As they grow more numerous, they grow more honest in their ambitions. As Merkel said in another clip on this channel, It is the Germans who have to integrate with them.
Muslim activist group JUMA, in Germany states plainly that integration is not going to happen.
A group of young Muslim teens physically attacked parade goers during the annual Krampus parade during a procession near Salzburg on Tuesday night. BY PAMELA GELLER
.
Muslims appeal to dumb females to don a hijab, to submit to acting stupid and to look happy doing it:
How’s this for a lying taqiyya snake:
look how sincere and how sweet she looks, and yet she’s spreading nothing but poison and lies:
This was yet another fake anti-Muslim hate crime that garnered international headlines without a murmur of skepticism from the establishment propaganda media. Pamela Geller took apart Yasmin Seweid’s flimsy story here — pointing out most notably that the alleged “Islamophobic harassment” took place in a crowded subway car, and yet in an age in which everyone has a phone and random incidents are captured on video all the time, there was no video of this incident, and indeed, no proof at all.
It looks like Erdogan wants to fight an all-out war inside Turkey against any and every enemy he may be facing.
Initially, the youth branches will be formed in 1,500 mosques. But under the plan, 20,000 mosques will have youth branches by 2021, and finally 45,000 mosques will have them. Observers fear the youth branches may turn into Erdogan’s “mosque militia,” like the Nazi Party’s Hitler Youth organization in Germany.
In a remarkable display of paranoia, Yigit Bulut (left), a top advisor to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (right), recently accused foreign chefs on cooking programs shown on Turkish TV stations of being foreign spies. .
Critics, including opposition lawmakers, are inquiring about Sadat’s activities, suspecting its real mission may be to train official or unofficial paramilitary forces to fight Erdogan’s multitude of wars inside and outside Turkey.
Initially, the youth branches will be formed in 1,500 mosques. But under the plan, 20,000 mosques will have youth branches by 2021, and finally 45,000 mosques will have them. Observers fear the youth branches may turn into Erdogan’s “mosque militia,” like the Nazi Party’s Hitler Youth organization in Germany.
Erdogan probably fears Shia expansionism more than Kurdish adventurism, but most likely in his thinking, Kurdish adventurism is part of Shia expansionism.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has good reasons to be living in constant fear. Only a few months ago, on July 15, hundreds of military officers, including several in his own security detail, attempted to topple him in a coup d’état. But the way he thinks he can best fight and win a future attempt at his governance — and life — exposes Turkey to the risk of civil war.
“Lets blame Russia for everything” is the latest trend, manufactured by spooky dude. No surprises here.
Soros pays the left to import Third World rapists, murderers, and child molesters into Western Civilization and then blames the Russians when they actually rape and murder?
Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain, just focus on Trump and blame the Ruskies.
An “expert” from the George Soros-funded and founded European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) claims intelligence agencies in Russia and Syria could set migrant sex mobs on German women in order to swing the country’s federal election.
Bild, Germany’s largest tabloid, carries the claim in a piece which asserts that Russia intends to “sabotage the outcome” of the Bundestag election next year by causing a “radical reshaping of public opinion”.
The ECFR’s Gustav Gressel said Moscow’s interference could go beyond spreading “disinformation”, and suggested it’s possible that Moscow could mobilise secret agents linked to the Russian mafia, Bashar al-Assad, and even long-deposed Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein to sexually assault German women.
“A section of the refugees from Iraq and Syria, if only a very small section, had connections with Assad or Saddam Hussein’s secret services”, he said.
According to Gressel, these people could be specifically targeted by intelligence agents or organised crime and directed to cause disturbances in Germany.
“What would happen, for example, if a similar event to [the mass sex attacks on New Year’s Eve] in Cologne were repeated at a summer festival before the election? How would Merkel stand then? What would be the consequence for the Bundestag election? Of course, this is an extreme example, but it is within the range of possibility,” he said.
The article, co-written by Julian Röpcke — a journalist whose unflinching support of al-Qaeda and the most extremist “rebels” in Syria earned him the nickname #JihadiJulian, a popular hashtag campaign on Twitter — claims Moscow interfered with the U.S. election by publishing internal Democratic National Convention documents through Wikileaks.
