Category: Uncategorised

DID THE FBI WANT ROBERT SPENCER AND PAMELA GELLER DEAD?

Thanks to TT for this excellent insight into the botched Garland assassination attempt, which seems to have been sanctioned by the Obama regime.

The raw evidence would lead one to conclude, yes.
Despite all the predictable politically correct whitewashing and appeasement, CBS did a good job of highlighting a curious and still unexplained aspect of the attack: the FBI clearly knew the attack was coming (although it didn’t bother to inform us or our security team), as the FBI agent was right there, following behind the jihadis, whom he had encouraged to “tear up Texas.” But even though they knew the attack was coming, they didn’t have a team in place to stop the jihadis. They had one man there, and one man only. The jihadis were not stopped by FBI agents, but by our own security team. If the jihadis had gotten through our team, they would have killed Pamela Geller and me, and many others. (They would no doubt have loved to kill Geert Wilders, but he left before they arrived.)
DID THE FBI WANT ROBERT SPENCER AND PAMELA GELLER DEAD?

FBI agent was at the Garland jihad attack, egging on the attackers.

March 30, 2017
.
Robert Spencer
.

60 Minutes ran a feature Sunday night about the FBI curious role in the May 2015 Garland jihad attack at a free speech event co-organized by Pamela Geller and me. It was, predictably enough, viciously biased, sloppy, and incomplete, but it was nonetheless illuminating in raising a hard and unanswerable question: did the FBI want Pamela Geller and me dead?

Despite the fact that the jihad attack took place at our event, neither Geller nor I appear, except in one still photo, in the 60 Minutes piece. All they say is that “a self-described free speech advocate named Pamela Geller was holding a provocative contest.”

The contempt fairly leapt from the screen. “A self-described free speech advocate”? Did 60 Minutes mean that Pamela Geller didn’t have the requisite degree in free speech advocacy? Or that she wasn’t really a free speech advocate? What they really mean, of course, is that she is not on the Left, and so cannot be celebrated as a free speech advocate the way the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists, who were all Leftists, can be.

Continue reading DID THE FBI WANT ROBERT SPENCER AND PAMELA GELLER DEAD?

4 Devout Muslims In Venice: ‘Place a bomb under the unbelievers and you go straight to Heaven’

Will the dimbulbs who keep telling us that Muslims only migrate for “a better life” in the West change their tune now? I won’t hold my breath.

Venice’s chief prosecutor Adelchi D’Ippolito said the suspects had celebrated the Westminster attack in London which saw Khalid Masood kill four people and injure up to 50 others on March 22.

‘Place a bomb under the unbelievers and you go straight to Heaven’: Four ‘radicalised’ people are arrested over plot to blow up Venice’s famous Rialto Bridge 
  • Three men from Kosovo and an unidentified minor have been arrested in Venice
  • Fisnik Bekaj, Dake Haziraj and Arjan Babaj were said to be ‘religiously radicalised’
  • They were ISIS supporters who were inspired by recent terror attacks in London
  • Police were monitoring them for months and raided 12 addresses to find them

Three men from Kosovo and an unidentified minor have been arrested on suspicion of plotting to blow up Venice’s Rialto Bridge.

Fisnik Bekaj, Dake Haziraj and Arjan Babaj were detained in overnight raids after it emerged that they had undergone ‘religious radicalisation’.

One of the suspected jihadist plotters boasted that they would ‘go straight to heaven’ if they put a bomb under the bridge, a wiretap conversation revealed.

They were reportedly inspired by the Westminster terror attacks in London and had discussed plans to join Islamist fighters in Syria.

This is the famous Rialto Bridge that the suspects allegedly plotted to blow up 

Raids were conducted at 12 addresses in the historic city centre to find the men.

‘With all the unbelievers there are in Venice, you put a bomb under the Rialto and you go straight to heaven,’ the alleged plotter said.

‘That was one the most worrying and alarming remarks we heard,’ said Venice prosecutor Adelchi d’Ippolito said at a press conference.

Two of the men worked as waiters in Venice, according to local media. One of the suspects was arrested in an apartment close to La Fenice, Venice’s opera house.

Police had been monitoring the group since last year, it emerged.

The suspects appeared to have been studying how to build explosives but did not have the necessary components for making a bomb, the court heard.

A search of a Venice apartment revealed the suspects were getting into physical shape and watched clips of Islamic extremists on how to carry out knife attacks. 

Israel has warned citizens to immediately leave Egypt’s Red Sea resorts and cancel all future travel plans over fears of an ISIS attack. 

The country’s counter-terrorism bureau said there is a ‘serious and current threat’ of a terror attack targeting the region, and in particular Israeli tourists.

The Red Sea region includes the tourist destinations of Sharm el-Sheikh, Hurghada, Marsa Alam and Luxor, which are popular with British holidaymakers.

Israeli tourists in the Red Sea region have been told to leave immediately and those planning to go have been told to cancel plans over fears of an imminent ISIS terror attackIsraeli tourists in the Red Sea region have been told to leave immediately and those planning to go have been told to cancel plans over fears of an imminent ISIS terror attack

Eitan Ben-David, the head of Israel’s counter-terror bureau, told The Telegraph: ‘We don’t want to cry wolf, wolf. We really believe that the threat is serious.’

