Police Terror “Just to Keep Us Safe”

Restriction contradictions based on politics not science

It’s all about “keeping us safe”

Fuck these incompetent, totalitarian fools who are treating us like slaves.

Only those scared witless are not asking questions.

Rita Panahi Herald Sun June 11, 2021
It’s abundantly clear, as it has been throughout the pandemic, that “science” and “best medical advice” has been corrupted by political considerations. We’ve seen that both locally and internationally. One wonders whether Victoria’s Lockdown 4.0 would be easing if it weren’t for the fed-up populace finally objecting to the destructive, disproportionate policies of the Andrews government.
Polling released this week by the Left-leaning Essential Report showed a steep decline in state Labor’s fortunes with only 48 per cent approving of the Victorian government’s Covid-19 response. The next lowest rating state government was Queensland with 65 per cent.
Last week I wrote about the alarmist, scaremongering language of Victorian health bureaucrats when it seemed that chief health officer Brett Sutton and Covid testing commander Jeroen “train dude” Weimar were competing with each other to coin the catchiest, scariest term to describe the Kappa variant.
Victorians were told the virus was spreading faster and in ways we’ve never seen, a claim that was disputed by several experts including professors Greg Dore, James McCaw, Peter Collignon and Catherine Bennett.
The coppers are totally out of control. Despicable.

More bullshit every day. Forced vaccination is against human rights, but gov’t bureaucrats insist on it. Revolting.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced a number of new COVID-19 measures following a National Cabinet meeting on Friday. This includes the formulation of a national plan, which Prime Minister Morrison says would allow lockdowns to be implemented as a “last resort” and give all Australians “encouragement” and “much-needed hope.” These new measures include: – International arrivals will be halved for the remainder of the year – Trial to allow fully vaccinated international travellers to quarantine at home for seven days – Four-phase plan introduced comprising of vaccination and suppression, post-vaccination, consolidation and a final phase

But a most bizarre development occurred at the weekend.
Professor McCaw claimed that I had “completely misrepresented” his comments. He wrote: “I strongly and unambiguously support the Victorian government’s response. My comments on the epidemiology – which you did report on – do not imply the policy response is anything other than exemplary.”
Now, I’m used to straw man arguments from random trolls but not from a professor. For the record, and it’s all in print and on video, I never said or even implied that Prof McCaw didn’t support the lockdown or indeed the Victorian government’s response, I simply quoted him strongly disputing the claim that the virus is spreading faster and in new, unexpected ways.
“There is no epidemiological evidence that this virus spreads faster,” Prof McCaw said. “There is no clear reason to think this virus is spreading in different ways.”
We live in strange times but I never thought I’d see a professor claim that his comments being quoted word for word and in context amounts to a “complete misrepresentation”.
Just as disappointing, but not surprising, was the cavalcade of supposed journalists led by the ABC’s Michael Rowland amplifying a verifiably false claim. Was there pressure applied or does the professor feel uncomfortable being quoted by a conservative?
Perhaps there’s a clue in Prof McCaw describing the Victorian government’s Covid response as “exemplary.” A strange description of the state that has notched up four lockdowns, one lasting 112 days, and is responsible for 90 per cent of all Covid deaths in Australia.
If Victoria is exemplary, what does that make NSW?
Victorians have been demoralised to such an extent that we’re grateful for the smallest of mercies, whether it’s being allowed outdoors without masks or granted the privilege of opening businesses, albeit in a manner that is unprofitable and unsustainable.
Oh wait, one of those little liberties has again been taken away, with Acting Premier James Merlino announcing on Thursday that the outdoor mask mandate will remain after its withdrawal was announced 24 hours earlier.
Of course there is no solid evidence that backs up masks being worn outdoors but when did that stop the state government from inflicting draconian measures on millions of Victorians?
Lockdown 4.0 is formally over, and it’s been replaced with Lockdown Lite, with harsh restrictions that are illogical and full of contradictory advice.
You have to wear a face panty when walking alone in a park but you can sit unmasked indoors at a cafe or pub. On what clown world medical advice did the government base those rules?
Under the new regimen you can sit in a restaurant with 50 other diners, visit busy shopping centres and line up for a Bunnings sausage but you can’t have your fully vaccinated mother around for a cup of tea.
One can understand why the Andrews government refuses to release the medical advice behind its decisions, given so much of what we are expected to uncritically believe is unadulterated hogwash.
In regional areas you can go to a brothel, heck you can go to several in one day, but you can’t have a family gathering with a strict limit of two adult visitors at home per day.
Brothels and strip clubs can have up to 100 people per venue in regional Victoria, the same number as amusement parks. How does that make any sense?
In Melbourne, formerly the world’s most liveable city, you can visit the drug injecting room in Richmond but not a gymnasium. Pilates is out of the question but injecting ice is considered a medical necessity … this is the health advice we are asked to blindly follow.
On what medical advice did the Victorian government extend the 5km travel radius to 10km and then 25km? On what evidence do they allow 50 people for funerals but only 10 for weddings?
Only those scared witless are not asking these questions by now and are happy to blindly submit to livelihood and liberty destroying lockdowns. A scared populace is a submissive one.
An informed comment:
it’s about time some journalists did some real investigative research into the tests governments around the world are using to test for COVID-19.It’s called the RT-PCR test developed by a bloke by the name of Kary Mullis in the early 1990’s. He is on record as saying (on video) “this test is not suitable for diagnosis. We are being sacammed!

Manufactured Pandemic: Testing People for Any Strain of a Coronavirus, Not Specifically for COVID-19

Url of this article:

First published by Global Research on March 27, 2020

The following is from a medical forum. The writer, who is a widely respected professional scientist in the US, prefers to stay anonymous, because presenting any narrative different than the official one can cause you a lot of stress in the toxic environment caused by the scam which surrounds COVID-19 these days. – Julian Rose


I work in the healthcare field. Here’s the problem, we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply can not make accurate assessments.

This is why you’re hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. That’s because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues.

The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not the PCR that is currently being used or Serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.

The problem is the test is known not to work.

It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.

Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.

The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.

And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load.

If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if it is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.

If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.

And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.

Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus.

They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive

PCR test for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common.

There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time.

All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease.

Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die.

You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on.

Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist.

Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically.

Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people, you are mislabeling your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic.

But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways.

1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead.

2. You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers.

3. You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience.

4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen.

Take these 4 simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks.

They can not “confirm” something for which there is no accurate test.