Author: sheikyermami

 

For nearly 18 months Khalisadar denied rape, before pleading guilty 

* More on Abdul Makim Khalisadar  

A report posted on Islam Watch, a site run by Muslims who oppose intolerant teachings and hatred for unbelievers, exposes a prominent Islamic cleric and lawyer who support extreme punishment for non-Muslims — including killing and rape.

* Thanks to JW & Islam Watch

* Fox News

A question-and-answer session with Imam Abdul Makin in an East London mosque asks why Allah would tell Muslims to kill and rape innocent non-Muslims, including their wives and daughters, according to Islam Watch.

“Because non-Muslims are never innocent, they are guilty of denying Allah and his prophet,” the Imam says, according to the report. “If you don’t believe me, here is the legal authority, the top Muslim lawyer of Britain.”

The lawyer, Anjem Choudary, backs up the Imam’s position, saying that all Muslims are innocent.

Here you can watch the interview with Islamic lawyer Anjem Choudary:

“You are innocent if you are a Muslim,” Choudary tells the BBC. “Then you are innocent in the eyes of God. If you are not a Muslim, then you are guilty of not believing in God.”

Choudary said he would not condemn a Muslim for any action.

“As a Muslim, I must support my Muslim brothers and sisters,” Choudary said.

“I must have hatred to everything that is not Muslim.”

Click here to read the report from Islam Watch.

* And here, also from Islam watch, we have a report about an imam who thought he had a god-given right to act according the teachings of his prophet:

*Allah permits the soldiers of Allah to rape infidel women and steal their belongings:

Imam Abdul, after a lot of thinking and contemplating, figured out that killing is too risky in England. He could end up behind bars for life. Rape is desirable, less risky and more fun. His congregation muslim members could help him in this Islamic duty by providing an alibi that he was preaching in the mosque at the time of the rape (in case he was apprehended).. He talked to them about this favour.. Seven of them agreed to testify for him provided Imam will do the same for them if they got caught themselves for their rape jihad.

The Imam had been lusting for a while on a good looking kafira, who lived alone in the neighbourhood.. Late one night he entered her apartment, captured her at a knife point and brutally raped her. To complete the sunna he took her very expensive computer cell phone as halal booty (aya 8.1).

The woman had seen this weird looking bearded pot bellied Imam walking in and out of the neighbourhood mosque. She reported him to the police and the Imam was nabbed. As promised the seven namazis testified for him and provided the alibi that Imam was preaching at the time of the rape.

But alas! DNA test contradicted their testimony. He and his seven namazi friends were all sentenced to prison terms.

He was caught by DNA. Judge Timothy King blasted his “hypocrisy”.

Imam got 7½ years for rape and 2½ for conspiring to pervert justice.

Seven members of East London Mosque admitted perverting justice and got 12 months each.

Burka-clad women in the public gallery yelled abuse at the judge — and one screamed that the victim was a prostitute.

* Read the whole thing and check out the comments too: the headbangers are seething…!

* Women in Islam & the Rape of Infidel Women by Abul Kasem

*

Dutch Pressure Stops Anti-Islam Film

* The ummah is jubilant: the self-censorship of the Dhimmi-Dutch and the world wide back flips in the Dar-al Harb by intimidated, cowardly governments has encouraged the soldiers of Allah to demand more censorship.

* The government of the Netherlands is loath to face another firestorm like the one brought on by Fitna, and has squeezed Ehsan Jami hard enough to persuade him not to release his planned animated cartoon about the Prophet’s pedophilic marriage to Aisha.

Dutch Pressure Stops Anti-Islam Film

From Islam Online

Jami, a former Muslim of Iranian origin, has decided not to release his cartoon film as expected on April 20.

Thanks to the intervention of the Dutch government, a second anti-Islam movie will not see the light, at least for now.

