“Islamophobia” deliberately transforms any critique of Islam into a crime

Former Pak. PM: Osama bin Laden was Our Hero…

Of course he was. That’s why the Paki’s protected him for years.

Elephant named after Osama bin Laden goes on rampage, killing five Indian villagers

‘What’s a girl seeking, alone at night?’ German mayor’s ‘victim-blaming’ blasted as immigrants accused of gang-raping teenager
‘What’s a girl seeking, alone at night?’ German mayor’s ‘victim-blaming’ blasted as immigrants accused of gang-raping teenager
“Islamophobia”: Europe’s New Political Weapon
  • The objective of using the word “Islamophobia” appears to have been to make Islam untouchable by placing any criticism of it as equivalent to racism or anti-Semitism.


  • The word “Islamophobia” deliberately intends to transform the critique of a religion — a fundamental right in Western societies — into a crime.


  • Continued below the fold.

“The Truth is No Defense” – Stephen Coughlin


Tlaib Frantically Asked Campaign For Personal Money, Messages Show, As Ethics Probes Announced

Rep. Rashida Tlaib is officially under House investigation from the Ethics Committee for illegally diverting campaign funds

Didn’t she want to impeach Trump for alleged campaign finance violations?

Where are the Democrat calls for her removal?

A federal judge has ruled that a 25-year-old woman born in New Jersey who later traveled to Syria and joined ISIS is not an American citizen.

Kudos to that judge. But rest assured that ‘human rights’ shysters & their Moonbat enablers will not rest until she’s permitted to come back.

France is Target of More Islamic Terror Attacks Than Any Other E.U. State
E.U. Court: Illegal to Throw Violent Migrants Out Of Asylum Homes


One thought on ““Islamophobia” deliberately transforms any critique of Islam into a crime”



    (But, seriously)…

    This ILLEGAL and wholly subjectivist “HURT FEELINGS” nonsense has got to stop!

    Offense can only be taken, never given! If someone says something mean and untrue about you, you either consider the source and

    scornfully laugh it off, file a lawsuit for defamation, (slander and libel are forms of fraud) or a crime report for inciting violence, if they went that far.

    But these recent fake judge-made “laws” are really only onus-reversing crimes, as in:

    “You have to prove you DIDN’T hurt my feelings, or else you owe me money or you have to go to jail! Nyah!”

    And there’s no such thing as a state of permanent, ongoing “emotional distress” that isn’t deliberately and willfully,

    habitually obsessed about – because our emotions are mere reflections of the three basic states of space-time (the static past, the fluid present, and the nebulous future, respectively): static fear, fluid greed, nebulous hope. Not exactly worth defending!

    Further, libertine “liberal” criminals have to resort to whining about their hurt feewings, simply because they don’t have any

    actual facts to justify their many crime excuses!

    So, being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow

    victims,” is now to be deemed the highest moral virtue!

    So much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist

    banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:

    “Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”

    Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!

    So any and all legislators, judges, and educators who put criminals’ hurt feelings above facts should be fired and JAILED.

    And that includes using the words “Respect!” and “Dignity!”

    Objectifying people as “victims!” is what really “disrespects their dignity!”

    Any and all “laws” criminalizing hurt feelings should be repealed and their originators fired and JAILED, too!

    Because all subjectivist “laws” are really adversarial crimes, seeking to use fraudulent slander to extort and enslave others. Fraud, slander, extortion and slavery (aka “Political Correctness”) are already crimes.

    Who complains about hurt feelings (aka defending their “dignity”) anyway?! ONLY criminals!

    They always feel hurt and left out when others try and succeed and they don’t, so they feel jealous and entitled to demand an

    quality of outcome and permanent rights (like, to your stuff) without any concomitant corollary responsibilities (like to earn or otherwise have to pay for it) over an equality of opportunity! i.e: to extort a right to remain irresponsibly wrong – to be able to angrily, “hatefully” attack others first while demanding a false right to be pitied for their chosen stance!

    Which is why they invented the whole nonsensical and emotive concept of “HATE CRIMES!” – because, in making “hate” into a

    crime, they extortively try to make it “illegal” for their potential victims to hate their crimes!

    Any law-abiding person who gets robbed or extorted doesn’t feel “sad” or “uncomfortable” about it, they feel righteously ANGRY! So noticing a constant demand for pity is one really good way for us to tell an extortive victimology-spewing criminal from a

    real victim of same!

    This false focus on “hurt feewings!” gives professional liars carte blanche to screw us all over. Where and when ever feelings are allowed to trump facts, hypocrites can virtue-signal by projecting their own most sensitive butthurt victim snowflake self-images onto anyone’s real opponents, no matter how bad, to claim offense on their behalf. These strawmen (snowmen?) “victims” are then given endless reparations extorted from complicit politicians for whatever fantasy “emotional violence” scenarios they can dream up, with no regard for facts at all. And it becomes a real crime when lawyers and judges argue and negotiate over hurt feelings etiquette and subjective diplomacy rather than objective cause and effect facts in our law courts.

    All such hypocrites hate “painful” dynamic cause-and-effect thinking about circumstantial, situational details, and so vastly prefer using static images, based on “life’s too complex for any of us to ever understand such things, so we have no free-will choices, and so must always split the difference, to be fair and equitable!” But splitting the difference is anything but being fair or equitable, as it invariably blames the victim while encouraging the extortive predatory criminal aggressors’ slavery.

    This they call shrewd and realistic, cynical realpolitic, pretending hurt feelings-assuaging difference-splitting diplomacy and negotiating (giving in to extortionists) while “compromising” one’s innocence, accepting false guilt, and “settling” for less, is somehow best for all concerned. In Canada, it brings “peace and order” – exactly as extortion brings “Submission” in islam.

    This is why (besdies there being no money in soluutions) lawyers must agree to follow rules of etiquette and be “civil” to each other, even as they blatanntly lie; and judges must pretend to consider (if not actually believe) even the most egregious lies.

    Invoking hurt feelings as something real to be championed and defended is a great excuse to irresponsibly ignore having to learn and remember any of the relevant facts. And to enshrine such nonsense into law turns the law into victim-blaming criminal theatre, where everything is about image over reality and form over substance, and nothing at all remains about moral justice.

Comments are closed.