“HOPE Not Hate Imam” Declares Boris “Islamophobic”

More than six weeks after they began, protests in Hong Kong show no sign of easing up
Ilhan Omar Trashes America — Again — In NYT Op-ed

Omar: Be ‘More Fearful of White Men’ Than Jihadists

Creatures like her should fear. Because one day whitey might just have a gut full of this shiite and fight back.

Ilhan Omar (Kerem Yucel / AFP / Getty)

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has published an op-ed in the New York Times on Thursday in which she urges readers to go beyond condemning President Donald Trump as a racist, and “confront” his policies. Along the way, she confirms Trump’s basic criticism of her: namely, that she does not like the United States of America, at least as she finds it.

New Govt ‘Islamophobia’ Adviser is HOPE Not Hate Imam Who Said Boris ‘Legitimised Hatred’


An imam appointed as an adviser on defining “Islamophobia” in one of the last acts of Theresa May’s administration has accused Boris Johnson of having “legitimised the hatred that exists towards Muslim women”.

Qari Asim, claimed as a board member and trustee by the far-left HOPE Not Hateorganisation which has received funding from billionaire plutocrat George Soros, made the accusation against Johnson in the wake of a column in which the Tory said the burqa made wearers resemble “bank robbers” and “letter boxes” — but should not be banned, as it is in many other countries.

“Boris Johnson’s comments have fanned the flames of Islamophobia,” the cleric insisted in late 2018, going on to claim there had been incidents of Muslim women in face veils being called “letter boxes” and that one woman in Bristol had been told to remove her veil by a bus driver — “So there are incidents that are already happening because I think what Boris Johnson has done [is] he’s legitimised the hatred that exists towards Muslim women who wear [face veils].”

2 thoughts on ““HOPE Not Hate Imam” Declares Boris “Islamophobic””

  1. Despite Johnson’s comic metaphors re burqas and his Oxbridge background in the classics, it would be a large miscalculation to see him as a champion of Western values vis-a-vis Islam. Of course it is early days and grass roots developments, terrorist incidents etc have a way of altering political positions. That said, any substantive movement in that direction would require a step or two further to the right. Currently that is a place that even the most Islam-skeptic Tory is unlikely to go.

  2. The very name of *”HOPE NOT HATE”* confirms globalist criminal intent to brainwash and dummy down the masses in order to better be able to enslave us all – *”PITY, NOT ANGER”*! where simply being constructively angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while uselessly pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!

    Having no facts, logic, or reasonable arguments with which to defend their own crimes and treason, criminals must in stead substitute this global attempt to control our very thinking – through an emotional, sub-conscious “narrative” – so much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:

    “Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”

    Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!

    Here’s what having “hope not hate” gets one … Like all criminals:

    Liberals love to hate and hate to love, because using victim-blaming slanderous accusations not only keeps their “enemies” feeling unsafe and unhappy, while also keeping them perpetually on the defensive (thereby making the leftopaths feel safer and happier) it also lets the libocrites focus externally, so they don’t have any time left for painful self-examinings or to experience any inconvenient guilty pangs of conscience. So: Ever Forwards, kamerades! EVER forwards, lest we be forced to look behind us to see the wake of devastation we left!”

    And even the risk of antagonizing their enemies is an exciting rush, because such masochism gives them the illusion of control of their own fear, BY causing (and/or by inducing others to help them cause) those very same problems which cause the damage which causes the pains they fear the most, too! PS: “Whee!”


Comments are closed.