Those Big Fat Warsi Lies

Muslims Are Incapable of Wrong-Doing Because Islam is Perfect

Source: The Guardian via Islam vs Europe

The Guardian’s recent interview with “Baroness” Warsi was very revealing of the Muslim mindset. In a speech she gave in January she objected to the term “moderate Muslim”.

And we should be careful about language around religious “moderates”.

..we need to stop talking about moderate Muslims, and instead talk about British Muslims.

And when it comes to extremism, we should be absolutely clear:

These people are extremists, plain and simple, because their behaviour has detached them from the thought process within their religion.

Source

What she’s saying essentially is that “extremists” aren’t Muslims. She reiterates this view in the extract from the interview above. As soon as a Muslim does a bad thing, he ceases to be a Muslim and becomes, in Warsi’s view, merely a generic “extremist”.

Cheradenine Zakalwe has a lot more: Muslims Are Incapable.

Marina Mahathir lies just as much:

liar and high-profile Malaysian apologist for Islam

Marina Mahathir is a Malaysian social activist and writer. And you may recognize her last name: she is also the oldest daughter of a certain Malaysian former prime minister, the man who is in many ways responsible for the ongoing Islamization of Malaysia, Doctor Mahathir bin Mohamad. In case you forgot, he is infamous for his virulent brand of antisemitism and his remark as Malaysia’s prime minister during a 2003 Organization of the Islamic Conference meeting: that Jews “…run the world by proxy.” Marina has largely inherited his particular political outlook; she is always ready to utter any amount of cognitive dissonance in the service of Islam. From “Irrational Fears Abound”, by Marina Mahathir, The Star, 9 November 2011:

Back to Warsi:

Wakademic F*kcwits John Esposito & Koran Armstrong tell us once again we got it all wrong about Islam…

John Esposito: In praise of Obama and dhimmitude

* To call Esposito a wakademic whore would be an understatement. Read Hugh Fitzgerald’s Tribute to John Esposito, here…

esposito.jpg
Profundity of thought?

The overarching theme of this wonderful piece of literary dhimmitude is the great need for Americans to “respect” Islam and exhibit “humility” towards Muslims. The logic is that these two approaches will ameliorate “radicalism” in the Muslim world. That the reverse appears to be true; that those two traits in and of themselves — “respect” and “humility” — often exacerbate radicalism and are seen as signs of weakness, is of no interest to the professor.

“Obama reaches out: rebuilding relations with the Muslim world,” by John L. Esposito forToday’s Zaman, but Jihad Watch has great comments…

                                                               *********

Koran Armstrong is an ex-nun who struck pay-dirt when she fell where the money lies: the Arabs have a liking use for such people.

                        

        Make sure you have a vomit bag handy for this drivel:

The Iranian Revolution was “the ultimate passion play”

To understand modern Iran we must unpick our prejudices and decipher the symbolism of its rich Shia history

Trainwreck Koran Armstrong peddles BS about 'Golden Rule', fails to mention that there's no such thing in Islam…

Thundra Tabloids:

Islam Apologist Karen Armstrong Preaches About ‘The Golden Rule’, Fails to Mention That Islam  Islam Doesn’t Practice it…

* Apologies: I was working on two different computers tonight. On one the post came up and on the other most of it was missing. Mysterious….

I just got done watching the entire mind numbing speechon ‘religious harmony’, by pseudo scholar, Karen Armstrong, which was filled with nothing but platitudes, parables and propaganda, and very, very low on substance and intellectual honesty. I take that back, there was absolutely nothing of value in the speech itself, but only if one uses it as a teaching aid to highlight academic buffoonery on a grandiose scale.