“Hate Crimes” & White Farmers

London Police Issue ‘Hate Crime’ Guidelines. Think Twice Before You Open Your Mouth.

The London Metropolitan Police have issued their guidelines for what constitutes a “hate crime,” and the parameters they delineate are wide…

Britain First banned from Facebook after pressure from European leaders

But its ok for muslims to run around the streets chanting death to the Jews and threatening to take over the UK and hoist their black flag on top of Parliament and Buckingham Palace!

“Let them call you racist, wear it as badge of honor,” Bannon tells French far-right

The former Trump adviser Steve Bannon tells the French far-right Front National to wear the racism label, given by the ‘globalists,’ with honour.

If i am racist for wanting to offer white Sth Africans a safe haven so be it. If I am racist because I do not believe that islam is civilised and needs to stay in the middle east then so be it. If I am racist because I put the safety of Australians and the security of our country first and foremost then so be it. If I am racist simply because I am white – and anything I say therefore must be racist by default then so be it. Do I defend non-whites – yes I will. Will I defend non-whites and whites who want to kill us. NO I won’t!

Australia considers fast-track visas for white South African farmers

Home affairs minister Peter Dutton says the group deserves ‘special attention’ due to the ‘horrific circumstances’ they face at home
Julie Bishop said the government had no intention of changing the current humanitarian visa program.

Foreign Affairs Minister rejects Peter Dutton’s calls on South African farmers

The credibility of Austalia’s immigration system was based on its non-discriminatory nature, said Julie Bishop.–SMH
 “Non-discriminatory” means Mohammedans & unassimilable African savages only.

Is Peter Dutton red-pilled or what?

Sam Vimes, XYZ

The history of South Africa is complicated and marred with the legacy of racism and inequality. This is a sad reality, uncomfortable to many, but one which needs to be acknowledged before any reasonable discussion of the country’s political situation can be held without resorting to childish name-calling and emotional language.

I’m no defender of the Apartheid government of the National Party, but neither am I a fan of the airbrushing of history and South African government in the post-Apartheid era, that has squandered the amazing opportunity given them in 1994 to work with all people of South Africa towards a true African democracy, one that was to look forward with equanimity when it came to dealing with the racial skeletons in its past.

Instead, what the South African government has done, particularly during the last few years under now-ousted president Jacob Zuma, is foster an increasingly hostile climate of racially-charged rhetoric, wherein the perils and evils of colonialism were touted, and the black majority constantly reminded that whatever ills still befall them in 2018, are due to the legacy of the white man and certainly nothing to do with an inept ANC kleptocracy that’s run the show for almost a quarter century now.

This piece is not intended to be a diatribe about the ANC’s many failings; for this the reader need only read any number of reports about crime, power, water, infrastructure, corruption, nepotism, breakdown of law, etc which ultimately beset all South Africans daily, with poor black South Africans living on the poverty line often most affected.

No, I bring this up because it provides context to the way that the rest of us treat Africa; the inherent failings of its governments, the low expectations of and for its people. Both seemingly provide a justification for the sort of grotesque reverse-racism that is now so prevalent in the minds of the twittering classes.

This is very evident in the case of South Africa’s white farmers, from the rates of murder and violence they endure, to the way in which the South African government has ramped up its rhetoric concerning the expropriation of land without compensation in the past weeks.

I am massively impressed by the statements made this week by Peter Dutton, Australia’s Home Affairs Minister, that Australia should look into fast-tracking visas for white South African farmers; yet it’s the response to this that’s astounded me. Not only has the South African government come out immediately and declared that no South African farmer suffers unduly relative to the struggles of other sectors of the South African population, (isn’t that a sad indictment on a government when they’re talking down the murder rate of one sector of the population while talking up an even higher murder rate elsewhere by way of justification), but the comments sections of the online media provides a staggering insight into just how utterly devoid of reason and compassion the Leftist hate mob has become, and in the case of white Western liberals, just how brainwashed they are to the notion that white people can also be victims of crime, violence and abuse of power.

8 thoughts on ““Hate Crimes” & White Farmers”

  1. Count on it, British hate crimes are for native Britons only. Muslim hate demonstrations against British citizens and the creation of what is virtually a Muslim ethnostate in the Tower Hamlets won’t be subject to any of those rules.

    10,000 Muslim Extremists [he repeats himself] riot and chase Non Muslims in London 2017

  2. Be sure to tune into Darren ‘Whackhead’ Simpson on Highveld Stereo 94.7 out of Jo’berg. Darren is flogging Robert Mugabe’s new CD. You didn’t know Robbie Mugabe has released a new CD? Caution advised on the political incorrectness scale of 1-10 : solid 10.

    Robbie Mugabe’s New CD

  3. That thousand yard death stare of the Foreign Minister. Crikey. What is she looking at the ‘It’s OK to be White’ poster on my website?

