Mass Islamic Immigration’s Effect on Primary Schools in Australia

You can’t import people in large numbers without also importing their culture:

Teachers at a primary school in Sydney, Australia have been threatened with beheading and other violence from young Islamic students, prompting one of them to quit her job.

What kind of vetting will stop this?

Students as young as those in Year 5, according to the Daily Telegraph, are making the violent threats and pressuring others to read the Koran at Punchbowl Public School in Sydney.

Year 5 students are 10–11 years old.

Documents given to the newspaper allege that three staff members have taken a leave of absence owing to stress, received counselling and been awarded compensation after bullying from Islamic students.

The teacher who quit after receiving death threats asked for it by refusing to let students hang a Syrian flag in the classroom. In another incident,

she was pushed into a corner by students who began marching around her chanting the Koran.

Students get bullied too by the pint-size Islamists. But this isn’t the kind of bullying liberals object to, or they wouldn’t be so gung-ho to import ever more of it from abroad.

syrian refugees
The supply is never-ending.

In other news:

Somali Enrichment:
Somali refugee found guilty over Brisbane machete attack
​A Somali refugee has been found guilty of attempting to kill his former partner with a machete during an attack in Brisbane’s south.
Muhumed Samow Ali and the woman had been separated for almost two months when he ran her off the road in September 2015.
He then chased her down a suburban Wacol street with the 40cm blade as she screamed for help.
“He hit me seven times and when he hit me the seventh time … that’s when I fell,” she told the Brisbane Supreme Court ….See More

Turks threaten “wars of religion” will soon begin in Europe

“Shame on the EU. Down with your European principles, values and justice…they started a clash between the cross and the crescent, there is no other explanation,”—Turkish despot Tayyip Erdogan

Erdogan accuses EU of anti-Islam ‘crusade’ over headscarf ruling
Erdogan accuses EU of anti-Islam ‘crusade’ over headscarf ruling
Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. © AFP
The Turkish president dictator has accused the EU of launching an anti-Islam “crusade” over a ruling that allows companies to ban staff from wearing headscarves. He added that the Netherlands has lost Turkey’s friendship amid a deepening crisis in ties.
.

Addressing a rally in the northwestern Turkish province of Sakarya on Thursday, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan expressed his discontent with a Tuesday ruling by the European Court of Justice, which states that Islamic headscarves can be banned by employers as part of a general policy barring all religious and political symbols. Continued below the fold….

“Rutte same as Wilders”

Erdogan accused the EU’s top court of starting a “crusade” against Islam after a ruling that allows European companies to ban employees from wearing religious or political symbols including the Islamic headscarf.

The European Union’s court, The European Court of Justice, my esteemed brothers, have started a crusade struggle against the (Muslim) crescent,” Recep Tayyip Erdogan said in a televised speech…..

Blackmail, extortion, threats, thuggery…….what other religions behave like this?  Make no mistake, this barbarous cult has plans to control the planet one way or the other.

.
Please support Q Society in the battle to stop the Islamisation of Australia.

Turkey Again Threatens to Flood Europe with Refugees Unless Turks Get Visa-Free Travel in Europe
Blackmail from a country that is no friend or ally of the U.S., Europe or the West in general. This amounts to an ultimatum: let in huge numbers of “refugees” who will enable jihad attacks and foster the Islamization of Europe, or allow Turks visa-free travel, which would enable jihad attacks and foster the Islamization of Europe. Erdogan’s agenda should be clear to everyone who is not an EU functionary.
EU court’s headscarf ruling ‘violation of human rights’ 
Context: Only Muslims are ‘human’, only Muslims matter, any resistance to hijabbery and Islamisation is a ‘violation of human rights’, know your place, infidel!
.
Turkish Justice Minister says ruling allowing employers to ban wearing of religious symbols ‘apocalypse of justice’
.
 Bekir Bozdag has called a European Union court’s ruling allowing employers to prevent workers from wearing religious symbols, including headscarves worn by certain Muslim women, a violation of human rights.
.

“Forcing people to choose between religious beliefs and their jobs doesn’t comply with either human rights or EU values nor with law and justice,” Bozdag tweeted Wednesday. (“Law & Justice” for Mohammedans means sharia.)

“Banning the headscarf as a ‘workplace rule’ is an indisputable violation of human rights, freedom of thought and faith as well as the right to work.”

