Immigration is causing serious social breakdown, blasts LEO MCKINSTRY

THE European Union’s vast experiment in open borders, free movement and cultural diversity has been tested to destruction.


As the influx The very fabric of European civilisation is disintegrating as the influx continues 

A sense of accelerating chaos now hangs over the continent. As the influx across the eastern Mediterranean grows to more than 3,000 new arrivals every day, on top of all the other waves of mass immigration, the very fabric of European civilisation is disintegrating. The traditional bonds of solidarity and shared identity are collapsing. In their place there are fully justified fears about terrorism, extremism, alien customs and savage misogyny.

Although Britain is not part of the EU core we are going through the same social revolution as the rest of Europe. The annual rate of immigration to our country officially stands at 630,000 but even that astonishing figure is probably an underestimate given that no fewer than 917,000 National Insurance numbers were dished out to foreigners last year.


The traditional bonds of solidarity and shared identity are collapsing

Indeed, white British people are now the minority in many of our urban conurbations including Leicester, Slough and London where almost 60 per cent of births are to migrants. Yet even in the face of all this upheaval – for which no one has ever voted – the supporters of the EU and mass immigration refuse to admit the scale of their failure. Instead of abandoning their lethal ideology, they engage in propaganda to shore up their project.

Deceit, scaremongering, sentimentality and distraction are their chosen weapons in their campaign to destroy the traditional social order. And they are not above exploiting children in support of their cause. They did so last August when the image of Syrian child Aylan Kurdi found dead on a Turkish beach was used with ruthless cynicism to galvanise public backing for the open floodgates in the name of compassion.

Now, in the wake of mounting public anger over the string of sexual assaults perpetrated in Germany and Sweden by migrant gangs, it is no coincidence that the cheerleaders for revolution want to switch the focus of the media debate back towards children. Synthetic concern over unaccompanied minors is now deployed to airbrush the monstrous crimes of the predators and to manipulate the public into accepting ever greater numbers.

But it is an appalling act of deception for, according to the United Nations, more than 70 per cent of these migrants to Europe are able-bodied young men. Nor are many of them genuine refugees. Only last week the EU Vice President Frans Timmermans admitted that 60 per cent of the influx is made up of economic migrants from North Africa. “These are people that you can assume have no reason to apply for refugee status,” he said.

But this will not halt the emotional blackmail. So the pro-EU ideologues continually seek to portray migrants as victims of “people traffickers” but in truth the smugglers are a symptom, not the cause, of Europe’s self-inflicted crisis. They would not exist if millions were not so eager to reach our shores. Far more offensive is the fondness of the pro-immigration brigade for invoking a parallel between the policies of Nazi Germany towards the Jewish people and current treatment of migrants, as in the manufactured row over the red doors of asylum seekers’ homes in Middlesbrough.

But this is a desperate moral perversion. The vast majority of migrants are not fleeing persecution at all. Moreover genuine refugees in Europe have been given accommodation, food and welfare, the very opposite of the terrible fate experienced by Jewish people under the Third Reich. Above all the grotesque irony of the open borders approach is that it has led to the import into Europe of a viciously anti-Semitic culture from the Arab world and Asia, which is why attacks in Europe have risen.


Only last week the EU admitted that 60 per cent of the influx is made up of economic migrants 

In fact the pro-immigration brigade has no sense of morality at all. It is telling that they were far more noisily indignant last week about David Cameron’s mild phrase “a bunch of migrants” to describe the freeloaders at Calais than they ever were about the brutal sexual assaults in Germany. They ridiculously claim that the membership of the EU makes us “safe” when we can all see that removal of border controls by Brussels has brought jihadism, violent crime, gang warfare and social divisions into our midst.

The menacing squalor of the migrant camps at Calais and the rioting at Dover on Saturday are twin symbols of the disorder that the EU has inflicted. Just as empty is the Europhiles’ claim that mass immigration has fuelled prosperity. “Free movement is hugely beneficial to our economy,” wrote Labour’s Andy Burnham, ignoring the reality that mass immigration has pushed down living standards and imposed a colossal burden on the civic infrastructure.

The EU cannot undo the epic mess that it has made. Talk in Brussels about applying an “emergency brake” on migration is meaningless. The EU’s whole existence is predicated on the abolition of patriotism, frontiers, self-government and nationhood. In its drive to create a multicultural superstate it has left us defenceless against the migrant floodtide. Our only hope of escaping this meltdown is to vote for our exit.

It’s one of the sweet fibs of the Left – that refugees make us richer.

Andrew Bolt

Here, for instance, is the ABC last year:

As the Government announces it will take 12,000 additional refugees, it’s worth nothing that the data shows a generous intake is likely to be the most economically sound immigration policy of all, writes Tim Dunlop.

University of Sydney sociologist Stephen Castles:

It is the people with the greatest courage, endurance and human resources who make it. Australia could benefit from these qualities – as we have done in the past: refugees have made major contributions to our economy and society since 1945.

