Category: Uncategorised

Sheikh who said husbands have a ‘right to sex with their wives’ NOW signs open letter from Muslims condemning viral video promoting domestic violence

Damage control. Religiously mandated lying to protect the religion (taqiyya). We Should not allow them to get away with it.

• Sheikh Shady Alsuleiman added his name to a statement condemning violence
• Australian National Imams Council president once said husbands ‘needed sex’
• In a speech last year, the sheikh said angels would curse wives who refused sex
• Australian Muslim Collaborative group he is part of slammed domestic violence
• The video they slammed demonstrated how to hit women with a ‘sivaak’ stick

By STEPHEN JOHNSON FOR DAILY MAIL AUSTRALIA

A controversial sheikh who condemned a video by an Islamist extremist group justifying domestic violence had himself argued husbands had a right to sex with their wives.

Sheikh Shady Alsuleiman, president of the Australian National Imams Council, is the first name on a list of 34 prominent Muslims who slammed a Hizb ut-Tahrir video featuring two women making the case for domestic violence.

However, last year he delivered a sermon at Lakemba, in Sydney’s southwest, arguing men reportedly had ‘authority’ over their wives.

He has since denied arguing men had a right to demand sex with their spouses.

Continue reading Damage Control

IOM: African migrants traded in Libya’s ‘slave markets’

People are held for ransom, forced labour or sexual exploitation after being sold for up to $500, UN agency says.

Libya is the main gateway for people attempting to reach Europe by sea [File: Ismail Zitouny/Reuters]

Hundreds of African refugees and migrants passing through Libya are being bought and sold in modern-day slave markets before being held for ransom or used as forced labour or for sexual exploitation, survivors have told the UN’s migration agency.

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) said on Tuesday that it had interviewed West African migrants who recounted being traded in garages and car parks in the southern city of Sabha, one of Libya’s main people-smuggling centres.

People are bought for between $200 and $500 and are held on average for two to three months, Othman Belbeisi, head of the IOM’s Libya mission, said in Geneva.

“Migrants are being sold in the market as a commodity,” he said. “Selling human beings is becoming a trend among smugglers as the smuggling networks in Libya are becoming stronger and stronger.”

The refugees and migrants – many from Nigeria, Senegal and The Gambia – are captured as they head north towards Libya’s Mediterranean coast, where some try to catch boats for Italy.

Continue reading Libya After Gaddafi: Muslims Sell Blacks For $200 At Open Slave Markets

DECEIVING YOU ABOUT THE KORAN

AUSTRALIA: Muslim Women Discuss Controversial Quran Passage Regarding Marital Discipline April 08

Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun

DON’T believe the Muslim apologists. The Koran really does instruct men to beat wives who don’t obey.

One of the defendants outside court

Tim Blair, The Daily Telegraph

Bassam Tibi: Euro-Islam Doesn’t Have a Chance

Thanks to the Gates of Vienna

The following essay by the Syrian-German Islamic reformer Bassam Tibi was originally published by Die Welt. Many thanks to Brunhilde for the translation:

Young men who bring a culture of violence with them

by Bassam Tibi

The events in Cologne were just a prelude: Many Arab migrants bring very misogynistic social values to Germany. That makes it almost impossible for them to be integrated. A guest commentary.

Is there any connection between the attacks on New Year’s Eve in Cologne and the situation in Syria? The answer is: Yes, there is a connection and the common denominator is violence against women.

Many of my German discussion partners do not seem to understand the violence that is directed against women in a oriental patriarchal culture. In the orient, a woman is not considered an entity, but an object of a man’s honour. The violation of a woman is not viewed only as a sexual act and crime against the woman herself, but more as an act of humiliation of the man to whom she belongs.

In this barbaric war in Syria, that completely erroneously is called a “civil war” (no citizens, but rather ethno-religious collectives, are fighting each other in it), the Shiite-Alawite soldiers of the Syrian army rape women of the Sunni opposition as a method of warfare.

With rape, these Alawites are seeking to dishonour the men of the Sunni opposition. The Sunni “rebels” for their part do the same with Alawite women. It is a war of all against all with women as pawns.

Cologne was not an isolated case

As a Syrian from Damascus, I am astonished at the ignorance and naïveté of the Chancellor and her defence minister, who believe that they can end the war with conferences in Geneva and Munich. But this war should be categorized as a “protracted conflict” that will be with us for many years. It is a type of war that I call “an irregular not state-run war.”

Among the war refugees, there are not only victims of violence but also many perpetrators, and even numerous Islamists. Added to that is the fact that these predominantly young men aged 14 to 20 bring with them the culture of violence, including against women, from the Near East to Germany. New Year’s Eve in Cologne is just a demonstration of that, and no isolated case as our politicians like to pretend in order to downplay the significance of the matter.

Continue reading Bassam Tibi: German politicians do not understand the dimension of the problems

Thanks to the Elder of Zyion

Jordan signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in 1976.

This covenant says

Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.

This covenant indicates pretty clearly that Jews have the right to practice their religion on the spot that is the undisputed holiest place in Judaism.

