for the Global Migration and Development Forum’s next annual conference in Mauritius in November, adding: “The UK has been very constructively engaged in this whole process from the beginning and very supportive of me personally.”

Asked afterwards how much the UK had contributed to the forum’s running costs in the six years it had been in existence, he said it was a relatively small sum in the region of “tens of thousands”.

“A relatively small sum?”  I leave you to ponder what is being achieved with this kind of “investment”.

9 thoughts on “The Abolition of the Nation States is a Done Deal”

  1. What a tool! Whatever is good for migration is good for companies like Goldman Sachs and BP. As long as nobody asks the people it directly concerns in the countries being invaded and we all do what this Tool and the others like him say, they will always be OK. THE EU SUCKS BIGTIME!

  2. “The EU should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states, the UN’s special representative for migration has said.”

    Can he give this advice to the 56 member stated of the OIC
    (Organisation of Islamic Cooperation).Is it possible for them to all become multicultural to maintain and increase future prosperity of all its states?

  3. Liberals are seditious racists.

    They have been taught that “nations” (which were first created during the Enlightement by racist whites with the sole purpose of restricting the migratory habits of noble savage tribes of colour) prove that good fences make for bad neighbours, fomenting jealousy in those (muslims) who have already destroyed ‘their’ countries (the formerly Greek, Christian ones they violently invaded and genocided, that is). In other words, the mentally inferior swarthy people are righteously indignant at whitey’s attempts to pen them up with false man-made “border” constructs, and so just can’t help being at the mercy of their animal instincts and prone to violence until those same borders have all been eliminated by helpful empathetic leftists.

    To leftists, “nations cause wars!”

    So the best way to avoid future wars, is to themselves first dismantle and destroy all ‘nations’ – then, they assume, there will at last be peace!

  4. Globalization is obvious treason to all national sovereignties. Everyone advocating for it is fomenting sedition, which is a crime.

  5. Re: “Mr Sutherland, who has attended meetings of The Bilderberg Group , a top level international networking organisation often criticised for its alleged secrecy, called on EU states to stop targeting “highly skilled” migrants, arguing that “at the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice” about whether to come and study or work in another country.”


    Since globalization destroys all sovereign national governments, it’s treason. And fomenting it is sedition.

    It’s always all about the money, and the illusion of control over others it brings.

    Banksters are criminal frauds. And one doesn’t have to be Jewish to be a bankster. They “own” all the deeds and debts of all the other false idolatrous entities OFFICIALLY called “the legal fictions of the corporate persons.” Not only do these vile sales-masters sell money (which obviously instantly devalues not only that money, but the labour and goods it re-presents as well) but they have also “allowed” them selves, through the last two centuries of bribing their political sales-puppets, the luxurious indulgence in outright FRAUD called “fractional reserves,” whereby their mouths literally write checks their pockets can’t cash; they literally print money out of thin air; up to 50 times (5,000%) what they actually have in their reserves. Repeat endlessly, compounding this crime, year after year, and century after century. And, unlike real-world, cause-and-effect investments, they charge idolatrous interest regardless of real economic activity; interest IS inflation. Fraud IS theft, and, so far as I know, theft is still a crime. In fact, all crimes are forms of theft. And the fact that they’ve bought off everybody else, is no excuse (it’s a critical thinking logical fallacy to claim “Evil isn’t evil because we all do it too! Whee!”)

    Many wrongs won’t make any of them into rights. Why this globalization and “amnesty” scheme now? Cui bono?

    Actually and factually: The USA still has one of the LOWEST corporate tax rates on the planet.

    And even if corporate taxes were set to ZERO, since their own corporate-made law says they are only beholden to their bottom lines, they would STILL try to cut costs by downsizing and outsourcing our jobs here to their 3rd-world slave-pens over there (and by bringing their 3rd-world slaves over here, too)!

    No jobs here = no taxes here = no government here (which is why it keeps buying China’s money) = no country here = welcome to the globalized plutocracy – treason to all national sovereignties!

    Why do you think you keep seeing all these multi-cultural advertising billboards everywhere?!
    Who do you think keeps pushing the multi-culti agenda? Who keeps insisting that it’s our duty not to be meanies by importing tons of primitive, non-White moslem savages, because somehow they’re all poor oppressed People Of Color refugees? Who keeps pretending they’re a “minority,” when in fact, worldwide, Blacks and Whites are on par?!

    It’s the corporations that do it to us, as they order their pet sales-puppet ‘politicians’ to sell us all out by selling off our countries to the lowest bidders (usually to our declared enemies) by buying (over time, on the installment plan; “borrowing”) their money in our names!

    It’s the banksters at the top of that corporate heap, and the oil-barons beneath them who hold all the other corporate gangs hostage to their ‘products!’ Besides, some oilmen own banks, and some banks own oil companies.

    They always hate having to pay any taxes to anyone anywhere, ever! So they’re in league with the global communists who want free movement and “equalized” lowest common denominator wages for their own labour slaves, and with the moslems who also hate all nationally sovereign countries, seeing them all as merely temporary, man-made false idols, intending to replace them all with the global moslem umma, ruled by their theocratic caliphate!

    And only these enemies of humanity control both the binary behavioural modification sticks (fears of they or their own families being personally firebombed of beheaded by the jihad) and carrots (greed for the oil-money bribes)!

    And against this triumverate of evil, what have we got, except the Truth?!

    So ask yourself this: What do the communazis, moslems and corporazis all have in common?

    They are all idolatrous group-rights-excuse promoting totalitarian Conformists! Extortionist gangster criminals!

Comments are closed.