….and pandering leftist loons are already preparing to serve it to their constituents on a silver platter.
Labor MPs ignore huge ‘no’ votes in their multicultural electorates
Labor frontbencher Tony Burke told Fairfax Media he would not be changing his vote to “no”, despite “yes” securing just 30.4 per cent support in the postal survey in his electorate of Watson, one of the lowest results in the country.
Labor MP Tony Burke (centre) with Senators Sam Dastyari (right) and Jenny McAllister (left) speak to journalists in Bennelong. Photo: AAP
“I went to the last election with a commitment to vote ‘yes’. That doesn’t change. My community knows that if they are treated with prejudice, vilified, or marginalised in any way I will stand up for them, regardless of polls.”
In Chifley, where 58.7 per cent of people voted no, local MP Ed Husic, a “yes”-voting Muslim, said the community would find a way to accommodate all points of view.
You only have to look to the countries that have already redefined the institution to get an idea. Here are twelve examples.
Quote of the Day comes courtesy of The XYZ’s Ryan Fletcher:
Australia, when faced with a democratic vote, decided to support those who fire-bombedthe ACL headquaters, vandalised private property, maliciously assaulted numerous NO campaigners, sent death threats to public officials and intentionally lied about the true intent of their agenda to redefine marriage.
Thousands of protesters marched through London in October against ISIL [Jack Taylor/Getty Images]
(Of course they didn’t protest against ISIL, they protested against the kuffars who oppose the ISIL head choppers.)
How has Islamophobia changed over the past 20 years?
by Aina Khan
London, England – Anti-Muslim hatred has become more pervasive and entrenched in the UK, compared with 20 years ago, according to a report by the think tank that catapulted the term “Islamophobia” in 1997. …
… The term “anti-Muslim racism” was proposed instead, as it was more encompassing of the tangible impact of Islamophobia. Farah Elahi, a research and policy analyst at Runnymede Trust said Islamophobia had now manifested structurally in policy. …
Daily Beast attacks Pamela Geller for exposing falsity of Rohingya ethnic cleansing narrative
Pamela Geller
“Pamela Geller, who Steve Bannon has called ‘one of the leading experts in the country if not the world’ on Islam, regularly suggests the Rohingya are responsible for the violence in Burma.”
They are. They started the conflict by attacking the Buddhists of Myanmar. They murdered 71 police officers in a jihad attacl. See this Geller Report article by Dr. Andrew Bostom. They have been involved in massacres of Hindus. Hindu families have fled Myanmar after Rohingyas massacred 86 Hindus. The jihadis dumped their victims in mass graves. The Indian government says that the Rohingyas are a security threat.
But as far as the deeply compromised Daily Beast is concerned, it’s just the “far right” ignoring the ethnic cleansing. What is “far right” about telling the truth about jihad terror — and about the Rohingyas? These enemedia tools are enabling the most savage, violent, misogynistic, hateful ideology on the face of the earth.
“The American Far Right Asks: What Rohingya Ethnic Cleansing?,” by Betsy Woodruff, Daily Beast, November 13, 2017:
From the French edition of The Local A French mayor and dozens of other MPs and elected councillors from around the Paris region sang the Marseillaise on Friday as they marched towards around 200 Muslim worshippers in a bid to stop them praying in the street. The stand off which was caught in …Read More…
.
Paris cancels Christmas market; holds special Ramadan party every year
BY ROBERT SPENCER
Meet the new France, not the same as the old France. If Charles Martel were to reappear in France today, he would be denounced as an “Islamophobe.”
The Champs-Élysées Christmas market in Paris has been cancelled by City Hall councillors. It is considered the city’s main Christmas market and welcomes 15 million visitors every year.
Vive La Resistance!
“Populist” French Mayor Told to Remove Nativity from City Hall
Populist mayor of Béziers Robert Ménard has been told by a French court to permanently take down a nativity scene from the city hall, but Ménard has vowed to let it stand.
