Islam and Sex (in Paradise) – the ultimate bribe in a game of oppression and fantasy. Islam = “submit” your whole life in order to spend eternity in an orgy of sexual delights:
1. Most of those that enter Paradise .. are men
2. Allah described for us the women in Paradise .. “full breasted” – so you will know what awaits you there!
3. Think how terrible it is for a man to lose all this.. for some temporary minute of lust.
They say they don’t idolise their “holy prophet”, but it is pure idolatry. Here’s proof:
Thanks to Michael Smith News
Islam is about as Aussie as the plague or the Ebola virus. Here’s the corrupt little twerp hanging out with hardcore headbangers in Lakemba praising themselves about how “Aussie” they are:
Update:
But of course its not about being “Aussie”. These creeps want and work towards an Islamic Australia. Reminds me of Tariq Ramadan, when he says “integration is done, we are here, here to stay. Nothing you can do about it, kafir….”
Three presidents out of 45 does not make a “tradition.”
And no, Jefferson never held an ‘iftar’ dinner. He had no intention to honour Islam.
The establishment media became upset this weekend after President Donald Trump canceled the “White House Muslim Iftar Dinner tradition started by Thomas Jefferson.” But the media is wrong in every respect. Thomas Jefferson never held any Iftar dinner and only three out of 45 presidents ever hosted one, so there is no such “tradition” to cancel.
Amy B. Wang of the Washington Post led the pack with this nonsense that Thomas Jefferson held the “first Iftar dinner” with a June 24 piece entitled, “Trump just ended a long tradition of celebrating Ramadan at the White House.”
The often-used claim that Thomas Jefferson held the first Iftar dinner at the White House was trotted out by the Post’s Wang. She recounted the time when the diplomatic envoy from the Bey of Tunis, Sidi Soliman Melli Melli, visited Washington during Ramadan in 1805.
Jefferson invited the envoy to the White House for dinner at 3:30 PM—the time most Washingtonians had dinner in those days. But after he sent the invitation he was told that Melli Melli could not partake of a meal until after sunset because of Ramadan. Thomas Jefferson was faced with two choices: cancel the dinner entirely or simply have the meal later in the evening at a time when his guest could attend. As a good host and a decent person, Jefferson chose the latter.
In fact, all Jefferson did was change the time of his meal. He had no intention of honoring Islam. Jefferson simply was not honoring the religion of “the Musselmen”—as he termed Muslims at the time—when he changed the time of the meal. Also, there is no evidence that Jefferson asked Melli Melli what sort of food a “Musselman” would eat, so no special food was prepared to suit a Muslim’s religious needs. Jefferson neither inquired about religious accommodations nor was any made. All he did was move the time of the meal as a courtesy.
Further, Jefferson sent no letters containing proclamations about the meal being an Iftar dinner nor mentioning Islam, he never mentioned such honors in his private papers, and there is no record that he spoke to anyone about his intentions to honor the Muslim practice of an Iftar dinner.
Piers Morgan had Tommy Robinson on his show recently, but only very briefly, and he hardly let Robinson have a word edgewise, interrupting him at every turn. Here is how it went:
Piers Morgan, co-host of “Good Morning Britain,” angrily denounced Tommy Robinson, an author and famous British critic of Islam, his guest on June 20, and called him a “bigoted lunatic” while debating his controversial response to the recent attack on Muslims in London.[Morgan had mistakenly identified Muslims leaving the notorious Finsbury mosque as the target; in fact, the target was Muslims leaving a nearby Islamic welfare house].
Morgan registered his objection, saying, “Here’s my point. Right, I’ve read a lot of stuff that you’ve said and done. I know your history, I know all of it. Good, bad and ugly. Some of it is ugly, some of it, I agree with.”