The ECFR is a Soros-funded, pan-European think tank of which the arch-globalist billionaire was a founding Council member. The organisation’s website featured a piece by the Hungarian hedge fund manager as early as February 2009 marking Russia as “hostile” and a “threat” to “open society values”, in which he instructed Europe to “neutralise” the nation.
The European Union has strongly signalled its intent to take action against “fake news” in recent weeks.
Despite the fact that information dealing with migrants attacking their European hosts has also been suggested to be “fake news” the media in parts of Europe routinely self-censors what they report, with journalists directed to avoid “stirring up prejudice” in their work.
Sheikh of Al-Azhar Ahmad Al-Tayyeb: In Islam, Unrepentant Apostates Should Be Killed; Homosexuality Is a Disease
Ahmad Al-Tayyeb, the Sheikh of Al-Azhar, discussed the laws pertaining to apostasy, and said that if it constitutes a “danger to society,” it carries a death sentence. In a daily show aired on several Egyptian TV channels and posted on the official YouTube channel of Al-Azhar, Sheikh Al-Tayyeb said: “The four schools of law all concur that apostasy is a crime, that an apostate should be asked to repent, and that if he does not, he should be killed.” He further said that “the concepts of human rights are full of ticking time-bombs” and that in Muslim society, sexual liberty and homosexuality are diseases. “No Muslim society could ever consider sexual liberty, homosexuality, and so on to be a personal right.” The video was posted on the official Al-Azhar Youtube channel on June 16.
EGYPTIAN PROFESSOR RAGHEB EL-SERGANY: EUROPE OWES ITS SCIENCE, MORAL VALUES, AND HYGIENE TO THE MUSLIMS
You gotta hand it to these dumb shiites, they call themselves ‘professor’ and claim they invented the wheel and right after that the bidet. How else would we know that Muslims invented hygiene?
Egyptian researcher Ragheb El-Sergany said that Europe became acquainted with science and with moral values only through the Muslims. According to El-Sergany, a professor in the Faculty of Medicine of Cairo University, it was the Muslims who brought the notion of cleanliness to Europe, where people used to wash themselves only twice a year, he said, adding that the bidet is evidence of this. The interview with El-Segany was broadcast on Hamas’s Al-Aqsa TV on November 24.
How dense are these people? Fighting fire with gasoline?
FRANCE’S NO GO ZONES: Women fight back after being BANNED from streets by Muslim men
FRENCH women have launched a fightback to reclaim areas of the country turned into no go zones by Muslim men as a shocking report lays bare the state of social segregation caused by mass migration.
A women’s rights campaign group is organising marches and protests in a bid to retake streets in predominantly Islamic neighbourhoods which they say have become entirely male dominated..La Brigade des Mères, which is aiming to restore gender equality in France’s troubled ‘banlieues’, says women in many communities are now too scared to go out because gangs of young men rule the streets.And a shocking undercover report, compiled by the TV channel France 2, shows how women are not welcome in bars and cafes in Muslim majority areas, with many men openly hostile to their presence in public at all.
Some areas of France have become no go zone for women, according to a report
Pascale Boistard, the women’s rights minister, declared: “There are now areas in our country where women can no longer go.”
The disturbing revelations come at a politically sensitive time for France, which will hold presidential elections in March in which far-right leader Marine Le Pen is expected to perform well.
Attitudes towards immigration have hardened in the country following the devastating terror attacks in Paris and Nice, with the Front National poised to capitalise on people’s fears about the erosion of French identity.
A report by France 2 highlighted the impact of Muslim migration on communities
The party of populist anti-Islam Dutch MP Geert Wilders has risen strongly in the polls since the lawmaker was tried and convicted of discrimination, according to a survey published Sunday.
If legislative elections due next March were held this week, Wilders’ Freedom Party (PVV) would pick up 36 out of 150 seats in the lower house of parliament, making it the biggest single political group, it found.
Before the trial began on October 31, the PVV was credited with 27 seats.
During the trial, but before his conviction on Friday, its estimated share rose to 34 seats. It currently has 12 lawmakers.
The new poll data … found that Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s Liberals would place second with 23 seats, against 40 today, and his junior coalition partners, the Labour Party (PvdA), would gain 10 seats, compared with 35 today.
