The Mohammedan Tsunami

Fox guarding chicken coop:

Screen-Shot-2014-04-02-at-4.15.45-PMTariq Ramadan, grandson of Hasan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, invited to sit on an “Advisory Group” on the Orwellian-named “Freedom of Religion,” –– Pamela Geller

Andrew Gilligan: many journalists and officials are afraid of being branded racist for criticising Lutfur Rahman.

 Lutfur Rahman’s ruling cabinet is 100 per cent Bangladeshi and Muslim, while 45.2 per cent of the population is (still) white. Finally,  following the BBC’s Panorama on Rahman this week, it looks as if the dam is breaking. A Government investigation is now looking extremely likely.  (source)

Hook-o-phobia in New York

New York cops fear hate preacher Abu Hamza’s trial could spark more terror
abu-hamza… One-eyed Hamza, who was extradited to the US from Britain in 2012, will appear in court next week in New York, and the city’s authorities fear another al-Qaida attack to coincide with the trial. ..Daily Star, thanks to Mullah pbuh

Douglas Murray smells the coffee: OUR NEW SHARIA LAW

The strangest thing of all about this is not the slow erosion of the principle of one law for all. It is not even the offering up of an increasing number of parts of British life to an extremist ideology. It is the ease with which it is all done. “This is not chopping off hands,” Sharia’s defenders say, scoffingly. “It is not chopping off heads or lashing people,” they continue. Some people already complain that critics of Sharia are giving Sharia as a whole a bad name, lumping in the “bad” Sharia with the “good” Sharia. In reality, of course, Sharia law, officially adopted just this week by Brunei, apparently complete with amputations and stoning, is not compatible with law as we have been practicing it for over 2000 years in the West. The short-term political gains for the political leaders who support it hardly seem worth the long-term losses that will befall our society if we continue incorporating this system of law into our national life. If we are indeed seeing the beginning of this process, we are far from seeing what lies at the end of it. (Mullah)


Not jihad, not crime, not rape; monitoring Islamic head choppers is the problem

Complaints about alleged illegal monitoring by Norwegian intelligence services doubled from 21 in 2001 to more than 40 in 2013. The focus has increasingly shifted to immigrant communities with ties to Islam, leading to concerns such surveillance could hinder their integration and have broader impacts on democratic rights. (Seems to be the problem everywhere these days. Fighting crime causes more crime; resistance to jihad causes more… jihad. Got it.)


Even the leftarded Harry’s Place can’t help but wonder why Camoron tasks MuBro crackpot Tariq Ramadan with advising his Hizb-ut Tahrir connected Muslim advisor “Baroness” Warsi, his trusty expert on all things muselmanic:

Brother Tariq and Baroness Warsi

Lucy Lips, April 2nd 2014, 3:48 pm

Let’s say someone offered this stupid, callous and offensive observation on Mohamed Merah’s terrorist murder spree in Toulouse in 2012:

Politically, he was a young man adrift, imbued neither with the values of Islam, nor driven by racism and anti-Semitism. Young, disoriented, he shot at targets whose prominence and meaning seem to have been chosen based on little more than their visibility.

Yes, it’s Tariq Ramadan. And you will remember that Merah deliberately targeted Jews for murder, including children.

Brother Tariq added this:

Where we might have hoped for a true debate on political issues, we must now be content with trapeze artists and jugglers, with illusionists, and with clever and cynical attempts to exploit a tragedy.

Imagine someone saying in the immediate aftermath of Anders Breivik’s atrocities that “one might have hoped Norway would now hold a proper debate about immigration and integration”. It would be an utterly foul reaction.

Now consider a woman who looks at the world of so many Toulouses and is concerned. She says:

Across the world, people are being singled out and hounded out simply for the faith they follow or the beliefs they hold. The persecution of people because of their faith or belief has, I believe, become a global crisis. I want to make sure we have the best advice available.

That woman is Baroness Warsi, speaking about her new “Foreign Office group on Freedom of Religion or Belief”.

