Muhammad, the role model of Muslims encouraged arson attacks on those who failed to show up for prayers. This scumbag was killing people in their sleep for not performing the group gymnastic sessions they call salat.
.
Bukhari (11:626) – “The Prophet said, ‘No prayer is harder for the hypocrites than the Fajr and the ‘Isha’ prayers and if they knew the reward for these prayers at their respective times, they would certainly present themselves (in the mosques) even if they had to crawl.’ The Prophet added, ‘Certainly I decided to order the Mu’adh-dhin (call-maker) to pronounce Iqama and order a man to lead the prayer and then take a fire flame to burn all those who had not left their houses so far for the prayer along with their houses’.”
The religion of peace. More like the religion of arson.
AN Islamic centre has been destroyed by fire this morning in Sydney’s west.–DAILYTELEGRAPH.COM.AU
Was it a “racist” act? Unlikely. Was it the competition, a righteous Muslim who sees this mosque as too moderate or something? Who cares.
It could also be an insurance job, an attempt to blame “Islamophobes” so the government will build a nice new mosque as a gesture or both?
Dutch AIVD: “The Possibility of a Terrorist Attack is Unprecedentedly High”
Posted on April 25, 2016 by Baron Bodissey
The following video highlights an unusual public announcement by the Dutch Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) that the threat of an Islamic terrorist attack in the Netherlands has reached an unprecedented high.
We Need to Bridge the Divide Between Jews and Muslims Now More Than Ever
Muslim Brotherhood theorist Sayyid Qutb explained:
The chasm between Islam and Jahiliyyah [the society of unbelievers] is great, and a bridge is not to be built across it so that the people on the two sides may mix with each other, but only so that the people of Jahiliyyah may come over to Islam.
Unfortunately, no one of these interfaith clowns bothered to ask Akbar Ahmed if he shares Sayyid Qutb’s views. Akbar Ahmed holds a Chair of Islamic Studies at American University. He used to be a Paki ambassador to the UK. Now he does da’wa in the U.S. This time he found a few delusional kumbaya Jews who were willing to listen to his drivel, only to sermonise them with Jewish phrases in the hope he could pull the Islamic wool over their eyes and ears. The PuffHo gives him a soapbox to amplify his efforts.
PACIFIC PRESS VIA GETTY IMAGES
Why would a senior rabbi and a Muslim scholar engage in dialogue at this moment in history, at a time when relations between Jews and Muslims have reached dangerous levels of tension around the globe?
Barely a day goes by when we do not read of some incendiary terrorist attack by a Muslim claiming to act in the name of Islam. Sometimes the victims are fellow Muslims, and at other times, the acts of violence are perpetrated against Jews or Christians. Muslims have attacked Jewish supermarkets, museums, synagoguesand schools, in part causing more and more Jews to leave France and other European countries, where their roots run deep, for Israel for fear of their safety. These acts are neither sanctioned by Islam nor are motivated by the nobler aspirations of humanity.
How we treat interfaith relations today will have significant implications for our world’s future.
The picture for Muslims is equally dire. Across North Africa, the Middle East, in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the Muslim world is in turmoil. Our hearts break when we contemplate the hundreds of schoolgirls kidnapped by Boko Haram in Africa and the nearly 150 — mostly children — killed at the Army Public School in Peshawar. Equally shocking is the frequent news of violence against Christians or other minorities in countries like Egypt and Pakistan. Muslim on Muslim violence is reaching new heights, with sectarian, tribal and political conflicts tearing the Muslim world apart. In the vacuum of authority, militant groups like the self-proclaimed Islamic State appear to rampage almost unchecked.
A MANHUNT is underway after a man was gunned down near the entrance to Centro Bankstown in south west Sydney this morning.
A white blanket is covering the body of one victim near the rooftop entrance to the centre, while a middle-aged man and a young woman were treated by paramedics.
TV cameras captured them being wheeled through the carpark to waiting ambulances.