“My issue with what you did, yesterday,” he continued, “is within one hour of this utter lunacy, this terrorist, driving from Wales, and deliberately mowing down innocent people, as it turned out, all Muslims, outside the Muslim welfare house, not the Finsbury Park mosque, killing one, maiming maybe 10 others, is your first thought process was not to express sympathy, for what had happened.”
“I read the tweets in sequential order, right,” he added, “within one hour your thought process was to go on the attack, to talk about another mosque, not the one that had been attacked, to talk about it in historical context, of when everybody knows the Finsbury Park mosque at the turn of the century was a bad place, with Abu Hamza, and everything else, right. And what you were doing, was fomenting hatred and almost suggesting that somehow this attack, this revenge attack as you put it, was somehow deserving because of the historical behavior of certain people at a completely different mosque — that was my problem.”
“OK, Piers,” Robinson responded, “the newspaper you work for said exactly the same within an hour — Abu Hamza’s mosque. Were they fomenting hate, the newspaper you work for? Were they? Were they inciting hate?”
“I don’t run the Daily Mail,” Morgan protested.
“Now, if I hold up this book and say, ‘There will never be peace on this Earth so long as we have this book, it’s a violent and cursed book,’ Can I say that? Sir William Gladstone said that,” Robinson continued, referring to the 19th century prime minister of Great Britain’s description of the Quran.
“Would you say that of the Bible? Show some respect,” Morgan retorted.
“Show some respect? Have you read this book?” Robinson shot back. “Have you read this book? There are a hundred verses in this book that incite violence and murder against us.”
Why didn’t Piers Morgan answer Robinson’s question? Has he read the Qur’an? If he had, why wouldn’t he say so? The problem for Piers Morgan is that either he has not read the Qur’an (which is entirely possible, for study is not his strong suit, and he seems to be noticeably unwilling to engage on its contents, never having mentioned a single one of its verses) and therefore has no business taking issue with what Tommy Robinson, channeling Gladstone, maintains, or he has read it in which case he knows what it contains and and wants to keep that information from the public. After all, if he had said, “Yes of course I’ve read the Qur’an,” Robinson’s next question would have been: “Okay, can you recall even one verse out of the more than one hundred that incite violence and murder against the Infidels?”
Continue reading Hugh Fitzgerald: Piers Morgan, Bigoted Lunatic
This Muslim was in an “advanced state of radicalization,” which means that he was fully prepared to gain the promise of Paradise for those who “kill and are killed” for Allah (Qur’an 9:111). “‘Highly radicalised’ ISIS terror suspect is arrested in Madrid just days before two million arrive in the city for Gay Pride festival,” […]
Police in Madrid have arrested three Moroccans including an ‘extremely dangerous ISIS member’ just days before two million people arrive in the city for the Gay Pride festival.
The 32-year-old man was described as being in an ‘advanced state of radicalisation’ and likened to terrorists behind recent attacks in the UK and France.
“‘Highly radicalised’ ISIS terror suspect is arrested in Madrid just days before two million arrive in the city for Gay Pride festival,” by Gerard Couzens, Mailonline, June 21, 2017:
The man who made the sick comments was one of three to be arrested (Picture: EPA)
A terror suspect said the innocent children killed in the Manchester Arena suicide bombing ‘got what they deserved’.
Rachid El Omari’s disgusting comments came to light during a court hearing in Spain where he was remanded in jail as an investigation into his arrest continues.
The 32-year-old is accused of planning a terrorist attack in Madrid and recruiting new members for Isis.
Judge Ismael Moreno said: ‘His identification with the ideology of the terrorist organisation Daesh led him to justify the terrorist attacks in December in France.
‘He claimed they got what they deserved and those who had pledged allegiance to the Caliphate like him had the job of defending Islam and converting everyone, as the Koran says those who don’t want to convert to Islam are infidels and have to die.
Continue reading Those who don’t want to convert to Islam are infidels and have to die…
For that, we would need politicians with balls who don’t hide behind some phony ‘human rights’ legislations that were never meant to protect people who hate us.
