you muslim hating assholes will be taught a lesson. There will be more mosques in Australia than churches within the next decade so you should convert now. Assholes !!!
FromÂ Cairns Imam gets his Mosque, 2008/06/28 at 12:25 AM
“Mr Smith” must be a Mormon or a Buddhist. A good Muslim wouldn’t be so impolite. Or could it be Mohammed Smith? ….what say you?
In other News:
UK: Police dogs trained to sniff out terrorists won’t touch Muslims — it offends them
Britain just keeps outdoing itself for nutty manifestations of dhimmitude. In an age when terrorists are most likely to be Muslim, and these dogs are supposed to be helping find terrorists, the dogs won’t touch Muslims. Dogs, after all, are unclean.
“Sniffer Dogs Offend Muslims,” by Tom Whitehead in theÂ Daily Express,Â
UPDATEÂ June 27, 9:39AM PDT: It looks as if the dogs will be sniffing around Muslims after all. Muslims objected, but their objections were overruled. See “Muslims will be searched by sniffer dogs despite religious objections, say police,” from theÂ Daily Mail,
Solution: no sniff, no ride!
Police in Bangladesh are using dogs. Muslims in Britain say Infidels should not use dogs to sniff up Muslims?
The trial by the British Transport Police (BTP) on all rail passengers travelling through the station prompted complaints from some Muslims who said their religion did not allow direct contact with dogs.
–from the article at the Daily Mail to which a link is given in the “Update” above
Their religion? Do tell.
Yes, do tell the long-suffering Infidels of Great Britain that the reason dogs are regarded with such contempt and hatred is because Muhammad, uswa hasana, al-insan al-kamil, once was reported to have said (check the endlessly tedious solemn rigmarole about the particular isnad-chain in question for yourself — it was good enough, apparently, for al-Bukhari and Muslim) that he wouldn’t enter a house that had either a dog or a statue in it. There go dogs, as domestic pets. And there go Europe’s statuary too, which has already been under Muslim assault as very thinly reported, here and there — you see, as long as the statues are vandalized, and so no longer worthy of respect, they become okay. That’s why, thirty years ago, some Al-Saud princeling at his new estate in Beverly Hills attracted all kinds of attention for having painted the statues he found on the estate, lining the drive, garish colors — bright greens and blues. Oh, it was all very funny, and people mocked his taste, but not a single reporter knew a thing about Islam, so not a single reporter knew that what the Al-Saud princelet had done was simply conform to Islam. How, after all, could he afford — given the source of his wealth — to do otherwise?
No, dogs are verboten.
Well, then, shall we Infidels give up using sniffer dogs, as we have always used before, at a time when the presence of Muslims makes the security situation even more, and increasingly, and permanently, dire in the countries of Western Europe? No and no.
And besides, there is an argument that Muslims themselves make to justify keeping dogs when they are not being used as domestic pets but are being used for guard duty. Look it up yourself, and you’ll find what has been written by Muslim clerics to justify this practice. And of course the dogs in question, the sniffer dogs, are being used precisely in that manner.
Of course, such an argument doesn’t have to be presented. Solicitude for Muslims, even pretend solicitude, doesn’t have to be displayed. But en passant one could say it this way:
1) Yes, we understand why Muslims do not cherish dogs as we in Great Britain do. They do not, but rather hate and fear with them with what many of us would regard as an irrational and primitive hate, because Muhammad, the man whose every word they think must be obeyed, once said he would not enter a house where there were “dogs and statues.” Well, Muslims will have to explain the bit about not entering a house where there are “statues” — would that include museums of art, for example? and if so, would they object to school visits by their children to such museums, or to the study, in school, of art which included the study of such statues? But about the dogs, well we know that in fact Muslims have made exceptions for dogs used for guard duty, for protection not domestic delight, and it is obvious that that is precisely the use of the sniffer dogs here.
(Dryly) We have used sniffer dogs in the past, and found their work most satisfactory. We shall, of course, continue to use them for police work in any ways that we determine are useful. In the detection of drugs, and now of bombs, which has over the past few years suddenly become a major concern of our security services, as of the security services of all the countries of Western Europe, they have been most useful and we expect their use to continue, and possibly increase, on busses, on trains, at airports, everywhere that we determine that their use is mandated by concerns for the safety of the British public.
Posted by: HughÂ Â atÂ June 27, 2008 1:09 PM