Sources say the victim, in his 40s, is Walid ‘Wally’ Ahmad, a convicted killer who who has been on the run since a fatal shooting at Condell Park earlier this month.
The Mercedes, believed to be involved in the fatal shooting at Centro Bankstown, was found well alight less than 1km from the centre.
The rationale and justification of these fatwas is based on the Islamic maxim, “necessity makes the prohibited permissible,” not unlike the more familiar adage, “the ends justify the means.”
Saudi Cleric Muhammad Al-Habdan: Citizenship of Infidel Countries Only in Cases of Life and Death
Saudi scholar Sheikh Muhammad Al-Habdan, a member of the Muslim Scholars Association, was asked in an Ahwaz TV fatwa show whether a Muslim is allowed to accept the citizenship of an infidel country, “like an American or European citizenship.” Sheikh Al-Habdan answered that this is haram, unless there is real necessity, “like in cases of life and death.” He added that the same held true for visiting infidel countries, which is allowed only when necessary – for trade or medical treatment, for example – but not for mere tourism. When the necessity ends, he explained, the Muslim must return to his country or any other Muslim country. The video was posted on the Internet by Ahwaz TV on April 6, 2016.
Paul Zanetti is rather optimistic about “our” mufti getting a smackdown on his defamation claims. I fear that it depends very much on our -leftist- judiciary, and for that reason it can go either way. That a judge would go into past statements of the mufti and use them against him is rather doubtful. It would require knowledge of sira & hadith, which judges don’t have.
We shall see. In any case:
Statements to the local Mid East media by the Australian Mufti included, “I am pleased to stand on the land of Jihad to learn from its sons,” and “We came here in order to learn from Gaza. We will make the stones, trees, and people of Gaza talk.”
(and they will say ‘oh Muslim there is a Jew hiding behind me, come and kill him….)
This last statement is particularly sinister because it comes straight from the Sahi Muslim Hadith (recordings of deeds and sayings attributed to Muhammad) adopted by Hamas, calling for death to the Jews.
The Grand Mufti Dr Ibrahim is an Islamic scholar so there can be no mistaking to what he was referring. Dr Ibrahim made it very clear what he believes.
Mufti’s Past About To Return To Haunt Him
…and it’s all his own doing!
PAUL ZANETTIPaul Zanetti is a Walkley award winning syndicated cartoonist with over 30 years in the media. He blogs at www.zanettisview.com
When you choose to sue someone – or an organisation – be very sure you know what you’re doing.
Defamation law in Australia can be tricky. A false move, misjudgement, forgetful memory or sloppy lawyer could lose you your house.
Plenty have been rendered homeless through ego driven legal cases based on nothing more than bluff and wind.
An understanding of the Defamation Act (2005) is helpful.
There are a range of defences to defamation.
Just because your feelings are hurt isn’t enough to sue for defamation if what was said about you is substantially true and reported in the public interest, which can trigger the defence of ‘qualified privilege’, which simply means the publisher (defendant) has a moral, social or legal duty to alert the recipient, or the public to information they need to know.
Most defamation actions cost around a quarter of a million or so each side. Lose, and costs could be awarded against you. Legal cases can turn on a technicality you never anticipated, or via a little known quirk in common law, so you should budget to lose upward of $half a million plus reputational loss before you even start.
Australia’s most senior Muslim cleric, the Grand Mufti Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohammad is suing News Corp for a story in The Daily Telegraph after the Paris Islamic terror attack last November.
Without going into the minutiae of the case, the Mufti alleges the News Corp tabloid suggested, among other things, he was “a supporter of violent Islamic holy war”.
The problem with suing a major news organisation for claiming you are a supporter of violent Islamic holy war, is you had better be very sure there is nothing in your past that might confirm that.