Labor’s then Immigration Minister, Chris Evans:
“We always talk about refugees as if they are a cost,” Senator Evans said at a fringe event to the ALP National Conference. “Refugees are generally young, we are an ageing population … we should see refugees for their capacity as well as their cost.

“They … have proved to be great contributors to Australian society.”

Really? If we were still bringing in, say, educated Jewish refugees from Europe those platitudes would be true.

But we aren’t and the platitudes are false, as I already noted six years ago:

NOW even the Gillard Government knows the truth about its bungled refugee program.

The people it’s bringing in are costing us billions, with 85 per cent of refugees on Centrelink benefits in their first five years here.

Worse, it’s the “refugees” who push in—the boat people we don’t pick, and who exploit the Government’s weak laws—who cost us most.

The vast majority of boat people say they are from Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and Sri Lanka, and these are exactly the refugees most likely to be unemployed and living on welfare, even after five years.

Just 9 per cent of Afghan adults have a job and 94 per cent receive benefits, which means every boatload of Afghans landing here is a boatload almost entirely of people we’ll be paying handouts to for years…

It’s the same story among Iranian adults, just 12 per cent of whom work.

And now more confirmation that whatever the moral case for bringing in refugees, it is an expensive act of charity:

The Turnbull government is ­considering boosting English, education and employment ser­vices for refugees amid new ­research showing only 7 per cent of a group of 2013 arrivals have jobs and budget estimates that welfare ­payments for new ­arrivals will ­exceed $100 million a year…

The Australian Institute of Family Studies study of a group of 2400 arrivals granted visas ­between May and December 2013, released last week, found 7 per cent of migrants reported being ­employed and 70 per cent of new arrivals were either working or studying, mainly to gain English language skills.

Is bringing them here really the cheapest and safest way to help refugees?

About 40 per cent were having difficulty finding housing and 35 per cent of men and 45 per cent of women were at moderate or high risk of psychological distress, compared to 7 per cent of men and 11 per cent of women in the general population.

The report showed that ­humanitarian arrivals struggled with poor English ability and low skills.

It showed nearly three quarters of humanitarian arrivals had ­either no or a poor understanding of English, while 78 per cent could not speak English on arrival.

This counting of the costs does not include the cost of the cultural clashes we have imported, forcing us to take expensive anti-terrorism measures, for instance. Note that the last three terror attacks on our soil were all conducted by refugees. Three Australians are now dead, and also don’t figure in the costs in today’s report.

Now to the moral issue this raises.

How can we best spend that $100 million a year to give the most help to the most refugees? Is it by bringing in 14,000 refugees a year and spending it on welfare for the workless, or by spending $1000 a person on 100,000 people in refugee camps overseas while they wait to go back home?

And another question: are we creating a new underclass here that will nurse resentments about our “racism” in keeping them in “disadvantage”?

10 thoughts on “Immigration is causing serious social breakdown, blasts LEO MCKINSTRY”

  1. The damage done by this generation of “progressives” is staggering.

    Western Europe is surely headed for some sort Balkanization and civil war.

    Even if the Euro leadership decided to stop the “refugee” flow today, the momentum would allow millions more in.

    The next few years will be unprecedented in modern history.

    You can be sure the “progressives” will be looking for new work at best or hanging from a rope.


    “Anti-Trump Saudi Prince Tied to Both Rupert Murdoch And Hillary Aide (Huma Abedin)” is the headline this morning on Breitbart. “Fox mogul Rupert Murdoch is partnered in multiple media ventures with Saudi Arabian Prince Alwaweed Bin Talal, including an Arabic religious TV network with a direct tie to Hillary Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin.”

    No wonder!!! Rupert Murdoch owns the biggest TV station in Turkey, something I’ve known since he bought it, but this, that he has partner, an Anti-American Saudi prince oil billionaire? That’s news. This Prince Alaweed owns the Al-Resalah TV network, and one of the members of his Supreme Advisory board for his company is Dr. Abdullah Naseef, President of World Muslim Congress and President of Forum For Social Studies. Dr. Naseef is the longtime benefactor of top Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin’s family business, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. This links Huma Abedin directly to some of the most fervent Anti-West, Anti-American people in Saudi Arabia.

    Huma Abedin isn’t just a Muslime, she’s directly involved in the effort to destroy us, she’s Hillary Clinton’s closest friend and she’s deeply involved in the running of our government. Her only expertise is in Muslime affairs. That’s it, promoting Muslime goals, promoting Islam. No other training. And she’s Hillary Clinton’s top advisor?

    Hillary Clinton, who was our Secretary of State, who stood by the side of our President and did his bidding?

    “We have a strategic alliance with Rupert Murdoch for sure and I have been with him for the last 15 or 20 years,” Alwaleed said. “My backing of Rupert Murdoch is definitely unwavering.”

    “The connection between Alwaleed, Murdoch, Abedin, Hillary Clinton and Saudi Arabia are troubling given a number of recent events. Prince Alwaleed is boasting about his role in impacting U.S. elections.”