Among others, she has appointed Brother Tariq to advise her.

What an idiot.

Those Big Fat Warsi Lies

Muslims Are Incapable of Wrong-Doing Because Islam is Perfect

Source: The Guardian via Islam vs Europe

The Guardian’s recent interview with “Baroness” Warsi was very revealing of the Muslim mindset. In a speech she gave in January she objected to the term “moderate Muslim”.

And we should be careful about language around religious “moderates”.

..we need to stop talking about moderate Muslims, and instead talk about British Muslims.

And when it comes to extremism, we should be absolutely clear:

These people are extremists, plain and simple, because their behaviour has detached them from the thought process within their religion.


What she’s saying essentially is that “extremists” aren’t Muslims. She reiterates this view in the extract from the interview above. As soon as a Muslim does a bad thing, he ceases to be a Muslim and becomes, in Warsi’s view, merely a generic “extremist”.

Cheradenine Zakalwe has a lot more: Muslims Are Incapable.

Marina Mahathir lies just as much:

liar and high-profile Malaysian apologist for Islam

Marina Mahathir is a Malaysian social activist and writer. And you may recognize her last name: she is also the oldest daughter of a certain Malaysian former prime minister, the man who is in many ways responsible for the ongoing Islamization of Malaysia, Doctor Mahathir bin Mohamad. In case you forgot, he is infamous for his virulent brand of antisemitism and his remark as Malaysia’s prime minister during a 2003 Organization of the Islamic Conference meeting: that Jews “…run the world by proxy.” Marina has largely inherited his particular political outlook; she is always ready to utter any amount of cognitive dissonance in the service of Islam. From “Irrational Fears Abound”, by Marina Mahathir, The Star, 9 November 2011:

Back to Warsi:

"Respeck it!"

Obama adviser Mogahed says West must show respect for Islam to ease Muslim anger toward U.S.

In their Gallup survey published under the hubristic title Who Speaks for Islam? What A Billion Muslims Really Think, Obama adviser Dalia Mogahed and Saudi-funded dhimmi pseudo-academic John Esposito cooked their data to increase the number of Muslim “moderates,” counting as “moderate” Muslims who wanted Sharia rule, hated America, supported jihad-martyrdom suicide bombing, and opposed equality of rights for women. Mogahed also defended Sharia on a British TV show hosted by the jihadist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, saying it amounted to “gender justice.”

“Obama adviser says politics roused Muslim anger towards US,”

by Habib Toumi for Gulf News, January 18 (thanks to JW): full article below the fold>>>


Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: “Islamophobia” is “on the rise”

Keep repeating the lies until it rings true:

The very concept of “Islamophobia” was invented by Islamic supremacists in order to claim victim status for Muslims and deflect attention away from the global jihad and Islamic supremacism. If self-proclaimed moderate Muslims really wants to cure “Islamophobia,” here is an easy way. They can:

1. Focus their indignation on Muslims committing violent acts in the name of Islam, not on non-Muslims reporting on those acts.
2. Renounce definitively, sincerely, honestly, and in deeds, not just in comforting words, not just “terrorism,” but any intention to replace the U.S. Constitution (or the constitutions of any non-Muslim state) with Sharia even by peaceful means. In line with this, clarify what is meant by their condemnations of the killing of innocent people by stating unequivocally that American and Israeli civilians are innocent people, teaching accordingly in mosques and Islamic schools, and behaving in accord with these new teachings.
3. Teach, again sincerely and honestly, in transparent and inspectable ways in mosques and Islamic schools, the imperative of Muslims coexisting peacefully as equals with non-Muslims on an indefinite basis, and act accordingly.
4. Begin comprehensive international programs in mosques all over the world to teach sincerely against the ideas of violent jihad and Islamic supremacism.
5. Actively and honestly work with Western law enforcement officials to identify and apprehend jihadists within Western Muslim communities.

If Muslims do those five things, voila! People like me will no longer suffer from the illness of “Islamophobia”!

“Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: ‘Islamophobia is on the rise,’” by Rick Chandler for NBC Sports, January 19:


Muslim minister says Britain “less tolerant, prejudice against Islam acceptable”

On the other side of the pond Wailing Warsi is making identical noises. If we weren’t constantly told to treat  Muslims as individuals rather than  a monolithic block, one could almost get the idea that they have an agenda:

The minister without portfolio also warns that describing Muslims as either “moderate” or “extremist” fosters growing prejudice.

Concerns over allegedly Islamophobic attitudes in Britain’s news media are long standing. A 2008 analysis of nearly 1,000 news stories by the Cardiff School of Journalism, in Wales, found that two-thirds of all stories covering British Muslim focused on Muslims as either a threat, a problem or both.  (Associated Press)

Quite a dilemma for the dhimmified Brits: Non-muslims the world over are terrorized and murdered by muslims, and she pretends she can’t comprehend why we are worried and poo poos our concerns….

Norman Tebbit  tells her to STFU:

Continue reading "Respeck it!"

U.K.: At least three Islamic schools enforce compulsory niqab for girls as young as 11

“It is a desert practice which belongs to another century and another world.”

The professional “moderate” Muslim Ed Husain said that.

Spencer:   If the media were quoting us, we’d be pilloried as “Islamophobes” (and somehow, “racist” as well). The OIC would accuse us of “incitement” and demand someone stop us.

British schools where girls must wear the Islamic veil

Quick! “Baroness ” Warsi to the front!  Lets have her give the Brits another lecture on Britishness:

‘No Country has the Right to Tell a Woman What She Should Wear and What She should Not Wear…; If She Wants to Wear … [a] Trouser Suit or She Wants to Wear a Burqa This is Her Individual Choice, and That’s Britishness’  … (Source)

Hundreds of girls are being forced by British schools to wear the Islamic veil in a move which has been heavily criticised by mainstream Muslims. (WTF is a “mainstream” Muslim? It sure is not in the Koran!)

Critics warned that the spectacle of burka-clad pupils entering and leaving the schools could damage relations between Muslim and non-Muslim communities

Islamic schools have introduced uniform policies which force girls to wear the burka or a full headscarf and veil known as the niqab.

Moderate followers of Islam said yesterday that enforcement of the veil was a “dangerous precedent” and that children attending such schools were being “brainwashed”.   (Telegraph UK) Continued below the fold>>>>

Other News:

“Deadly Enemy”

Totally gaga: Bill Maher Calls Republicans ‘A Deadly Enemy’

Gateway: Hundreds of Leftists March at One Nation Rally Chanting: “Obama Aint No Socialist. We Are! We Are!” (Video)

Demented Banana Bender:

Castro-supporting actor Harry Belafonte lashed out at the “insidious” Tea Party Movement today at the leftist One Nation rally.

The leftist crowd loved it.

Harry Belafonte at One Nation Rally Lashes Out at “Insidious Tea Party… Moving To Achieve Villainous Ends” (Video)

“Winnipeg students” join jihad in Pakistan, local Muslims “stressed” over ongoing investigation

Continue reading U.K.: At least three Islamic schools enforce compulsory niqab for girls as young as 11

How the British Establishment and Al BeBeeCeera Failed to Demonize Nick Griffin & the BNP


Ever since Griffins BBC appearance the far left slime bombers go apeshit. Quite obviously, its them who fail in the marketplace of ideas. Its his critics who fail to debate.  Even more so, these smear merchants fail to see that vilifying Griffin and the BNP  is a discredit to themselves.

B409737D-03F4-B5D0-565DA453BAE7F092 Nick Griffin

Andrew Bolt:

It’s the Hanson phenomenon, only far more serious, and shows the danger of attempts to ban the BNP leader from speaking on the BBC:

One statistic above all stands out from the YouGov opinion poll commissioned by the Telegraph. And it’s not that 22 per cent of respondents would consider voting for the BNP, amazing though that is. It’s that a majority of voters, while they may despise the BNP, think it “has a point”:

More than half of those questioned said they agreed with the BNP, or thought that it “had a point” in wishing to “speak up for the interests of the indigenous, white British people … which successive governments have done far too little to protect.” This included 43 per cent who said that, while they shared some of its concerns, they had “no sympathy for the party itself”.

