ABC scribblers call Raheem Kassam “Right-wing provocateur” and try to get him banned from speaking in Australia.
Keneally’s speech shows exactly why Kassam should be allowed in.
Labor calls for right-winger Raheem Kassam to be banned from entering country
There’s no such thing as “hate speech”, there’s either free speech or dictatorship by far-left fucktards like Keneally & cohorts. Do not fall for labels like “Right-Wing Provocateur”. The left doesn’t tolerate any dissent in their efforts to have us replaced by third world savages.
- British activist Raheem Kassam is due to speak at a conservative conference in Australia
- Labor wants the Federal Government to block his entry to the country
- Senator Kristina Keneally, in Parliament, accused him of hate speech
Federal Labor is urging the Government to block a controversial right-wing figure from entering the country for a conservative conference in Sydney next week.
Key points:
- British activist Raheem Kassam is due to speak at a conservative conference in Australia
- Labor wants the Federal Government to block his entry to the country
- Senator Kristina Keneally, in Parliament, accused him of hate speech
British activist Raheem Kassam is due to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC, alongside former prime minister Tony Abbott, Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, his former boss and UK Brexit party leader Nigel Farage, and New South Wales’ One Nation politician Mark Latham.
The conference attracts tens of thousands of people in the United States, and is now branching out into Australia.
Shadow Home Affairs Minister Kristina Keneally told the Senate last night that Mr Kassam should not be allowed a visa to enter the country.
The setting of Keneally’s speech shows exactly why Kassam should be allowed in. Parliamentary privilege exists so that members can discuss and debate issues free from civil and criminal law restrictions. The Parliamentary Privileges Act (1987) covers ‘all words spoken and acts done in the course of, or for purposes of or incidental to, the transacting of the business of a house or committee.’ The defining purpose of the legislation is to promote free speech in the chamber, the last place elected representatives should fear representing their own or constituent views.
Yet in fantastic irony, a sitting NSW senator under privileged legislative impunity, calls on the coalition to bar Kassam for fear he will “enter our country with the express intent of undermining equity and equality” through “hate speech.” If Keneally is as serious about the character assassination as the gravitas of her speech would indicate, she should have no problem calling a press conference in NSW outside her own home and repeat it.
Further, employing a vague and subjective term like ‘hate speech,’ to determine that a mainstream right-wing British political commentator is unfit to enter the country, is perhaps the most poignant example of how hostile the Australian Labor party is towards free expression.




Re: Shadow Home Affairs Minister Kristina Keneally complained: “We should not allow career bigots — a person who spreads hate speech about Muslims, about women, about gay and lesbian people — to enter our country with the express intent of undermining equity and equality.”
Now try translating that word salad into the common tongue:
“We should not allow career bigots — a person who spreads hate speech about Nazis, Communists, muslims and other gangster extortionists intent on slaving us — to enter our country with the express intent of undermining equity of outcome and equality between criminals and their intended victims.”
Right.