 

The red-hot problem with race laws

Pontificating, virtue signalling Jack in the box  Joe Hildebrand seems to have wild mood swings: some of us still remember how he dissed all Australians a primitive, uncouth racists in one of his insufferable TV shows, where he presented us with a family of Indian Muslims who were all too willing to play along. Next thing you know he turns around and writes a quite reasonable article in favour of free speech. You’ll be the judge if this is enough to redeem him.
MARCH 30, 20177:46PM

There’s one big problem with our race hate laws. Picture: Mick Tsikas/AAP

The great lament of leaders and lawmakers has always been that you can’t legislate against stupidity. And yet, in one of life’s great ironies, we are so stupid we keep trying to.

The perfect example is the current debate about free speech, which has been so deluded and hysterical you could be forgiven for wondering if we’ve mastered the power of speech at all.

At its core is Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, a once innocuous piece of law that has become such a lightning rod of discontent that our Prime Minister’s survival may rest upon it.

Continue reading The red-hot problem with race laws

NO TRUTH PLEASE, WE’RE BRITISH

Killing the messenger after the London attacks

Bruce Bawer

After last Wednesday’s deadly attack outside London’s Houses of Parliament, the left-wing British media expressed outrage – not at the appalling way in which Islam and Islamic terrorism have transformed life and sown death throughout the Western world, but at the purported moral depravity of those who dare to connect the dots.

In the Guardian, Jon Henley and Amber Jamiesen sneered at Marine Le Pen for “linking the London attack to migrant policy, despite the attacker being British.” (My emphasis.) They smeared as “xenophobic” Nigel Farage’s argument “that the London attacks proved Donald Trump’s hardline immigration and anti-Muslim policies were correct.” The Independent‘s Maya Oppenheimer censured Farage’s comments, too, countering his critique of multiculturalism by saying he’d “failed to mention the fact many of the victims of the attack were in fact foreigners themselves.” (My emphasis again.) Needless to say, the issue wasn’t Britishness vs. foreignness; it was Islam. But to say so was verboten. As Theresa May said (in what already seems destined to become an immortal statement), “Islamist terror” has nothing do with Islam.

Continue reading NO TRUTH PLEASE, WE’RE BRITISH

ISLAMIC PROJECTION: WHY MUSLIMS HATE INFIDELS

Accusing non-Muslims of doing to Muslims what Islam commands Muslims do to

Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center

A little known fact: When Muslims persecute religious minorities in their midst, they often justify it by projecting the worst aspects of Islam onto the “infidels.”  A well-known phenomenon, “projection” is defined as “the attribution of one’s own ideas, feelings, or attitudes to other people.” One academic article dealing with violence and projection states, “Projection allows the killer to project his (unacceptable) desire to kill (torture, rape, steal, dominate, etc.) onto some target group or person. This demonizes his target, making it even more acceptable to kill.”

Accordingly, anyone who listens to the last video made by ISIS inciting violence against Egypt’s Copts would think the Christian minority is oppressing the Muslim majority, hence the need for “heroic” ISIS to “retaliate.”  Similarly, after ISIS slaughtered 21 Coptic Christians on the shores of Libya in 2016, it made a video portraying its actions as “revenge” against the Coptic Church, which ISIS bizarrely accuses of kidnapping, torturing, and forcing Muslim women to convert to Christianity. (Apparently the killing of nearly 60 Christians in a Baghdad church a few years earlier—which the jihadis then also portrayed as revenge to the Coptic Church’s forced conversion of Muslim women—was not enough).

Continue reading ISLAMIC PROJECTION: WHY MUSLIMS HATE INFIDELS

Mohammedans worldwide desperate to impose Islamic blasphemy laws

The UN is a tool of jihad. Needs dismantling asap. Muslim countries press UN for “legal options” against “blasphemy”

Muslim countries to press at UN for “legal options” against “blasphemy” on social media
Pakistan asks Facebook and Twitter to identify Pakistanis outside country who post anti-Islam material Mattis says al-Qaeda terrorists–JIHADWATCH.ORG
Image may contain: one or more people and text
In Britain, Muslims Fear Backlash from Tomorrow’s Next Atrocity

BY MICHAEL WALSH

(AP Photo/Matt Dunham)

To quote Mark Steyn quoting Tim Blair quoting a commenter back in 2006:

I believe the old definition of a nanosecond was the gap between a New York traffic light changing to green and the first honk of a driver behind you. Today, the definition of a nanosecond is the gap between a western terrorist incident and the press release of a Muslim lobby group warning of an impending outbreak of Islamophobia. After the London Tube bombings, Angus Jung sent the Aussie pundit Tim Blair a note-perfect parody of the typical newspaper headline:

.

British Muslims Fear Repercussions Over Tomorrow’s Train Bombing.