Wilders was found guilty of discrimination against Moroccans but acquitted of hate speech over remarks he made at an election rally in March 2014.
He had asked supporters whether they wanted “fewer or more Moroccans in your city and in the Netherlands.” When the crowd shouted back “Fewer! Fewer!” a smiling Wilders answered: “We’re going to organise that.”
It is against the law to promise fewer Muslim immigrants but perfectly legal to bring in more.
If Europeans are ever to stand a chance of unravelling the coils of laws constricting their throats, preventing their ability to speak out against the demographic redrawing of their countries or any other potential danger they may note, it may prove helpful understanding how this slow strangulation took shape.
Although the gross unfairness of Geert Wilders’s prosecution is clear when compared with other Dutch politicians who have articulated far worse, there is also compelling evidence that much that is preached from the Koran in mosques daily would clearly fall under such a definition of hate speech — also remaining curiously outside the attention of public prosecutors.
Are not elected Member of Parliament even more responsible to for the safety of the public than are other citizens? If elected officials are criminalized for speaking out, at what point do such restrictions start posing a national security problem?
How are ordinary, decent, native Europeans ever likely socially and politically to articulate how they never consented to being part of a “grand experiment,” without incurring the stain of bigotry accompanying this reasonable assertion, from friends and co-workers alike?
Would it not be a remarkable irony if, instead of burying Wilders, as the conviction seemed intended to do, it propelled him instead to victory?
Sections of the Racial Discrimination Act which allow race-hate court claims based on insults and offence are so damaging to freedom of speech they must be repealed, and not just amended, according to the most comprehensive submission to the parliamentary committee investigating the laws.
The above must be the most tortured sentence ever. 18C is not about “race hate”, it kills free speech. No gov’t and no judiciary should be trusted with protecting you or me from being insulted or offended.
Yesterday, as the Human Rights Commission hardened its defence of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act and suggested merely “clarifying” the terms of “insult and offend”, the parliamentary committee was also told the law violates the right of free speech, is secretive, punishes defendants through process and may be unconstitutional.
In a 58-page submission to the legal and constitutional parliamentary committee tasked with considering changes to improve the controversial section 18C and the procedures of the Human Rights Commission, the Institute of Public Affairs argues the laws deny freedom of speech, erode democracy, undermine attempts to combat racism and have a “chilling effect” on debate about serious social issues.
“Only by removing the law from the statute books entirely can parliament restore Australians’ right to freedom of speech, improve our liberal democracy, and eliminate the sundry abuses that it has caused,” the submissions from the conservative think tank says.
The committee is examining possible changes to section 18C and the procedures of the Human Rights Commission after a judge threw out a racial hatred case brought against three university students from Queensland University of Technology being sued for $250,000 in damages by indigenous QUT staffer Cindy Prior for Facebook comments.
The IPA said section 18C “does not protect any other natural right that might reasonably be said to countermand the right to freedom of speech. There is no right not to be offended. Nor does individual dignity demand this kind of restriction on free expression”.
The submission said 18C was also bad for democracy and limited the range of ideas people could express by its “chilling effect” on debate.
“Moreover, freedom of speech strengthens social cohesion by exposing bad ideas and malevolent actors, rather than allowing them to fester in silence,” the submission said. “The third limb of the case for repeal is that in practice the law has proved unworkable and unfair. The law does nothing to prevent the kinds of racism that people are most likely to encounter, overlaps with other laws to the point of redundancy, and is so poorly drafted that significant uncertainty about its key terms persists.
“Indeed, the law may well be an unconstitutional exercise of the external affairs power or an unconstitutional burden on Australians’ implied right to freedom of political communication.”
It said proposals to amend the act and substitute “vilify” for “insult” or “offend” or simply remove insult and offend and leave “humiliate” would be inadequate.
During the committee hearing yesterday Gillian Triggs backed away from her earlier suggestions that replacing or removing “insult and offend” could be a solution. The commission believed it would be “a retrograde step to amend it” because it would put the law “right back to square one”.
