“…it is immoral to return to an aggressor the positions from which he might renew his aggression!”
Haaretz? Surprise, surprise:
West Bank settlements are good for peace
One of the axioms of the “peace process” is that the settlements are “an obstacle to peace,” as if removing them would instantly bring peace on earth. It’s well known, however, that before 1967 there were no settlements, and no peace – unless, of course, you consider the communities within Israel “settlements,” since the Arabs considered them occupied territory. The greatest contribution of the settlements, then, is that they took the place of Israeli towns as occupied territory, except perhaps for Hamas and considerable parts of the Arab world. Therefore, the formula that removing settlements equals peace is laughable and baseless.
Links:
- HANOI JANE and other left wing America-haters attacking Israel now
- Tolerance in Islam
- UK Rioting Began with Mosque Leaders Urging Violence…
Continue reading Haaretz Publishes Prof Raphael Israeli Article





What “settlements?” Judea & Samaria has always been Jewish land. Who are the Palistanian usurpers?