Merkel is turning Germany into a dictatorship

Germany’s Speech Police Target Truth, Spawning Cold War Flashbacks

Thanks to Mullah

Still don’t believe that a university education makes people dumber?

American colleges instill disdain for whites, Christians, males, prosperity, & USA and call it “social justice.” They are hate nurseries. College Students In Safe Spaces Aren’t Being Educated .

Maher: Berkeley used to be the cradle of free speech, now its just a cradle….

must state whether it condones slavery & rape or fire a Sharia-supremacist who does: Jonathan Brown 

In San Diego, there is ‘islamophobic bullying’ going on….

“Islamic Takeover CONFIRMED – American School Surrenders to SHARIA LAW.” The district said it is not endorsing Islam, favoring a religion or imposing Sharia law.


The burqa debate does not present a clash of freedoms, but tyranny vs freedom. As usual, the Left is defending tyranny.


For a century Turkey has denied the Armenian genocide. What is also shameful is how little the churches have cared.

`Moderate Muslims` go to huge lengths to pretend Jihadi barbarism is nothing to do with terrorist who founded Islam

What happened to Paris?

4 thoughts on “Merkel is turning Germany into a dictatorship”

  1. I am beginning to think that Europe deserves Islam. The lack of will to resist shows a moral cowardice that was apparent just before WW2. If Le Pen gets elected, there may be a glimmer of hope. If not, Europe is finished as a liberal democracy. The UN is even more of a joke than ever. It’s about time that any nation with even a shred of decency pulled out of the UN. Looking at you, USA. Australia is so irrelevant no one would notice if we withdrew.

    1. Time to forget the cesspit of UN and form multi-country partnerships.

      If OIC can do it ( on the basis of religion) why can’t others?


    She could go into partnership with Erdogan of Turkey.

  3. “Social Justice” is communism, and communism is group-rights gangster extortion leading to slavery. That’s all it is!

    Libertine “liberal” criminals insist they be allowed to “progress” to always extort others to have ever-more rights to be delinquent – and in fact to remain irresponsibly wrong, with ever-less responsibilities – because, as all humans choices were really ever only ’caused’ by a complexity of historically predetermined, predestined and inevitable previous causes and effects, (far beyond our knowledge or capacity to ever understand them, such that we will forever all remain fallible and potentially dangerous victims), then their hypocritical subjective and emotive rejection of all objectively universal facts beyond ‘this one true fact,’ (that chaos is predictably inevitable LOL) proves them wrong:

    for if and when they alone are granted endless rights with no responsibilities, then from whom do these rights proceed?

    Well, from their own chosen victims, or course: from those deluded and so mentally inferior ‘conservative’ humans who, foolishly believing in objectively universal facts and free-will choices, are dumb enough to have enough hope for the future to become makers, from which the much smarter liberal takers (aka worthless parasite) can derive their lucrative subsistance, by forever spinning merely temporary and easily-solved problems with obvious and easy, permanent solutions, into eternal crises for which there are only at best temporary band-aid ‘palliative therapies’ available, and even then only by submitting to the expert authority leadership of the obviously much-smarter, far more shrewd, realpolitikingly decisive liberals.

    Deciding there is no solution, and so that in fact the only real solution is to try to instantly become a part of any given problem, works out great for them!

    Well, so far, anyway….!

    Subjectivist hypocrites actually endorse objectivity to legitimize their claims: because they claim that “inevitable” (predictably, universally objective) albeit otherwise unknown and unknowable, predestined and predetermined forces are always behind every “false illusion” of human free-will intent and choice.

    So we get these two, permanently opposed philosophical poles:

    Law-abiding Conservatives: “Criminal behavior is an effect of free-will choice!”

    Criminal libertines: “But what CAUSED that choice? There’s always a cause!”

    Their implication is that there are no crimes nor criminals because we’re all “victims.”

    In this way, they proudly enslave themselves to the crime-excusing ‘inevitable force’ alibi!


    Further, there is no cause-and-effect morality: Since predation CAN happen, “Therefore” it WILL always happen; “So” we MUST form ever-larger gangs to pre-emptively, defensively extort & deter enemies in order to safely accuse and punish them for their potential crimes BEFORE they can commit them!

    ALL of the so-called “soft” sciences are VICTIMOLOGIES – sociology, psychology, and even criminology – because they all begin by looking at symptoms of human behaviour, but quickly “progress” to the false premise that they must look for CAUSES of those behaviours – and said causes must always be inevitable, predetermined predestined mysterious magical forces beyond anyone’s control! (The implication being that we are all really ever only helpless victims – of “society” / mere products of our environments, or as Marx put it, of “Historical Predeterminism” and as Muhammad put it, as proudly Submissive “slaves of allah”)!

    Simple human free-will choice is never an answer they accept!


    SO: What is this “hate-speech” notion, of which the leftopaths are so fond, and why should it be considered a crime if it’s NOT already: a) a threat; and b) slander (fraud)?

    If it’s not either PHYSICALLY threatening speech – or emotionally threatening BECAUSE it could physically impact one’s life, like how fraudulent slander causes other people to react to one as if one were a criminal in need of hating and beating – then it’s THE TRUTH: and so it SHOULD cause one the emotional distress of ‘hurt feelings!’ So it isn’t objectively “offensive,” but is, in fact, socially beneficial in that it helps defend society from criminals, whether or not said predictably victim-blaming criminal is subjectively “offended” by their victims being notified about THEIR offenses!

    Having no facts to justify their aggressive hypocrisy, all criminals will resort to using emotive ‘arguments’ to justify their crimes by playing the victims. So they (liberals, muslims) can be relied on to try to criminalize hurt feelings and to make offending people, (i.e: the liberal criminals, by accusing them of their crimes) illegal, too!

Comments are closed.