UK Home Office allows jihad preacher banned in Pakistan to preach in UK mosque (but even mosque bans him)
Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri preaching of hatred and jihad violence is so hardline that he is banned from preaching in Pakistan, but the UK Home Office paused from its banning of foes of jihad terror long enough to welcome into Britain. However, the negative publicity over this move was such that even the mosque that had planned to host him has now canceled, claiming that they are shocked! shocked! to learn that Qadri preaches intolerance, hatred, and violence.
This is the comic opera that is contemporary Britain: the Home Office is so bent on appeasing Islamic supremacists that it goes farther than even mosques in the country are willing to do.
“Mosque leaders dump plans to host controversial hate preacher exposed by Sunday Post,” by Gordon Blackstock, Sunday Post, December 11, 2016:
“Mosque leaders dump plans to host controversial hate preacher exposed by Sunday Post,” by Gordon Blackstock, Sunday Post, December 11, 2016:
MOSQUE leaders have praised The Sunday Post for warning them they had booked a hate preacher so extreme he’s banned in Pakistan.
Last week we exclusively revealed that hardline cleric Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri had been asked to speak at Falkirk Central Mosque.
The booking came despite the fact the preacher had been banned in his native Pakistan for his hardcore message.
British PM Crows About Banning Pamela Geller from UK During Pro-Israel Event
Britain’s Prime Minister Theresa May has bragged in a speech to the Conservative Friends of Israel group about banning a pro-Israel Jewish woman, Pamela Geller, for ‘Islamophobia’.
The faux pas — already noticed by major pro-Israel advocates in Washington, D.C. and Westminster — came on Monday afternoon as Mrs. May announced the government’s endorsement of a definition on anti-Semitism.
But in order to caveat her support for British Jews, Mrs. May reignited a long-standing war of words with U.S. Israel advocate Pamela Geller and her colleague Robert Spencer.
The pair were banned from the United Kingdom when Mrs. May was Home Secretary.
UK Prime Minister Theresa May went on record again today, defending her ban on Pamela Geller. She said Geller was prohibited from entering the UK because she is an “islamophobe.” She has gone on to to allow jihad preachers and imams inciting to jihad but banned heroic bishops and persecuted Christian leaders. And yet the British government has deployed the SAS to guard Christmas shoppers against Islamic terror. How islamophobic!
While Geert Wilders was being prosecuted in the Netherlands for talking about “fewer Moroccans” during an election campaign, a state-funded watchdog group says that threatening homosexuals with burning, decapitation and slaughter is just fine, so long as it is Muslims who are making those threats, as the Quran tells them that such behavior is mandated.
“I am still of the view that declaring statistical facts or even sharing an opinion is not a crime if someone doesn’t like it.” – Finns Party politician, Terhi Kiemunki, fined 450 euros for writing of a “culture and law based on a violent, intolerant and oppressive religion.”
In Finland, since the court’s decision, citizens are now required to make a distinction, entirely fictitious, between “Islam” and “radical Islam,” or else they may find themselves prosecuted and fined for “slandering and insulting adherents of the Islamic faith.”
As Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, said, “These descriptions are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it.” There are extremist Muslims and non-extremist Muslims, but there is only one Islam.
It is troubling that Western governments are so eager to crack down on anything that vaguely resembles what has erroneously been termed “Islamophobia,” which literally means an irrational fear of Islam.
Considering the violence we have been witnessing, for those Westerners who have studied Islam and listened to what the most influential Islamic scholars have to say, there are quite a few things in Islam of which one legitimatelyought to be fearful.
Several European governments have made it clear to their citizens that criticizing European migrant policies or migrants is criminally off-limits and may lead to arrest, prosecution and even convictions. Although these practices constitute police state behavior, European governments do not stop there. They go still farther, by ensuring that Islam in general is not criticized either.
Finland is the European country most recently to adopt the way that European authorities sanction those who criticize Islam. According to the Finnish news outlet YLE, the Pirkanmaa District Court found the Finns Party politician, Terhi Kiemunki, guilty of “slandering and insulting adherents of the Islamic faith” in a blog post of Uusi Suomi. In it, she claimed that all the terrorists in Europe are Muslims. The Court found that when Kiemunki wrote of a “repressive, intolerant and violent religion and culture,” she meant the Islamic faith.
