Working along roadsides and secondary highways in cities big and small, they are a haunting reminder that while Italy has been successful in curbing immigration from Libya, it has largely failed to help a fraction of the migrants trafficked as sex slaves. (ABC News)
Spare me the bleeding hearts BS. Italy has not failed. Italy has no obligation to help Africans. Period. These people are not victims, they are all perpetrators. African prostitutes are all over Europe and Asia these days. If they were back in Africa they would do exactly the same.
African Savages Terrorise the People of Florence:
Tommy Robinson Attacked by African Savages in Italy, Fights Back:
Three female refugees want to avoid deportation by telling the Dutch court they are “too westernised” to return. The women from Afghanistan and Somalia think their lives are in danger because they no longer live in accordance with the standards for women in their home countries.
Today the women will appear before the highest Dutch administrative court where they will try to avoid deportation to their home countries. They claim their lives could be in danger because they accepted the ‘unacceptable’ Western standards for women.
Qatar is a slave state of 200,000 masters and large numbers of foreign workers, many of them worked to death and treated little better than slaves. But yet it’s enormously wealthy and beneath its façade of moderation, it seeks to export Islamic supremacism around the world.
And there have been suspicions over the years that Qataris played a larger role in 9/11.
But Qatar these days is far more of a threat than it was on 9/11. Its close ties to terror have made it a pariah nation in the region even as its support for Islamic theocracy crosses all factional lines.
It’s the main patron of the Muslim Brotherhood, an international Jihadist network, and has close ties to Iran. It spreads terrorist propaganda through Al Jazeera while subverting friendly governments. It seeks to influence American policy through think tanks like Brookings while spying on Americans.
There are good reasons why we live in well organised, prosperous and safe countries and why there are s#*thole countries that are corrupt, violent and impoverished. Our obligation, our sacred duty, is to protect our countries, our people, our culture & civilisation from third world savages in order to remain who we are and not to become like them. To make that happen, stop feeling guilty for being rich, stop giving money to globalist non-profits who flood your country with the people in the pictures.
How ‘real’ is that image? What is the purpose of that image? How concerned with that crying infant are the people who captured, arranged, presented and paid for that image to be shown to you?
The problem with this shithole-world misery porn we get from orgs like Amnesty is that they provide no context, no real information and certainly no appreciation of the complexity of why shitholes exist and why our country isn’t one.
It’s just propaganda. And you know you’re being manipulated by some serious deep state propaganda whenever there’s a little child there to pull your heartstrings.
“One eyewitness said the attack happened in front of a Japanese restaurant near the U1 Nestroyplatz station on the Praterstrasse. He claimed the male victim injured in the first attack suffered from a heart attack and that the attacker shouted ‘Allah, Allah.’”
It is noteworthy that this was not included in initial reports of the attack. The international media continues to try to mislead people about the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat by leaving out salient details such as this one. (More below the fold)
“Four people including a 17-year-old girl are critically injured as ‘deranged knifeman shouting Allah’ goes on rampage in Vienna before ‘man of Afghan descent’ is arrested,” by Charlie Bayliss, Mailonline, March 7, 2018 (thanks to the Geller Report):
An Afghan man has been arrested after four people were injured in two knife attacks in Vienna, Austria.
Six Stabbed in Northern Paris as Acts of Violence Escalate Across France
This article from Le Parisien doesn’t mention Islam or Muslims, but we all know who the “migrant men” are who are striking terror in the hearts of disbelievers. French politicians are waging jihad against their own citizens, by aiding and abetting the Mohammedan invasion.
Six people were stabbed in a single attack in northern Paris this week as reports claim that the number of random attacks across the country number as many as 777 per day.
The stabbing attack took place in the heavily-migrant populated 18th arrondissement of the French capital and saw a drunken man attack people around him at random, causing panic, Le Parisienreports.
The attacks started at around 11:20 pm on Tuesday. Police arrested the drunken man hours later at 1:15 am thanks to CCTV cameras in the area. The man was found hidden in the doorway of a building with his clothes soaked in blood.
Of the six people stabbed, five of the victims were rushed to a nearby local hospital while the sixth victim was able to escape injury due to the thick clothing he was wearing.
“The exploitation is so widespread that some Syrian women are refusing to go to distribution centres because people would assume they had offered their bodies for the aid they brought home”, the BBC explains quoting a new UN report on the humanitarian abuses.
