Sharia courts rule Britannia…

* Well, not quite yet. But from here on it won’t be long. Because the Jooozzz do it too. Can’t let them get away with it, can we? Because that would be ‘unfair and discriminatory’…

Revealed: UK’s first official sharia courts

Abul Taher/Times Online

ISLAMIC law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases.


The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.

Rulings issued by a network of five sharia courts are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court.

Previously, the rulings of sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and depended on voluntary compliance among Muslims.

It has now emerged that sharia courts with these powers have been set up in London, Birmingham, Bradford and Manchester with the network’s headquarters in Nuneaton, Warwickshire. Two more courts are being planned for Glasgow and Edinburgh.

Sheikh Faiz-ul-Aqtab Siddiqi, whose Muslim Arbitration Tribunal runs the courts, said he had taken advantage of a clause in the Arbitration Act 1996.

Under the act, the sharia courts are classified as arbitration tribunals. The rulings of arbitration tribunals are binding in law, provided that both parties in the dispute agree to give it the power to rule on their case.

Siddiqi said: “We realised that under the Arbitration Act we can make rulings which can be enforced by county and high courts. The act allows disputes to be resolved using alternatives like tribunals. This method is called alternative dispute resolution, which for Muslims is what the sharia courts are.”

The disclosure that Muslim courts have legal powers in Britain comes seven months after Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, was pilloried for suggesting that the establishment of sharia in the future “seems unavoidable” in Britain.

In July, the head of the judiciary, the lord chief justice, Lord Phillips, further stoked controversy when he said that sharia could be used to settle marital and financial disputes.

In fact, Muslim tribunal courts started passing sharia judgments in August 2007. They have dealt with more than 100 cases that range from Muslim divorce and inheritance to nuisance neighbours.

It has also emerged that tribunal courts have settled six cases of domestic violence between married couples, working in tandem with the police investigations.

Siddiqi said he expected the courts to handle a greater number of “smaller” criminal cases in coming years as more Muslim clients approach them. “All we are doing is regulating community affairs in these cases,” said Siddiqi, chairman of the governing council of the tribunal.

Jewish Beth Din courts operate under the same provision in the Arbitration Act and resolve civil cases, ranging from divorce to business disputes. They have existed in Britain for more than 100 years, and previously operated under a precursor to the act.

Politicians and church leaders expressed concerns that this could mark the beginnings of a “parallel legal system” based on sharia for some British Muslims.

Dominic Grieve, the shadow home secretary, said: “If it is true that these tribunals are passing binding decisions in the areas of family and criminal law, I would like to know which courts are enforcing them because I would consider such action unlawful. British law is absolute and must remain so.”

Douglas Murray, the director of the Centre for Social Cohesion, said: “I think it’s appalling. I don’t think arbitration that is done by sharia should ever be endorsed or enforced by the British state.”

There are concerns that women who agree to go to tribunal courts are getting worse deals because Islamic law favours men.

Siddiqi said that in a recent inheritance dispute handled by the court in Nuneaton, the estate of a Midlands man was divided between three daughters and two sons.

The judges on the panel gave the sons twice as much as the daughters, in accordance with sharia. Had the family gone to a normal British court, the daughters would have got equal amounts.

In the six cases of domestic violence, Siddiqi said the judges ordered the husbands to take anger management classes and mentoring from community elders. There was no further punishment.

In each case, the women subsequently withdrew the complaints they had lodged with the police and the police stopped their investigations.

Siddiqi said that in the domestic violence cases, the advantage was that marriages were saved and couples given a second chance.

Inayat Bunglawala, assistant secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: “The MCB supports these tribunals. If the Jewish courts are allowed to flourish, so must the sharia ones.”

Additional reporting: Helen Brooks


5 thoughts on “Sharia courts rule Britannia…”

  1. Who will be the first muslim in Britain to opt for sharia law when convicted of theft, and have a hand cut off in public?

  2. Using Sharia law as a means of ADR in family matters is mind boggling. It is beyond dispute that; Sharia law is totally incompatible with human rights and the principle of equality. Why would any woman chose to submit to a means of mediation which clearly treats her less favorably and discriminates against her in the issue of divorce, maintenance etc? In effect sign away her rights under the law of the land? And if so, how could this be enforceable under the English Legal system? It just cannot be!

    Domestic violence is not a matter for ADR but rather for the criminal law! Anger management course for the perpetrator! Is this a punishment to fit the actual crime? but what the hek as long as it saves the marriage, no doubt they will all live happily ever after, at least according to the Sharia experts! [this is pure deception, violence against women for disobedience perceived or otherwise is sanctioned under Sharia law].

    As for the choice, given the nature of the patriarchal, Muslim society, how much choice can there be, in particular, for women? In any event, how many of them know of their available options, much less to be in a position to make an informed choice?

    While ADR can be a very satisfactory means of resolving disputes in civil matters, unfortunately Sharia law is not only incompatible with the law of the land but also with basic fundamental human rights and in particular with the principles of equality. Obviously, the Islamists with the aid of the far left are working, ever so gingerly, using the law of the land to impose Sharia law by whatever means as parallel system of law in the UK.

Comments are closed.