"Support Freedom of Religion"

Imam Rauf’s replacement mufti, the all new Ground Zero mosque imam Adhami, just came out with some very moderate statements that can only be misunderstood by the excremental eneMedia and shamelss Islam promoters like New Yok’s mayor Bloombugger:

Adhani: ‘Apostates against Islam must be jailed’

Atlas Shrugs

Now that the media has whitewashed and sanctioned the extremist jihadi rhetoric of Rauf and Daisy (it’s not extremism, it’s Islam, baby) the Khan, anything goes.

The new and more radical Ground Zero mosque imam Adhami, a disciple of the WTC unindicted co-conspirator Siraj Wahhaj, is now stumping for Islamic law on apostasy. Now one might say that Imam Adhami is a moderate, because he is only calling for jail for those who convert out of Islam, when death is ultimately the penalty demanded by the sharia (Islamic law). (Pamela has more)

Interesting, is it not, that for them ‘freedom of religion’ takes on a completely different meaning:

For them, freedom of religion means the freedom to kill unbelievers, apostates, adulterous wives, homosexuals and even their own children ‘if they fear rebellion’.

For them, freedom of religion means the freedom to strike terror in the hearts of the unbelievers, to kill in order to spread the religion, the right to child-marriage, polygamy, female genital mutilation and the freedom to lie and deceive the unbelievers.

Freedom of religion means a whole lot of different things to them, like sedition, subversion, infiltration, to bring our miserable house down and to replace our law with the perverse despotism of Muhammad, profit of Islam.

Freedom of religion also includes the (public) stoning of women, head-chopping, cutting off arms and legs on opposite ends etc etc.

Their freedom of religion means enslaving us all, terrorizing us in the name of Allah, abandonment of reason and all power to the Mullah’s.

All of the above amounts to high treason against humanity and to any civilized  society.

In light of the above,  one of my favorite Churchill quotes comes to mind:

“It is the primary right of men to die and kill for the land they live in,  and to punish with exceptional severity all members of their own race who have warmed their hands at the invader’s hearth.” (Winston Churchill)

Who would be more deserving to hang next to those who are determined to destroy us with our own laws?

Burqa

Ban the burqa?

What would our world look like if Muslims were given complete freedom to practice their religion?

Zopag

Muslim clerics in Lucknow expressed their displeasure at the French President Nicolas Sarkozy for terming the burqa as an index of subjugating women, and said Muslims must be given complete freedom to practice their religion.

“It’s an attack on freedom of humanity”

(note once again, please, that Muslims only consider Muslims as human. Unbelievers are  “things najis”, filth, vermin, sons of apes and pigs and “killing unbelievers is a small matter to us…”)

If Muslims are living in their country, then the Muslims must be given complete freedom to practice their religion; else declare it a Christian theocratic country so that all the Muslims would leave,” said Maulana Kalbe Jawad Naqvi, a senior Shia Muslim cleric.

(Gee, what a simple solution! Why didn’t anyone think of this before?)

Andrew Bolt:

I think the initial argument given by Liberal Senator Cory Bernardi is a bit silly, but his concern over the role of the burqa here is one that some of the Left now share, too:

Burqa Diversity

Ban the Burqa

Gunman disguised in burka and sunglasses robs cash courier

The burqa is no longer simply the symbol of female repression and Islamic culture, it is now emerging as the preferred disguise of bandits and n’er do wells.

In Sydney this morning a man was robbed by a burqa wearing bandit who further disguised his (or her) identity by wearing sunglasses. The bandit was described by police as being of “Middle Eastern appearance”.

It also establishes a different set of rules and societal expectations in our hitherto homogenous society.

That’s not all:

Delhi: Woman in burqa causes security alert on plane

Continue reading Burqa

Al-Qaradawi to BBC: "Freedom Is Produced by the Application of the Shari'ah"

Thanks  but no thanks, Yusuf!  We don’t want any of it. Because what you call freedom is what we call slavery….

Thanks to Translating Jihad

Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Muslim Tolerance

Qaradawi gives a fair account of what lsam has in store for us:

This is from a BBC interview with Shaykh al-Qaradawi, which was published on BBC Arabic on 6 Feb, entitled “Al-Qaradawi to BBC: Freedom Is Produced by the Application of the Shari’ah.” I saw bits and pieces of this translated to English on other news sites, but I never found the entire article, so here you go. I found the last two paragraphs to be the most interesting, where on one hand he compares the lack of freedom of religion in the Hijaz to the fact that the Vatican doesn’t allow proselyting in its territory, but then on the other hand he goes on to say that there should be no proselyting of other faiths at all among Muslims. So why even waste the time with the Vatican comparison, if there’s no freedom of religion in Islam at all?
Continue reading Al-Qaradawi to BBC: "Freedom Is Produced by the Application of the Shari'ah"