Some more legacy building by Obama.
‘Zionists of America’ President Slams Obama’s Synagogue Speech
Mort Klein, President of Zionists of America, wrote the following response to Obama’s speech:
In a speech…at Adas Israel Synagogue in Washington, D.C., President Obama voiced his usual empty flowery platitudes about having Israel’s back and never allowing Iran to develop nuclear weapons, and even asserted that he was “an honorary member of the tribe” – while promoting policies that place a knife squarely in Israel’s back, and lying about his record and the Iran nuclear deal.
The President’s platitudes were clearly meaningless: In the next breath during his speech, Obama complained about Jewish “settlements” – which are in reality Jewish communities in historic Jewish land comprising less than 2% of Judea and Samaria, and promoted a Palestinian state – while ignoring the facts that the Palestinian Authority (PA) continues to promote anti-Jewish hatred in their schools, media and speeches, and that the PA is part and parcel of a unity government with the terrorist group Hamas, and that both the Hamas and PA President Abbas’ Fatah party’s charters call for Israel’s destruction….
The President also referred to Judea and Samaria as Arab land in his speech – when the Jewish people have the greatest historical, political, religious and legal right to these areas. After all, we are called Jews because we are from Judea.
The President also made the nonsensical statement: “The rights of the Jewish people then compel me to think about a Palestinian child in Ramallah that feels trapped without opportunity.” This is absurd in light of the fact that Israel has given away all of Gaza and almost half of Judea and Samaria, where the Palestinian Arabs run their own lives other than sharing security: the Arabs have their own Parliament, schools, textbooks, newspapers, radio and TV stations, businesses and police force….
The President also falsely claimed during his speech he wants a full discussion about how to stop Iran. Yet, he lobbied Congress incessantly to “disinvite” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from speaking to Congress about the very same subject – how to stop Iran. Obama also twisted Democrats’ arms to not attend PM Netanyahu’s speech, and fought against Congress having any say on the Iran deal. The Obama administration also adamantly refused to treat the Iran deal as a treaty – which would require approval of two thirds of the Senate – despite the fact that virtually every past nuclear deal has been deemed a treaty….
Obama is pointing to his first job in Chicago working for the Holy Rosary Catholic Church as playing an instrumental role in his shift towards Marxism and forming his global communist ideology. That’s improbable, since Marxism requires the abolition of religion, and he was raised in that ideology from a very young age. The more likely case is that he’s simply spreading out some anecdotal manure and using the Catholic Hospital convention as fertile soil upon which to base his self-declaration as a great humanitarian.
The Obama view of the world is a perverse and distorted one where people don’t create wealth through hard work. If they have it, the government made it possible or they were born into it. Maybe that’s true of his cronies and those corporate elites he bows to, but for the millions of Americans who aren’t Democrats on the public dole, we have to earn our keep and we intend to keep what we earn.
He made another disturbing point, about “who they are or where they come from” and it’s key. Obama’s describing global redistribution, with the American people the ones this self-anointed Robin Hood is taking from.
We learn that it wasn’t the hate-monger Jeremiah Wright, infamous commie mentor Frank Marshall Davis, his communist grandparents or even his mother that set Obama on the path to global despotism. He’s blaming good, everyday Catholics and his supposedly non-mushroom based life-altering experience.
We are now told that this was the time Obama had his epiphany about using American taxpayer dollars of the United States to correct all of the inequality of the world. We might wonder how it is that a lowly community organizer in Chicago might have known he’d have the ability to raid the American treasury at the time, having not yet been anointed King of the World. It’s an easy answer; those who put him into the White House shared their secret plans with him, to keep him focused on the prize.
Obama then takes his public truth or dare session a little further, quoting Pope Francis, saying, “We are all called upon to satisfy the demands of justice, fairness and respect for every human being.”
That might be Obama and the Pope’s personal callings, and if so, more power to them, personally. But publicly, as it relates to the pillaging of the American treasury in order to redistribute to those who haven’t, in Obama’s commie opinion, received a fair or just share, the duo of duplicitous “do-gooders” need to keep their fingers to themselves. Taxpayer money is for our use and if anything, we need to be distributing less, not more.
Obama says that despite challenges in his career choice, he saw how kindness, compassion and faith can change the “arc of people’s lives.” Nobody in the real world talks like that, but the Obama regime operates outside of the real world. Maybe his speech writer got some flowers from his “husband” today and is feeling a little extra flamboyant.
He then goes on to express the revelations that supposedly came to him as a result of that experience, the realization that everybody deserves to live in dignity, “And that all children, no matter who they are or where they come from, or how much money they were born into, ought to have the opportunity to achieve their God-given potential.”
Regardless of the supposed impact that experience had on Obama, which experience tells us is nothing but a complete fabrication, there’s a distinction between his personal giving and that of the United States.
He had better remember that. We’ve had enough of his “right things to do.” He needs to start concentrating on “the legal or the appropriate things to do,” rather than attempting to somehow justify his abuse of power as being “right.” It’s wrong, he’s wrong, and the left is wrong.
In view of how torturous it is to listen to this guy, the comments referenced in the articlebegin at about the :30 point in the video. Why suffer any more than necessary?