UK: Religion of Broken Skulls Teaches Teacher a Lesson


A  Satirical Look at the Fear of Criticizing Violent Islam in a Democracy

UK: Muslims slash teacher’s face and fracture his skull “for teaching other religions to Muslim girls”

Gary Smith was not proselytizing; he was just teaching a world religions course. But for Akmol Hussein, Sheikh Rashid, Azad Hussain, and Simon Alam, such a distinction is so exceedingly fine as not to matter at all. And non-Muslims who proselytize for their religions among Muslims face a death penalty according to Islamic law, but these Muslims didn’t kill Gary Smith; they just fractured his skull. I guess that makes them moderates. Islamic Tolerance Alert from East London. “Four men slashed teacher’s face and left him with fractured skull ‘for teaching other religions to Muslim girls,'” from the Daily Mail, February 21 (thanks to JW):

More on the attack on the teacher for teaching Muslims religion other than Islam (Vlad Tepes)

Religious Education Teachers Should Die

Four men launched a horrific attack on a teacher in which they slashed his face and left him with a fractured skull because they did not approve of him teaching religion to Muslim girls.Akmol Hussein, 26, Sheikh Rashid, 27, Azad Hussain, 25, and Simon Alam, 19, attacked Gary Smith with a Stanley knife, an iron rod and a block of cement.

Mr Smith, who is head of religious education at Central Foundation Girls’ School in Bow, east London, also suffered a fractured skull….

Detectives made secret recordings of the gang’s plot to attack Mr Smith prior to the brutal assault.

Yet they didn’t give him protection sufficient to head off the assault? Why not?

The covert audio probe captured the gang condemning Mr Smith for ‘teaching other religions to our sisters’, the court heard.The RE teacher was targeted as he made his way on foot along Burdett Road in nearby Mile End on July 12 last year, Snaresbrook Crown Court was told.

Prosecutor Sarah Whitehouse told the court: ‘The evidence from what was said on the probe points overwhelmingly to a religious motive for this attack.’

It is believed the gang had made two earlier attempts to get at the teacher.

They were due to stand trial for the attack at Snaresbrook Crown Court but pleaded guilty to causing grievous bodily harm with intent.

A fifth defendant, Badruzzuha Uddin, 23, admitted assisting the thugs by hiding blood-stained clothing….

10 thoughts on “UK: Religion of Broken Skulls Teaches Teacher a Lesson”

  1. These four were doing just what the Koran tells them to do. The problem is they are perpetrating these acts in a “western” country where this religion(?)/ideology has no place. Why are they here ? and who has allowed this ? ….
    Politicians who aided and abetted the invasion by large numbers of illiterate Mohammedans, to change the balance of power forever, with the intention to replace the natives with a Mohammedan proletariat need to be arrested and tried for treason.

  2. The English police knew this teacher was going to be attacked. Why didn’t they arrest the suspects? Were they frightened of the koranimals or were they on their side and they wanted the teacher to be taught a lesson so that other teachers will not attempt something similar?
    I am afraid the English people have to fight the koranimals and their own police.
    Sad day.

    1. How do we know the police were not …. Muslims?

      The police dept that launched an investigation against the brave reporters who made “Undercover Mosque” were Mohammedans, corrupt as can be.

      When sacked, they got huge payouts on top of their outrageously high salaries.

  3. Re: Gerald – I totally agree, by not acting on the information they had, and protecting the teacher, they were therfore complicit in the attack.
    A sad day indeed for the UK.

  4. I showed a group of MPs an Islamic book full of hatred and incitement to murder. The MPs agreed the book should be banned in the UK. A month later, when they found out it was the Koran, there was the most panic-stricken U-turn you have ever seen.

    They finally said that the Koran was not covered by the laws of incitement. Who says?


Comments are closed.