  4. If the criminal African tribal savages want someone to “play with”

    Let the Africans have Australia’s islamopiles
    (the ones who love arabs/islam/islams/diversifiers so much they enable the islams and the criminal African tribal savages – imigration and permanent residence)
    (in fact they insist on it – of course stopping short of inviting these enabled into their own homes and not supporting the enabled from their own tax payer supplied incomes)

    eg. This selection of Greens who are Traitors/Seditioners/Subversive and have to be treated appropriately

    Senators – Federal
    Richard Di Natale (Vic), 2011–present (elected in 2010)
    Adam Bandt MP (Melbourne, Vic), 2010–present
    Rachel Siewert (WA), 2005–present (elected in 2004)
    Sarah Hanson-Young (SA), 2008–present (elected in 2007)
    Lee Rhiannon (NSW), 2011–present (elected in 2010)
    Peter Whish-Wilson (Tas), 2012–present
    Janet Rice (Vic), 2014–present (elected in 2013)
    Nick McKim (Tas), 2015–present
    Andrew Bartlett (Qld), 2017–present
    Jordon Steele-John (WA), 2017–present

    New South Wales – Current
    Dawn Walker, 2017–present
    Jeremy Buckingham, 2011–present
    Mehreen Faruqi, 2013–present
    Justin Field, 2016–present
    David Shoebridge, 2010–present
    Jenny Leong, 2015–present (Member for Newtown)
    Jamie Parker, 2011–present (Member for Balmain)
    Tamara Smith, 2015–present (Member for Ballina)

    Victoria – Current
    Sue Pennicuik, 2006–present
    Samantha Dunn, 2014–present
    Sam Hibbins, 2014–present (Member for Prahran)
    Ellen Sandell, 2014–present (Member for Melbourne)
    Nina Springle, 2014–present
    Samantha Ratnam, 2017–present
    Lidia Thorpe, 2017–present (Member for Northcote)
    Huong Truong, 2018–present

    Tasmania – Current
    Cassy O’Connor, 2008–present
    Rosalie Woodruff, 2015–present

    South Australia – Current
    Tammy Franks, 2010–present
    Mark Parnell, 2006–present

    Western Australia – Current
    Robin Chapple, 2001–2005, 2009–present
    Tim Clifford, 2017–present
    Diane Evers, 2017–present
    Alison Xamon, 2009–2013, 2017–present

    Queensland – Current
    Michael Berkman, 2017–present (Member for Maiwar)

    Australian Capital Territory – Current
    Shane Rattenbury, 2008–present
    Caroline Le Couteur, 2008–2012, 2016–present

    Northern Territory

    Surprising how many (power dressed 😉 ) females are Greens !
    (But I wouldn’t call them Women)
    Not surprising how many wimpy males are Greens !
    Not surprising how many testosterone pilled females and wimpy males are islamophiles – Yeah they are using Europe as a template !

    (Of course this purge of islamophiles would naturally include all former Treasonous/Seditious/Subversive “Greens”)
    It is a case of get expelled/removed or go to jail !!!

    Now – for the rest of the islamophiles …


    ALL liberal “hate-speech laws” ARE crimes!!!

    “The whole concept of “hate speech” (laws against hurt feelings) is political correctness run amok, a leftist anti-free-speech tool that provides an unlimited excuse to shut down and punish anyone who openly disagrees with establishment dicta. Every totalitarian state has similar laws designed to protect the rulers. Such laws have no place in a free society.”

    – Patrick1984 –

    But Terminiello v. Chicago (1949), Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), National Socialist Party v. Skokie (1977), R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992), Virginia v. Black (2003), Snyder v. Phelps (2011) These SCOTUS cases show that unpopular speech is still protected speech.

    SO: What is “hate-speech” and why should it be considered a crime if it’s NOT already: a) a threat; and b) slander (fraud)?

    If it’s not either PHYSICALLY threatening speech – or emotionally threatening BECAUSE it could physically impact one’s life, like how fraudulent slander causes other people to react to one as if one were a criminal in need of hating and beating – then it’s THE TRUTH: and so it SHOULD cause one the emotional distress of ‘hurt feelings!’ So it isn’t objectively “offensive,” but is, in fact, socially beneficial in that it helps defend society from criminals, whether or not said predictably victim-blaming criminal is subjectively “offended” by their victims being notified about THEIR offenses!

    Having no facts to justify their aggressive hypocrisy, all criminals will resort to using emotive ‘arguments’ to justify their crimes by playing the victims. So they (liberals, muslims) can be relied on to try to criminalize hurt feelings and to make offending people, (i.e: the criminals, by accusing them of their crimes) illegal, too!

    ALL “Hate-Speech Laws” ARE CRIMES!

    “Progressive” criminals – who like all criminals desire an equality of outcome over a true equality of opportunity, and to get it will always try to socially engineer ever-more rights and ever-less responsibilities for them selves, by offloading their responsibilities onto their victims by stealing their victims’ rights – pretend to hold submissive masochism as the highest virtue (for their victims to hold, not them) and the ultimate crime to be causing offense and hurting other people’s (criminal’s) feelings, (i.e: by accusing them of their crimes).

    So they want to make it illegal to accuse criminals of their crimes, since that might hurt their feelings and in offending them with the often-painful truth, “make” them commit even more crimes!

