Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker today told reporters, “I think we’re focused on balancing our budget. It would be wise for the president and others in Washington to focus on balancing their budget.”
True. Â Â Cubachi reported:
The state-run media ran interference for President Obama by spiking the Lara Logan Tahrir Square assault story.They knew it would damage Obama who helped push American ally Hosni Mubarak from office.
Jewish World Review reported:Â Breaking: State-Run Media Ran Interference for Obama By Spiking Logan Assault Story
- Islam and the Brutal Sex Assault of Lara Logan
- Lara Logan: Raping the “Jew” The most essential clue as to the motive of those sexually assaulting a CBS journalist was curiously left out of mainstream reporting.
Is Soros about to pull the plug?
On a recent trip to North Korea, Foreign Affairs Vice MinisterÂ Kim Kye Gwan greeted CNN’sÂ Wolf Blitzer by saying (through a translator): “I’m personally very happy to meet with you, Mr. Wolf, who I presume have the same power as the American president.”
“Mr. Wolf” responded bashfully, “Thank you very much, but I don’t think it’s true.” (Source)
“Birthers” get another shot (WND)
In a stunning move, the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another “conference” on a legal challenge to Barack Obama’s eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate.
The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4.
It was in January that the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments. But the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.
Should Obama ultimately be shown to have been ineligible for the office, his actions, including his appointments, at least would be open to challenge and question.
At the time, the Supreme Court acknowledged the “motion for recusal” but it changed it on official docketing pages to a “request.” And it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.
Hemenway then submitted a request for a rehearing, pointing out that the situation appeared to be violating the rules of theÂ U.S. Supreme Court.
He also argued that if court members continue to “avoid” the dispute they effectively will “destroy the constitutional rule of law basis of our legal system.”
“We have not exaggerated in presenting the question of the constitutional rule of law being at stake in this matter,” Hemenway wrote in a petition for rehearing before the high court. “A man has successfully run for the office of president and has done so, it appears, with an awareness that he is not eligible under the constitutional requirement for a person to be president.
There’s lots more, here on World Net Daily