Indeed it is a monumental fact that the multiculturalism on which Mughal himself feasts was founded on “racial identity politics”. It has been at the very heart of British multiculturalism for decades.Â
Of course what gets the goat of Fiyaz Mughal is that it’s the wrong kind of identity twice over which Richard Dawkins supposedly highlights: the identity of English people who are also kuffar! Yes, white English people aren’t allowed to have an “identity”; let alone practice “identity politics”. So I hope that Fiyaz Mughal communicates his strong disgust at “racial identity politics” to, say, the various Bangladeshi community centers or the Music of Black Origin Awards (MOBO).
Of course this is Muslim racism against white English people in that Mughal is explicitly denying this ethnic group an identity. And yet “racial identity” has been “celebrated” insistently in the councils, newspapers, interfaith meetings, Leftist demos, etc. of the UK since at least the early 1980s.
So why do people put up with Fiyaz Mughal’s blatant racism, prejudice and bigotry? Why does this Muslim supremacist think that the identity of English white people (or even just of the English) is a notion – and even an ethnic group – fit for extinction?
This kind of hypocritical racism also has a long history in the Left.
Take Ratna Lachman of the (Trotskyist/progressive) “rights group” JUST West Yorkshire. JUST West Yorkshire, apparently, “promotes racial justice”. It does this so well that Ratna Lachman once said the following:
“The so-called ‘white working class’ means the far right.”
Does the “so-called” black or brown working class meanÂ
far right too? Of course not! Why is that? Because Ratna Lachman, just like Fiyaz Mughal, is a racist. In fact the so-called black or brown working class is actually championed by Ratna Lachman and JUST West Yorkshire. It’s only the white working class she singles out for extra-special attention; just asÂ
The Guardian, Hope Not Hate, the SWP-UAF, theÂ
Huffington Post, etc. also do.
(Read it all)