    “CNN reported in 2008 that “donations to the William J. Clinton Foundation include amounts of $10 million to $25 million from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.” “Huma Abedin was hired as a consultant to the William J. Clinton Foundation after Clinton left her role as Secretary of State.”

    So this promoter of Islam and hater of democracy is still being paid by the Clintons with money from Prince Alaweed.

    “Abedin is also at the center of Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal.”




    This filthy little activist Muslim bitch Sarii Ghalab, with her little Muslim activist sidekick Ijabo Mohamud, all covered and anonymous, has allied herself with the CBC in Edmonton, Alberta, and begun a vicious campaign of harassment of a small shoe repair business owner and his family.

    This is the absolute garbage, this is the criminal harassment that is the signature of activist terrorist Muslims and their Marxist supporters like the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

    This is the transparent standard operating procedure of hard left liberals and Marxist Mass Media throughout Europe, the UK and North America.

    The intent is to create a firestorm that consumes the business owner and his family and will eventually, with the harassment directed at the owner, the shopping mall owners and others, drive this small business from the mall, bankrupt the business and leave this man’s family and children penniless.

    CBC knows exactly what this is. This is nothing less than sheer political activism. This is yet another facet of radical Islamic activists manipulating legislation, manipulating the lying Marxist yellow press and using existing legislation to harass legitimate objections to a barbaric, savage, supremacist 7th century political ideology that seeks, using any mechanism at its disposal, total global domination.

    The CBC is well aware that this Muslim bitch is a political activist that is couching her activism in a “Ghandi-esque” gesture of “forgiveness” for a “vicious hate-crime”.

    The CBC is further aware that Muslim clothing like this is the hallmark of orthodox activist Muslims who are willing to slaughter hundreds and thousands for their “religion of peace”.

    The CBC fully supports the harassment of this small business owner and his family and is actively pursuing a course of persecution that will bankrupt this man and his family. No doubt this man, his family and his children will be attacked and badly injured or killed. Should this happen, this is exactly what this Muslim bitch, Sarii Ghalab and her sidekick, Ijabo Muhamud planned on from the beginning.

    Further, the reporters in this case, Zoe Todd and Andrea Ross, at the direction of Anne Sullivan (CBC news editor), Neill Fitzpatrick (CBC News director) and Gary Cunliffe (CBC news director), all of CBC Edmonton, Alberta, are in the process of tracking down this man’s family and his children in order to release to social media the location of this families school and other employment locations.

    CBC and these Muslim activists, Sarii Ghalab and Iljabo Mohamud, are now basking in the glory of a vicious attack on a small business owner who, in his every right, refused to serve a Muslim activist. Now these vicious Muslim animals have embarked on a campaign to target this man’s children and family, labelling them as criminals and exposing them to severe physical injury or murder.

    This is yet another example of the taxpayer funded Canadian Broadcasting Corporation peddling its Marxist yellow journalism to harass and threaten decent Canadians who simply chose not to do business with Muslim political activists.

    This is yet another example of the taxpayer funded Canadian Broadcasting Corporation peddling its yellow journalism and engaging in Marxist journalism through the support of Muslim political activists.

    This is the same Marxist yellow journalism that has CBC ignoring mass rapes of German women and girls by Muslims in Germany, ignoring their own surveys that illustrate that 37 percent of Canadians support a total ban on Muslims, ignoring the hundreds of No-Go zones across Europe, ignoring the ban on the hijab that grows across Europe and failing, and utterly failing to report the real story behind the so called “Syrian Refugee Crisis”

    Here is the link to the story.

    All advertisers of CBC locally are to be contacted and given details regarding this vicious act of journalistic terrorism.

    Here is the contact information of the CBC reporters and news directors responsible for this vicious act of harassment and intimidation.

    The personal information of the CBC staff listed below is being gathered now and includes personal vehicle make and model, licence plate number, credit information, personal home address, etc etc. This information will be released as it becomes available.

    The Muslim activists, Sarii Ghalab and Ijabo Mohamud and now being tracked. They will be identified in detail and all their personal information including home addresses will be publically released. This information will also include all information relevant to the parents and their parents employers. After all, wandering about the city, lodging complaints while wrapped in sackcloth and hiding your face is an act of terrorism.



    NO SECRETS !!!!!!!

    Andrea Ross – CBC reporter

    Zoe Todd – CBC reporter

    Anne Sullivan- CBC news editor (Todd and Ross supervisor)

    Gary Cunliffe – CBC news director
    780-468-7505 (office)
    780-238-8460 (cell)

    Neill Fitzpatrick- CBC news director

    Jessica Chan – CBC communications manager


    William Trueport
    New York, New York

  4. Did you “protect” the emails Sheik?

    If you did, why?

    anyway, if you didn’t here is the CBC email format.

    all lower case

    firstname dot last name at cbc dot ca

    Jimmy Swaggering
    Swaggerville, Campytown

Comments are closed.