*
“I can confirm that Mr Ehsan Jami has decided not to broadcast his controversial film,” Ayhan Tunja, a member of the Muslim Coordinating Council of the Netherlands, told IslamOnline.net Tuesday, April 1, over the phone.

“He has announced his decision on Dutch television,” he added.

Jami, a former Muslim of Iranian origin, told the Netwrek TV show he has decided not to release his cartoon film, The Life of Muhammad, as expected on April 20.

The film would have reportedly shows a sexually aroused prophet.

A clip from the film aired on a Dutch television channel last week showed a man said to be the prophet in the company of a 9-year-old wife on their way to a mosque to allegedly deflower his bride.

Jami said Justice Minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin has talked to him about repercussions of the film release on social harmony and coexistence in the Netherlands as well as it national interests.

“The minister told Mr Jami he will be responsible for what happens,” said Tunja.

The European country is already embroiled in a controversy regarding a documentary by far-right lawmaker Geert Wilders portraying the Qur’an as inciting violence.

Pleased Muslims

Muslims thanks Minister Ballin for his intervention.

The leaders of the Muslim minority, estimated at nearly one million, welcomed the new development.

“I’m pleased that Mr Jami has decided to listen to the minister’s advise. It is a wise decision,” said Tunja.

* “Shut up or else…we cannot guarantee your safety….”

So the government of the Netherlands, the leadership of a sovereign European state, has declared that people who perpetrate violence are not responsible for their behavior. Has it really come to this?

Notice has now been given: cartoonists are to be held responsible for the destructive and murderous behavior of religious zealots.

Total dhimmitude has now arrived in Holland:

He was particularly thankful for the government for its swift intervention in the issue.

“We were planning a meeting with the justice minister to make it clear that Mr Jami’s film was totally unacceptable and would trigger violence across the world,” the Muslim activists told IOL.

“We are very pleased that the minister acted fast even before our meeting.”

Tunja noted that the government could not have done the same with MP Wilders.

“These are two different cases,” he said.

“Nobody saw or knew the content of Mr Wilders documentary in advance and that’s why the government could do nothing,” explained the Muslim activist.

“But segments of Mr Jami’s cartoon were shown on TV and that’s why the government was able to complaint that its content was unacceptable,” he added.

“This is how freedom of expression works in the Netherlands.”

The government has reportedly distanced itself from Wilders and tried unsuccessfully to convince him not to broadcast the film.

The 15-minute documentary, entitled “Fitna,” an Arabic word for sedition or strife, intersperses images of terror attacks with verses from the Qur’an.

It has being dawning condemnations from across the world since its release on Thursday.

Rallies have been staged in several Muslim capitals to protest the insult to the Muslims’ holy book.

A leading Malaysian Muslim supermarket chain has called for a boycott of Dutch products in protest.

Dutch businesses have already threatened to sue Wilders if his film led to an economic boycott of their products.

* Thanks to Baron Bodissey

*

By Henryk M. Broder

* After a revolting interview yesterday, the once respectable SPIEGEL allows Henryk Broder to present his views, obviously because we need some’ balance’:

Dutch politician Geert Wilders may be many things, but he is not the right-wing populist he is accused of being. What the debate over his film “Fitna” reveals most clearly is the West’s cowardice toward Islam.

So, it comes as no surprise that TV presenter Tom Buhrow opened the Friday late-evening news on the German TV channel ARD with a report on the “anti-Islamic video of the right-wing populist” Geert Wilders — as though there were a central authority in the otherwise censor-free Federal Republic of Germany that is responsible for prescribing the vocabulary of Euro-Islamic affairs. It was followed by a report on the relaxed response of Dutch Muslims, who were shown sitting in their cafes peacefully drinking coffee while Wilders raised havoc outside.

According to this interpretation of events, Wilders has only himself to blame for the fact that he has to be under 24-hour police protection and sleep in a different location every night. If he’d taken on, say, the Federation of Dutch Floriculturists, his private life would be fully intact.

