Germany’s hate-speech laws are unconstitutional

But the Merkel regime is undeterred and the resistance is weak:

“This is the end of the constitutional state”-Beatrix von Storch

German far-right AfD MP investigated over anti-Muslim social media posts

Beatrix von Storch, deputy leader of AfD party, could be charged with incitement to hatred, and was temporarily banned from Twitter and Facebook

‘Barbaric, gang-raping Muslim hordes of men…’

German AfD MP under fire for anti-Muslim new year tweets – accused Cologne police of appeasing “barbaric, gang-raping Muslim hordes of men” after they tweeted a new year message in Arabic.

Writing on Facebook, AfD leader Alice Weidel wrote that authorities were submitting to “imported, marauding, groping, abusive, knife-stabbing migrant mobs”.

Ms Storch’s party defended her comments, claiming that the removal of her remarks was a form of censorship.

Beatrix von Storch holds a bag reading ‘AfD? Appropriate disposal of right-wing agitation!’ in the German Bundestag.
Beatrix von Storch holds a bag reading ‘AfD? Appropriate disposal of right-wing agitation!’ in the German Bundestag. Photograph: Clemens Bilan/EPA

A far-right German MP is under police investigation over inflammatory anti-Muslim comments she made on social media on New Year’s Eve.

The Twitter account of Beatrix von Storch, deputy leader of Germany’s AfD party, was temporarily suspended on Monday, but she was later posting again on the site.

Von Storch accused Cologne police of appeasing “barbaric, gang-raping Muslim hordes of men” after they tweeted a new year message in Arabic. The police also tweeted the message in other languages, including English, French and German.

The authorities are considering whether Von Storch should be charged with incitement to hatred, a criminal offence.

Her Twitter account was suspended for 12 hours for her post, as it breached the site’s rules. On her return to the social media site, Von Storch posted in German: “Facebook has now also censored me. This is the end of the constitutional state.”

Germany has enacted stringent hate speech laws, with social media firms facing fines of up to €50m (£44m) if they do not remove “obviously illegal” hate speech and other postings within 24 hours of receiving a notification.

These so-called ‘hate speech laws’ are cooked up in haste by the deceitful Merkel regime and entirely unconstitutional.

In June, von Storch answered “yes” to a question on Facebook asking whether firearms should be used against women and children trying to cross the German border.

A non-issue. Redundant. A perversion of the political discourse. A nation that doesn’t protect its borders is no longer a nation.  The use of weapons to defend your border from the islamic invasion is moral, legal and justifiable under the law.

Von Storch, whose grandfather served as finance minister under Hitler, later suggested her computer mouse had slipped.

A low blow from the extreme left Grunard. 

She posed with former Ukip leader Nigel Farage when he launched AfD’s German election campaign in September. Farage described chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to keep open Germany’s borders at the height of the 2015 refugee crisis as the “worst decision by any leader in modern political history”.

Nigel Farage, former leader of the UK Independence party, with AfD deputy leader Beatrix von Storch.
Nigel Farage, former leader of the UK Independence party, with AfD deputy leader Beatrix von Storch. Photograph: Odd Andersen/AFP/Getty Images

During New Year’s Eve celebrations in Cologne in 2016, scores of women were sexually assaulted and mugged by large groups of men. Police said the suspects were largely of north African origin and most had recently migrated to Germany.

For Berlin’s most recent New Year’s Eve festivities, a “women only” zone was set up.

The “safe zones” for women were an utter failure.

3 thoughts on “Germany’s hate-speech laws are unconstitutional”

  1. Von Storch scorches the leftards again LOL!

    ALL liberal “hate-speech laws” ARE crimes!!!

    “The whole concept of “hate speech” (laws against hurt feelings) is political correctness run amok, a leftist anti-free-speech tool that provides an unlimited excuse to shut down and punish anyone who openly disagrees with establishment dicta. Every totalitarian state has similar laws designed to protect the rulers. Such laws have no place in a free society.”

    – Patrick1984 –

    But Terminiello v. Chicago (1949), Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), National Socialist Party v. Skokie (1977), R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992), Virginia v. Black (2003), Snyder v. Phelps (2011) These SCOTUS cases show that unpopular speech is still protected speech.

    SO: What is “hate-speech” and why should it be considered a crime if it’s NOT already: a) a threat; and b) slander (fraud)?

    If it’s not either PHYSICALLY threatening speech – or emotionally threatening BECAUSE it could physically impact one’s life, like how fraudulent slander causes other people to react to one as if one were a criminal in need of hating and beating – then it’s THE TRUTH: and so it SHOULD cause one the emotional distress of ‘hurt feelings!’ So it isn’t objectively “offensive,” but is, in fact, socially beneficial in that it helps defend society from criminals, whether or not said predictably victim-blaming criminal is subjectively “offended” by their victims being notified about THEIR offenses!

