The Guardian Unhinged

Opposing Islam Is Fascism!

That’s exactly why the intellectually superior editors of the Guardian instantly delete all opposing views in the comments. Its all for ‘the greater good,’ really. Its all about being ‘fair & balanced’, no s#*t!

People tell me that once upon a time the Guardian was known as a respectable newspaper. Nowadays it has become a nest for assorted Commies, radical Greens, terrorists, anarcho-progressives, all kinds of anti-Semites,  Arab parasites, leeches who feed of them,  conspiracy theorists,  Jihadists,  and other kinds of loons. The crazier, the better.

At the very least, if you are not a  hate-preaching  mufti or a one-legged lesbian  with a glass eye who hates the world, or, at the very least an African or South American revolutionary,  you haven’t got the  chance of a snowflake in hell  to get published.

This week, the Grunard  has really come out and combined forces to attack the true enemies of progressive society: Pamela Geller & Robert Spencer, who are to be burned at the stakes for stirring the pot against the Islamization of America and the Ground Zero mega mosque. Imam Rauf’s  100 million dollar victory monument is salt  in the wound of all Americans, but for the giggling, enlightened progressives at the Grunard opposing the mosque is far worse. Why?  Because appeasement works so well, and since Muslims are doing so much to culturally enrich us  every day, we need to make things easier on them, right?

The result of so much delusional bile can be seen here: The US blogger on a mission to halt ‘Islamic takeover’ from a goose by the name of  Chris McGreal, who gets his feathers plucked instantly: The Guardian of What? McGreal is not only fact challenged, but also makes it up as he goes along. But isn’t spin and stupidity everything the left wing media has these days?

Then, there’s another hit piece from by Andrew Brown at The Guardian’s Comment Is Free that gets shredded by Robert Spencer here: Department of Corrections: Insults and idiocy from The Guardian.

Check it out, its pathetic.

Meanwhile, the Islamofascists are  running from debate:

Dawud Walid of Hamas-linked CAIR bails out of debate with Spencer…. which doesn’t stop Manya Brachear of the Chicago Tribune to offer a soapbox to  notorious Islamo-headbanger Ahmed Rehab:  Chicago Tribune journalist/propagandist Manya Brachear gives space to Hamas-linked CAIR to smear freedom fighters

Islamic supremacist Ground Zero mega-mosque Imam Rauf starts U.S.-paid Middle East tour

Howard Dean complains of Dems demonizing opponents of Ground Zero mosque; will Pelosi investigate him?

Salt in the wound

“The ultimate insult…”

From the comments, the kind of people who read the Grunard:

Two tenants of American politics, the right to bear arms and freedom of speech, two of the most divisive and repugnant tenants anywhere in the world. Unfortunately protecting people from incitement to racial hatred and people with guns is less important than energy harvesting and the capitalist dream.

Heaven help us! I hear North Korea is beautiful this time of year, off you go!

Muslims find "Leave Islam Safely" ads "repulsive"

Telling the truth about Islam is repulsive to Muslims.

I can smell a fartwa coming on:

“Another repulsive anti-Muslim stunt from Geller and Spencer”

From the Bunglawussi website:

Following on from the “Leaving Islam?” bus ads in Miami and New York, this new campaign by Stop the Islamization of America involves adverts on Chicago taxis. As you can see, its message is that Islam inspires Muslim families to murder their daughters.

See SIOA press release, 12 July 2010

Well, it does:

A question of Islamic honor: Police say 17,000 women are victims every year in the UK alone.

What does Islamic Law dictate as punishment for a parent who kills his or her child?

Consider Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law: here


SIOA Honor Killing Awareness Campaign: Freedom Taxis Hit the Streets of Chicago

Read it all….

Continue reading Muslims find "Leave Islam Safely" ads "repulsive"

Spencer: Is There a Moderate Islam?

How much longer will we be chasing this mythical creature, like the unicorn, bigfoot or the Loch Ness monster?

Childish detractors like John R. Guardiano only add nonsense to rubbish and annoy the s*#t out of those who know their stuff.  Why should those who sound off in ignorance be accepted as partners in debate?   Today, the “moderate Muslim”  remains more elusive than a cure for cancer. There is at least a theoretical possibility that a cure for cancer can be found one day… unless of course Islam takes over and drags us all down into its own endless Dark Ages.

But hey, don’t curse Guardiano just yet: there  is always another wakademic f*kcwit who can do you one up; meet Philip Jenkins from Pennsylvania State University, who is also the author of books  like ‘Jesus Wars’.

There is no end to this.

“Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible.”

‘Is the Bible more violent than the koran?’