During the trial, Kiemunki was asked why she did not make a distinction between Islam and radical Islam. She replied that she meant to refer to the spread of Islamic culture and religion, and that she “probably should have” spoken of radicalized elements of the religion instead of the faith as a whole. Kiemunki was fined 450 euros. Her lawyer has appealed the verdict.
Kiemunki issued a press release after the verdict, in which she said:
“I am still of the view that declaring statistical facts or even sharing an opinion is not a crime if someone doesn’t like it… I wrote that I don’t want our country to be overtaken by a culture and law based on a violent, intolerant and oppressive religion.”
According to YLE, she added that her essay did not generalize about Muslims, but pointed out that not all Muslims are terrorists. “In these times, specifically in the recent past and today, all of the perpetrators of terrorist acts have turned out to be Muslim,” she said.
In Finland, Terhi Kiemunki, a Finns Party politician, was found guilty by a court of “slandering and insulting adherents of the Islamic faith.” (Image source: YouTube video screenshot)
So in Finland, since the court’s decision, citizens are now required to make a distinction, entirely fictitious, between “Islam” and “radical Islam,” or else they may find themselves prosecuted and fined for “slandering and insulting adherents of the Islamic faith.” As Turkey’s President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan said, “These descriptions are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it.” There are extremist Muslims and non-extremist Muslims, but there is only one Islam.
The following article makes my blood boil to an extent that I find hard to describe. If I were a German man — and I mean a real German man, not one of the swarthy-faced bucks that Angela Merkel keeps trying to pass off as “German” — I’d be dusting off my pitchfork and putting a match to my torch in preparation for a public accounting with the political elite of the Bundesrepublik.
The German government has a serious political and demographic problem. Thanks to its open-borders policy — which it seems to consider mandatory, and permanent — it has enriched itself with more than a million young men of foreign extraction, mostly from the Middle East and Africa. These hot-blooded youths have the same urges as any other males in their age group, but to their misfortune, most were unaccompanied by any young females of their ethnic group.
So the government decided to solve the problem by arranging “get-togethers” between the “New Germans” and girls “who have lived here in Germany for a long time” — that is, young ladies with fair skin and blue eyes who speak German as their native language.
Fresh meat for Mohammedan savages. Never has any government descended to such a level of despicable behavior.
To put it bluntly, the state has decided to pimp out its nubile young women to the migrant men it brought into the country through its collective madness.
Where does this leave young native German men? Are they all gay? Are they expected to find Russian brides on the internet? Or are they considered useless, worthy only of being discarded?
Many thanks to Nash Montana for translating this article from “killerbee”:
The State as Pimp?
(Caption under the picture in the article [not shown]: The mother of all pimping shows was “Herzblatt”, the Dating Game show.)
The capitalist-fascist BRD [German Federal Republic] regime is at the moment conducting a settlement policy with the goal of reducing the number of Germans within the total population.
There are multiple ways in which they do this:
1.
Germans of prime fertile age are being prevented from creating families through two-year contracts, permanent internships, job center shenanigans, etc.
2.
Immigrants are encouraged and supported financially to settle in Germany.
3.
Family reunion of immigrant/refugee families.
And now it appears a new variant has been added.
The deciding factor for the multiplication of a population is its women.
If the CDU/CSU fascists therefore succeed in “hooking up” as many German women as possible with refugees and immigrants, they have taken an important step further.
Because a German woman who is with an immigrant and is bearing his children logistically can’t have children with a German man at the same time.
Here’s a quote by ‘Frundsberg’, who has taken a closer look at this phenomenon and provides photos and links:
“Today out of pure coincidence I came upon a news article in my city where the school leadership arranged a “come together to get to know each other” with refugees. As I looked at the picture in the article, I noticed something: In the picture there was not one male German student, but only females. The refugees shown were also not of school age anymore. I then started researching on the internet and behold, other schools in Germany had organized similar events as well. Let those pictures really sink in.”
[article then shows the three pictures]
What does any of this have to do with school and teaching? These refugees, all of them, are way past the age for going to school and, oddly, male German students are conspicuously absent.
Is what we see here a sign that minor female German students are being consciously pimped out to refugees?
In Finland, Terhi Kiemunki, a Finns Party politician, was found guilty by a court of “slandering and insulting adherents of the Islamic faith.” (Image source: YouTube video screenshot)
