As can be expected, our detractors are hard at work discrediting the people of Australia for appreciating and celebrating our great great nation,  besmirching and vilifying  our ancestors, who fought and died to make Australia what it is today. Here’s Wally, the Mohammedan agitprop,  with fellow degenerate Scott Stevens, taking a huge dump on everything we hold dear:

Is ‘Australia’ morally justifiable?

IMAGE: HOW INCLUSIVE IS ‘AUSTRALIA’? (SARA WINTER/GETTY IMAGES)LINK TO LARGER IMAGE.

Among the global menagerie of patriotic celebrations, Australia Day is one of the most debauched and disturbingly unreflective. What is it about Australia Day that makes it a lightning rod for banality, viscerality and the most inane forms of nationalistic sentiment?

Could it be that the sort of sentiment this day attracts is symptomatic of a malaise at the very heart of the nation – a malaise that stems from the refusal fully to acknowledge the ethical primacy of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples within the nation’s life?

The moral promise of so-called ‘immigrant nations’ – like the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand – is to sever the connection between ethnicity and full citizenship. And yet that promise is itself predicated on the story of an original severing of the connection between First Peoples and their land, an original act of dispossession.

In order to be morally justifiable, in order to create a place for the First Peoples of this land, in order to be an idea worth celebrating, ‘Australia’ cannot simply designate a success story. Rather, it must come to name the original sin of this nation and the collective guilt of those who continue to profit from that founding act of dispossession.

Political Correctness is cowardice dressed up in a coat and tie. –Pat Condell

“This is for all you third world criminals who are flooding into Europe illegally by pretending to be refugees. It’s just to let you know that everybody knows you are mostly able bodied fighting age men, thousands of whom are pretending to be children because you don’t have a shred of honour, dignity, or shame between you.

We know that you are not, in fact, refugees at all, but illegal invaders, opportunists and predators, and that your disgusting behaviour is making things much worse for genuine refugees, who are not nearly as welcome here any more, thanks to you.

We also know that the American people dodged a bullet recently when they had the good sense to elect a president who will keep you, and barbarians like you, out of their country.

However, having said all that, you won’t get any trouble from us here in Europe. You see, we’re multicultural. We’re afraid to breathe too hard in case it makes us racist. So you can come here and crap all over our values and laugh at us, and we won’t say a word. We’re so self-consciously, decadently progressive that we’ve chosen to pretend that all cultures are equal, even backward, uncivilised ones like yours that don’t even deserve to share the same planet. We’re ashamed of our culture because it’s so embarrassingly superior, and we think it needs taking down a peg or two, for the sake of equality. And we’re hoping that you primitive throwbacks will help us to do that by bringing with you the ugliest aspects of your ugly culture, to drag us all down to your level. Well, it’s not as if we haven’t been there before. About a thousand years ago.

Continue reading A Word To The Criminal Muslim Migrant

Another BS poll from Austria meant to embellish the Mohammedan conquest. Much of it is based on pure ignorance and “positive thinking” rather than an informed, skeptical opinion.

Poll: 40 Per Cent of Migrants Think Citizens of Host Country Have Too Much Freedom

by CHRIS TOMLINSON

BY ANDREW G. BOSTOM

Imam at Trump’s Prayer Service Condemned Jews and Christians. Time to remove Koran 1:7 from gov’t “interfaith” events, if not ban “interfaith”da’awa  altogether.

Source:

Prof mandates students visit mosque on Good Friday – Pamela Geller

At Texas Christian University in Fort Worth, professor Yushau Sodiq is currently teaching a required course in the Department of Religion, entitled “Understanding Diverse Faith Communities.”
 He has mandated a field trip to a mosque on Good Friday, a day that is granted off to students to allow them to observe the Christian religious holiday (which is especially important to observant students at a private university). Attending the trip – and therefore not worshiping Christ on Good Friday – is worth 10 percent of the entire course, or a whole letter grade. Academia is in bad shape everywhere, but this flagrant act of Islamic supremacist bullying is in a class by itself.

Yushau Sodiq’s faculty page on the TCU website says that he “earned his B.A. degree in Islamic Studies in 1976 and his M.A degree in Islamic law in 1979 from the University of Medina, Saudi Arabia.” After earning his Ph.D. in Islamic Studies from Temple University in Philadelphia, he “taught Islamic courses at the University of Sokoto, Nigeria from 1080 [sic]-1983.”

Medina, Saudi Arabia, and Sokoto, Nigeria: two hotbeds of jihad terror recruitment and activity. Non-Muslims aren’t even allowed to enter the Prophet’s Mosque and other areas of central Medina. Did professor Sodiq pick up his Islamic supremacism and contempt for infidel religious observances there?

Related:

‘Wow, there’s obviously so many Muslims.’ So, it’s super comforting.”

Benedictine, a Catholic institution in a suburban county that is 78 percent white and 86 percent Catholic or Protestant, may have the highest percentage of Muslim students of any Catholic university in the nation. 