The controversy surrounding the placement of the nativity scene began in 2014 shortly after Ménard had been elected mayor of the city.
Complaints were lodged against the religious scene, with some claiming that it violated the strict secularisation laws in France, and now the administrative court of appeal of Marseille has judged that the 2014 nativity had no place in the city hall, L’Expressreports.
Clichy muslims double down on Islamic genocidal manifest destiny, sues mayor and counter-protestors
Vlad Tepes Exclusive
This past week there has been a lot of news about thee illegal street prayers in Clichy. It started with a few, maybe seven, French citizens objecting to the violation of many French laws, but mostly the ones on state secularism:
It was discovered shortly after that the reason for the street prayers was that the mosque offered to them was about a mile away, (1.5 Kms) from the spot of the street prayers and they wanted a mosque right there. Add to that, most of the muslims at this event were bussed in from much farther than a mile.
French President Emmanuel Macron has blamed France for the rise of Islamism and said the Republic was not good enough for “youths”, as he outlined a series of social programmes for the country’s migrant-dominated, low-income neighbourhoods.
“Radicalisation has taken hold because the French Republic has resigned,” Macron said on Tuesday in the northern French city of Tourcoing, near Lille, as he outlined 15 social policy plans.
Focusing on the banlieues (low-income housing projects), which are home to large Muslim populations and were known for mass riots a decade ago, the French president said: “I will never confuse the few thousand radicalised and the millions of inhabitants of these neighbourhoods.”
Acknowledging that “in many of these troubled territories, radicalisation has taken hold”, he said that that fact should lead the nation to “question itself”.
A Muslim man holds a Quran and shouts slogans during a protest outside the U.S. Embassy in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on Friday, July 21, 2017. (AP Photo/Daniel Chan)
.
Rehab Dughmosh, a Muslim woman who tried to murder people with a golf club and a knife in a Canadian Tire store last June, appeared in court Friday and was furiously defiant:
Damn your legislation, damn your nationality, go to hell. Hey you infidels, I do not worship what you worship.
In saying this, she inadvertently provided us infidels with some useful information about Islam’s legendary tolerance. Dughmoshwas quoting chapter 109 of the Qur’an.
Chapter 109 is an early Meccan sura — that is, a section of the Qur’an that Muslims believe dates from the early portion of Muhammad’s prophetic career. In Mecca, he was solely a preacher of religious ideas, not a military or political leader, as he became later in Medina.
Indeed, this chapter of the Qur’an is usually presented as an example of the tolerance of Islam.
Villagers in Burma recount violence by Rohingya Muslim militants
SITTWE, Burma — The Hindu woman wept as she vowed never to return home, where she said Rohingya militants slaughtered her son, daughter-in-law and three granddaughters in August.
“They killed my family,” Halu Bar Hla, 70, said through tears at a camp for internally displaced people in western Burma. “I will not go back. I will die if I go back to my village. They will slit my throat.”
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson met with Suu Kyi early Wednesday in Burma. At a joint briefing after the meeting, Tillerson said he was concerned about “credible reports of widespread atrocities committed by [Burma’s] security forces and vigilantes.” He said that the United States will consider targeted sanctions against individuals but that he will not advise broad-based economic sanctions at this time. The Burmese military issued an internal report this week that exonerated its soldiers of any wrongdoing.
Andrew Bolt, the loveable daggy old uncle of the Australian Right, loves to showcase how he denounces even the mildest right-wing rudeness while the left ignores open thuggery amongst those they consider on their side. In his mind and the mind of many other right of centre commentators, such double-standards are proof of their superior morality and the righteousness of their cause.
Bolt even has a catch phrase regarding such events: that for the Left it’s not the principle that counts, but the side.
He’s wrong.
The Left believes their crazed principles are incredibly important, but they also realise that principles don’t matter at all if your side loses.