More than half the humanitarian donations from the United Kingdom to Syria through small NGOs have ended up in the hands of ISIS and other jihadist groups, according to the think-tank Quilliam Foundation. In this way, millions of pounds, thanks to the generosity of British taxpayers, have fallen in the hands of terror groups.
Fatiha-Global, which should have brought help to Syrian refugees fleeing the war, instead diverted the funds to the Islamic State, the very terror group which had caused the refugee crisis to begin with. To top it off, the head of Fatiha-Global, Adeel Ali, was photographed with the jihadists of the Caliphate — the same jihadist group that beheaded British volunteer Alan Henning, who had come to Syria on behalf of the subsidiaries of Fatiha.
Amnesty International has come under scrutiny for its relationship with CAGE, an NGO founded by an extremistdevout Muslim, Moazzam Begg,which campaigns for the release of imprisoned jihadists. When one of Amnesty’s senior officers, Gita Sahgal (pictured), expressed concerns, she was suspended. (Image source: Nano GoleSorkh/Wikimedia Commons)
“Is it a crime to ‘demonstrate hostility to the Muslim faith’? The jailing of Britain First’s leaders suggests it might be. And however much you hate Britain First, that should worry you. No one should be punished for hating religion.”
The leaders of the far-right group Britain First have been jailed for a series of hate crimes against Muslims. The group’s leader, Paul Golding, was sentenced to 18 weeks in prison, while deputy, Jayda Fransen, was sentenced to 36 weeks on Wednesday. They had each been found guilty of religiously aggravated harassment at Folkestone magistrate’s court earlier the same day. “These defendants were not merely exercising their right to free speech but were instead aiming religiously aggravated abuse at innocent members of the public,” the prosecutor told the court.
Why you shouldn’t be cheering the jailing of Britain First’s leaders.
Is it a crime now to be hostile to the Muslim faith? Reading some of the media reporting of the jailing yesterday of Britain First leaders Jayda Fransen and Paul Golding for religiously aggravated harassment, it would seem so. Fransen and Golding were sentenced to 36 weeks and 18 weeks respectively at Folkestone Magistrates’ Court for a leafleting and online-video campaign in which, among other things, they yelled at Muslims going about their daily business in Kent, wrongly accused some people of being suspects in a Kent gang-rape case involving Muslim migrants, and caused distress to young people, young Muslims, who witnessed their behaviour. Horrible. Media reports inform us that they have now been imprisoned because, in the words of the judge, ‘they “demonstrated hostility” to Muslims and the Muslim faith’.
Demonstrated hostility to the Muslim faith? Our response to that should be: so what? In a free country, you should be perfectly at liberty to ‘demonstrate hostility’ to the Muslim faith. And any other religion, or creed, or god, or ideology. Indeed, the right not to believe, the right to blaspheme, the right to ‘demonstrate hostility’ to religion, are hard-won liberties. People died for this. The fact that the media this morning – including the Telegraph, the Guardian and the BBC – are all using the exact same formulation of ‘demonstrated hostility to Muslims and the Muslim faith’ to describe why Fransen and Golding are going to jail, and the fact that this isn’t ringing any alarm bells in public discussion, is a terrifying indicator of how thoroughly we now accept that people’s views on religion ought to be a matter for state control and possibly state repression.
The judge’s actual words were that Fransen and Golding had ‘demonstrated hostility’ to ‘people of the Muslim faith’ in their harassing, obsessive campaign around that Kent rape case. That is, to Muslims. But it is not surprising in the least that the media have reported this as ‘hostility to the Muslim faith’, nor that much of the media think it is acceptable to punish people for demonstrating such hostility, because the trial absolutely was concerned with Fransen’s and Golding’s views on Islam. That is clear from the fact that they were convicted of ‘religiously aggravated harassment’. That is, they weren’t merely punished for harassing people. They were also punished for what they were thinking as they harassed these people, in essence for what they believe: that Islam is bad and Muslims are dangerous. They weren’t only punished for what they did but also for what they thought. There’s a word for that: thoughtcrime.
In last night’s livestream with Matty’s Modern Life, and Magnus O’Mallon from The Australian Freedom of Speech Movement, I noted that when I googled “South Africa” yesterday, the number one result wasn’t the recent election of Cyril Ramaphosa as the new Prime Minister, the impending water crisis in Cape Town or even, you know, the planned expropriation of white land. Instead, it was the tiff David Warner had with South African batsman Quinton de Kock.