Continue reading Texas: Christian Uni Prof Makes Students Visit Mosque on Good Friday

Just before the election, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte tries to sound just like Wilders to rally the troops:

‘Integrate or Leave’: As Wilders Surges in Polls Dutch PM Ramps Up Migrant Rhetoric

By M. Catharine Evans

Linda Sarsour, the radical Muslim activist who helped organize the national Woman’s March this past Saturday, is a “nasty” interloper hoping to spread the oppression of sharia law to American women.  In her speech, she told the crowd that Muslims have been victimized and are suffering under American government oppression.

How mind-bendingly ludicrous.  Logically, Sarsour should be there to criticize Islam, which treats girls and women as non-human slaves with absolutely no rights.  Instead, her speech was anti-American, anti-Trump, and anti-Israel, which, I suspect, was the whole agenda behind the well organized, well funded marches across the country.

Sarsour, the executive director of the Arab American Association of New York (AAANY), set up shop selling the myth of Islamophobia soon after 9/11.  She is a hijab-wearing pro-Hamas Islamic supremacist with an in-your-face attitude.  In 2004, she admitted in a Columbia University publication that her brother-in-law was serving a 12-year sentence in Israel after being accused of Hamas-related activities.  Sarsour also stated that she herself had been questioned by authorities in the U.S. and that her Palestinian husband, who had been here for seven years, faced deportation hearings.  No wonder she was honored by the Obama White House as a “champion of change.”

In a 2008 interview with Tyra Banks about people’s reaction to traditional Muslim clothing, Sarsour responded:

I’m so sick and tired of the ignorance in this country, the fear[.] … If you’re afraid some Muslim guy’s going to bomb the plane, take the damn bus. (video)

Like her infidel sisters at the D.C. March, Sarsour likes using the F-word.  In her 2011 YouTube performance of the “Hijabi Monologues,” Sarsour takes a page out of Al Sharpton’s playbook.  She claims she suffered all kinds of anti-Muslim abuse growing up in Brooklyn.  It makes her “angry and tired” when people ask her where she’s from.

Do you not see me? … I’m tired … My name is Linda[.] … F— you, what the f— is your problem, a——, where the f— are you from?

At 17, Sarsour wed in an arranged marriage, but this kind of anti-feminist Muslim patriarchal oppression of women hearkening back to the 7th century doesn’t seem to present any problem for the marchers.  Men marrying little girls, genital mutilation, stoning, and denial of human rights are simply “cultural differences.”  For the dimwitted Madonnas and Judds out there, Sarsour represents diversity, not subversive assimilation into a feminist movement for the express purpose of enslaving them under sharia as well.

Sarsour’s ties to far-left groups and individuals, in addition to terrorist organizations, helps her attract all sorts of radicals to her cause.  She hangs out with communist Harry Belafonte, referring to him as Mr. B; Black Lives Matter activists; Mustafa Abdullah, an organizer with the St. Louis chapter of the ACLU; and others.  Sarsour’s connections enabled her to be effective in helping to halt the NYPD’s surveillance of mosques.  Her latest act: getting hundreds of thousands of stupid American females to show up with vagina hats to protest a new president who promises to crack down on Islamic radicals like herself.  At the same time, she was working the crowd, tying repressive hijabs on their heads.

It was quite a victory for the America-hating Sarsour.

Continue reading Terrorist-tied co-chairman of Women’s March relies on the stupidity of liberal American females to push sharia

Hugh Fitzgerald: Professor Kishwar Rizvi and “Misinformation About Islam”

“There has been much misinformation about Islam. Reports in Western media tend to perpetuate stereotypes that Islam is a violent religion and Muslim women are oppressed.” — Professor Kishwar Rizvi, in Salon

Apparently for Ms. Rizvi, a professor at Yale of Islamic Art and Architecture, it is “misinformation” about Islam that leads to the “stereotypes” (that is, views) that Islam “is a violent religion” and that ‘Muslim women are oppressed.” And if it’s a “stereotype,” it must, in Rizvi’s view, be false. It’s not quite as simple as that. Just because something has become a “stereotype” doesn’t mean that it should be dismissed rather than discussed; stereotypes are not plucked at random from the air, but can reflect, to a greater or lesser degree, an observable truth. The question is: how much evidence exists to support these particular “stereotypes”?

Is there any reason to think that Islam is a “violent religion”? Where shall we start? What about with the 109 Jihad verses that call for war against the Unbelievers for the sake of establishing Muslim rule? Here’s just a tiny sample, to refresh Professor Rizvi’s memory:

Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [sedition or unrest, connected to disbelief] is worse than killing… but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [unrest, and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.

Quran (2:216) – “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.”

Quran (3:151) – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”.

Quran (4:76) – “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…”

Continue reading Meet Kishwar Rizvi, prof of ‘misconceptions & stereotyping of Islam dispelling’