* A snickering Muslimah residing in Germany complains that Fitna didn’t ‘shock’ her…

The hostility does not lie in the eye of the beholder, but rather in the nature of the film’s subject. Part of the ritualistic response of Muslim communities to the observation that Islam is not always a peaceful religion is invariably the threat of violence, should the “insult” not be retracted — regardless of whether it was made by the pope, a politician or a poet.

And Wilders is guilty of breaking with yet another aspect of the prevailing consensus. He opted to act, not just react. Since announcing his film three months ago, he has been defining the course of the debate, driving his opponent away from him. Nobody would have been surprised if Wilders had ended his game by confessing that the film itself did not actually exist.

What he wanted to accomplish had already been accomplished (more…) with the threat to show an “anti-Islamic video.” He showed the “free West” to be a paper tiger. The Dutch government distanced itself from the project and asked its ambassadors in Muslim countries to explain to their host governments the situation in their home country, where the government is not as omnipotent as it would like to be.

The EU, wanting to please all sides, issued a statement that emphasized the importance of freedom of speech while at the same time relativizing it: “We believe that acts such as (Geert Wilders’) film serve no other purpose than inflaming hatred.”

Even UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon chimed in to condemn the Wilders film “in the strongest terms.” He said that nothing can justify hate speech or incitement to violence. “The right of free expression is not at stake here. … Freedom must always be accompanied by social responsibility.”

*  UNESCO condemns Fitna 

This is the kind of tone that one waits for in vain when Islamists call for jihad, fanatics massacre non-believers or Holocaust deniers organize conferences. The only objective of these exercises is to prevent a repetition of what happened in 2006, when a dozen harmless Muhammad caricatures caused a blaze of indignation from Jakarta to Rabat. At the time, many politicians, including the prominent German Green Party politician Claudia Roth, called for “de-escalation.”

The call was not aimed at the arsonists who were burning Danish flags and destroying embassies, but at the Europeans, who were watching the jihadists in bafflement, in a bid to not pour more oil on the flames.

A similar thing happened recently in Sudan, when a British woman innocently named a teddy bear Muhammad. Or when Salman Rushdie was knighted by the British queen. Muslims were outraged and Europeans sought cover until the storm had blown over.

And now the “right-wing populist” Wilders is being sacrificed on the altar of appeasement policy. He is no cineaste, and his film is certainly no masterpiece. It is, however, a brute challenge to us to at least recognize reality.

* C’mon, Broder, get real: Wilders doesn’t have to be a cineaste and it he didn’t set out to make a ‘masterpiece’, the film is a mirror in the face of ugly Islam, and the ummah don’t like it.

*

Indonesian government bans Fitna

But what have they done to counter the use of the Qur’an to justify violence? Exactly zero.

“Moderate” Indonesia: Government bans anti-Koran film,” from AKI via JW

Jakarta, 1 April (AKI) – Indonesia has banned the controversial anti-Koran film by the Dutch right-wing MP, Geert Wilders.
The Indonesian president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono called for calm in the mainly Muslim nation on Tuesday and said that Wilders would also be barred from entering the country.

* Damn! Where’s he gonna go now?

*

Dole bludgers today, our masters tomorrow?

* Just to clear up ‘misconceptions’, you see: send her your ‘common stereotypes’, she will will ‘CHANGE’ and ‘break down’ those stereotypes about the ‘Arab world’ (is there any other?) and set you straight!

Have a laugh:

http://youtube.com/QueenRania

Tiny minority of extremists world map

* We plan to keep this as a permanent feature to be updated regularly, starting with ‘moderate’

Indonesia

Muslims attack churches in Indonesia

* You are welcome to do your own research and sent in your links….

Algeria

Algeria Orders Closure of 19 Protestant Congregations

Police in Muslim country detain Christians for carrying Bibles.

