Russia: Five Muslims detained at a shopping mall for plots to commit jihad massacres at school and police station
“The detained leader of the group was named as Idris Alibekov, 23, from the Russian region of Dagestan, who works as a security guard in a Moscow coffee shop.”
A security guard. To have questioned about his perspectives and loyalties before giving him such a job would have been “Islamophobic.”
Assignment asking pupils to contemplate forgiving Manchester bomber shows the need to challenge morally loaded ‘homewoke’
When Ariana Grande was asked this year about her thoughts on the terrorist attack at her May 2017 gig at the Manchester Arena that left 22 people dead, she was surprisingly reserved. The US pop star said she struggled to talk about the deaths because her thoughts were with the families of those murdered.
“It’s their losses, and so it’s hard to just let it all out without thinking about them reading this and reopening the memory for them,” she said.
Maybe that understanding of the human condition could be explored further by at least one UK school, Bridlington School in East Yorkshire, following a tin-eared homework assignment it recently gave to pupils.The project was: “Imagine that you are a parent of one of the Manchester bombing victims. Write a response to the point of view that: ‘All terrorists should be forgiven.’“
.
Okay, that’s one way of looking at it. While not suggesting what that viewpoint should be, the phrasing is itself morally loaded. The defense that followed left no doubts as to what approach was the preferred one, as the headteacher juxtaposed ‘forgiveness’ with ‘hate.’
Conversely, the Year-Eight children could have been asked to explore how it felt to have lost a child in Salman Ramadam Abedi’s devastating and criminal attack from the viewpoint of a bereaved parent.
Maybe look at it from the eyes the family of eight-year-old Saffie Rousos, 14-year-old Eilidh MacLeod or 15-year-old Olivia Campbell-Hardy.Surely as an exercise in empathy, that would be a far more challenging piece of work and would avoid the perils of suggesting that “All terrorists should be forgiven.”
But, in a classic woke backfire, Twitter lit up with angry parents, relatives of bombing victims and others caught up in terrorist atrocities and, before she knew it, head teacher Kate Parker-Randall had a storm on her hands.
Bridlington School@BridSchool
Following discussion on social media today, our head teacher, Kate Parker Randall has issued the below statement…
Sue R@SueRoberts24
A girl from our village was murdered in this attack. Beyond outright condemnation for his – the terrorist – actions I see no justification for making this a homework topic. The teacher is, at the very kindest interpretation, thoughtless.
Gaynor Heath@witchtwo
NOT good enough. We have all read the wording and that doesn’t hold water. Sackings are called for and they were children NOT young adults. This is a very poor excuse for gross misconduct.
I don’t agree. You have directed the way the child should think by telling them in what direction their input must be.
The country is sick and tired of these forced left wing ideas indoctrinating our young minds.
It’s time for this nonsense to be stopped and/or teachers sacked.
Undeterred, into the melée she strode:
The essay was intended to allow students to formulate their own views about whether hate or forgiveness are the best response to even such terrible crimes.
While she apologized for the upset caused, there was no apology for the tone-deaf approach to setting the homework in the first place because that would suggest that the agenda, the subtle suggestion that terrorists aren’t all that bad really and should be given a break, was wrong.
Head teacher Parker-Randall said the angry online response to the homework was “totally unintentional consequences.” And, surely, the head teacher meant this.
ALSO ON RT.COMBritish uni students to examine ‘censored, gay, feminist, amateur’ PORN as part of ‘illuminating’ X-rated courseWhen the homework task was set there would have been no question in the naïve mind of teachers that this would cause any offense. Doesn’t everyone forgive terrorists? One mum took her 12-year-old daughter out of the school until she received a satisfactory explanation, while another pupil’s grandma called the task “absolutely disgusting.”
Another, whose son was injured in the Manchester attack, condemned the exercise as “wholly inappropriate.” This debacle was replayed on a similar scale as the ‘homewoke’ task set for pupils at an Oxfordshire school earlier this year, in which they were asked to pen a suicide note from the standpoint of young woman in 1912 as part of their GSCE studies.
A mum, who wrote to the school expressing her concerns, said the exercise was a “massive fail.” Again, the school apologized for “any distress caused” but stopped short of saying it had been wrong to set the exercise.
ALSO ON RT.COMParents outraged as girls ‘too embarrassed to pee’ in London primary school UNISEX TOILETSAny parent with children attending a UK school is hardened to this sort of everyday, unapologetic, right-on nonsense.There’s misguided advice on multiculturalism, school dinners trying to be nutritious, vegan, kosher, and halal all at the same time and children alerted to transgender issues before they have had even rudimentary sex education.
They are lectured about tolerance and forgiveness at such a young age that they simply swallow the whole dish of liberal rubbish without any real questioning because it is a teacher, a respected adult figure, giving it to them.
This half-baked, idealistic theory of one big happy world where everyone’s a winner, no one is allowed to be upset and allowances must be made for even the most egregious ideas, needs to be challenged every time it rears its head.
Maybe that’s something a class can discuss.
The UK is one of the sickest places in the Universe.
Pretending that the global crime-gang called islam is a “race” of poor swarthy animal-people, oppressed by the mentally superior whites, in order to slander everyone who notices it’s a crime-gang as a hatefully bigoted “racist” – is to deliberately enable that crime-gang’s crimes by hiding and destroying the evidence of same, and thus to be a willing accessory to those crimes. Since islam is a murder-gang, and the penalty for committing and enabling the commission of murder is DEATH, anyone and everyone who calls an opponent of muslims, islam, and their global jihad, a “racist!” should be lawfully put to death.
Everyone who defends islam and muslims endorses crime.
Endorsing crime IS a crime, so those doing it are criminals.
Right in the Qur’an is: the obligation to murder Jews and Christians (Surah 9:29), to terrorize all non-Muslims (8:12), to rape young girls (65:4), to enslave people for sex (4:3), to lie about one’s true goals (3:54), and the command to make war on all the infidels (9:123) and subjugate the entire world to Allah (9:33).
Are death-threats legal? NO.
Is extortion legal? NO.
Is slavery legal? NO.
Is murder legal? NO.
Is rape legal? NO.
THEN ISLAM IS ILLEGAL!
Rape, slavery, robbery, extortion and murder are never OK!
Everything muslims pretend to see as “holy” is already a crime!
So nobody has a legal right to practice islam anywhere on earth!
IN TRYING TO MAKE CRITICISM OF THE GLOBAL CRIME GANG CALLED “ISLAM” INTO A CRIME, TO PROTECT THAT CRIME GANG BY HIDING THE EVIDENCE OF ITS CRIMES, SUCH PEOPLE ARE CRIMINALS AND TRAITORS TO RATIONALITY, CIVILIZATION, AND HUMANITY ITSELF.
But, hadn’t you heard?!
Being constructively angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while uselessly pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “equally-helpless fellow victims,” is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!
Having no facts, logic, or reasonable arguments with which to defend their own crimes and treason, criminals must in stead substitute this global attempt to control our very thinking – through an emotional, sub-conscious “narrative” – so much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:
“Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”
Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!