Thanks to the Religion of Peace
The Myth of the Non-Muslim Terrorist
The notorious Loonwatch.com site has been claiming that 94% of all terror attacks have nothing to do with Islam. What they aren’t saying is that according to their own source, Muslims are 35 times more likely to commit acts of deadly terror – and that’s just in the United States.
Since January, 2010 the Islamic propaganda outlet, Loonwatch.com, has prominently posted an article with the title “All Terrorists are Muslim… except the 94% that aren’t.” Although not saying exactly who it is that believes “all terrorists are Muslim”, the gist of the piece is that an FBI report from seven years ago concluded that the vast majority of attacks have nothing to do with Islam.
As Loonwatch puts it:
- Only 6% of terror attacks are by Muslims
- 7% of terrorism is by Jewish extremists
- 66% of terror attacks are by leftists and Latinos
This would appear to defy common sense. Reports of bombings, shootings, stabbings and even beheadings by terrorists cross the newswire each day. Some are indeed the work of communist groups or nationalists, but the vast majority are clearly the product of Islamic extremists who kill in the name of religion.
Loonwatch is playing a couple of tricks here – the biggest being that they are drawing on domestic data only. In other words, when they say that 94% of terrorists aren’t Muslim, they actually mean in the United States, where terror attacks are relatively rare and Muslims make up only 1% of the population.
So, if we ignore the overwhelming bulk of attacks across the globe, Muslims are “only” six times more likely to commit acts of terror than the general population. The numbers get even worse for Loonwatch on closer examination.
As it turns out, much of the FBI list includes “violence” against property rather than people. In fact, the formula used by the agency to define terrorism is somewhat fuzzy. While it includes tree-spiking and bank robbery, for example, it somehow omits the Arizona assassination of a Sunni cleric by Iranian terrorists in 1980, the 1990 murder of Rabbi Kahane by an Islamic radical at a New York hotel, and even the killing of two CIA agents by a Muslim extremist at Langley in 1993.
When Americans hear the word ‘terrorism’, however, what comes to mind isn’t vandalism, but rather those acts of genuine violence that are intended to cause loss of life. So, how do we focus on these incidents and filter out the rest?
Well, perhaps the best way of knowing whether terrorists are serious about killing people is if they actually do. Since Muslims and non-Muslim terrorists have equal opportunity to kill, Loonwatch shouldn’t object to an analysis of only those attacks which cause deaths. What does the data have to say when we exclude non-lethal attacks?
Even by the FBI’s curious standard, the sort of truly violent terrorism that most concerns Americans is extremely rare in the United States. Only 29 attacks on their list of incidents between 1980 and 2005 resulted in actual death. Of these, Islamic extremists were responsible for 24%, accounting for 2,981 kills (civilians only), while non-Muslim attackers racked up 196.
Thus, what the FBI report is really saying is that a demographic which makes up only 1% of the American population accounts for one-fourth of all deadly terror attacks in the U.S. and 94% of related casualties! (The 94% statistic is somewhat ironic because it is the same figure than Loonwatch is touting to dispel concerns). The Jewish population in the U.S. is more than twice that of Muslims, but there were only three so-called Jewish attacks during the entire 25 years (all by the “Jewish Defense League”) with a total of three killed.
Since 2005, there have been at least six additional deadly attacks that would probably qualify as terrorism in the U.S. even to the FBI. One was the 2012 shooting by a skinhead that resulted in six deaths at a Sikh temple and the other five were by Muslims, which left 19 dead. This means that since 1980, Muslims in the U.S. have been 35 times more likely to commit terror than all other demographics combined.
Now, the point of all this isn’t to “prove” that any particular person is dangerous. The numbers are quite low and it is unlikely that the Muslim you know personally is all that different from you, much less plotting mass murder. A person’s nominal religion is not grounds for thinking a certain way about them or for reaching conclusions that are based on anything other than their own words or deeds.
What we are demonstrating is how Muslim propaganda groups like Loonwatch and CAIR knowingly manipulate the public into false conclusions about Islam using disingenuous methods. They are also dishonest when they try to confuse people into thinking that criticism of Islamic bigotry means hatred for Muslims.
Taqiyya may be a part of Islamic law, but a noble cause never requires a lie.
Then again… how noble can a religion really be when it’s most vocal members are far more concerned about image rather than the dead and dismembered victims of its most devout?
Note: A 2013 study by the Brookings Institute found that 77% of terror attack plots in the United States were motivated by Islam. A 2015 study found that 99.5% of all suicide attacks worldwide were also motivated by Islam.
Editor’s Note: The well-funded Loonwatch previously analyzed our own list of Islamic terror attacks looking for reasons to discount the extent of the violence and the moral obligation of Muslims to act. Not surprisingly, the terror continues – and will until vocal Muslims like these direct their efforts toward ending Islamic terror rather than trying to make the rest of us think it doesn’t exist.