The violence and intimidation of the Left means they are able to decide who gets to easily speak in the public square, and outside the establishment who gets to speak at all. That’s one of the main ways they win. (Read the whole article below the fold or here)
The fake marriage debate is not about the rights of homosexuals. It’s about the destruction of Western civilisation by a class of people programmed to hate it. Moreover, it’s happened before.
‘Let’s just burn it down to make it better!’ – Every Marxist ever.
When the Chinese Cultural Revolution began at Peking University in 1966, it seemed just a localised event. Once the iconoclastic frenzy got official support from Mao, however, the wave of destruction spread to educational institutions across the country. From there it touched every facet of Chinese society.
By the time the revolutionary spasm of destruction had worn itself out five years later two million were dead, the heritage of the country had been all but destroyed and the social order of the nation had been entirely upended. Chinese culture has never recovered.
Not quite, not yet anyway. But Mohammedans & their leftist enablers are taking us there, every day a little more:
Runnymede Trust coined the word ‘islamophobia’ – now seeks to define it as anti-muslim racism – thus giving a blasphemous, violent belief-system recognition as being a race, to be given legal protections, or something. Beware of false prophets – and the fake races that follow them] Farah Elahi on Islamophobia (runnymedeTrust)
The efforts to have the fake god of islam’s murderous ideology given the status of a race, protected by anti-discrimination laws – even as members of the ‘race’ cast terror into the hearts of those who are not members of the islamic ‘race’ …
The relentless, persistent conflation of Islam (& any criticism thereof) by shrieking “racism” borders on genius. It guarantees victimhood to the perpetrators of the worst atrocities & gives license for them to continue murdering us.
‘Bigotry blind spot’: Baroness Warsi decries Islamophobia in UK
Arwa Ibrahim
Tuesday 14 November 2017
.
In an attempt to push the word “Islamophobia” into public discourse, the Trust’s report “Islamophobia: Still a challenge for us all,” which was launched at the event, features contributions from 23 academics and maps Islamophobia across society. The original report “Islamophobia: A challenge for us all,” introduced the word “Islamophobia” into public discourse, but years later Islamophobia has become so prevalent that Warsi claimed it has “passed the dinner table test,” an issue she raised in 2011. Unpicking the term further, Warsi laid out what she referred to as the “seven sins of Islamophobia” as ways of understanding racisim against Muslims and how it continues to persist. …More pushing the phony phobia; implying that being afraid of the fake god’s blasphemous, abhorrent religion is ‘sinful’; and promoting the Runnymede myth of the ‘muslim race’ atMiddle East Eye
.
Call for new definition of ‘Islamophobia’ in UK
REBECCA SPONG
Wednesday 15 November 2017
.
A lack of clarity around the meaning of the word is hindering efforts to design policies that could prevent the discrimination of Muslims in the UK, whether it be in the workplace or as a victim of hate crime, the report found. …… The recommendation formed part of a wider report, released on the 20th anniversary of Runnymede’s first paper on the subject in 1997, in which it is credited for coining the term “Islamophobia.”
More on the ‘lack of clarity’ about the word that the Runnymede Trust apparently coined – but now wants to redefine the fake god’s unfortunate followers as a ‘race’ – at Arab News
.
Sayeeda Warsi accuses UK press of hate speech and Islamophobia
Warsi said hate was a daily reality for Muslims in Britain in 2017, adding: “In sections of our press, it is relentless and deliberate. Steadily and methodically using paper inches and columns to create, feed and ratchet up suspicions and hostilities in our society, driving communities apart and creating untold – and unnecessary – fear and distress.
More tripe in support of the fake god and its fake race / religion atThe Guardian
Do you want your culture to survive? Then you are a racist and a white supremacist. So barks CNN political commentator and former Bernie Sanders national press secretary Symone Sanders:
Thanks are due to Ms. Sanders for clarifying the issue. Only by embracing the eradication of the culture that produced Aristotle, Shakespeare, da Vinci, Madison, Beethoven, Einstein, Edison, the Wright Brothers, et al. can you escape the charge of racism.