Mohamed ElBaradei: "resisting Iran is counterproductive…"

Fox guarding chicken coop proves wrong strategy, after all:

images-1 “Counterproductive..” El Baradei……..

El Baradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast

Mohammed  ElBaradei has a long history of obfuscating and denying Iran’s obvious intentions. Why is it so hard for successive US-administration to give him the shoe?

He is not alone, of course: the US administration is infiltrated by “advisors and lobbyists” who do their bidding for Arab/Muslim causes, and with Fareed Zakaria doing Islamo-prop on CNN and Newsweep, when will America get hit with a cluebat?

Report: Iran has data necessary to make a nuclear bomb

“ElBaradei has long been reluctant to adopt a confrontational strategy on Iran, an approach he sees as counterproductive.” Sure, and the alternative has worked so well this far — mostly for Iran.

More on this story. “Report Says Iran Has Data to Make a Nuclear Bomb,” by William J. Broad and David E. Sanger for the New York Times, October 3: Jihad Watch

Other News:

ElBaradei: “Israel is the number one threat to the Middle East given the nuclear arms it possesses”

It’s important to note that the source of this quotation is Iran’s Islamic Republic News Agency, and therefore must be taken with a grain of salt: Will ElBaradei contradict or deny he said that?

But regarding the statement itself: Never mind that Iran is the most visible state sponsor of jihad terrorism across the Middle East, while Israel is concerned only with defending its own borders. Never mind that Iran is run by clerics who prize death over life, and endorse a president with apocalyptic aspirations to hasten the return of the Mahdi. No, Iran is the “number one threat” to the Middle East with conventional weapons, making comparisons to Israel immaterial.

“ElBaradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast: report,” from Xinhua, October 4/JW

8 thoughts on “Mohamed ElBaradei: "resisting Iran is counterproductive…"”

  1. Let Iran make a N-bomb. it’s gonna happen anyway!
    if they try to use it…. drop some m.o.a.b.’s on their cities.
    That will change their perspective.

  2. ElBaradei is an incompetent scientist – essentially a perverted political entity – the real question is why has he been allowed to influence the IAEA for so long!!!

  3. SM, I have to disagree with your solution.

    First of all, dropping a MOAB on Iranian cities would only kill innocent civilians, many of whom want the current regime toppled.

    Secondly, I think a pre-emptive strike by the combined air powers of the US and Israel on their nuclear centrifuge sites would provide the impetus for a new revolution in Iran which could possibly topple the tyrannical government of the clerics and Ahmadinejad and possibly install a new democratic government.
    I think the US is waiting for the development of the new 30,000 lb bunker buster. Once they have sufficient fire-power to blow these facilities sky-high then I think you’ll see some action. Stalling is giving Ahmadinejad more time to develop what he needs to launch a nuclear weapon against Israel and possibly an Eastern European country.
    That is the only problem…time.

  4. When the strange and mentally deranged theocrats get their collective greasy hands on nukes. We all know what is going to happen, when people who do not possess one iota of commonsense have this sort of destructive power at their slimy fingertips. There will be some sort of mindless sabre rattling that will turn into a nuclear exchange. How do you like your Imams? FRIED or TOASTED! As we see on a daily basis these people are struggling with modernity and technological progress. It will crush their ignorance beyond recognition.

  5. Al-Kidya

    I think you are right, reading your comment disagreeing
    with my solution, i realize that it would only strengthen
    the regime in Tehran, also they would block off the strait
    of Hormuz, which would cause worldwide energy problems.

  6. This was sent to our highest political figure in Canada.
    Obama’s advisers support Iran’s nuclear development.

    I realize you have access to the best of intel, but I am taking the liberty of contacting you out of concern.

    Due to my knowledge of Islam, I am connecting some points, that may have slipped your advisers awareness on Obama’s history.

    I’m sure you realize that he was born to a Muslim Kenyan father, Automatically this makes him a Muslim by that religions laws.

    In his mothers second marriage, she married an Indonesian Muslim.

    He was registerd in an Indonesian school as a Muslim, later in life he “supposedly” becomes a Christian, in a sect that hates the U.S.A. and with Communist ties.

    As a Christian he would automatically be considered an Apostate, subject to being Reviled and under a Death ruling, as per Mohammeds edicts.

    Through stealth he has reached one of the most powerful positions in the World, to assist Islam in its Goal of World Domination.

    Here is the most important clue.

    His acceptance into Harvard Law School was assisted by a Muslim Attorney, Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour and associates.

    This Attorney at some stage was an adviser to Saudi Billionaires.

    He also was involved with Hewy Newton and Bobby Seale and helped establish the Black Panther Party. He is known to have an intense hatred of U.S.A and Western Democracies.

    The main point is as an adviser and Muslim tied to Saudi Billionaires, Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour would never of supported a true Christian Apostate from Islam.

    This is a part of the master plan to undermine and conquer Western Societies for Islam.

    Obama also visited Pakistan in 1981, when Americans were not allowed in the country.

    My studies of his psychological reactions to events and speeches, strenghtens my awareness of Obama as a Wolf in Sheeps Clothing.


    This is the best source I’ve found.


    Lorenzo Bouchard

  7. El Baradei was not the problem – the problem is why he was allowed to play his game for so long.

Comments are closed.