How Do Muslims Justify Emigrating to Non-Muslim Nations?

A puzzling question for many. Most Westerners are baffled that Mohammedans constantly bitch about how terrible infidels treat them in their own countries, regardless of the fact that always more of them arrive to settle behind, what they believe to be, enemy lines, and few, if any of them, ever leave.

Most Western analysts regurgitate the old chestnut that “migrants seek a better life” and while that may be an expected bonus, migration means much more bettering ones economic circumstances.

Hijrah, or jihad by emigration, to emigrate in the cause of Allah – that is, to move to a new land in order to bring Islam there, is considered in Islam to be a highly meritorious act. “And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find on the earth many locations and abundance,” says the Qur’an. “And whoever leaves his home as an emigrant to Allah and His Messenger and then death overtakes him, his reward has already become incumbent upon Allah. And Allah is ever Forgiving and Merciful.” (4:100)

To invade infidel lands, to settle, to displace, to conquer, to subjugate, to enslave and to destroy,  that is the motivation and the driving factor of all Islamic migration. Why is that so hard to understand?

How Do Muslims Justify Emigrating to Non-Muslim Nations?


Our guest-essayist SF returns with an analysis of the Islamic Hijra to the West.

How do Muslims justify emigrating to non-Muslim nations?

by SF

Islam is a supremacist, totalitarian “religion”. It holds that Muslims are the only true human beings, and that all non-Muslims are inferiors who must be converted, enslaved, or killed. Yet today, more than ever, we see hordes of Muslims desperately fleeing their paradisiacal Islamic homelands for non-Muslim countries, particularly in Europe. And they pass through many other Muslim countries to get there.

What are the underlying causes?

1. Overpopulation: Islam is a primitive, savage, tribal “religion”. The Koran tells all Muslims to have as many children as possible, so that they can be raised as Islamic holy warriors who can conquer the world in the name of allah.
2. Islam arose and prevails in countries with limited natural resources, so that sooner or later it eventuates that there is just not enough to go around.
3. The average level of intelligence in Muslim countries tends to be on the low side, so that they have trouble competing in our global economy, which favors technological prowess. As a result, they become economic migrants, leaving for liberal Western countries with generous welfare benefits.

How do they justify this?

1. They say that allah made Western countries rich, and Muslim countries poor, so that Muslims will have an added incentive to wage holy war on the infidels and plunder them.
2. Muslim religious teachers have established rules that allow Muslims to emigrate to non-Muslim countries:
a. The non-Muslim country must allow Muslims complete religious freedom.
b. The emigrating Muslims are to be considered as scouts who are sent to evaluate the non-Muslim country, and help prepare it for eventual Muslim conquest.

Because of these conditions, the Muslim emigrants have no problem killing any native non-Muslim who insults Islam, or engaging in acts of terror if the native non-Muslim host government does not show enough “respect” towards Islam and Muslims (an interesting way of showing their gratitude).

America now has a foreign-born Muslim congresswoman (Democrat, of course), whose parents had requested asylum. They are apparently devout Islamists who were part of the vicious and corrupt ruling elite in their home country. A civil war eventually erupted which was led by savage and militant Islamic jihadis, causing the ruling elite to flee or be killed.

The congresswoman is an “in your face” Muslima. She loves all Muslims, and despises any non-Muslims who have the arrogance to oppose the spread of Islam (so Trump is “the great satan”, and Netanyahu “the little satan”.) Predictably, the Democrats and their enablers in the major media worship her as “the future of the Democratic Party and America”. They praise how much Muslim immigration is “enriching” America, but never acknowledge that no sane Westerner ever emigrates to a Muslim country; and very few Muslim emigrants to a Western nation ever move back to a Muslim country.

2 thoughts on “How Do Muslims Justify Emigrating to Non-Muslim Nations?”


    Either they admit they left their perfect islamic paradises because the grass was greener on the other side (considering most of those islamic shitholes have no grass at all) or they admit they only left because of the Qur’anic commands to spread islam through infidel lands by HIJRAH ( violence &/or stealth-jihad whichever works best in any given circumstantial situation)!

    By allowing and encouraging them to come here, libocrites are a metaphorically introducing societal cancer which will grow and grow until all the host society’s resources are consumed by it, and the (the same as all those previously Greek Christian countries in the Middle East which suffered the exact same fate in ages past, and so are now those “islamic” shitholes we all presume were always “muslim lands” but really weren’t) host countries die.

    ALL the so-called “islamic / muslim” countries in the world – like Egypt, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria, and Turkey (previously known as Thrace, Tarsus and Anatolia) were formerly GREEK, CHRISTIAN countries! Ditto Arabia itself – Christian, Jewish and pagan before Muhammad genocided them.

    Not to mention Pakistan and Bangladesh/ Bengal (previously known as India) and Iran. Ditto Chechnya and Albania (and, thanks to Hitler and Bill Clinton, Kosovo)!

    They were ALL violently invaded, raped, enslaved, and conquered by islam’s holy-mobster “muslim” gang members.

    It’s well-known that “Islam has bloody borders.”

    Contrary to Christendom, which had already been violently conquered by PAGAN Rome, and all had then decided to peacefully convert en masse to Christianity to curry favour with the Byzantine Roman Emperor Constantine.

  2. “… libocrites are a metaphorically introducing societal cancer which will grow and grow until all the host society’s resources are consumed by it…”

    Well said and straight to the point.

Comments are closed.