*

Moshe Feiglin was in New York on September 11, 2001. In a flash of brilliance he understood and wrote this profound essay. What ever you may think of Feiglin, informed or otherwise, read this essay. It contains an uncomfortable truth that the liberal West is unwilling to embrace. The West prefers to negotiate its surrender believing that the “alligator” won’t eat it.

He recommended destroying their symbols just as they destroyed ours.

Subsequent events have proved him right:

When the black boxes of the hijacked airplanes are recovered, we will hear the pilots screaming “Allah Akbar” in the last moments before the crash. They slaughtered you in the name of Allah and now the President calls on you to pray to him.

Read it all…

* Pali child abuse as entertainment for the whole family, while ‘Fitna’ enrages the Koranimals and the nutroots sing along

* Bush and the US government have paid, over the years, millions of dollars in aid to UNRWA for the ‘Palestinian’ Arab Muslims – and in return what do we see? – TV shows showing Arab kids stabbing the President.

Here is open bloodlust and Islamic supremacism, in a film produced by Muslims for Muslims — indeed, for Muslim children. Will the OIC denounce this film? Will Ban Ki-Moon and Louise Arbour?

If not, why not?

Why exactly is Fitna worse than this?

“Child Stabs President Bush to Death and Turns the White House into a Mosque in a Hamas TV Puppet Show,” from MEMRITV

*

* This is the revolting propaganda the spineless western leaders and media seem to miss very conveniently. What a shame that the very enemy bent on our destruction has their inside allies within our western nations. The media and the apologists and appeasers. This the billions of aid the west sends to them is being used for.

*

Fitna movie Trivia: Fun for the whole Family! 

* Will the Dutch turn into cannibals to please their Muhammadan overlords?

What Muslims really want:

The ambassadors of 26 Islamic countries want the Netherlands to investigate whether the film Fitna made by Dutch right-wing populist MP Geert Wilders can be banned. They asked Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen whether it is possible to start legal proceedings against the anti-Islam film. The meeting at the ministry in The Hague was attended by ambassadors of countries including Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

* “Right wing populist” – Wilders should sue these media turds for vilification….

Verhagen crawls: “Thank you, dear Muslims, for not hurting us..!”

Mr Verhagen told the 26 ambassadors he was pleased that responses from the Muslim world up to now had been moderate. He said the public prosecutor was investigating whether any offence had been committed, and the Dutch government clearly distanced itself from the film.

More from Radio Netherlands

*

The Depressing List of Cowards & Appeasers Willing to Sacrifice Freedom of Speech gets longer every day

My Right To Offend You

*

Saving Wafa Sultan

There is a fatwa (death threat) on her head. Islam wants her dead.

Wafa Sultan in hiding 

(IsraelNN.com) Dr. Wafa Sultan has been forced to go into hiding with her family following a fatwa (religious edict) from an Islamic scholar, according to Omedia. Sultan faces the fatwa following a recent debate on Al-Jazeera in which she challenged Egyptian Islamist Talat Rheim over Dutch cartoons of Mohammed, who Muslims revere as a prophet. Sultan argued that Denmark had the right to print the cartoons.

Sultan joins a growing list of public critics of radical Islam facing death threats. Her supporters have asked the American public to join them in writing to the embassy of Qatar, the country which sponsors Al-Jazeera, as well as to United States President George Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, asking them to defend Sultan’s right to free speech and personal safety.

If you are concerned here is the link to Atlas Shrugs.

*

Revolting SPIEGEL interview:

* These media whores are becoming more despicable by the day. Wilders is a ‘Right wing populist who wanted to provoke an international scandal’ with his film. How do you deal with such Assholes without whacking them upside the head?

‘Moderate Islam Is a Contradiction’

SPIEGEL: Your tirades are a challenge to all moderate Muslims and those pushing for Islamic reform.

* Note: ‘your tirades’- not the hate preachers depicted in Fitna, the movie. Who is pushing for ‘Islamic reform?’ Where are the ‘moderate Muslims?’

