Tommy Robinson on the Geller Spencer ban, and his upcoming walk.
The police seem to admit, when its convenient, that there are areas which are muslim, and their laws apply and not England’s. I bet if you point this out to them, that they said this, you would be accused of racism. Â (Vlad Tepes)
Sign the petition asking that we be allowed into the country here.
Not everyone who is protesting against the outrageous injustice of our being banned from Britain is at the same time a lily-livered sellout. In “A gross double standard over hate speech” in The Spectator, June 27, Douglas Murray adduces the same examples I invoked here to show that you can perfectly well talk about jihad violence in Great Britain, as long as you’re for it.
“First there was no mention of a muezzin when the mosque was inaugurated; then on Fridays only; then three times a day, now five times a day.” — Interview in Die Zeit
A Turkish mosque in the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia has begun sounding public calls to prayer from an outdoor loudspeaker system mounted on the roof of the edifice.
The mosque is one of a growing number of Islamic institutions in Germany (and other parts of Western Europe) publicly calling the Muslim faithful to prayer — five times a day, seven days a week — with cries of Allahu Akbar(“Allah is Greater”).
James Bloodworth, the editor of liberal British blog Left Foot Forward:
“…the ban is “counterproductive” as it will merely provide Geller and Spencer with “easy ammunition to throw back at us.”
“Let Geller in!,” by Alex Seitz-Wald at Salon, June 28:
It’s no secret that we vehemently disagree with anti-Muslim activist and blogger Pam Geller — and the feeling is mutual.
What is reprehensible about Spencer & Gellers views? Seitz-Wald doesn’t say.
“It will merely make them free speech martyrs, despite their abhorrent views,”Jillian York, the Director of International Freedom of Expression at the Electronic Frontier Foundation said in an email.
What “abhorrent views” do they hold? Again, Jillian York doesn’t say. Just like the G-lards and her sycophants never explained  what makes Geert Wilders views “abhorrent”. But the G-lard goose didn’t need to explain her lies and her criminal career background at Slater & Gordon either.
I do not support the approach taken by either Geller or Spencer to the problem of Islamic extremism. Both have endorsed groups such as the EDL and others which at best do not deal with the thuggish elements in their ranks and at worst are truly racist or xenophobic.
No wonder her enemies call her “mad Mel”.
Dumber than Duss?
“It’s not something I imagined I’d ever have to say, but here it is: Geller and Spencer should be allowed to speak. Our societies are strong enough to survive their stupidity.”
Unfortunately, our societies don’t seem to be strong enough to survive the stupidity of  jitterbugs like Duss.
Back to reality: the British dhimmi government does the bidding for the invading Muslim armies:
The “far-right” English Defence League (EDL) supporters have been threatened with arrest if they gather at the site where soldier Drummer Lee Rigby was murdered this weekend.
Reacting to the Met’s decision, Tommy Robinson said: “The police are enforcing no-go zones for non-Muslims. It’s a charity walk with two people taking part.
Relatives and supporters of five asylum seekers who took part in the 2011 riot at the Villawood detention centre have expressed disgust and dismay at the jail sentences of between 14 and 22 months handed down to four of the men.
Norway, she lectured, was steadily becoming “a multicultural society,” and Norwegian women, if they didn’t want to wind up being brutally ravished in an alleyway by some Pakistani gang, should choose their wardrobes appropriately. Period. …
“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”– Hussein Obama
Abdullah bin Bayyah met with members of the Obama administration’s national security team on June 13, despite his close ties with a Muslim Brotherhood leader who advocates for the destruction of Israel and has been banned from the U.S. since 1999
The UK and U.S. have banned Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who leads the anti-Israel International Union of Muslim Scholars.
The Obama administration invited that group’s VP, Abdallah bin Bayyah, to a private meeting on the day it announced support for Syria’s rebels
The organization ended its December 2012 board meeting by calling for the end of Israel and the return of its lands to the Palestinians
Hours after MailOnline began inquiring with the National Security Council about its meeting with bin Bayyah, the cleric’s website was edited to remove the claim that National Security Adviser Tom Donilon attended
The White House’s National Security Council has confirmed that staffers held a June 13 meeting with Shaykh Abdallah bin Bayyah, an Islamist cleric who shares leadership of the International Union of Muslim Scholars, where he is vice-president and the terror supporter Yusuf al-Qaradawi is president.
The meeting occurred on the same day the Obama administration announced plans to arm Syria’s rebel factions, in the wake of a determination that President Bashar al-Assad had used chemical weapons against his own people.
It certainly does. In fact, its the central dogma of the Islamic belief system.