Dismantling and exposing the fraud of “the perfect man”
In Islamic theology, al-Insān al-Kāmil (Arabic: الإنسان الكامل) also rendered as Insān-i Kāmil (Persian/Urdu: انسان کامل) and İnsan-ı Kâmil(Turkish), is a term used as an honorific title to describe Muhammad. The phrase means “the person who has reached perfection.”[1] It is an important concept in Islamic culture of the prototype human being, pure consciousness, one’s true identity, to be contrasted with the material human who is bound by one’s senses and materialism. The term was originally used by SunniSufis and is still used by them, however it is also used by Alawis and Alevis.[2] This idea is based upon a hadith,[2] which was used by Ibn Arabi, that states about Prophet Muhammad, ‘I was a prophet when Adam was between water and clay’.[3]
German-Egyptian Scholar Hamed Abdel-Samad Analyzes the Psychology of the Prophet Muhammad – Archival
In one of a series of online lectures, German-Egyptian scholar Hamed Abdel-Samad analyzes the personality of the Prophet Muhammad, whose biography, he says, is “held captive in a prison of unwarranted over-sanctification and glorification.” Abdel-Samad, who suggests that “there can be no reform or cleansing of the [Islamic] heritage until we rid Muhammad and the Quran of this sanctity,” describes the Prophet Muhammad as a human being who was driven by human motivations and urges. “Did he have marital problems? Psychological problems? Some illness? We don’t know,” says Abdel-Samad, suggesting that Muhammad’s revelations reflect “the psychology of a sick and rejected man, an outcast.” The lecture was posted on the Internet on June 24, 2015.
Not only do we have a commie pope who kisses the feet of Muslim savages, we now have a cardinal dimbulb who disses patriots and praises Islam. We truly live in interesting times. Is it (because) these heavenly clowns on earth wish they would hold power (again) over people, because the churches are empty; is it because the church made a pact with satan to advance the NWO? Who knows. I cannot answer that. At the moment we are stuck with a church that has lost the plot, and this milquetoast is the face of the cowards who are siding with our enemies to diss patriots.
The Cardinal Archbishop of Cologne, Rainer Maria Woelki (pictured), has publicly criticized leaders of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) political party for their statements against Islam, insisting that “whoever says ‘yes’ to church towers must also say ‘yes’ to minarets.”
The Cardinal was reacting in particular to recent statements by AfD deputy leader Beatrix von Storch, who told the Frankfurter Allgemeine newspaper: “Islam is in itself a political ideology that is not compatible with the constitution.”
“We are in favor of a ban on minarets, on muezzins and a ban on full veils,” said von Storch, who is also a member of the European Parliament.
In his videotaped response, Cardinal Woelki suggested that all religions are equally well suited to German culture and law. “The religion of Islam is compatible with the German constitution just as Judaism or Christianity are,” he said.
“Anyone who denigrates Muslims as the AfD leadership does should realize that prayer rooms and mosques are equally protected by our constitution as our churches and chapels,” he said.
Related:
Muslim Migrants savages in Germany Chant “Adolf Hitler” and Allahu Akbar”
The Muslims adore Adolph Hitler because of his Jew hatred that brought about the Holocaust. Muslims would like to kill all the Jews first and then destroy the Christians.
Today we have a reminder that the Crusades were not an unprovoked example of Christian Imperialism against the Middle East. But a reaction to the spread of Islam by the Sword against Christian Europe.
They said it. They are proud of it:
Qatari Educational Software on Islamic Conquests in Europe
Animated videos posted on the Internet teach children about Islamic conquests in Europe. The videos were produced as educational software for “Boys and Girls,” the children’s section of the Qatari government-owned Internet portal Islamweb.net. A large number of the portal’s educational videos were posted on various YouTube accounts. One video discusses the conquest of Al-Andalus, which was “in order to spread the light of Islam.” “This is how Islam entered Al-Andalus, where it built a great civilization,” an animated character says. Another video describes the conquest of Belgrade, “the fortified city that was the pride of Europe.” The videos were posted on the Internet in February 2016.
Leo Hohmann wrote an excellent review of Easy Meat with interviews with Peter McLoughlin and others in WND:
In Britain, they call it “sex grooming.”
