Geert Wilders Plucks Muslim Goose

SupportWilders.jpg

From the Gates of Vienna:

Our Flemish correspondent VH reports on the latest scandal from the Netherlands: Geert Wilders called a socialist Muslim politician a “super dumb goose”. The horror!

Here’s the report from De Telegraaf, as translated by VH:

Geert Wilders: “Fatima Elatik is super dumb goose”

Geert Wilders made mincemeat of the Amsterdam PvdA district mayorFatima Elatik [the appointed leader of the Amsterdam district council of Zeeburg, and a fellow party member and fan of the Muslim Brotherhood supporter Ahmed Marcouch[1]], who compared the politics of the PVV member with those of Adolf Hitler. “What a super dumb goose she is,” Wilders replied yesterday.

The Moroccan-Dutch Elatik has worked herself into a lather over the questions in Parliament of the PVV, which wants to know how the Muslim population will develop in the Netherlands over the coming decades. “Just give it a while and they will analyze our DNA to show that we are no good”, Elatik twittered. “I think there was once another politician in Europe, some 60 years ago, who did the same thing to another Semitic people.”

In response, Wilders fought back with: “The demonization by the Labor Party (PvdA) keeps going on. I hope they realize where this may lead.”

Comment posted at The Daily Standard (De Dagelijkse Standaard):

fatima

Well now, there we have the PvdA alderman Fatima Elatik once again making a remarkable statement on Twitter. Where only a while ago she wanted to expel the entire PVV electorate from Amsterdam, today she creates a beautiful dummy so as to become “bon ton” [all okay] in left-wing circles by making a Wilders-Hitler comparison.

Soon she realized that as a politician — and particularly one of a party that is on the verge of collapsing, like the PvdA (Socialists) — she really cannot say such things. But she still quickly adds a clincher to it: “that we sometimes forget that Hitler was also democratically elected”. Who “we” are and what Elatik wants to say with this is not quite clear …

Read it all…

Britain's dumbest Jew: "There Are Circumstances in Which Terrorism is Justifyable"

News first:

Al-Maqdessi (R) announced the start of theocratic rule in the Palestinian territories

Counter Jihad News:

David Miliband:

“There are circumstances in which terrorism can be justifiable“

Counter Jihad has  graphic pic’s

milibandg270906_228x3022

Pamela is right: this guy doesn’t know the difference between good and bad or right and wrong.  That’s why our world is turning to mush. A careering creature like Miliband  who stands for nothing will fall for anything… Miliband is the strawman for the value-free society…
Daily Mail via Atlas Shrugs

Foreign Secretary David Miliband was accused last night of condoning terrorism after declaring that there were circumstances in which it was ‘justifiable’.

Continue reading Britain's dumbest Jew: "There Are Circumstances in Which Terrorism is Justifyable"

Muhammad & Zainab: The Wives of Profit Moe

Zaynab and the Beast

This is what Allah (aka Muhammad) had to say:

وَإِذْ تَقُولُ لِلَّذِي أَنْعَمَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَأَنْعَمْتَ عَلَيْهِ أَمْسِكْ عَلَيْكَ زَوْجَكَ وَاتَّقِ اللَّهَ وَتُخْفِي فِي نَفْسِكَ مَا اللَّهُ مُبْدِيهِ وَتَخْشَى النَّاسَ وَاللَّهُ أَحَقُّ أَن تَخْشَاهُ فَلَمَّا قَضَى زَيْدٌ مِّنْهَا وَطَرًا زَوَّجْنَاكَهَا لِكَيْ لَا يَكُونَ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَرَجٌ فِي أَزْوَاجِ أَدْعِيَائِهِمْ إِذَا قَضَوْا مِنْهُنَّ وَطَرًا وَكَانَ أَمْرُ اللَّهِ مَفْعُولًا

Written by Mumin Salih
Saturday, 15 August 2009
Beauty and the beastAn analysis of Zaynab’s divine marriage to Mohammed

“Your marriages were arranged for you by your fathers, but my marriage was arranged for me by Allah from above the seven heavens”