One sample of many:
A Shafi’i manual of Islamic law endorsed by the most prestigious institution in Sunni Islam, Al-Azhar University in Cairo, says that the leader of the Muslims “makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians…until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax,” and cites Qur’an 9:29 in support of this idea: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled.” (‘Umdat al-Salik o9.8)
The ‘Hate-speech’ that got Robert Spencer banned from the UK (Vlad)
In FrontPage this morning I show that it is perfectly acceptable to speak about jihad violence in the UK, as long as you’re for it. If you oppose it, watch out.
Sign the petition asking that we be allowed into the country here.
Wednesday morning I received an official letter from the British Home Office, notifying me that I would not be allowed to enter the country on the grounds that “your presence here is not conducive to the public good.” My colleague Pamela Geller received a similar letter. We had planned to lay a wreath at a memorial to British soldier Lee Rigby, who was beheaded by Islamic jihadists on a Woolwich street on May 22. But it is not conducive to the public good in Britain to oppose jihad violence and Islamic supremacism.
U.S. ambassador to Egypt Anne Patterson exposed the Obama administration’s allegiance when she urged Egyptians—including the beleaguered Christian Copts—not to protest against the Muslim Brotherhood
Speaking from the United States after Theresa May personally intervened to ban him, Spencer said: “It is a victory for fascism and Islamic supremacism, and for the mendacious smear campaign conducted by Keith Vaz and Hope Not Hate. …
In FrontPage this morning Robert Spencer shows that it is perfectly acceptable to speak about jihad violence in the UK, as long as you’re for it. If you oppose it, watch out.
Sign the petition asking that we be allowed into the country here.
This is one of the worst cases of immoral relativism ever. The mad scribbler of this article throws  Geert Wilders, the BNP, Hizb ut-Tahrir, Spencer & Geller in one pot.
Britain’s bar on anti-Muslim activists travelling to the country could do more harm than good, says Padraig Reidy
Pamela Geller (Pic Mark Tenally/Demotix)
“Counter-jihadists” Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer have been banned from the UK, according to letters apparently sent from the Home Office they have posted on their respective websites.
The pair were due to address a rally this weekend in Woolwich, London, scene of the brutal murder of Drummer Lee Rigby on 22 May. Rigby’s killers have claimed to be acting in the name of Islam, and had links to banned extremist group Al Muhajiroun.
The Home Office letters quote Geller and Spencers words as justification for their exclusion; Geller apparently claimed that Al Qaeda “is Islam”, and Spencer says the religion “mandates warfare” against non-believers.
Is there anything al Qaeda has done that’s not Islamic? Is there one honest Muslim anywhere who denies that Islam mandates warfare against non-Muslims?
The violence came two months after a deadly clash in a town near Kashgar, elsewhere in Xinjiang killed 21 people, including 15 police officers and community workers. Ethnic riots occurred four years ago in Urumqi, the regional capital.
Uighur activist Dilxat Raxit, spokesman for the Germany-based World Uyghur Congress, said Wednesday’s violence was triggered by Chinese government policies of “sustained repression and provocation” of the Uighur community.
Many Uighurs say they suffer discrimination in jobs and in obtaining loans and passports, and that Beijing imposes tight restrictions on their religious and cultural life. Children and women are barred from attending mosques, and fasting is discouraged during the Muslim month of Ramadan, which starts this year in early July.
Need a translation for that?
China says riots in western Xinjiang region, home to Uighur Muslim minority, leave 27 dead  (CBS)
A Muslim Uighur woman begs as armed Chinese paramilitary police march past on a street in Urumqi, the capital of the Xinjiang region, July 5, 2010. / GETTY
BEIJINGAssailants attacked police and other people with knives and set fire to police cars in China’s restive far-western Xinjiang region on Wednesday in violence that killed 27 people, one of the bloodiest incidents since unrest in the regional capital killed nearly 200 in 2009.
Whether or not you agree with Geller’s and Spencer’s statements on Islam, there is no way that these writings reach the defined  level of “unacceptable behaviours” listed in the beginning of the letter.  To say that these opinions can incite people to terror acts is simply not defensible. To compare their statements with the hate speech and clear incitement that radical Islamic clerics spout in the UK against Jews, infidels and gays is a perversion.
Will Human Rights Watch and Amnesty defend Geller’s and Spencer’s right to enter Great Britain and to speak there?
Moreover, will the people who complain when Israel bans people from entering (on “flytillas”) for the express purpose of combating Israel’s existence and causing disturbances act equally outraged that England has a much looser standard for banning anyone who might act in a way that “is not conducive to the public good”?
After this disgraceful decision on the part of the UK we can expect a wave of hypocrisy from all the “liberals” who pretend that Israel is far worse.
This decision proves that a powerful nation, not under any direct threat from anyone, Â is far more restrictive of basic freedom of expression than Israel is. Not that anyone from the Left would ever, ever admit it.
In other news:
Ignorant kumbaya Jews are an embarrassment to all of us:
Pamela Geller (Pic Mark Tenally/Demotix)