I have some sympathy with the “but would you give a platform to Adolf Hitler” argument. But the BNP politicians, although unpleasant, are not the Nazis, and if half the voters think that at least this one party raises an important issue, then banning it from debates can only entrench doubt in democracy, or at least cyncism towards the existing political and media establishment.

If the BNP are as dumb and wicked as claimed, then open debates will eventually destroy it. Using violence, abuse, censorship and even the law to instead bully it into silence will only make more people determined to defend it – if only to defend their own right to be heard. That was the lesson of Hansonism.

Here’s how BNP leader Nick Griffin actually went on the BBC: Video here

Matthew Engel complains that the gang-up was exactly not what was needed. I agree, especially given what these polls say. Argument, not abuse, is the most effective antidote. I’m with Rod Liddle: don’t panic or rage, just talk.

Sheik Yer’mami noticed that “Baroness Warsi” managed to slime Griffin with some imaginary Nazi associations. But truth was never part of the Mohammedan agenda… Traditionally, the Mohammedans sided with the Nazis then and glorify Hitler even now. Its a pity that Griffin himself took the bait of “racism” instead of attacking Mohammedanism as such.

Muslim Baby Boom? Polygamy? Warsi Blames The Infidels…

The Star

FEARS of an Islamic baby boom have grown after it was revealed the Government is not stopping Muslim men from having more than one wife.

Warsi: “what Britain needs is a polygamy police unit…”

Baroness Warsi, Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion, lifted the lid on the polygamy problem by accusing Downing Street of being afraid to offend Muslims.

She said the Government was ignoring the issue of multiple wives because of “cultural sensitivity”.

And she said the result is a boom in the number of Muslim women forced to take part in polygamous marriages. It is also allowing Muslim men to have children with several women at the same time.

Baroness Warsi, 37, said: “There has to be a culture change and that has to be brought about by policy-makers taking a clear stance on this issue, saying that in this country, one married man is allowed to marry one woman. And that must be the way for everyone who lives in this country.

“There has been a failure on the part of policy makers to respond to this situation.

(Perhaps. But more likely is the failure of the Muselmanic invaders to respect the laws of the infidel nation state. Fat chance!/ed)

“Some of it has been done in the name of cultural sensitivity and we’ve just avoided either discussing or dealing with this matter head-on.”

Polygamy is illegal under UK law but religious marriages are not registered and so are not legally valid.

This opens the door for a Muslim man to marry his first wife in a civil ceremony and then marry someone else in a religious one.  Baroness Warsi urged the Government to consider the mandatory registration of all religious marriages to stop men in Britain marrying more than one woman.

And Stephen Green, of campaign group Christian Voice, said: “If this is going on then the Government should not be afraid of offending people in that community.”

* Freedom dies as radical Islam advances


But her remarks provoked an angry backlash from some Islamic experts last night.

Manzoor Moghal, chairman of the Muslim Forum, said the Government should not interfere.

He said: “Why would you not allow Muslims to conduct their affairs in their cultural, religious framework, without interference from the state? Why should we take them to task for having a second, third and a fourth nikah [marriage] which is compatible with their religion?”

Answer: Because WE, THE INFIDEL HOST SOCIETY ARE PAYING FOR IT with our taxes!  Because Muslims use and abuse women to outbreed the infidel host society with the intention to destroy us!

A Ministry of Justice spokesman denied that polygamy was being ignored by the Government and insisted the practice was illegal in Britain.

But he added: “It is not the role of government to take a position on the rites, beliefs or practices of any particular religious faith, other than where these give rise to conflict with the common law.”

* Comment:  Mate, this is about your existence. You better start defending yourself or you’ll be gone along with your common law and your tolerance!