Its not like we haven’t heard it before:   Yashiko Sagamori wrote the following article 2003:

Take a look! Has anything changed?


Robert Spencer:

Over at the NewsReal blog they’ve been arguing for several days, while I was flying through the air in a tin can, giving a talk, flying elsewhere in another tin can, etc., over whether or not I am right about the non-existence of moderate Islam. And so now it is time for a Marshall McLuhan moment. If you don’t know what I mean by that, watch this clip.

Continue reading Spencer: Is There a Moderate Islam?

Jihad? What Jihad?

Pentagon on Fort Hood: Jihad? What Jihad?

by Robert Spencer

The Defense Department released its report Friday on the jihad massacre at Fort Hood, and it is hard to imagine a document more full of denial and deception. Above all, the Pentagon seems intent on ignoring and obfuscating the reasons why Nidal Hasan murdered thirteen people at Fort Hood in November.

Ron Paul knows who the enemy are:

“There’s Been a Coup by the CIA, They Run Everything, We Need to Take Them out”...ZIP


Although there were numerous signs that Nidal Hasan was an Islamic jihadist who believed it part of his religious responsibility as a Muslim to wage war against Infidels, the words “jihad,” “Muslim,” “Islam” and even “Islamist” never appear in the 86-page mélange of droning bureaucratese.

Continue reading Jihad? What Jihad?

Is "Backlash" worse than Jihad?

Ever noticed how concerned  and how quick  our far left media is to aid and abet the global jihad by assisting the Muslims in our midst in their  propaganda that they are poor little victims of our misguided efforts to keep our society safe?

Mickey Moe Mouse

Spencer: “Backlash” after Dallas Jihad Terror Plot?

Here is my column in FrontPage this morning, discussing the denial and obfuscation coming from Muslims in Dallas in the wake of Hosam Smadi’s jihad plot:

Late in September, a Muslim named Hosam Maher Husein Smadi, was arrested after placing an inert car bomb at a 60-story office tower in downtown Dallas. In March 2009, according to his indictment in U.S. District Court, Smadi declared his intention to wage war in the name of Islam. Yet characteristically, if dispiritingly, Muslims in the Dallas area are now expressing fears of a “backlash,” rather than taking the hard steps necessary to make sure there are no more jihad plotters who are inspired by Islamic teachings, as was Hosam Smadi.

Related links:

Smadi was very clear about the Islamic motivation for his plot: “I truly say it that [sic] my dream is to be among God’s soldiers, first for the support of Islam and my beloved Sheik Usama, may God give him long life.” He decried the “world plan to destroy Islam, Muslims, and to seize their lands for the benefit of the Jews and for the love of infidelity.” He swore: “In the name of God, the Gracious and Merciful, this is my vow to you, my brother, that I am ready. And if you were a lover of Jihad as I am, then, by God, I am ready for the Jihadi life.” And he affirmed: “The reign is only for the living and powerful God.”

Continue reading Is "Backlash" worse than Jihad?

Lizard Meltdown: Libel Blogger Charles Johnson Supports Islam Terror

British protestors against Islamization are now “bigoted cretins”.

The completely derailed little green snot-ball is no longer just a backstabbing dipstick.

* But no amount of lies, smears and defamation can replace reality, truth and integrity.


A veritable Lizard Peace Partner:

Mohammed Naseem is the scumbag who recently blamed  the infidels, the media and ‘the governments policies”  for the attacks of 9/11, 7/7, Madrid, Beslan, Mumbai etc etc….

Jihad News:

Comedy Gold From M. Cherif Bassiouni, DePaul University

Spencer: M. Cherif Bassiouni strikes back

Updates from Fitzgerald:

M. Cherif Bassiouni, Distinguished Research Professor of Law Emeritus and President Emeritus, International Human Rights Law Institute, DePaul University, has responded to my email posted here with the 1,000-word email that follows. You will note that nowhere in it does he resolve the contradiction in his statements about Islamic apostasy law that I asked him about in my email to him. I’ll address that in more detail below.

More Comedy from Islamistan:

Scientists in Japan microscopically confirmed islam is the “correct religion“-

Pakistan Daily Press News Agency/via ZIP

Continue reading Comedy Gold From M. Cherif Bassiouni, DePaul University

Death For Apostasy: Spencer Rips Islamic Scholar Cherif Bassiouni

“The punishment for apostasy from the religion of Islam is execution”

Afghanistan Daily Life

Here is a cluebat for those who might be tempted to believe the soothing lies that are coming from Islamic apologists in connection with the Rifqa Bary story: “Why should a person who disbelieves after becoming Muslim be executed? The punishment for the apostate is execution. Why such harshness?,” from Islam Question and Answer, Fatwa No. 12406 (thanks to the Jawa Report) via Jihad Watch:

The punishment for the apostate is execution. Why such harshness?.