Islamised State School in Sydney Got ‘Busted’ For Excluding Female Teachers

 Update:

Teacher quits after primary school students threaten to behead her…

 Is this the type of Australia we want our children and future generations of children to grow up in?

Sydney primary school teacher says year 5 students threatened to behead her, kill her family

Frightened teachers at a Sydney primary school have revealed students are showing signs of extreme radicalisation at a young age, saying they have been traumatised by threats of beheading and other violent behaviour.

Students as young as in Year 5 are making the threats and pressuring peers into reading the Koran at Punchbowl Public School in Sydney’s southwest, the Daily Telegraph has reported.

Documents given to the newspaper reportedly reveal that at least three staff members have taken stress leave, received counselling and been paid compensation after bullying from Islamic students.

AU.NEWS.YAHOO.COM
.
“Sydney School Principal Axed For “Excluding Female Teachers” From Key Events.

That was how the story broke, in the ‘Australian’ and the (Aussie) “Telegraph:”.

“The school principal and deputy of a school in Sydney’s south-west have been fired amid claims that they excluded female staff members from official events.

‘Punchbowl Boys’ High School principal Chris Griffiths and Deputy Principal Jourmana Dennaoiu were removed from their roles at the school following an investigation, ‘The Australian’ reports.

‘The NSW Education Department confirmed yesterday that the pair had been dumped from the Muslim-majority school.

‘The newspaper understands that the school’s treatment of its female staff was one of the main issues that led to the decision, reporting that a decision was made last year to exclude them from taking official roles in the Year 12 graduation ceremony and annual presentation day.

‘A raft of other issues (indeed! – CM) further contributed to the Department’s decision.

“As a result of a recent appraisal of Punchbowl Boys’ High School, there has been a change in the leadership of the school”, a spokesman for the Education Department said.  “A new principal and deputy principal will commence work at the school tomorrow.”

‘Education Minister Rob Stokes said a new principal has been appointed to the school, effective immediately”.

The “Telegraph” ran essentially the same story – 

“Punchbowl HIgh Principal Sacked For Excluding Female Staff From Events”.

‘The principal of a south-west Sydney boys’ school has been sacked for excluding female staff from official events.

Continue reading Islamised State School in Sydney Got ‘Busted’ For Excluding Female Teachers

Dutch Elections

Geert Wilders is “very optimistic” about his chances, while People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (conservatives, VVD) leader Mark Rutte has seen his poll ratings rise in recent days.

The Dutch election is expected to have a massive turn out with some areas reporting up to 100 percent. The election is seen as one of the most important in recent Dutch history as anti-mass migration candidate Geert Wilders hopes to build on the anti-globalist momentum of the Brexit and Trump campaigns.

  • Millions of Dutch voters are going to the polls today in divisive elections
  • The Dutch election is seen as a test of anti-immigrant and nationalist feeling
  • Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte is likely to win, but see his share of vote fall
  • Firebrand anti-Islam MP Geert Wilders is clinging on to second place 
  • Wilders: ‘This patriotic revolution, whether today or tomorrow, will stay’

Right-wing Dutch MP Geert Wilders has hailed his party’s General Election results despite exit polls saying that Holland’s liberal Prime Minister Mark Rutte will cling to power.

Rutte promises “continuity”- more Islamisation, more riots, more murders….

These dolts don’t feel threatened by Mohammedans, they turn on Geert Wilders:

‘This is a chance for a big democracy like The Netherlands to make a point… to stop this… domino effect of the wrong sort of populism.’

Geert Wilders prepares to cast his vote for the Dutch general election in The Hague, Netherlands. He has reason to be cautious after his Freedom Party (PVV) has flopped in past votes

Geert Wilders prepares to cast his vote for the Dutch general election in The Hague, Netherlands. He has reason to be cautious after his Freedom Party (PVV) has flopped in past votes

The VVD’s 31 probable seats, in the Dutch Parliament of 150, is a drop of 10 on the previous polling results, according to reports by Dutch media.

It is believed the party has benefited from Rutte’s stance during the government’s recent row with Turkey.

Queues began swelling early at the polls today and the research institute IPSOS said turnout was already ‘a lot’ higher than at the same point in 2012 when final participation was 74 per cent.

