Who will decide what “hate-speech” is? Mohammedans?

Government regulations could KILL the world wide web

Who will decide what “hate-speech” is? Mohammedans?

Fanatical communist  claims when we directly quote Ilhan Omar it puts her in danger and it makes us “racist”.

The Deep State vs Donald Trump

It was never about Russia. The targeting of served to protect Hillary Clinton and her enablers/co-conspirators in Obama administration from prosecution.

James Comey: ‘I’ve Never Thought of’ Electronic Surveillance of Trump Campaign as ‘Spying’

‘Sanctuary cities”

If sanctuary cities don’t want more illegals, why are they harboring them in the first place?

Any mayor of a sanctuary city who’s offended at a plan to send illegal immigrants to his city must be a racist.

President STUNS Democrats, threatens to move all illegal immigrants to sanctuary cities… “They say they have open arms. Let’s see if they have open arms.”

Fired German Intelligence Boss Slams Merkel Migrant Policy on Hungarian Television


Former German intelligence chief Hans-George Maassen told Hungarian media this week that the door of immigration was “still open” and slammed the asylum policy of Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Speaking to broadcaster M1, the former president of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) said that despite there being fewer asylum seekers than 2015,” the lock is still open,” Die Welt reports.

During the 25-minute interview, Mr Maassen also touched upon the problems with integrating a large number of asylum seekers saying, “Integration is possible if you create the legal framework and also get people to integrate or be integrated. Integration can not only be ordered, but integration must also be demanded.”

Maassen is delusional. He is clueless about Islam. No one can integrate Mohammedans.

In other news:

Swedish Migration Employee Allegedly Gave 121 False Visas To Mohammedan Migrants

An employee of the Swedish Migration board is facing scrutiny and charges after being accused of handing out false visas to 121 Afghan migrants.

Over 10K Illegal Aliens in U.S. from Terrorist-Sponsored Countries
Israel Rockets to the Moon While Its Enemies Launch Rockets at Civilians

The arrest of is meant to send a message to all Americans and journalists: be quiet, behave, toe the line. Or you will pay the price.

From the Religion of Peace:

Lawyers: Michigan Airport Stabber a Victim of Canadian Intolerance…
Islamic Teacher: Molestation was Effort to ‘Cure’ Female Student…
Omar Portrays Herself as Victim, Following 9/11 Insensitivity…
Tlaib Quickly Plays ‘Color Card’ to Defend Omar…
(Germany) Massive Brawl Triggered by Disagreement over Islam…
Sainthood Sought for Priest Whose Throat was Slit by Jihadis…
Imam Beaten Up by Three Sisters of Jilted Woman…
Islamic Scholars Urge ‘Embrace’ of Polygamy…
Hamas ‘Well-Established’ in Germany…
(Swedish) Pro-Migrant Politician Blames ‘All Men’ for Rape…
Wife Set on Fire After Seeking Divorce…
Italian Cemetery Covers Crosses to Avoid Offending ‘Another Religion’
Migrant Criminal’s Gang Member-ship is ‘Proof of Cultural Integration’
Pakistani Rapist Gets the ‘Old World’ Treatment in Austria…
Berlin: Homeless Man Stabbed in Anti-Christian Attack…
Imam Beaten with Sticks After Leaving Islam for Christianity…

2 thoughts on “Who will decide what “hate-speech” is? Mohammedans?”

  1. ALL liberal “hate-speech laws” ARE crimes!!!

    “The whole concept of “hate speech” (laws against hurt feelings) is political correctness run amok, a leftist anti-free-speech tool that provides an unlimited excuse to shut down and punish anyone who openly disagrees with establishment dicta. Every totalitarian state has similar laws designed to protect the rulers. Such laws have no place in a free society.”

    – Patrick1984 –

    But Terminiello v. Chicago (1949), Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), National Socialist Party v. Skokie (1977), R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992), Virginia v. Black (2003), Snyder v. Phelps (2011) These SCOTUS cases show that unpopular speech is still protected speech.

    SO: What is “hate-speech” and why should it be considered a crime if it’s NOT already: a) a threat; and b) slander (fraud)?

    If it’s not either PHYSICALLY threatening speech – or emotionally threatening BECAUSE it could physically impact one’s life, like how fraudulent slander causes other people to react to one as if one were a criminal in need of hating and beating – then it’s THE TRUTH: and so it SHOULD cause one the emotional distress of ‘hurt feelings!’ So it isn’t objectively “offensive,” but is, in fact, socially beneficial in that it helps defend society from criminals, whether or not said predictably victim-blaming criminal is subjectively “offended” by their victims being notified about THEIR offenses!

    Having no facts to justify their aggressive hypocrisy, all criminals will resort to using emotive ‘arguments’ to justify their crimes by playing the victims. So they (liberals, muslims) can be relied on to try to criminalize hurt feelings and to make offending people, (i.e: the criminals, by accusing them of their crimes) illegal, too!

    ALL “Hate-Speech Laws” ARE CRIMES!

    “Progressive” criminals – who like all criminals desire an equality of outcome over a true equality of opportunity, and to get it will always try to socially engineer ever-more rights and ever-less responsibilities for them selves, by offloading their responsibilities onto their victims by stealing their victims’ rights – pretend to hold submissive masochism as the highest virtue (for their victims to hold, not them) and the ultimate crime to be causing offense and hurting other people’s (criminal’s) feelings, (i.e: by accusing them of their crimes).

    So they want to make it illegal to accuse criminals of their crimes, since that might hurt their feelings and in offending them with the often-painful truth, “make” them commit even more crimes!

    Is there anything which really ought to qualify as hate speech and be banned?

    NO – not because it’s “hateful” (because that sort of nonsense is only making subjective assessments based on emotions;) and “HATE” is really only the perfectly natural human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing crimes (like islam); without ‘hate’ we would never bother to accuse crimi8nals of their crimes in order to stop those crimes.

    Unreasonable false displays of hatred and anger on the other hand, are what the Left is good at – but that’s already illegal, not because of the anger displayed – that’s just the outrageous holier-than-thou virtue-signalling packaging used to disguise their preposterous extortion attempts – but because it’s fraudulent slander.

    Such criminal leftists who try to make “hate” into a crime, only ever make it ‘illegal’ to hate crime itself!

    Speech which is already disallowed is incitement of immediate violence and death-threats … and even those aren’t illegal, if say they call for the police to use violence to counter ongoing mob violence and looting, or call for the death-penalty for murderers!

    Further, ALL politicians who craft “hate-speech laws” and ALL cops who arrest people for “hate-speech crimes” and ALL lawyers and judges who prosecute people for them, should themselves be fired and JAILED for putting “hurt feelings” before FACTS!

Comments are closed.