Zaynab to Mohammed’s other wives

The above assertion was Zaynab’s claim to fame, which no other woman had been able to match. Indeed, no other woman was privileged to have her marriage and family life planned for her by Allah, and carefully documented in the preserved tablet and the Quran. Zaynab’s ‘divine’ marriage was not a private matter because its implications still affect the Muslims’ lives today. As a corollary to satisfying Mohammed’s sexual desires, Allah had to ban the highly moral practice of adoption and introduce instead a morally corrupt legislation that allows women to breast feed adult men. Another upshot of this saga is that the Muslims today are still perplexed and divided regarding the wisdom of the ‘barrier (=hijab) verse’ that in effect locks women behind the dark shields of Islam. The historical events mentioned in this article are well documented in the Quran and the reputed sira books and no Muslim can question their authenticity. The analysis, however, is mine and is an attempt to read the small prints to understand that famous Islamic love, or rather lust, story.

More from Islam Monitor

American Females on Wild Goose Chase For 'Hearts & Minds' in Afghanistan (by voluntarily wearing the burka)

By ALFRED de MONTESQUIOU, Associated Press Writer

KHAWJA JAMAL, Afghanistan – Put on body armor, check weapons, cover head and shoulders with a scarf.

Afghan Woman To Woman

That was the drill for female American Marines who set out on patrol this week with a mission to make friends with Afghan women in a war zone by showing respect for Muslim standards of modesty.

The all-female unit of 46 Marines is the military’s latest innovation in its rivalry with the Taliban for the populace’s loyalty. Afghan women are viewed as good intelligence sources, and more open to the basics of the military’s hearts-and-minds effort — hygiene, education and an end to the violence.

“It’s part of the effort to show we’re sensitive to local culture,” said Capt. Jennifer Gregoire, of East Strasburg, Pa. She leads the Female Engagement Team in the Now Zad Valley of Helmand province, the heartland of the Taliban insurgency.

Related links:

“If you show your hair, its kind of like seeing a nude picture here, because women are very covered up,” she said.

Continue reading American Females on Wild Goose Chase For 'Hearts & Minds' in Afghanistan (by voluntarily wearing the burka)

"We will outbreed you with the bellies of our women…"

  • Jihad by outbreeding the infidels in Europe:

Out-Breeding to Victory in Europe

Frontpagemag
By: Sultan Knish / Sultanknish.blogspot.com

The Telegraph recently made headlines with a survey that suggested that a fifth of the European Union will be Muslim by 2050. This is if anything an understatement of the situation, since once you subtract Eastern European states and focus in on Western European countries such as England, France and Italy… or Sweden, Islam will comprise a sizable enough minority to be considered a state within a state. And even the most pessimistic statistics will grow gloomier if 75 million Turks inside the presently Islamist Turkey will become part of the European Union.

Tundra Tabloids: Europe is dying from socialism: high taxes, late marriages and accompanying low birth rates

islamic-bomb

A multiculturally befuddled sub-editor at the AGE celebrates diversity:

Andrew Bolt:

The Age publishes a cheery headline:

Dutch embrace Islamic name

They do? So Henk and Aagje now call their son Mohammed? Jan and Truus have chosen Muhammad for theirs, rather than Piet?

The report under that headline is rather more accurate, suggesting not a Kumbayah “embrace” of Islamic names, but a displacement by:

MOHAMMED, or other variations of the name of Islam’s founding prophet, has become the most popular name choice for baby boys in the four biggest cities of Holland. The country’s social security agency found that traditional Dutch names have been displaced in Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague and Utrecht as the country’s Muslim population grows.

* There is a bright side, though:

Whilever they continue to call their boys Muhammad our media  will never be able to completely sweep Islamic terrorism under the carpet.

Meanwhile always eager to get ahead, Russia estimates that Islam will become its predominant religion by 2050. The Russians, both under the USSR and in the Putin era, have done everything they can to try and raise the birth rate, but remains at half that of Uzbekistan, or even war torn Chechnya. With the Russian population set to fall by almost 50 million, to 100 million in 2050, the Muslim birth rate will have made up the surplus. Having tried all the usual financial family incentives and even made an effort at luring back its former Jewish emigrants, Russia is now counting on its state run network of mosques, which can only preach Jihad at America, England and any non-Russian infidels, to maintain control. It is an absurd strategy, but no more so than Europe’s own.