Amid the tussle between Prime Minister Mark Rutte and Wilders, many of the 12.9 million eligible voters had been wavering between the 28 parties running.

Wilders voted in a school in The Hague, mobbed by hundreds of reporters, as final polls suggested he was trailing the Liberal VVD party of the outgoing PM.

He said: ‘Whatever the outcome of the election today, the genie will not go back into the bottle. And this patriotic revolution, whether today or tomorrow, will stay.’

Wilders’ one-page election manifesto includes pledges to close borders to immigrants from Muslim nations, shuttering mosques and banning the Koran, as well as taking the Netherlands out of the European Union, in a so-called ‘Nexit’.

‘Netherlands does not belong to all. Do you hear me? The Netherlands belongs to the Dutch,’ Wilders said in Tuesday’s debate.

In the same debate, Rutte said: ‘When people look for leadership, they look to me.’

Would be very sad if that’s the case.

‘You’ve not seen the last of me’:

Right-wing Dutch MP Geert Wilders hails his party’s General Election results but exit polls say liberal PM will cling to power

Mark Rutte's VVD party currently has 31 seats according to the polls, while Wilders' Party for Freedom is joint second, alongside two other parties, with 19 seats

Mark Rutte’s VVD party currently has 31 seats according to the polls, while Wilders’ Party for Freedom is joint second, alongside two other parties, with 19 seats

While the Dutch Labour party has seen their vote completely collapse with a projected loss of 29 seats, other new left-wing parties have picked up some of this support.

One such party is the GroenLinks, or Green Left, who are now projected to jump from four to 16 seats tonight.

A part of the Greens–European Free Alliance at the European Union, the party is in favour of radical pro-mass-migration policies.

The party hit the headlines this morning after PVV leader Geert Wilders took to the airwaves to say people should vote for the party — if they wanted a Netherlands overrun by immigration. 

We? Who is “we”, imam?

London Imam on work headscarf ban: ‘We allow nudists on our streets, so why not headscarves?’

So sick of Paki da’wa gigolos dumping their fanatical trash in our countries, claiming “their rights”.

The ECJ has said headscarves can be banned by employers

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

A London Imam has told Julia Hartley-Brewer that banning headscarves at work is a great injustice for women – suggesting that we allow nudists on our streets, so religious headwear should get the same treatment.

The claim by Ajmal Masroor prompted incredulity from our presenter during a fierce debate, which followed the ruling by the European Courts of Justice that it is acceptable for employers to ban employees from wearing headscarves and other religious garments.

Masroor told Julia that “we should not have European courts dictating what we should and shouldn’t do,” adding that this is a “great injustice on a woman’s choice”.

Julia responded by saying the religious diktat demanding women cover their hair is based on a misconception – that if they don’t do so, men will be driven crazy by lust.

Julia also suggested that, if this debate is based on modesty, Masroor himself should cover his head. In response, Masroor claimed the “hair industry would indicate women spend far more money on hair than men do”.

Continue reading We? Who is “we”, imam?

Why Pauline Hanson hasn’t got what it takes

Hugh Fitzgerald: One Minute and 33 Seconds, Or Pauline Hanson Ill-Prepared

Pauline Hanson, the Australian politician and leader of the One Nation Party, two days ago called for a referendum to change her country’s Constitution, so that section 116 of that document, which prohibits banning a religion, might be scrapped, in order that Islam might then be prohibited.

For Hanson claimed, as she has so many times before, that Islam is a political ideology and not a religion. She singled out the Muslim group Hizb ut-Tahrir as a pro-Sharia law group that was of particular concern. This was, for Hanson, a lost opportunity to win over those who are made uneasy by Islam, but who are also disturbed by what they regard as Hanson’s either/or remarks about the faith. She might have said, more accurately and more convincingly, that “yes, of course Islam is a ‘religion’ insofar as it concerns itself with the belief in, and worship of, a superhuman power. I don’t deny that aspect of it. But, ladies and gentlemen, I’m afraid, that Islam is also, at the same time, and much more significantly, a ‘political ideology’ which has to do with extending the power and reach of the faith and its Believers, and with what the ideal Muslim state ought to look like.”