“Deport them. That’s what we would do. If they’re your citizens, then stop them from preaching.” The foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates on how the West should fight Islamic hate preachers – but why our leaders are so weak.
This is a must-watch. The UAE foreign minister speaks first:
Reader Andrew Curran, back from eight years of working in senior engineering and security jobs in Saudi Arabia (and now looking for work here) gives the background:
The governments of the Gulf Cooperation Council nations, particularly Saudi Arabia, understand the threat presented by Islamic extremism and how illegal immigration is tied into that threat. Saudi Arabia experienced multiple attacks during 2003 to 2005 which brought the country to its knees economically and resulted in 100’s of deaths. Companies and government agencies were begging expatriate workers to stay, but could not halt the exodus of expertise until they hit back at the extremists, and hit back hard.
Continue reading SAUDI FOREIGN MINISTER: STOP WHINGEING AND DEPORT HATE PREACHERS
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, of the “Ground Zero mosque”, once again wrote a deeply inaccurate article reprimanding Americans for their supposedly “right-wing caricature” of Islamic law, sharia, which he insists is not a threat to American law. In his recent article “The silly American fear of sharia law“, he denied that sharia is incompatible with US laws and the constitution. Oh, really?
Imam Rauf tries to blame sharia’s amputation and stoning on Biblical Law:
“Sharia is not about amputations and stoning. These extreme punishments carry over from earlier, biblical law” and “Within the history of Islam, they have rarely occurred. What Islamic law does prescribe are the same do’s [sic] and don’ts of the Ten Commandments.”
Imam Rauf’s article is, to say the least, misleading — especially regarding the Ten Commandments. Sharia is not only incompatible with Western legal system but is the direct opposite of Western values; it has violated all ten of the Ten Commandments.
Continue reading When Muslim Deceivers Lie About The Shari’a
Muslim girls in Sydney are dressed in white from head to toe as part of a hijab ceremony to signify the age when they must cover up their bodies, with an Islamic imam slamming it as a step toward Sharia law.
Australia’s most senior Shia cleric Sheikh Kamal Mousselmani presided over the ceremony where 24 girls walked on stage to show their maturity.
‘The hijab is compulsory for the girls when they become nine according to our religion,’ he told Daily Mail Australia.
Australia’s most senior Shia cleric speaks at the hijab ceremony for nine-year-old girls
The girls were dressed in white, the same shade as a wedding dress, however Sheikh Mousselmani denied the ceremony was about preparing girls for marriage, despite Islamic law saying girls reach maturity at the age of eight.
‘You want me to tell you that it was a marriage ceremony. Definitely not,’ he said.
‘It’s a white colour, it’s a happy colour.’
EU DIPLOMATS today admitted that hardly any of the people arriving in Europe on boats are genuine refugees as they vowed to quicken up the rate of deportations for failed asylum seekers.
Hardly any of them are deported. Once these new arrivals have their feet on the ground, they usually move on to where their coreligionists reside and where they can find all the assistance they need.
By NICK GUTTERIDGE, BRUSSELS CORRESPONDENT
GETTY
The EU says most migrants arriving in Europe are not refugees
European leaders are expected to back significantly toughening up the policing of the continent’s outer borders when they meet for an EU Council summit in the Belgian capital tomorrow.
In a letter to EU heads of state its president Donald Tusk said that “illegal arrivals” to Italy had rocketed by 26 per cent over the last year and urged them to approve more cash to train and equip the Libyan coastguard.
That would mean migrants saved at sea would be taken back to North Africa rather than being shipped to Europe, which currently happens if they are rescued by a vessel operating under an EU flag.
Currently people smugglers pack people into unseaworthy vessels, knowing that they only need to get them out beyond Libyan national waters and into the central Med where they will hopefully be picked up by EU search vessels.
Eurocrats ultimately want Libya to take over running search and rescue operations