While Europe may not boast a population that is by turns dying of alcohol poisoning or trying to escape abroad– Europe is dying the slow death of socialism instead. High taxes, late marriages and the accompanying low birth rates have hit Europe hard. And attempts to compensate for gaps in the workforce during economic upswings with immigration, has imported the barbarians through the gate, past customs and into every major European city.

Continue reading "We will outbreed you with the bellies of our women…"

Indonesia: Jihad? Just Don't Do it Here! Bucktooth Bashir: Get Stuffed!

Indonesia’s Islamic Defenders Front: “Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not need jihadists anymore. Those who want to fight for Islam can go to the battlefields in Palestine or Iraq”

  • Nice try. But the chances ain’t good…

In other words, violent jihad is still a noble undertaking in the eyes of the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) — just not in Indonesia, not now, while it’s bad for business in the wake of last month’s hotel bombings. Note also the implied distinction between jihad and “terrorism,” which the FPI says it expects the government to keep a lid on for Ramadan.

Never mind that the FPI has done its fair share to spread terror around Indonesia among religious minorities. But Ramadan — that can’t be disturbed, of course. “FPI ready to fight terrorists,” by Andi Hajramurni for the Jakarta Post, August 14:

Hard-line Muslim group the Islam Defenders Front (FPI) in eastern part of Indonesia denounced on Friday acts of terrorism and declared their readiness to help fight terror suspects on the run.

Translations of the group’s name vary slightly: Sometimes they’re the Islamic Defender Front as well.

The group’s leader, Habib Mahmud bin Umar Al Hamid, said terrorism went against Islam, which promotes peace.

He said a terror group would find it difficult to develop if people did not give any room for them to spread their teachings.

“If people are united and support the government, police and military, terrorists will find no opportunity to strike. Therefore we call on people to fight terrorism.”

He said the FPI was against violence and could not accept the use of violence in the name of religion in the country.

“Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not need jihadists anymore. Those who want to fight for Islam can go to the battlefields in Palestine or Iraq.”

He said the FPI expected the government to ensure no violence occurred during Ramadan fasting month, so that Muslims could conduct their religious duties untroubled.

Everyone else, not so much.

Other News:

Bucktooth Bashir begs to differ:

Abu Bakar Ba'asyir the intellectual leader of Jemaah Islamiyah
The Jakarta Post – Slamet Susanto and Suherdjoko

A notorious Muslim cleric who was once jailed for the Bali terror attacks in 2002, Abu Bakar Ba’asyir, warned the nation on Friday to face more suicide bombings unless Indonesia enforced Islamic sharia law.

To reduce or combat bomb attacks in Indonesia, the majority Muslim country should change its administration system by implementing sharia, Ba’asyir said.

There you go… More from Counter Jihad: Without sharia – terrorism

Muslim terrorist families linked by history to Dar’ul Islam

Brought together by a shared belief and aim in setting up an Islamic state of Indonesia and fighting for marginalized Muslims, the family of Ahmad Kandai has devoted their entire lives to fi ghting for such a cause.

Ahmad is a noted figure in the Darul Islam (DI) hard-line movement that sought to turn Indonesia into an Islamic state between 1942 and 1962.

His older brother, Nasir, tried to assassinate former president Sukarno in November 1957 in Cikini, Central Jakarta, after the country’s fi rst leader initiated the Nasakom doctrine that combined nationalist, religious and co mmunist principles.

Nasir was executed by the military without trial. Ahmad’s sons – Farihin, Abdul Jabar, Mohamad Islam, Solahuddin and Mohamad Yasir – all claim to be jihadist by nature.

“We’re all involved *in terrorism*,” says Farihin, who spent three years in Afghanistan in the 1980s, fi ghting with the Mujahedeen against Russia.