And she might then have added, in a more-in-sorrow tone, that “unfortunately, Islam as a ‘political ideology’ is far more important than Islam as a ‘religion,’ and we should not be shy about recognizing that. Both the Qur’an and the Hadith are concerned with the duty to defeat the Unbelievers, and the requirement that Muslims fight those Unbelievers, using whatever instruments – violence, either in regular combat (qitaal) or through terrorism, propaganda, wealth, or the weapon now mentioned by more and more Muslims, that of demographic conquest – are both available and effective, until the entire world is dominated by Islam, and Muslims rule, everywhere.”

Then she might have adduced Qur’anic passages, confidently citing, by sura and ayat, those that most strikingly support that claim of the duty of Muslims to engage in Jihad. She might have invited her listeners to read the Qur’an, as she did, especially (here should follow a very slow reading of a very short list of a half-dozen of the so-called Jihad verses, such as 3:151, 8:12, 2:191-193, 9:5, 9:29) and then another half-dozen verses denouncing the Unbelievers, such as 98:6, and recommended that they read, too, parts of the Hadith, ideally in the collection of Bukhari (Hanson could have taken care to explain how the different collections of Hadith are ranked by Muslims according to their assumed trustworthiness), to find out more about Muhammad, the Perfect Man and Model of Conduct.

And then she could have invited her listeners to simply look around the world, at just what has happened in those countries where Muslims have been allowed to settle in recent years in large numbers, and: “Ladies and gentlemen, please draw your own conclusions. What has the large-scale Muslim presence meant for the tranquility and physical security of Infidels everywhere? What has that large scale presence meant for the taxpayers who pay for their country’s welfare-state benefits? Am I wrong,” Pauline Hanson ought to ask aloud, “to worry”?

Last week, Ms. Hanson provided another example of an opportunity lost. She was walking through a shopping center in Cannington, a south-eastern suburb of Perth, greeting voters ahead of the Western Australian election. She was confronted by two hijabbed women and challenged as to her knowledge of Islam. Her encounter with them lasted for one minute and 33 seconds.

Continue reading Why Pauline Hanson hasn’t got what it takes

Dog-Feces Ice Cream, or “We can’t restore our civilization with somebody else’s babies”

Half a decade or so back, I wrote:

“It’s a good basic axiom that if you take a quart of ice-cream and a quart of dog feces and mix ’em together the result will taste more like the latter than the former. “– Mark Steyn*

“We can’t restore our civilization with somebody else’s babies.”–Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa)

The dogs of CAIR are unleashed:

Rep. Steve King Explains Controversial Tweet: Streets of Europe ‘Burning’ with Violent Unrest from Mass Migration

Rep. Steve King Explains Controversial Tweet: Streets of Europe ‘Burning’ with Violent Unrest from Mass Migration

Wilders Election Debate: Put Dutch First, Not ‘Brussels, Africa, and Asylum Seekers’

Wilders Election Debate: Put Dutch First, Not ‘Brussels, Africa, and Asylum Seekers’

Politico: European Elites Fear That Steve Bannon Could Destroy the EU

Politico: European Elites Fear That Steve Bannon Could Destroy the EUSSR

In other news:

TRUMP COMMANDS STATE DEPARTMENT TO SLASH UN FUNDING IN HALF

FAKE NEWS: CRONKITE AWARDS GO TO TAPPER, RAMOS, KATY TUR, CNN’S ‘RELIABLE SOURCES’

*(In fairness it must be said that the  Mark Steyn quote above refers to the OIC controlled UN, which pushes Mohammedanism on predominantly Judeo-Christian nations, so either way, the context is there.)

Continue reading Dog-Feces Ice Cream, or “We can’t restore our civilization with somebody else’s babies”

If wishes were horses, even beggars could ride

Update:

The Grand Mufti of the Stealth Jihad: Zuhdi Jasser Says “There’s No Greater Threat” Than Pamela Geller and Her Colleagues

Jasser and his ilk are not moderates. They are liars.

In one fell swoop, “moderate Muslim” Zuhdi Jasser has dropped a MOAB* on the most effective counter-jihadists in the West. The Grand Mufti of the Stealth Jihad has devoted an entire episode of his show on The Blaze Network, “Reform This!” to smearing me and many of my colleagues, including Robert Spencer, Andrew Bostom, Clare Lopez, John Guandolo, and others, as “alt-jihadists.” He even says “there are no greater jihadists than the alt-jihadists when it comes to living in the land of freedom. Because they seem to be wanting to kill us and knock us off at the knees.”