2 thoughts on “Only 6% of terror attacks are by Muslims? Pull my other leg!”
Re: “Now, the point of all this isn’t to “prove” that any particular person is dangerous. The numbers are quite low and it is unlikely that the Muslim you know personally is all that different from you, much less plotting mass murder. A person’s nominal religion is not grounds for thinking a certain way about them or for reaching conclusions that are based on anything other than their own words or deeds.”
If you insist your right to your fantasy “Belief!” actually means anything in the real world (like, to be worthy of tax breaks) then it also means we can legally judge you for proclaiming it.
ALL MUSLIMS ARE TERRORISTS!
“Terrorism” is really only the simple crime of “extortion” writ large!
(Extortion is “threats!”)!
All group rights must come with group responsibilities.
When you describe yourself as a criminal gangster who asserts it’s his holy right and duty to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-members of your gang, you get judged for that threat, because death-threats are already crimes.
And that sums up islam.
ALL Muslims are MURDERER-GANG MEMBERS. Their Quran COMMANDS murder. Therefore the only good Muslims are dead ones. Unless they only only commit “moderate” murder. Then only give them “moderate” executions.
ALL muslims are criminals, simply by being members of the world’s largest and most ancient yet ongoing crime-gang.
By their own sharia “law” (crime) rules, ALL muslims are supposed to be seen as “Objects of Fear” by ALL infidels, all the time!
Being a member of a crime-gang is a crime, even if the member hasn’t committed any specific crime beyond that of their general membership, because they represent the inherent public threat the crime-gang presents. It’s the LAW. Everything muslims pretend to believe is “holy” is already a crime!
Islam is a monolithic crime-creed, with instructions in their war and crime-manual applying to all aspects of their holy mobster “muslim” minions’ lives. Its management is not a top-down affair.
Each and every one of them knows their obligations to the tribe and knows they are at war with us. The Qur’an sentences us all to “Death By Muslim!” for our “crime” of simply not being muslims ourselves!
Would we bother to separately arrest and try each and every individual member of a crime-gang or ARMY which had officially declared war on us and was openly attacking us?!
People should just read the Qur’an: It orders ALL MUSLIMS to extort, enslave, and murder you for your “crime” of not-being a muslim.
Anyone who admits they’re a member of a gang whose sworn, official purpose for existing is to extort, enslave, and murder you – embodies and embraces a permanent death-threat. And offensive death-threats are CRIMES.
Even if the threat fails to convince, it’s still at least a form of ATTEMPTED extortion, and all attempted crimes are still crimes, no?
Source-cited Proof of this?
Muhammad, speaking as “allah,” commands striking terror in 8.57 & 8.60, and swore he would cast it in 3.151 & 8.12 and that he cast terror in 33.26 & 59.2. Moe said he was made victorious with terror, as quoted in Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220. Since obedience, imitation and emulation of Muhammad are commanded, and since Allah rewards acts of terrorism with Brownie Points in 9.120, every Muslim is a terrorist.
This is how liberals argue – that, despite the mountains of evidence and bodies, they want each and every muslim to be prosecuted individually, and only if they have been caught committing a specific crime. Because extortionist gangster liberal criminals also want group membership (gang) rights without any group responsibility.
But in reality, anyone who admits they’re a member of a gang whose sworn, official purpose for existing is to extort, enslave, and murder you (i.e: islam) – embodies and embraces a permanent death-threat.
And offensive death-threats are CRIMES.
Even if the threat fails to convince the average delinquent criminally negligent liberal, it’s still at least a form of ATTEMPTED extortion, and all attempted crimes are still crimes, no?
And aren’t there laws about being complicit willing accessories both before and after the crimes, too? Shouldn’t gang membership qualify automatically as same?!
Otherwise, a getaway car driver was only driving a car, and the lookout was only loitering, at most.
The chop-shop guy could pretend he sincerely believed “Carjack Bob” simply bought a new car every day, didn’t like it, and wanted to dispose of it!
Sure, some dispensations from mandatory jihad participation are given for physical disabilities, like for old age, blindness, lameness etc., but the listing of those exemptions only serves to prove that the word “jihad” means violent and non-defensive warfare. And those exempted from physical participation are still obliged to be accessories and equip and otherwise assist those who are still physically able to participate in the raids.
So NO muslim is isolated from the evil of islam’s mandatory “jihad” terrorism.
Read the Qur’an! It is inseverable: 2.85. Jihad is ordained for Muslims: 2.216. It commands acts of terrorism: 8.12, 57 & 60. It rewards acts of terrorism: 9.120. It commands perpetual war: 8.39 & 9.29. Believers are only those who wage war: 9.111 & 49.15.