“Maybe it’s because of our vows to uphold Islamic law, despite the traumatic history of our family. “Our historical ties with DI encourage us stay ever true to our course.”  More from Counter Jihad:  Muslim terrorist families linked by history to Darul Islam

What the Quran says about Jihad

What the Quran says about Jihad

(Anything but inner struggle)

armed militants from Islamic Jihad celebrate

The Muslims are commanded to wage an everlasting war against the unbelievers and are assured victory in the struggle. Surely, the Marxist social philosophy is an extension of the Koranic doctrine. To realize the significance of this statement, one ought to read the following:

1. On unbelievers is the curse of Allah. (The Cow: 161 )

2. Allah is an enemy to unbelievers. ( The Cow: 15 )

3. The worst of beasts in Allah’s sight are the ungrateful, who will not believe. (Spoils of War: 55)

4. Oh ye who believe! the non-Muslims are unclean. (Repentance:17)

5. Oh ye who believe! Murder those of the disbelievers and let them find harshness in you. (Repentance: 123)

6. Oh believers, do not treat your fathers and mothers as your friends, if they prefer unbelief to belief, whosoever of you takes them for friends, they are evil-doers. (Repentance: 20) 7. Humiliate the non-Muslims to such an extent that they surrender and pay tribute. ( Repentance: 29 )

Through the doctrine of hatred, Islam incites Muslims against non-Muslims and proposes Jehad as the solution to make Islam the dominant faith. What is Jehad? It is the battle against unbelievers such as the Hindus, the Christians, the Jews, the atheists – in fact, unbelievers of all sorts.

Jehad is nothing but an Inducement to Murder and Plunder non-Muslims for their Sheer Crime of Not Believing in Muhammad

Continue reading What the Quran says about Jihad

Just call me Dr Jihad!

NHS: Breeding ground for terrorists

Yes, Obama’s healthcare reforms will lead to the recruitment of jihadist doctors. This is amazingly not an Onion report.

With thanks to Harry’s Place

Related Links:

Islam: It’s The Ideology, Stupid!

By Warner MacKenzie

The West’s propensity for ignorance is nothing short of astounding when one considers that, in this first decade of the 21st century, a veritable gold mine of information, on any topic, is available at one’s fingertips via the internet. Never before have books on the subject of Islamic history and terrorism been so prolific, yet the same old dangerously erroneous opinions on the causes of Islamic violence remain as popular, uninformed and widespread as ever.

Seemingly unwilling to make the effort to research the true causes of modern Islamist violence, many in the West, including the media, are ever ready to proffer an autoethnophobic (cultural self-loathing) root-cause as to how “We Westerners must have, somehow, caused the problem and therefore deserve what we are getting”. The apologists, propagandists and appeasers continue to confidently promote the view that Islamic terrorism is born of, and nurtured by, poverty, social marginalisation, and Islamophobic bigotry. A raft of other exculpatory justifications for the current global violence is put forward with the one common theme that, in one way or another, the West is to blame and its chickens are simply coming home to roost. So when the recent revelation emerged that a number of medical professionals were involved in two failed terrorist attacks in Britain, the naively deluded went into a confused tailspin, scratching their, cognitively dissonant heads. Their beloved paradigm of the disempowered, impoverished and alienated Muslim now had more holes than a lace tablecloth. No doubt they are busily readjusting their theories to explain how these privileged, intelligent, middle-class professionals could be driven to their wits-end, and forced to lash out with such blind destructive fury at the “evil” West.

The number of medicos involved indicates that the Hippocratic Oath appears to be held in the same contempt as oaths of citizenship or, for that matter, any other. Of course, as emulators of their Prophet Muhammad’s example– an obligation incumbent on all Muslims– it’s little wonder that the dishonouring of one’s sworn oath is regarded so carelessly “By Allah, and Allah willing, if I take an oath and later find something else better than that. then I do what is better and expiate my oath” Sahih Bukhari 7:67:427.

True patriots and loyal citizens they can never be, as no sworn undertaking, irrespective of how solemn or binding, is capable of trumping a Muslim’s primary loyalty and overriding obligation to the “cause” of Islam. Nor is there anything novel in the involvement of medically trained jihadis in radical Islam.

A few prominent extremist doctors include:

• Dr. Ayman Al-Zawahiri–Al-Qaeda mastermind and number two man, a surgeon.
• Dr. Mohammad Rabi Al-Zawahiri–Ayman’s father and a Muslim Brotherhood enthusiast, pharmacologist and professor.
• Dr. “Abu Hafiza”– Moroccan psychiatrist andAl-Qaeda master planner.
• Dr. Abdel Aziz Al-Rantisi–Late HAMAS leader, pediatrician;
• Dr. Mahmoud Al-Zahar–HAMAS co-founder and leader, surgeon and lecturer at the Islamic University in Gaza;
• Dr. Fathi Abd Al-Aziz Shiqaqi- physician -Late founder of Islamic Jihad and active in Fatah.

Another widely accepted myth is that Islamic radicalism is merely an understandable and predictable response to post WW II Western foreign policy, particularly that of the United States due to its support for Israel and involvement in Iraq, Afghanistan etc. This simplistic explanation totally disregards the inflammatory effect of the radical Islamic ideologues of the 1920s, ‘30s and ‘40s, before America had any involvement with the Middle East and well before Israel even existed. The inescapable historical truth is that influential thinkers such as Hassan al Banna, Sayeed Qutb and Mualana Sayeed Abul Ala Maududi were the modern revivalists of an ideology as old as Islam itself ; an ideology founded on the belief of Islamic superiority with its dream of world domination. It was the later Saudi and Iranian windfall oil wealth that allowed those countries to promote, finance and export radical Wahabbi and Khomeinist armed jihad to countries both within and outside the Middle East, Hizbollah being a prime example. Hassan al Banna’s al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun (Muslim Brotherhood) is indisputably the progenitor of all modern radical Islamist groups.

The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Maududi’s Jamaat-e-Islami in Pakistan sought to restore the Islamic theocratic ideal, namely the union of religion and state, whilst conveniently blaming the decline of Muslim societies on the contrary secular Western idea of the separation of church and state. Qutb and Maududi inspired a whole generation of Islamists, including Ayatollah Khomeini, who developed an Iranian version of their works in the 1970s.

Despite the gullible Westerner’s certitude that terrorist attacks are “all to do with Iraq and Afghanistan”, they are, in fact, all about Islam’s desire to rule the world as a borderless Caliphate. Whenever the willfully deluded Westerner or duplicitous Muslim seeks to explain away these terrorists attacks as reactions to U.S or British foreign policy, simply ask them what it was that precipitated the first world trade centre attack in 1993 – ten years before Iraq and eight years before the U.S. became involved in Afghanistan!

What was it in Khomeini ‘s revolution , if not expansionist ideology, that refused to be satisfied with their stated objective of ridding Iran of the Shah and Western influence, but then, going on to spread Islamic revolution to the rest of the world ?

Khomeini tells us that:

    “Islam says: Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to paradise, which can be opened only for holy warriors!

    There are hundreds of other [Koranic] psalms and hadiths urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.”

    “Islam grew with blood . . . . The great prophet of Islam in one hand carried the Koran and in the other a sword . . . . Islam is a religion of blood for the infidels but a religion of guidance for other people.”

But of all the ideologues whose works were a source of radical inspiration to tens, if not hundreds, of millions, Sayeed Abdul A’la Maududi is the most direct and unambiguous in his description of Islam’s ultimate aspirations:

    “Islam is not a normal religion like the other religions in the world and Muslim nations are not like normal nations. Muslim nations are very special because they have a command from Allah to rule the entire world and to be over every nation in the world.”

    “Islam wishes to destroy all States and Governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and programme of Islam regardless of the country or the Nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and programme, regardless of which Nation assumes the role of the standard bearer of Islam or the rule of which nation is undermined in the process of the establishment of an ideological Islamic State.”

    “Islam is a revolutionary faith that comes to destroy any government made by man. Islam doesn’t look for a nation to be in a better condition than another nation. Islam doesn’t care about the land or who owns the land. The goal of Islam is to rule the entire world and submit all of mankind to the faith of Islam. Any nation or power that gets in the way of that goal, Islam will fight and destroy. In order to fulfill that goal, Islam can use every power available every way it can be used to bring worldwide revolution. This is Jihad.”

