As Barack Obama and his useful idiots in his administration, Congress and the media attempt to immigrate hundreds of thousands of Islamists into the united States, the law needs to be brought to bear and the law is not on their side. Islamists, like all totalitarians, are prohibited by law (yes, American law) from immigrating to the united States.
In 1952, Islam, along with Communism was effectively banned by law.
Outrage on Trump Misplaced – Already Illegal for Muslim Fascists, Communists and other Totalitarians to Immigrate..
UNBELIEVABLE! In reaction to Donald Trump’s proposed temporary ban on Muslim immigration, senile Democrat Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont has introduced an amendment making it easier for Muslim terrorists to get into America
As Trump Stirs Islamophobia, Michigan Muslims Worry
For months before the Nov. 13 terror attacks in Paris, anti-Islam sentiment had been simmering in Dearborn, whose high population of Arab-American Muslims makes the city of nearly 97,000 a nexus in the escalating wave of Islamophobia …More on the escalating wave of fear of evil, terror-casting islam at Patch thanks to Mullah, pbuh
That’s because Islam is “perfect”, Muhammad said so, and that settles it.
Tony Abbott calls for ‘revolution inside Islam’
Muslims do not need a Western cultural supremacist like Tony Abbott to tell them what Islam needs.
Stereotypical litany of bullshit from a Mohammedan agitprop:
The former Prime Minister tells Sky News host Paul Murray how he believes Western countries should respond to the Islamic State.
It seems that Tony Abbott has taken a page out of Donald Trump’s campaign booklet. Last night, in a Sky News interview with Paul Murray, Abbott managed to further alienate an already ailing Muslim community and reinforce white-supremacists everywhere in one fell swoop.
“Alienating Muslims…” How original!
As a self-proclaimed expert on cultural issues, Abbott has used his personal experience as a Catholic, white male to champion the “freedom and tolerance” in “Western” culture and demanded that the “live and let live” Muslims recognise that “all cultures are not equal” and push for a revolutionary “Islamic reformation” from within.
“Self-Proclaimed”, is there anything Mohammedan that is not “self-proclaimed by the profit of Islam?
“Abbott has used his personal experience as a Catholic, white male to champion the ‘freedom and tolerance’ in ‘Western’ culture.” Photo: Nic Walker
“Catholic, white male”, is that something that should be criminalised?
Abbott’s first mistake is conflating human rights with “Western values”. Human rights are universal and exist today because of an accumulation of philosophy and activism across civilisations. They no more belong to the West than they do to the Iranians for the work of Cyrus the Great in 539 B.C. in freeing the slaves and declaring racial equality and religious freedom in the first ever Human Rights Charter – the Cyrus Cylinder.
Let that sink in for a moment. The Mohammedans have rejected the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and replaced it with the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights which is a sick joke. All rights, according to CDHR are under the shari’a, which means infidels haven’t got any.
Abbott has managed to broad-brush all Muslims as potential extremists by rooting the challenge of Islamic extremism as a “problem within Islam” and defining it as a culture that thinks you can “kill in the name of God”.
That’s a fact. Muselmaniacs “broad-brush” all infidels, all the time. It is time that we throw the ball back in their court.
As someone who once trained to be a priest, Abbott should know that it is not difficult to find a verse in the Bible that permits killing in the name of God. The unfortunate truth is that all religions are comprised of people who can be driven by greed or power to commit some of the most heinous acts. For example, victims are still dealing with the ramifications of rampant sexual abuse of children and subsequent cover-ups by members of the Catholic Church.
Bible = descriptive. Quran = prescriptive. This Mohammedan relies on absolutely ignorant kafirs to sell his spin.
Finally, he failed to recognise that there is already a thriving movement for an Islamic renewal within Muslim communities around the world. This push for renewal doesn’t stem from a desire to adopt Western values but rather from Islam’s own strong tradition of freedom, tolerance, pluralism, democratic institutions and enlightenment.
Abbott didn’t fail at all. Islam failed us. There is no ” thriving movement for an Islamic renewal within Muslim communities around the world”, except going back the the roots of Muhammad’s fanaticism. Once the West understands this, its the end of Islam.
Some examples of this are how Islam has an inbuilt system of social welfare (zakat), or how it specifically endorses freedom of religion in the Koran (“there is no compulsion in religion”). Another example is how Islam protects women’s rights, agency, and inheritance.
OMG, don’t get me started.
If Abbott were interested in examining the movement that he professes to support he would find that progressive Islamic scholars (such as Amina Wudud, Reza Aslan and Adis Duderija) use the Koran as their main source in supporting the Islamic renewal, not Western civilisation. The main thesis of their argument for reformation is not to “emulate the West” but rather to address the transgressions from the true religion of peace.
Amina Wudud, Reza Aslan and Adis Duderija have next to no standing as Islamic scholars or leaders and seek to pull the Islamic wool over the eyes and ears of Western audiences.
As a member of the progressive Islamic movement, I recognise that Muslims have a problem with the spread of extremist ideologies such as Wahabbism and Salfism (offshoots of Sunni Islam that advocate for a strict literal interpretation of texts rather than contextual interpretation).
Wahabbism and Salfism come straight out of Mainstream slam.
But I do not see these ideologies as a reflection of the values of Islam that I, and many other Muslims, grew up with. For example, as a child there were very few women in my home city of Damascus who wore a hijab – today it is rare to see a woman who doesn’t. The ruins of Palmyra stood undisturbed by Muslims for centuries before Islamic State came to town. Extremism within Islam is a modern phenomenon and recognising that will combat the idea that Islam is the problem.
Obviously, Reem Sweid knows next to nothing about the religion he so vehemently defends.
What Muslims need is not “a restoration of cultural self-confidence in those who are supporters of Western cultural civilisation” but rather the space to allow Muslim progressives to speak for themselves and not be associated with the likes of Tony Abbott and other Western cultural supremacists.
Abbott said the West needs “a restoration of cultural self-confidence in those who are supporters of Western cultural civilisation”, not Mohammends. They can go and pound sand, as far as I’m concerned.
The push for reform must be an independent self-driven movement from within Muslim communities. Building a safe space for Muslims to be self-critical and reflective about how their religion is being practiced is a difficult undertaking at the best of times. Australians, both non-Muslim and Muslim need supporters who will help revive the peaceful pluralistic traditions of Islam, not demean it and give credence to the ideology of the extremists.
“Safe space” gibberish doesn’t work on me. No Muslim knows how to be self-critical and reflective about Islam, they all know it is above criticism and keep telling us to shut up, or else. There have never been “peaceful pluralistic traditions of Islam” and there will never be any, because Islam doesn’t tolerate the other. Period.
Reem Sweid is the director of Muslims for Progressive Values, Australia. www.mpv-australia.org
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/comment/muslims-dont-need-western-cultural-supremacists-to-tell-them-what-islam-needs-20151208-glj0d9.html#ixzz3txKCfqf2
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook