‘‘Wishing our Muslim friends a holy Ramadan’’ and our strange obsession with 'boat-people'

1404734030758.jpg-620x349“Father” Bower, 51, Anglican priest  kaputnik at Mann Street, Gosford, is using his pulpit and the internet to flaunt his moral supremacy and his multicultural kumbaya  delusions. Needless to mention that his “church” is a political circus for redistribution, “social justice”, homo-marriage, open borders and ‘climate change’, or , if you prefer, ‘climate justice’.

When the time comes, “our Muslim friends’ will show him the real meaning of Ramadan.

In other news:

Do you really think people like this need our protection?

An accused murderer emerges from our peaceful refugee community:

westfieldKazem Mohammadi Payam, 35, who came to Australia after being granted a protection visa in 2010, appeared before Parramatta Local Court today.

The girlfriend of an Iranian refugee accused of murdering another man in front of hundreds of shoppers at Westfield Parramatta sobbed uncontrollably as her partner appeared in court over the killing. (Draconian Measures, Tim Blair)

Boat-people hysteria:

It’s amazing how many people want to stick their noses into this country and tell us what to do and how to think.

The New York Times gets all bossy with us: (Tim Blair)

Australia is pursuing draconian measures to deter people without visas from entering the country by boat. In doing so, it is failing in its obligation under international accords to protect refugees fleeing persecution …

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, António Guterres, said recently that “something strange happens” in the minds of Australians when it comes to asylum seekers who arrive by boat without a visa.

This is absurdly disingenuous. Economic opportunists and Islamic terrorists commonly discard their passports in order to make background checks more difficult, thereby improving their chances of gaining residency as genuine refugees. It isn’t strange at all that Australians reject this. Does the New York Times allow unknown and unidentified strangers to enter its building and stroll around on its editorial floors? If someone attempted to do so, would “something strange” happen, such as security or police throwing the intruder out?

The New York Times article is a disgraceful interference in another country’s affairs by the USA. . Look at the composition of the UNHRC and any sane person would tear up that treaty in a heartbeat. How many hypocritical, despotic third world  nations do we need to tell us how human we are? All the western countries should form their own international community and leave the UN to the losers.

It’s odd that we hear so much about Australia’s obligation to protect refugees fleeing persecution, but so little about asylum seekers’ obligation to seek protection in the nearest stable country.

People who pre-book flights over several stable countries, then dump their passports and pay large sums for sea passage to Australia, are not refugees fleeing persecution.

What sort of media do we have in this country where people of whom we know nothing about are reflexively labelled ‘asylum seekers’ simply because they happen to be in a boat off our coast? It’s not as if the term asylum seeker is a neutral one. It isn’t! It’s a highly emotive term. For years our media has been actively on knowingly lying to us. What sort of journaillie arrives at a conclusion and states a fact without  knowledge or evidence? Surely, this is outrageous. But this is the new normal…

From another commenter:

In another twist, and contrary to what the bleeding hearts would have you believe, even the UN refuge convention acknowledges that entering a country without proper documentation is illegal. It goes on to say that refugees may not be punished for entering a country illegally, but their arrival is still illegal. Australia is quite within its rights to detain people who have committed an offence and decide what penalty should apply. Once their cases are determined, the penalties applied are consistent with the convention.

Domestically, Australian law enforcement agencies have an obligation to uphold the law. Internationally, Australia has an obligation to disrupt and suppress the activities of criminal syndicates by whatever lawful means it has at its disposal. Attacking people-smugglers by making their product unsaleable seems like a pretty good strategy.

2 thoughts on “‘‘Wishing our Muslim friends a holy Ramadan’’ and our strange obsession with 'boat-people'”

  1. Following this link ….
    An accused murderer emerges from our peaceful refugee community:

    Revealed ….
    More than 30 asylum seekers [Vile Muhammadans] released into the community have been charged with offences rang-ing from people smuggling to paedophilia and murder, according to Department of Immigration figures“.

    The above …. is just one of the many reaons why ….
    -(and every other link in the above post by the Sheik indicates the same requirement)

    The following actions really have to be done quickly …. ….
    1. Incarcerate all Dhimmis(Assistors/Enablers/Traitors/Seditionists).
    2. Stop ALL Muhammadan immigration to the West.
    3. Expel ALL Muhammadans from the West.
    4. Expel ALL unwilling to go Muhammadans.
    5. Bulldoze ALL islam’s “Mostgrotesques”.
    6. Expel ALL -(survived their incarceration)- “Dhimmis” from the West.
    7. Expel ALL unwilling to go -(survived their incarceration)- “Dhimmis“.

    So Kazem Mohammadi PayamYOU ARE – Just another Muhammadan Criminal.
    Not an “Asylum Seeker” – AT ALL !

Comments are closed.