The following comments, by other prominent Muslims, leave us in no doubt how widely these views are held.

    “One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”
    —Former Algerian President Houari Boumedienne’s prophetic warning to Europe in a speech at the U.N. In 1974. Thirty three years later, his prediction is in the process of unfolding.

    “Soon we will take power in this country. Those who criticize us now, will regret it. They will have to serve us. Prepare, for the hour is near.”
    — Belgium-based imam in 1994. “De Morgen”, Oct. 5, 1994. Cited in Koenraad Elst, “The Rushdie Rules”, Middle East Quarterly, June 1998.

    “The Quran should be America’s highest authority”. “Islam is not in America to be equal to any other religion but to be dominant.”
    — Omar Ahmad, CAIR’s (Council on American-Islamic Relations) chairman of the board.

    “I would like to see the Islamic flag fly, not only over number 10 Downing Street, but over the whole world,”
    — Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed, (former leader of the extremist Al-Muhajiroun movement in Britain) in an interview with Reuters.

    “I want to see the U.S become an Islamic nation.” —-Ibrahim Hooper of CAIR.

    “We are not fighting so that you will offer us something. We are fighting to eliminate you.”
    —Hussein Massawi, the former Hezbollah leader behind the slaughter of U.S. and French forces 20 years ago.

    “Jihad and the rifle alone. NO negotiations, NO conferences and NO dialogue.”
    —Sheikh Abdullah Azzam— (Osama bin Laden’s late mentor.)

    “Allah revealed Islam in order that humanity could be governed according to it. Unbelief is darkness and disorder. So the unbelievers, if they are not suppressed, create disorder. That is why the Muslims are responsible for the implementation of Allah’s Law on the planet, that humanity may be governed by it, as opposed to corrupt man-made laws. The Muslims must make all efforts to establish the religion of Allah on the earth”

    —Muhammad ‘Abdus Salam Faraj, “Jihad: The Absent Obligation”, p43

And finally, Anjem Choudary, Omar Bakri Mohammed’s successor, claims Islam’s sovereignty in the U.K. and U.S.A.

What is it in these clear statements of intent that Western people find so hard to comprehend and come to terms with?

Warner MacKenzie is a resident of Sydney, with a long-standing interest in Islam and its impact on Western society.

Comedy Gold From M. Cherif Bassiouni, DePaul University

Spencer: M. Cherif Bassiouni strikes back

Updates from Fitzgerald:

M. Cherif Bassiouni, Distinguished Research Professor of Law Emeritus and President Emeritus, International Human Rights Law Institute, DePaul University, has responded to my email posted here with the 1,000-word email that follows. You will note that nowhere in it does he resolve the contradiction in his statements about Islamic apostasy law that I asked him about in my email to him. I’ll address that in more detail below.

More Comedy from Islamistan:

Scientists in Japan microscopically confirmed islam is the “correct religion“-

Pakistan Daily Press News Agency/via ZIP

Continue reading Comedy Gold From M. Cherif Bassiouni, DePaul University

Big Bang in Kabul

Suicide car bomb kills 41 in central Kabul

* Not to worry: suicide bombing is “un-Islamic”- and anyhow, its only a tiny minority of extremists who misunderstand their peaceful religion, right?

Blast near Indian Embassy reportedly deadliest in capital since Taliban’s fall

MSNBC

Image: Afghan security force personnel assist survivors

updated 12:43 a.m. ET July 8, 2008

KABUL, Afghanistan – A suicide car bomb outside the Indian Embassy killed 41 people and wounded nearly 150 others Monday, ripping through the building’s reinforced walls and scattering bodies and pools of blood across some of Kabul’s most protected streets.

Like other recent high-profile attacks, Afghanistan quickly blamed Pakistan, India’s archrival, for the blast, which was the deadliest in Kabul since the fall of the Taliban in 2001.

Breaking: Explosions Rock US And UK Embassies In Kabul (UPDATES: Blast In Front Of Transportation Min, Multiple Casualties, 55+ Injured)

Afghanistan: husbands to deny wives food if they fail to obey sexual demands (that’s the law, baby…)

Continue reading Big Bang in Kabul