But Jordan has again engaged  in a rhetorical attack on Jews who peacefully visit their holiest site:

The Jordanian government on Thursday condemned the “storming of Jewish extremists” of the Temple Mount under the protection of Israeli police so they wouldn’t be lynched.
.
The Minister for Media Affairs, government spokesman Mohammad Momanim, said in a press release that Jordan “strongly condemns these provocative acts that offend the sanctity of the holy place and the feelings of Muslims all over the world and we call on the Israeli authorities to stop it immediately.”

So the “feelings of Muslims” are more important than Jews having the basic human right to visit their holiest spot – let alone pray there.

Momani urged the international community to pressure Israel to adhere to fictional obligations to keep Jews off the Mount.

He condemned and rejected the actions of “Jewish extremists” and said that their quiet strolls are a “mockery of the importance of continued calm and an abuse of international efforts to re-launch serious negotiations between the Israeli occupation and the Palestinians.”

Here you can see those terrible “Jewish extremists” doing their storming this week. Prepare to be shocked at how provocative they are.

At the same time, Muslims erected a banner celebrating the founder of Hamas Sheikh Yassin on the Temple Mount.

No one condemned that.

MUTILATING LITTLE GIRLS IN MICHIGAN’S LITTLE PALESTINE
A female genital mutilation horror in the Midwest.

Daniel Greenfield

Continue reading To stop FGM, we must take as much pride in our principles and values as monsters like Jumana do in her theirs

Hizb ut-Tahrir domestic violence video denounced by Muslim leaders

If caught, Islamo-spokesturds resort to the usual BS about “English understanding” and the old “out of context” gobbledygook:

“You’re taking a revelation from God and you’re trying to apply an English understanding of that particular verse as a standalone verse, which is not what any scholar would do.

“You’re talking about how it applies in the everyday life of a woman, so what you’re trying to do is take an isolated verse and quote it out of context of where it’s supposed to be embedded in a holistic understanding … of male and female relationships in the Koran.” …

Sharia Councils and Sexual Abuse in Britain

by Khadija Khan

• As bad as this is, there is an even darker side to the story: Under sharia law, the second husband is under no obligation to give his wife a quick divorce – allowing him to keep her as his virtual sex slave for as long as he wishes.
• If one asks how all of this jibes with British law, the answer is that it does not.
• The UK-based NGO, Muslim Women’s Network, penned an open letter — with 100 signatories — to the British government and Home Affairs Select Committee demanding that the Sharia Council be investigated to determine whether its practices adhere to British law. In response, the Sharia Council declared the letter to be “Islamophobic” and accused the Muslim Women’s Network of being an anti-Muslim organization.
• It is British law, not sharia, law that protects Muslim individuals and couples, as it does any other citizen. Contrary to what apologists for this travesty say, the plight of Muslim women should be treated as an issue of human rights.

“Sadly, you can say what you like around the kitchen table at home.”– Gillian Triggs, HR & SJW on half a million of taxpayer dollars.

LOOKING back, it’s almost quaint how united we all were following the slaughter of 3000 people in the US on September 11, 2001. In those simpler days, it was universally agreed that we might just have a problem with Islamic extremism.

The only holdouts were so-called 9/11 truthers, who simultaneously believed that then-president George W. Bush was a simpleton yet also capable of pulling off the greatest conspiracy in history. There are still some who insist Bush and his evil minions somehow loaded the World Trade Center towers with explosives and then set in train the events leading to 9/11.

Run a Google search on “controlled demolition” and prepare to enter a parallel universe of absolute madness. Among normals, however, the cause of 9/11 was clearly apparent: a bunch of crazed Osama bin Laden devotees took over four passenger jets and aimed them at targets throughout the US.

This was understood across the political spectrum. Leftist Christopher Hitchens, for example, had this to say a couple of months after 9/11: “I should perhaps confess that on September 11 last, once I had experienced all the usual mammalian gamut of emotions, from rage to nausea, I also discovered that another sensation was contending for mastery.

“On examination, and to my own surprise and pleasure, it turned out be exhilaration. Here was the most frightful enemy — theocratic barbarism — in plain view … Other and better people were gloomy at the prospect of confrontation. But I realised that if the battle went on until the last day of my life, I would never get bored in prosecuting it to the utmost.”

Hitchens continued the fight until his death 10 years later. But something strange has happened among many of his fellow leftists, and indeed throughout the community of civilised nations. Despite some 30,000 Islamic terrorist attacks since, at a rate of more than five per day, the world is now less inclined to face reality than it was 16 years ago.

The modern fashion is instead to turn away from reality and then applaud your own decency and virtue.

In Australia, one alleged media organisation will, these days, actually omit information about a murderous terrorist’s appearance if it hints at a fondness for Islam.

“I won’t go into reports about what the man identified by eyewitnesses as carrying a gun was wearing or what he looked like,” The Guardian’s Calla Wahlquist wrote in her coverage of Curtis Cheng’s shooting in 2015. She was referring to news that Cheng’s killer, Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar, had been wearing black robes.

Continue reading Tim Blair: Denial permeates public debate about who and what is driving global terror