Why provoke discussion on the latest stage of white genocide in South Africa when you can just flog another ‘toxic masculinity’ story..
But we Australians, and Europeans in general, should be paying very close attention to the recent passing of a motion by the South African parliament, to begin the process to ammend the constitution to allow the expropriation of land without compensation – ie, stealing land from White Afrikaaners and giving it to black people.
It should not concern us that every attempt at ‘land reform’ in history has led to the starvation of millions. The black population in South Africa has been artificially high for a good century as a result of the civilisation our brothers provided them. If they want to return to a number more in balance with nature, that is up to them.
Communist.
We should be paying very close attention to the language used to justify the proposed theft. This line from Julius Malema, the communist leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters and sponsor of the land expropriation motion, tells us all we need to know:
“The time for reconciliation is over. Now is the time for justice… We must ensure that we restore the dignity of our people without compensating the criminals who stole our land.”
The reason the field of post-colonialism is thoroughly Marxist is because its key argument is a set up. It argues that white people stole the land, wealth, and the very lives of every other group on the planet and that we live in wealth, comfort and security to this day on the basis of this original sin. Thus if everything we have is the result of theft, we have no claim to it, and we have no right to oppose what we have being taken from us – even our very lives.
Because property rights are ‘racist’.
Malema’s argument, that to compensate white farmers for the expropriation of their land would be racist as it would condone the original theft, (it can’t be theft if no-one owned it in the first place, but I digress) may sound completely nuts, but the same narrative is used by the left here in Australia.
Whether it is #ChangeTheDate or #BurnItToTheGround, the central idea is the same: apparently, our ancestors stole the land, wealth and the very lives of the people who inhabited Australia when Europeans discovered it, and we live in wealth, comfort and security because of this original sin.
This is emotional blackmail.
It is a protection racket.
And if we let it happen in South Africa, it will happen here. It will happen in New Zealand. It will happen in America. It will happen in Canada… no wait, Canada is already screwed. There is nothing we can do to save the Canadians. But it will most certainly happen in Europe too.
“I would kill for my religion. Why would I not lie for it?”–Yasser Arafart
From the Gates of Vienna
Tariq Ramadan Lies About Jihad by Michael Copeland
Tariq Ramadan is at present “on leave” from the Qatari-funded Chair of Contemporary Islamic Studies set up for him at Oxford University. He is in detention in France facing charges of rape, brought by former admirers and students.
Ramadan has been a close influence on the UK government. He was a member of the taskforce set up by Tony Blair after 7/7. He was an adviser to David Cameron. He was a member of the Foreign Office’s Advisory Group on Freedom of Religion or Belief, chaired by Tory Baroness Warsi. He is grandson of the Muslim Brotherhood’s founder Hassan al-Banna, of which his father Said Ramadan was a leading light.
The idea of Jihad as Holy War, said Tariq Ramadan recently to a mainly Anglican audience, “is wrong”. He commended his listeners “to struggle for what is better”. “Struggle” (as in “Mein Kampf” — My Struggle) is often used to denote a Muslim’s duty of Jihad.
This old canard is more than an artful dissimulation: it is a lie. Holy War is part of Jihad.
Islamic authorities do not confirm Ramadan’s claim. The Manual of Islamic Law says:
GENEVA (AFP) — The UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein delivered a stern reply to Hungary’s government on Tuesday after it demanded his resignation, pledging to remain in office while insisting Prime Minister Viktor Orban is “a racist”.
Government spokesman, Zoltan Kovacs, said Hungary will continue to oppose the EU and UN’s vision on migration. According to him, migration and its related challenges is one of the country’s main problems.
Slovakia’s prime minister hinted that foreign forces, including philanthropist billionaire George Soros, were behind efforts to overthrow his government as it faces unprecedented pressure to resign.
Two young women were arrested in the French department of Morbihan in Brittany after a wave of vandalism on a number of churches in the area and for trying to set one of them on fire.
What kind of woman wants to be saved by Yvonne Ridley?
Sri Lanka’s Special Task Force & Police officers stand guard near a burnt house after a clash between two communities in Digana, central dist. of Kandy. March 6, 2018. (Reuters).
Gavin Fry, 32, and Leah Meurer, 28, were asleep inside their bedroom in Kings Park, Melbourne, on Friday night when they woke up to four armed thugs standing over the bed demanding cash.
