Sydney University adopts law courses pushing for recognition of sharia law, polygamy and child marriage in Australia

It is completely unacceptable to even consider validating Sharia in this country.

It is barbaric, oppressive and incompatible with western democracy.

Have you wondered why the Islamic community is so silent in the same sex marriage debate? They want the definition of marriage to be messed with so they can push for lowing the age of consent and polygamy. This is most certainly the agenda of devout, Quran obeying Muslims who believe Sharia is superior to western democratic rule and values.

For years a few lone voices have been highlighting this encroachment of Sharia, or creeping Sharia and here it is and all we hear from our leaders is nonsense such as Islam is a religion of peace.

Thankfully more people are waking up but we need to step it up for the sake of our nation and further generations.

There is a better way but it will require you to do your bit.

Please stand with me. There are many ways you can do this. Share posts, become a member of Australian Conservatives and assist me to promote the conservative values that ensure a secure and prosperous present and future for Australia.

 You can support me personally here: https://www.paypal.me/KirraliePersonal  

 Read this alarming article from the Daily Telegraph:

Sydney University adopts law courses pushing for recognition of sharia law, polygamy and young marriage in Australian legal system

JACK HOUGHTON, The Daily Telegraph

July 14, 2017 12:00am

THE most prestigious law school in Australia has two courses which call for elements of sharia law to be recognised in the mainstream legal system — including allowances for polygamy and lowering the age of consent.

One of the Sydney University courses, Muslim Minorities And The Law, is taught by Salim Farrar and Dr Ghena Krayem and it uses a book the pair wrote as “the monograph upon which the unit of study bases its teaching”.

The Daily Telegraph can reveal the book claims “sharia and common law are not inherently incompatible” and that police’s failures to accommodate Islamic religious identity during operations was hampering the fight against Islamist terrorism.

The book also takes aims at judges for denouncing “conservative Muslim values” during sentencing.

“Where found guilty of transgressing Western values, for example in gender equality, or violating national security, courts have clearly communicated their denunciation of ‘traditional’ or conservative Muslim values when sentencing, dispensing exemplary sentences and announcing aggravating factors, even when the written law does not explicitly demand it,” it says.

The idea of mixing sharia law with Australian law has been criticised by the legal fraternity and Islamic leaders, who said the “division between religion and courts” must be upheld.

“There is no doubt that this is an area that needs to be researched, particularly given the fact that anecdotal evidence suggests that this is an increasing practice in Muslim communities,” it says.

The course brief for Mr Farrar’s undergraduate course Introduction To Islamic law says it will focus on “shari’ah (the classical laws as derived from the religious sources), and will seek to explain its relationship to the contemporary laws of Muslim states and to the cultural practices of Muslim communities living in Australia and other predominantly non-Muslim states.”

Sharia law is Islam’s religious law. It is often described as a code for living for Muslims. There is ongoing dispute between traditionalists and reformists over its application in Western society.

At its most extreme, sharia law calls for death by stoning for adulterers.

However, the Sydney academics condemn such practices in their writings.

The book says “in terms of police operational practice, there has been little evidence of accommodation of Islamic religious identity across our jurisdictions.

“Rather, evidence suggests police have targeted and discriminated against Muslims simply on grounds of religious identity. While Muslims tend not to object to greater personal intrusions where clearly justified for security reasons, such procedural unfairness is likely to be counter-productive in the fight against ­Islamist terrorism.”

In a chapter on Islamic Family Law, the authors say a man has the “exclusive” right to divorce his wife and states that sharia does not recognise minimum age in marriage.

“There is no minimum age for a contract of marriage, but it should not be consummated if that would cause harm to the putative spouse.”

It also criticised the Australian legal system for not recognising the religious significance of paying a woman a fee to marry her, a practice known as mahr.

Law Society of NSW president Pauline Wright said universities were “places of ideas and should be exploring them but having said that in terms of the law — in my view — all Australians should be subject to the same law.

“I don’t think bringing different laws in based on the religion of people coming before the courts is appropriThe Australian Federation of Islamic Councils spokesman Ali Kadri said sharia was often “misunderstood”, but expressed a similar sentiment.

“I think there is nothing within Australian law which stops me from following my religion as I am supposed to and I would not be compromising anything within my religion by following Australian law as it is,” he said.

“I don’t think we need to have religious connotations with any law because we are a secular country.”

Dr Krayem and a team of Melbourne academics were awarded a federal government research grant in 2015 to research the Response Of Australian Family Law To Islamic Community Processes, to influence “future policy developments”. Family law expert Robert Balzola said it was concerning that public funding was behind the research.

A university spokesman said the “optional” course would provide students with a “basic understanding of the sources of Islamic law and its interpretation”. Both academics declined to commentate.”