    Is there anything which really ought to qualify as hate speech and be banned?

    NO – not because it’s “hateful” (because that sort of nonsense is only making subjective assessments based on emotions;) and “HATE” is really only the perfectly natural human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing crimes (like islam); without ‘hate’ we would never bother to accuse criminals of their crimes in order to stop those crimes.

    Unreasonable false displays of hatred and anger on the other hand, are what the Left is good at – but that’s already illegal, not because of the anger displayed – that’s just the outrageous holier-than-thou virtue-signalling packaging used to disguise their preposterous extortion attempts – but because it’s fraudulent slander.

    Such criminal leftists who try to make “hate” into a crime, only ever make it ‘illegal’ to hate crime itself!

    Speech which is already disallowed is incitement of immediate violence and death-threats … and even those aren’t illegal, if say they call for the police to use violence to counter ongoing mob violence and looting, or call for the death-penalty for murderers!


    Further, ALL politicians who craft “hate-speech laws” and ALL cops who arrest people for “hate-speech crimes” and ALL lawyers and judges who prosecute people for them, should themselves be fired and JAILED for putting “hurt feelings” before FACTS!

    Especially in the case of islam!

    Pretending that the global crime-gang called islam is a “race” of poor swarthy animal-people, oppressed by the mentally superior whites, in order to slander everyone who notices it’s a crime-gang as a hatefully bigoted “racist” – is to deliberately enable that crime-gang’s crimes by hiding and destroying the evidence of same, and thus to be a willing accessory to those crimes. Since islam is a murder-gang, and the penalty for committing and enabling the commission of murder is DEATH, anyone and everyone who calls an opponent of muslims, islam, and their global jihad, a “racist!” should be lawfully put to death.

    Everyone who defends islam and muslims endorses crime.
    Endorsing crime IS a crime, so those doing it are criminals.

    Right in the Qur’an is: the permission to murder Jews and Christians (Surah 9:29), to terrorize all non-Muslims (8:12), to rape young girls (65:4), to enslave people for sex (4:3), to lie about one’s true goals (3:54), and the command to make war on all the infidels (9:123) and subjugate the entire world to Allah (9:33).

    Are death-threats legal? NO.
    Is extortion legal? NO.
    Is slavery legal? NO.
    Is murder legal? NO.
    Is rape legal? NO.


    Rape, slavery, robbery, extortion and murder are never OK!

    Everything muslims pretend to see as “holy” is already a crime!

    So nobody has a legal right to practice islam anywhere on earth!


    But hadn’t you heard?! Being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!

    So much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:

    “Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”

    Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!

  6. This ILLEGAL and wholly subjectivist “HURT FEELINGS” nonsense has got to stop!

    Offense can only be taken, never given! If someone says something mean and untrue about you, you either consider the source and scornfully laugh it off, file a lawsuit for defamation, (slander and libel are forms of fraud) or a crime report for inciting violence, if they went that far.

    But these recent fake judge-made “laws” are really only onus-reversing crimes, as in:

    “You have to prove you DIDN’T hurt my feelings, or else you owe me money! Nyah!”

    And there’s no such thing as a state of permanent, ongoing “emotional distress” that isn’t deliberately and willfully, habitually obsessed about – because our emotions are mere reflections of the three basic states of space-time (the static past, the fluid present, and the nebulous future, respectively): static fear, fluid greed, nebulous hope. Not exactly worth defending!

    Further, libertine “liberal” criminals have to resort to whining about their hurt feewings, simply because they don’t have any actual facts to justify their many crime excuses!

    So, being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is now to be deemed the highest moral virtue!

    So much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:

    “Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”

    Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!

    So any and all legislators, judges, and educators who put criminals’ hurt feelings above facts should be fired and JAILED.

    And that includes using the words “Respect!” and “Dignity!”

    Objectifying people as “victims!” is what really “disrespects their dignity!”

    Any and all “laws” criminalizing hurt feelings should be repealed and their originators fired and JAILED, too!

    Because all subjectivist “laws” are really adversarial crimes, seeking to use fraudulent slander to extort and enslave others. Fraud, slander, extortion and slavery (aka “Political Correctness”) are already crimes.

    Who complains about hurt feelings (aka defending their “dignity”) anyway?! ONLY criminals!

    They always feel hurt and left out when others try and succeed and they don’t, so they feel jealous and entitled to demand an equality of outcome and permanent rights (like, to your stuff) without any concomitant corollary responsibilities (like to earn or otherwise have to pay for it) over an equality of opportunity! i.e: to extort a right to remain irresponsibly wrong – to be able to angrily, “hatefully” attack others first while demanding a false right to be pities for their chosen stance!

    Which is why they invented the whole nonsensical and emotive concept of “HATE CRIMES!” – because, in making “hate” into a crime, they extortively try to make it “illegal” for their potential victims to hate their crimes!

    Any law-abiding person who gets robbed or extorted doesn’t feel “sad” or “uncomfortable” about it, they feel righteously ANGRY! So their constant demands for pity is one really good way to tell an extortive victimology-spewing criminal from a real victim of same!

Comments are closed.