Wilders: Moderate Islam? That’s a contradiction. It’s going to be a long time before we see a new Koran, an equivalent to the New Testament. Attacks don’t happen in the name of Buddhism or Christianity; nor do homosexuals get beaten up, as happens daily in Amsterdam.

SPIEGEL: You have turned down many offers of dialogue from Muslim groups. You’re mainly interested in winning votes.

Wilders: I represent half a million people who are concerned about Islam. I’m a party politician and I’m not ashamed of it.

Interview conducted by Gerald Traufetter (a brainwashed idiot for the world)

*

US: Christian Nutters seek ‘peace’ with Islam-terror:

“Do good to those who hate you,” Schirch advised. “It’s the smart thing to do,”

Frontpage Mag has more

*

* Live Leak grows set of balls and puts ‘Fitna’ back up

* Fitna movie site hacked by Islamic cyber terrorists

* Should we be impressed?

*

* Princeton prof Richard Falk, newly-appointed by the UN Human Rights Council, turns out to be ‘troofer’

Princeton prof Richard Falk, newly-appointed by the UN Human Rights Council as its “Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967,” is also a devoted supporter of the crackpot “9/11 Truth” movement, which denies that Al-Qaeda attacked the U.S. on September 11, 2001.

More here

*

The religion of fear: Islam without violence is like an egg-free omelette…

Hahahaha! Keep it coming, bro!

*

Fitna is an Embarrassment for the Dutch Cabinet

By Ayaan Hirsi Ali

The central thesis of Fitna is: the Koran commands Muslims to spread their faith throughout the entire world, by means of jihad and indoctrination. To show that some Muslims take these edicts literally, viewers are shown images of terror attacks in New York and Madrid. In the movie, you hear excerpts of sermons filled with hatred and Muslim crowds that cheer on the preachers.

In one scene, a girl of three is taught by rote that the Koran reveals that Jews are pigs and monkeys. At the end of the movie, suddenly one hears the sound of a page being ripped from a book followed by a message that this is a page from a telephone book, not the Qur’an, and that it is up to Muslims to deal with the intolerance in their Holy Book.

Fitna is polite, but Fitna is a severe embarrassment for the Dutch cabinet. First, because almost all of the publicity for the movie originated from the cabinet. If, last year, the Prime Minister had given a reaction along the lines of: “we cannot respond to a movie that has not yet been shown and until such a time a cabinet position will not be provided,” there would have been no worldwide, festering controversy.

Savages

A second reason for which the cabinet is suffering a severe loss of face is that it has shown that freedom of speech is not safe in its hands. By acting as if it was a worthwhile endeavor to investigate whether the movie should be banned (either before or after its release), the cabinet improperly reversed its constitutional position with regard to the Second Chamber of Parliament.

In the Netherlands, the cabinet governs, and Parliament controls the cabinet. In relation to Member of Parliament Wilders, however, the cabinet has improperly set itself up as the controller. The Dutch cabinet has actively sought to silence an elected Member of Parliament. That the Parliamentary opposition did not intervene against this appalling attempt at censorship, is more distressing than any possible movie about Islam could be. Fitna laid bare just what a distrustful image this Social-Christian cabinet has of Muslims. It considers Muslims as half-savage beasts, [a bit like Bokito, Holland’s most famous gorilla] who will jump over the fence of reason at the slightest provocation and who in a collective frenzy disrupt the public peace.

They can only be kept in check by not engaging them as mature reasonable adults, by not contradicting them, not presenting them with difficult questions about their religion, by talking positively about it; all the while creating myriad emergency response plans through full crisis scenarios, because a film happens to be made about their holy book. It is just as in the case of Bokito the gorilla, who was put behind high bars in a zoo but was feverishly petted. This attitude is called “respect”, towards Muslims. I wonder what Muslims think of being regarded in this way?

Read it all

*