In the Netherlands, they’re called “Lover Boys.”
But the phenomenon is the same. A gang of Muslim “Asians” of mostly Pakistani descent seeks out, pursues, chats up and cultivates school girls for sex, turning them into bodies for sale.
A new book is out that the European left is trying its best to ignore. It contains research that blows away the theory, widely reported in the media, that it’s a tiny minority of Muslim men involved in the rape gangs and then only in one British town, Rotherham.
Author Peter McLaughlin argues in his exhaustive study, “Easy Meat: Inside Britain’s Grooming Gang Scandal,” that it’s at least 300 Muslim men who were preying on girls in Rotherham over a 16-year period. And the same type of gangs have been operating in dozens of cities across the United Kingdom, as well as in Muslim areas of the Netherlands and Sweden.
“In 2008 one of the policing agencies having to do with sex trafficking commissioned a 20-minute educational video to be shown to school girls to show how the gangs operate,” McLoughlin told WND. “They hang around schools and malls and use an attractive young man to convince them he wants to be their boyfriend and he gets them to drink and do drugs and then she has sex with him and later his ‘brothers’ and his ‘uncles’ and whomever else he pimps her out to.”
That video was never actually shown to the girls, he said. And Britain’s homage to political correctness led police and child-welfare advocates to cover up what was happening for fear of being called racists.
The ABC lies when it suggests there is only one or some Muslim groups that want sharia.All Muslims are religiously obliged to replace “man made” laws with Allah’s sharia.
That’s why:
Stop, for god’s sake stop, importing trouble—and Muslim immigrants, as a whole, necessarily mean trouble, in all lands where the political and legal institutions, and social arrangements, are flatly contradicted by the Shari’a. Muslims are obligated to change or tear down those institutions, in order toremove all “obstacles to Islam.” It is not special or individual malice that prompts that attitude. That is their duty, a central duty. Why not come to fully and soberly understand that duty, and out of a minimal sense of self-preservation, cease to import those into our lands (America, Canada, Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Australia, and every other place that has so generously admitted, under a twisted definition of “refugees,” people who do not, and can not, wish our ways or institutions or constitutions well.
(We have to be nice to them so they will treat us kindly. Yes, we have political clowns in Europe who are that stupid.)
At a hearing by MEPs into the Brussels attacks, the Belgian deputy prime minister Jan Jambon added that ‘the worst thing we can do is to make an enemy of Islam’.–DAILYMAIL.CO.UK
.
In the Middle East, honour is for the winners, shame for the losers.
The Arab Middle East today remains beholden to its foundational culture, Bedouin tribal culture. We see Arabs to this day cleaving to their kin groups, their tribes, their religious sects, manifesting in their actions group loyalty, support of closer over more distant, and balanced opposition, each party defined as much by whom they stand against, as what they stand for. At every level honour is at stake: tribes vs. tribes or sedentary authorities, Sunni vs. Shia, Arab vs. Kurd or Persian. Nor should we ignore the loss of Arab honour in their defeats by the Israelis, and the persistent Arab desire to regain that honour. (More)
“If you’re around these migrants you are likely to be mugged. You are quite likely to be raped. The levels of crime are amazing.”
Heat Street‘s Louise Mensch argued that it’s inappropriate for President Barack Obama to “lecture” Europe about taking in more migrants. Do you agree? (Fox Business)
Australia’s lame stream media’s smarmy go-to imam Mohammed El-leissy continues to deceive the public:
A Sydney teen accused of plotting an Anzac Day terror attack had been part of an intensive deradicalisation program with Australian police since last year.
.
These ‘Sunrise’ degenerates have to be held responsible for conflating Islam with race. They are deceiving the public.
Plans to build a Mosque in Melbourne have been rejected by the local council. The decision was met with outbursts from angry protestors claiming the decision was racist. What do you think? #sun7Sunrise
PAUL ZANETTIPaul Zanetti is a Walkley award winning syndicated cartoonist with over 30 years in the media. He blogs at 