Praise be to Allaah.

The punishment for apostasy from the religion of Islam is execution. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And whosoever of you turns back from his religion and dies as a disbeliever, then his deeds will be lost in this life and in the Hereafter, and they will be the dwellers of the Fire. They will abide therein forever”

[al-Baqarah 2:217]

And it was proven that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever changes his religion, execute him.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari in his Saheeh. What this hadeeth means is that whoever leaves Islam and changes to another religion and persists in that and does not repent, is to be executed. It was also proven that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “It is not permissible to shed the blood of a person who bears witness that there is no god but Allaah and that I am the Messenger of Allaah except in three cases: a life for a life, a previously-married person who commits adultery, and one who leaves Islam and forsakes the jamaa’ah.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari and Muslim.

Continue reading Death For Apostasy: Spencer Rips Islamic Scholar Cherif Bassiouni

Spencer: The Somali Pirates Are Jihadists

Of course they are. So why does our media call them ‘teenagers?’ Because “Poverty Breeds Terrorism?”

15888381                                       Teenager coastguard from Somalia

Piracy. . . Or just the Same Old Jihad?  (Pajamas Media)
According to the Qur’an, piracy in financial support of Jihad is Jihad. (Even if you already know the story of Susan Boyle, you’ll want to see the full video).

In Human Events this morning I discuss an almost completely ignored element of the Somali pirates’ identity: they’re jihadists.

This week, we celebrate the Navy SEALs’ rescue of American ship captain Richard Phillips. Their action, from the night airdrop that delivered them to the waiting warships to the split-second action in which three of the pirates were killed, was what we expect from our best special operations troops.But while we praise their skill, let’s not lose sight of who Phillips’ captors were. His Somali pirate captors are Islamic jihadists, dedicated to the same goals as Osama bin Laden and other jihadists around the world.

In August 2008, when the pirates became especially active off the Horn of Africa, Andrew Mwangura, head of the East African Seafarers’ Assistance Programme, declared that Al-Shabaab, a group of jihadists in Somalia, use piracy to fund their jihad: “According to our information, the money they make from piracy and ransoms goes to support al-Shabaab activities onshore.”

Continue reading “Spencer: The Somali Pirates Are Jihadists”


Al-Qaeda to Somalis: “Increase your strikes against the crusaders at sea”

Perhaps al-Qaeda is trying to exploit Somali anger at the recent US-pirate standoff, and redirect it to the jihad? Not really: “interaction between pirate groups and Somalia’s Al Qaeda-linked groups was first noticed about nine months ago.”

“Qaeda asks Somalis to attack ‘crusader’ ships,” from the Daily Times/JW


Glenn Beck gives Charles Johnson (Little Green Footballs) his comeuppance (or, how Queeg suddenly became inconsequential)

Backstory: Charles Johnson is not a conservative blogger. After 9/11, he joined ranks with Republicans as a convenience, because that was the right thing to do; he did some good things, most notably dissolving Dan Rather in a vat of acid (Charles got his 15-minute fame boost from that worthy episode) and he helped define the meaning of Islamofascism for many on the right.

Blue-eyed Stupidity Receives A Good Thrashing


There’s something about the phrase “moderate Taliban” that doesn’t quite work for me.


* Robert Spencer knows his stuff, and when  a PC-infected American journo meets a sly Muhammedan taqiyya spin-doctor who feeds him with BS,  it doesn’t take Spencer long to put it through the shredder. A pleasure to watch how he does it:

Muslim filmmaker: “To say that American lifestyle or society is at loggerheads with the concept of the Quran is very, very wrong”

All that “jihad” business? Pah! Just a misunderstanding!

“Quran Compatible With American Values, Filmmaker Says,” by Trevor Williams in Global Atlanta, (thanks to Robert Spencer and JW):

Despite a perceived cultural clash between the West and Islam, many of the values upheld by Americans are also enshrined in the religion’s holy book, the Quran, an Indian filmmaker said in Atlanta.“The Quran is already there, it’s being played out every day, day in and day out in American life,” said Faruq Masudi, who is promoting his newest movie in Georgia. “To say that American lifestyle or society is at loggerheads with the concept of the Quran is very, very wrong.”

* What Next? Moderate Ku Klux Klan?

Continue reading Blue-eyed Stupidity Receives A Good Thrashing