Ayan Hirsi Ali: not all immigrant men, or even most, indulge in sex attacks

“Not all Muslims….”

Why Don’t Feminists Fight for Muslim Women?

lindsey-lamont-5zHTQbkwb2Y-unsplash

Why Don’t Feminists Fight for Muslim Women? presented by Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Culture matters. It ‘s the primary source of social progress or regression. Nowhere do we see this more clearly than in the status of women. The Judeo-Christian culture—and perhaps a more apt word is civilization—has produced over time the law codes, language and material prosperity that have greatly elevated women’s status.

But this progress is not shared everywhere.

There are still hundreds of millions of people that live in a culture—the Islamic, for instance—that takes female inferiority for granted. Until recently, these cultures—the Western and the Islamic—were, for the most part, separated. But that is changing. Dramatically so.

Large numbers of immigrant men from the Middle East, South Asia and various parts of Africa have brought a different set of values to the West, specifically Europe. More than a million arrived in 2015 alone. More are on the way.

As a result, crimes against girls and women—groping, harassments, assaults and rape—have risen sharply. These crimes illustrate the stark difference between the Western culture of the victims and that of the perpetrators.

Let me be clear: not all immigrant men, or even most, indulge in sex attacks or approve of such attacks, but it’s a grave mistake to deny that the value system of the attackers is radically different from the value system of the West. In the West women are emancipated and sexually autonomous. Religiosity and sexual behavior or sexual restraint is determined by women’s individual wishes. The other value system is one in which women are viewed as either commodities (that is, their worth depends on their virginity), or on the level of a prostitute if they are guilty of public “immodesty” (wearing a short skirt for example).

I do not believe these value systems can coexist. The question is which value system will prevail. Unfortunately, this remains an open question.

The current situation in Europe is deeply troubling: not only are Muslim women within Europe subject to considerable oppression in many ways, such norms now risk spreading to non-Muslim women who face harassment from Muslim men.

One would think that Western feminists in the United States and Europe would be very disturbed by this obvious misogyny. But sadly, with few exceptions, this does not appear to be the case.

Common among many Western feminists is a type of moral confusion, in which women are said to be oppressed everywhere and that this oppression, in feminist Eve Ensler’s words, is “exactly the same” around the world; in the West just as in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran.

To me, this suggests too much moral relativism and an inadequate understanding of Sharia law. It is true that the situation for women in the West is not perfect, but can anyone truly deny that women enjoy greater freedom and opportunities in the United States, France and Finland than they do in Iran, Pakistan or Saudi Arabia?

Other feminists have also argued that non-Western women do not need “saving” and that any suggestion that they “need” help from Western feminists is insulting and condescending to non-Western women.

Never miss a new video. Join for free.

 

My perspective is a practical one: any efforts that help Muslim women—whether they live in the West or under Islamic governments should be encouraged. Every effort to pressure these governments to change unjust laws should be supported.

Western feminists and female Western leaders have a simple choice to make: either excuse the inexcusable, or demand reform in cultures and religious doctrines that continue to oppress women.

Nothing illustrates this better than what happened in Cologne, Germany on New Years Eve, 2015. That night, during the city’s traditional celebrations, numerous German women (467 at the last count) reported being sexually harassed or assaulted by men of North African and Arab origin. Within two months, 73 suspects had been identified, most of them from North Africa; 12 of them have been linked to sexual crimes. Yet, in response to the attacks, Cologne’s feminist Mayor Henriette Reker issued an “arm’s length” guideline to women. Just “keep at an arm’s length” distance between you and a mob of Arab men, she advised Cologne’s female population, and you will be fine.

Mayor Reker’s comments underline the seriousness of the problem: a culture clash is upon us. The first step in resolving it is to unapologetically defend the values that have allowed women to flourish. Feminists with their organizations, networks and lobbying power need to be on the front lines on this battle. Their relevance depends on it. And so does the well being of countless women, Western and non-Western.

Previous blog entries:

‘We’ve bought into the lie that is tolerance and diversity’: Inside radical Muslim group Hizb ut-Tahrir’s Sydney conference – where gender segregated members heard children should not sing the national anthem
  • Radical Muslim group Hizb ut-Tahrir held Saturday night conference in Sydney 
  • Media was banned from the ‘Unapologetically Muslim’ function centre forum 
  • Speaker at Campie in city’s south-west said his kids didn’t sing national anthem 
  • Hizb ut-Tahrir leader Wassim Doureihi laughed when asked to condemn ISIS 
  • An evangelical Christian handed out pamphlets outside the Muslim conference 

A radical Muslim group held a conference on Saturday afternoon discouraging members and their children from singing the Australian national anthem – while refusing to condemn ISIS.

Global Islamist political party Hizb ut-Tahrir, which is campaigning for Sharia law, hired a community hall at Campsie, in Sydney’s south-west, for the event.

Yellow taped lines were placed on the carpet segregating men at the front from women at the back, with Daily Mail Australia witnessing ushers directing men to sit at the front of the auditorium.

This was despite a 2016 New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal ruling which found Hizb ut-Tahrir’s gender segregation policies at public events were a form of unlawful sex discrimination.

The media was kicked out of a radical Muslim conference that discussed discouraging children from singing the national anthem and why ISIS shouldn't be condemned
Yellow taped lines had been placed on the carpet segregating men at the front from women at the back
Global Islamist political group Hizb ut-Tahrir, which campaigns for Sharia law, hired a community hall at Campsie, in Sydney's south-west, on Saturday afternoon
After taking a seat Daily Mail Australia was asked to leave the Orion Function Centre as about 300 Muslim men, women - all wearing either hijabs or niqabs - and children were arriving

 

Hizb ut-Tahrir Australia live streamed the event on Facebook, featuring high school English teacher Sufyan Badar (left) on stage interviewing Wassim Doureihi (right)

 

Asked why the media wasn't allowed at the four-hour 'Unapologetically Muslim' forum, this reporter was informed it was an 'Islamic conference' and complied with directions to leave

Wassim Doureihi (right) told the audience his children refused to sing the national anthem and laughed on stage when asked if ISIS should be condemned
Outside the function centre on Beamish Street, an evangelical Christian was handing out pamphlets as he wore a T-shirt with the words, 'If you genuinely want to know more about Jesus (in your heart) ask Him and He will answer you'
The married theologian with children in his fifties told Daily Mail Australia after the event he regarded Islam as a threat to Western civilisation
The Saturday conference was held two days after Hizb ut-Tahrir announced its Australian spiritual leader Ismail al-Wahwah had been released from a Jordanian prison

 

Hizb ut-Tahrir spokesman Uthman Badar (centre) appeared at Saturday's conference two years after he told a forum at Bankstown, in Sydney's south-west, that ex-Muslims, called 'apostates', should be killed
Attendees of the Hizb ut-Tahrir conference were told a white, male pro-refugee customer was intolerant for describing as 'barbaric' Sharia law hudud punishments, that can include the amputation of hands for stealing

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.