That’s right: “No greater jihadists” than me and my colleagues.

“Alt” means Nazi. He knows exactly what he is doing. (Pamela Geller has more)

*MOAB stands for “mother of all bombs”.

Zuhdi Jasser’s Predicament — And Ours

By Andrew Bostom and Alyssa A. Lappen

Dr. Zuhdi Jasser is a decent man conflicted by what he wishes to be mainstream Islamic reality, as manifested in doctrine and practice since the creed’s 7th century foundation, through the present. 

 

Dr. Jasser gave a one hour interview with Pamela Geller that aired on 5/22/2007, which must be heard in its entirety to understand his Weltanschauung, as well as his predicament — and ours.

 

Although Dr. Jasser made some noble comments, and expressed views certainly worth championing, there were unsettling aspects of some of his statements and arguments. Dr. Jasser’s apologetics regarding Islamic Jew-hatred and misogyny were counterfactual. Such comments are delusive at best, perhaps out of Dr. Jasser’s apparent genuine embarrassment regarding the tenets of  mainstream Islam as practiced since its advent.

 

From minutes 20:00 through 27:30, Jasser’s  discussion of Islamic Jew hatred is punctuated by ahistorical and doctrinally false apologetics (including “Golden Age” mythology; ridiculous claims about “bad Koranic translations”…etc.), possible taqiyya about what “allowing” a Muslim man to marry a Jewish woman actually means — it is not “ecumenical,” i.e., Jasser fails to acknowledge that a Jewish woman married to a Muslim man must allow the children to be raised as Muslims. Jasser then asserts that I share a “Wahhabist/Al Qaeda interpretation” of Koranic Jew hatred at 26:30-26:50. Specifically, Jasser objects stridently to what he claims are,

Continue reading If wishes were horses, even beggars could ride

How the Turkey question could swing the Dutch vote

The Dutch public go to the polls tomorrow, and the question of Turkey is on the menu. This past weekend the Dutch government forbade a plane containing the Turkish Foreign minister from landing in the country.  The Turkish minister had been due to address a crowd in Rotterdam.  Another Turkish minister – the hijabi Fatma Betul Sayan Kaya, due to attend a similar rally – was prevented from entering the Turkish consulate in Rotterdam.  All of which led the Turkish government to dismiss the Dutch people (and then the Germans as well) as ‘Nazis’. Last night, Turkey then banned the Dutch ambassador from returning to Ankara. Of course none of this frenetic Turkish political activity is about the Dutch election, but rather about the upcoming ‘vote’ in Turkey over whether to allow President (former Prime Minister) Erdogan the full powers of a Caliph.

Continue reading How the Turkey question could swing the Dutch vote

Al Jazeera offers a more balanced view about Wilders than our fake news networks

Who votes for Geert Wilders?

And has the far-right politician managed to steer the country in his own nationalist direction without being in power?

A ban on migration from Muslim countries, closing all Dutch mosques and a ban on the Quran are just some of the controversial commitments that Geert Wilders has made [Obin van Lonkhuijsen/EPA]

by 

Correction: March 13, 2017: An earlier version of this article stated that Wilders is predicted to win a quarter of the seats in parliament. Polls now show it’s closer to almost one-fifth. This story has been updated to reflect this.
.

As the Dutch parliamentary election edges closer, traditional parties fear a victory by Geert Wilders and his far-right Party for Freedom (PVV). But attempts by these parties to win back voters only seem to have strengthened Wilders’ nationalism.

There are only a few days left until the Dutch cast their votes. Many are still in doubt, but a steady group of angry voters have already made up their minds. They will vote for Geert Wilders and his PVV. Of the 150 seats that the parliament offers, Wilders is predicted to win almost a fifth of them, a huge gain in a parliamentary system that is built for 12 to 15 parties.

A ban on migration from Muslim countries, closing all Dutch mosques and a ban on the Quran are just some of the controversial commitments that the far-right politician has made in his one-page manifesto for the upcoming Dutch elections.

“Those foreigners think that we have always been this rich,” says Janine, a retired cleaning lady who says she will vote for Wilders next week. “But many here were penniless. Can you imagine how frustrating it is to see that newcomers get everything?”

Continue reading Al Jazeera offers a more balanced view about Wilders than our fake news networks