Western liberals are convinced that all cultures are equal, all religions equally bad,  that we all share the same values and that we have to accommodate millions of third world welfare seekers, regardless of their mental baggage. For them, our society caused (and causes) all the misery in the world.
Obsessed with their own (im-)moral supremacy  progressives never cease to blame the West for anything from “colonialism” to “white privilege”, which only encourages more  Islamic grievance mongering. Islamic hate preachers, suicide bombers and headchoppers  in the mind of lefties are  brown or black people, and to call them out on it would be “racist”.  Being “racist”  in today’s politically correct multiculti society is worse than being a pedophile.
Lefties, who stand firm on the belief that third world savages can do no wrong, accuse our society of the most heinous crimes and keep asking “why do they hate us”, instead of  studying Koran, sira and hadith, which would enable them to make an informed judgement.
Robert Spencer recently said it well:
“They hate us because the book says to kill us and they think allah wrote the book…”

Interstingly, we now have a Muslim, a “Dr” Sadek Hamid, who turns hate on its head:
The way he sees it, we just gotta love Muslims, because the real problem is….. “growing extreme right-wing activism”
Sadek just can’t understand that people don’t love their cultural enrichers, who dabble as head choppers, hate preachers and suicide bombers:
UK Muslims: Why do they hate us?
The release of the British Prime Minister’s Task Force Report on Tackling Radicalisation and Extremism recently is another flawed response to serious social problems. The recommendations from the government’s latest policy thought experiment do little to offer fresh thinking on how to address the issues of radicalisation among members of the Muslim community and the growing extreme right-wing activism. It also perpetuates simplistic “Good Muslim, Bad Muslim” dichotomies.
The on-going Woolwich trial for the horrific murder of soldier Lee Rigby underlies the timing of the publication. Though it makes a reference to “tackling Islamophobia and neo-Nazism”, there are no specific proposals to counter terrorist acts against Muslims by fascist and white supremacist groups. Instead, the entire document pathologises a “Muslim problem”, by focusing on new measures directed at Muslims, madrasahs, mosques and more problematically, blames an undefined “distorted interpretation of Islam”.

Continuing in the spirit of the discredited “Prevent” policy, which helped to create a “suspect community” out of British Muslims, and wasted large amounts of public money, this curious amalgam of generalisations and unsupported claims, advocates a set of recommendations that make little sense. It defines extremism as “vocal or active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs”, which also includes any “calls for the death of members of our armed forces, whether in this country or overseas”. While most people would support these ideals, the gaps between rhetoric and reality often remain un-bridged, particularly for those on the receiving end of miscarriages of justice, curtailed civil liberties and violent intolerance towards societal diversity.
Continue reading Sadek wants to be loved by you