What believing Muslim is not a terrorist? 33.21 orders Muslims to emulate Moe. Bukhari 1.8.387 & 4.52.220 have him bragging about winning with terror. 8.12, 8.57 & 8.60 command Muslims to engage in terrorism. 9.120 promises Brownie Points for acts of terrorism. Get a clue.
Moe was a terrorist: Bukhari 1.8.331 & 4.52.220. Muslims are commanded to emulate him: QV 33.21. They may not be actively engaged in terror acts, but all Muslims are terrorists. Islam is war: 2.216, 8.39, 57, 60, 65; 9.5, 29, 111. 120 & 123. Islam is all or nothing; a bundled package deal: 2.85.
Moe said that his provision was placed under the shade of his spear. Look up the hadith in Tafsir Ibn Kathir “The Benefits Of Iron”; it is near the end of the page. Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters. Look them up in Ibn Sa’d or alquraan.net. He prayed for prey at Badr. He asked the “Lord of the Devils” for “the good of this town” before every ghazwat. Look it up in “The Life of Muhammad”.pg. 510-511.
Crack open Sahih Bukhari and read the books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition, they show us what Islam really is. Obtain clues from the Qur’an, too. 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
If a Muslim is a believer, he is a threat to our lives, liberties and prosperity, whether in a pack or acting as a lone wolf. Jihad is what Islam is; what Muslims do and it is defined in Islamic law as “war against non-Muslims. Look it up in “Reliance Of The Traveller” Book o, Chapter 9.0 and try to prove me wrong.
Offensive Jihad is fard al-Kifaya, to be performed in every year. When we retaliate, the obligation becomes fard al-ayn: binding on the entire Ummah individually. That makes every Muslim a ticking time bomb.
You hope that we Kuffar are stupid, ignorant and gullible. Unfortunately for you, a growing number of us are scratching below the surface, reading the Qur’an, hadith, exegesis & jurisprudence to discover the reality of Islam. “The Book Of Jihad” and the second volume of “Hedaya” are excellent sources of information.
I urge every office holder and candidate to join us by going to http://islamexposed.blogspot.com/p/islam-101-for-politicians.html where you will find quotes from and links to the vital texts.
According to their own sharia “law” texts, no muslims are “civilians.”
In islam, ALLAH DID NOT CREATE ALL HUMANS EQUAL!
According to their Qur’an, allah deliberately made infidels so muslims could murder them for him, as a test of their obedience (well, more as a joke, since allah knows in advance who will pass and fail his tests, and it’s all predetermined predestined force anyway)!
If they truly follow islam, then YES all muslims are ALL terrorists.
Just like you couldn’t be a “nazi” and not support Hitler and Mein Kampf, you can’t (by their own rules) be a “muslim” and not be a terrorist, because that’s what the Qur’an commands and Muhammad himself did: terrorize and extort everyone else!
ALL MUSLIMS ARE TERRORISTS!
“Terrorism” is really only the simple crime of “extortion” writ large! Extortion is “threats!”
ALL muslims are criminals, simply by being members of the world’s largest and most ancient yet ongoing crime-gang. Being a member of a crime-gang is a crime, even if the member hasn’t committed any specific crime beyond that of their general membership, because they represent the inherent public threat the crime-gang presents. It’s the Law. Everything muslims pretend to believe is “holy” is already a crime!
The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims:
Sura (Chapter) 47:1-4 of the Qur’an:
1: non-muslims are bad, because they insult allah by dividing his nature;
2: muslims are good, because to them allah is the cause of everything;
3: Allah made them both like that;
4: So muslims should chop off the non-muslims’ heads.
(Allah could have done it himself, but he wants you muslims to do it for him).”
It’s all right there, in context: islamic violence is entirely general doctrine-driven, and not at all specific grievance-driven.
(And chapter 47 isn’t by any stretch even remotely the worst, most violent chapter; that honor goes to either chapter 8 or 9).
So, if and when you consider islam to be a religion, you must agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?
At WORST, all REAL religions only say:
“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”
…but ONLY islam says:
“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”
At forced ‘Faith!’ ISN’T a “Faith!” at all – it’s only extortion, and extortion is always a CRIME.
Bottom line: If you decide to believe in “allah,” you have declared yourself a criminal, and so must be arrested, indicted, tried and convicted. Your confession of “faith” in your crime-god will help us to do so.
And there are no “moderate” muslims, simply because there is not “moderate” islam!
Here’s the REAL “difference” between “moderate” and “radical” muslims:
“Radical” muslims want to murder you for not being a muslim.
“Moderate” muslims want ‘radical’ muslims to murder you for not being a muslim.
Get it, yet?
Comments are closed.