    Having no facts to justify their aggressive hypocrisy, all criminals will resort to using emotive ‘arguments’ to justify their crimes by playing the victims. So they (liberals, muslims) can be relied on to try to criminalize hurt feelings and to make offending people, (i.e: the criminals, by accusing them of their crimes) illegal, too!

    ALL “Hate-Speech Laws” ARE CRIMES!

    “Progressive” criminals – who like all criminals desire an equality of outcome over a true equality of opportunity, and to get it will always try to socially engineer ever-more rights and ever-less responsibilities for them selves, by offloading their responsibilities onto their victims by stealing their victims’ rights – pretend to hold submissive masochism as the highest virtue (for their victims to hold, not them) and the ultimate crime to be causing offense and hurting other people’s (criminal’s) feelings, (i.e: by accusing them of their crimes).

    So they want to make it illegal to accuse criminals of their crimes, since that might hurt their feelings and in offending them with the often-painful truth, “make” them commit even more crimes!

    Is there anything which really ought to qualify as hate speech and be banned?

    NO – not because it’s “hateful” (because that sort of nonsense is only making subjective assessments based on emotions;) and “HATE” is really only the perfectly natural human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing crimes (like islam); without ‘hate’ we would never bother to accuse criminals of their crimes in order to stop those crimes.

    Unreasonable false displays of hatred and anger on the other hand, are what the Left is good at – but that’s already illegal, not because of the anger displayed – that’s just the outrageous holier-than-thou virtue-signalling packaging used to disguise their preposterous extortion attempts – but because it’s fraudulent slander.

    Such criminal leftists who try to make “hate” into a crime, only ever make it ‘illegal’ to hate crime itself!

    Speech which is already disallowed is incitement of immediate violence and death-threats … and even those aren’t illegal, if say they call for the police to use violence to counter ongoing mob violence and looting, or call for the death-penalty for murderers!

    Further, ALL politicians who craft “hate-speech laws” and ALL cops who arrest people for “hate-speech crimes” and ALL lawyers and judges who prosecute people for them, should themselves be fired and JAILED for putting “hurt feelings” before FACTS!

    Especially in the case of islam!

    Pretending that the global crime-gang called islam is a “race” of poor swarthy animal-people, oppressed by the mentally superior whites, in order to slander everyone who notices it’s a crime-gang as a hatefully bigoted “racist” – is to deliberately enable that crime-gang’s crimes by hiding and destroying the evidence of same, and thus to be a willing accessory to those crimes. Since islam is a murder-gang, and the penalty for committing and enabling the commission of murder is DEATH, anyone and everyone who calls an opponent of muslims, islam, and their global jihad, a “racist!” should be lawfully put to death.

    Everyone who defends islam and muslims endorses crime.
    Endorsing crime IS a crime, so those doing it are criminals.

    Right in the Qur’an is: the permission to murder Jews and Christians (Surah 9:29), to terrorize all non-Muslims (8:12), to rape young girls (65:4), to enslave people for sex (4:3), to lie about one’s true goals (3:54), and the command to make war on all the infidels (9:123) and subjugate the entire world to Allah (9:33).

    Are death-threats legal? NO.
    Is extortion legal? NO.
    Is slavery legal? NO.
    Is murder legal? NO.
    Is rape legal? NO.


    Rape, slavery, robbery, extortion and murder are never OK!

    Everything muslims pretend to see as “holy” is already a crime!

    So nobody has a legal right to practice islam anywhere on earth!

    But then again, hey, hadn’t you heard?!

    Being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!

    So much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:

    “Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”

    Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!

    When one doesn’t have facts on one’s side (no criminal can rationally or logically justify their “crime is good – for me, because you all do it, too!” stance) one only has emotions left, and defending hurt feelings and “dignity” doesn’t rely on cause and effect sequencing (where crime is defined as attacking thereby innocent other first).

    But feelings or emotions aren’t thoughts, much less morals – because unlike facts, they can be wrong: one may love an enemy who is still out to get one, and hate someone who is only trying to help – no, instead, our emotions are mere reflections of the three basic states of space-time (the static past, the fluid present, and the nebulous future, respectively): static fear, fluid greed, nebulous hope. Not exactly worth defending with one’s life!

  2. PS: Because they choose to interpret all emotions as varying levels of pain, and their own fears as external attacks, psychopaths don’t want to think about causes and effects or problems and solutions, they just want it all to end!

    Since evil leftist masochists are always hell-bent on becoming victims of worst-case scenarios, they “project” onto, and slander-blame, their victims, because their first emotion is fear of getting caught for their crimes.

Comments are closed.