And here we are, eleven years later, and it’s more of the same old same old. This story in the Washington Post by one Jennifer Hassan isn’t quite there, but it’s pretty darn close. It’s just a matter of time now:

Continue reading Mohammedans worldwide desperate to impose Islamic blasphemy laws

Mohammedan Table-manners

How to Eat Like Muhammad (Anthony Rogers)

Glazov Gang: Ex-Muslim Sandra Solomon Unveils the Terror in London

Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel. 

This special edition of The Glazov Gang was joined by Sandra Solomon, an ex-Muslim who grew up in Saudi Arabia who is now valiantly fighting against the Islamization of the West — and of her new home country of Canada in particular. (Support Sandra on her Facebook Page HERE.)

Sandra came on the show to focus on Unveiling the Terror in London, revealing the true reason Jihad struck the UK Parliament and Westminster Bridge.

Don’t miss it!

And make sure to watch Sandra discuss Can I Criticize Islam Without Fearing For My Life?, where she shares an inquiry she recently made at a Toronto mosque: CLICK HERE.

Update:

Good news, folks. To understand the left and their policies, you’ll simply have to disable a few portions of your brain:

Islam: “if [a husband] has a boil oozing pus, anywhere from head to toe, the wife will not be doing him full justice even if she licks it clean.”

Montreal Imam Wael Al-Ghitawi: A Woman Must Not Refuse Her Husband When He Summons Her to Bed; Must Not Leave the House Without His Permission 

June 16, 2016, MEMRI TV
.

In a lecture posted on the YouTube channel of Montreal’s Al-Andalous Islamic Center on June 17, 2016, Canadian Imam Wael Al-Ghitawi discussed the wife’s obligations toward her husband in accordance with Islam. Al-Ghitawi said that she must not refuse her husband’s conjugal rights and must not leave the house without his permission. He cited a hadith according to which the Prophet Muhammad said that “if [a husband] has a boil oozing pus, anywhere from head to toe, the wife will not be doing him full justice even if she licks it clean.”

Wael Al-Ghitawi: “In the hadith compilation of Imam Ahmad (ibn Hanbal) it says: ‘No human being should bow down before another human being, but if this were allowed, I would have ordered women to bow down before their husbands, because of the magnitude of the husband’s rights over his wife. By Allah, if (a husband) has a boil oozing pus, anywhere from head to toe, the wife will not be doing him full justice even if she licks it clean.’ This is no trivial matter. These are the words of the Prophet Muhammad. Some people might find it difficult to stomach this hadith. I mean, if a man has a boil, does his wife really need to lick it? I am not saying that she must lick it. But the Prophet Muhammad demonstrated the magnitude of the husband’s rights over his wife by saying that even if she licks the boil, she would not be doing him full justice.

[…]

“Another of the husband’s rights is not to be refused when he summons his wife to bed. If the husband wants her, she must consent, in order to protect his faith from the temptations that lurk everywhere.

[…]

“The wife must not refuse her husband when he summons her to bed, as long as she is able, and does not suffer from any mental or physical condition preventing this, like menstruation or post-natal bleeding, in which case she may refrain from doing so. But even in such cases, the husband may enjoy her, avoiding the vagina. In order for both husband and wife to avoid Allah’s curses, the wife must obey her husband and fulfill his needs, or else the angels will curse her and the Lord’s wrath will be upon her.

[…]

“The (husband) has another right over his wife: She must not go out of the house without his permission. This is the husband’s right according to the shari’a. What about the state law? I am not talking about that now. You are a woman who married according to the shari’a, so if your husband tells you not to leave the house–don’t leave the house! ‘How come he’s allowed to prevent me?’ you ask…Just don’t leave the house! That’s one of his rights. Allah granted him this right. So don’t leave the house without his permission!”

Anne Aly seeks to strengthen 18C by introducing Islamic blasphemy laws

Under the Islamic system, blasphemy is everything a Muslim doesn’t like to hear.

It hasn’t taken long for Muslim MP Anne Aly to show her true colors regarding her support for Islam and Islamic blasphemy laws (which is punishable by death in muslim majority countries).

Anne Aly told The Australian there was “scope to reassess” extending section 18C, warning that the debate about racism now “extends to religion”.

So much for our “deradicalisation expert” who is now dabbling as a shari’a enforcing savage.

Labor MP wants 18C extended to cover insults to Islam
Malcolm Turnbull is being urged to ensure that proposed changes to section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act knock out vexatious or frivolous complaints already…
AT.THEAUSTRALIAN.COM.AU

Grand Mufti seeks Racial Discrimination Act cover for Muslims

Pauline Hanson insists Australia has a reverse racism problem, telling defenders of race-hate laws to look at the way women who choose to wear mini skirts are being treated by Muslims.

Insult, offend and humiliate provisions to be removed from Racial Discrimination Act

The words ‘offend’, ‘insult’ and ‘humiliate’ will be replaced with ‘harass’, while ‘intimidate’ will remain in the Act. Changes to the Act will make it illegal to racially ‘harass’ someone in an overhaul of section 18C.  

Malcolm Farr rubbishes free speech in the Murdoch press:

The anti-18c brigade deny they want to be free to malign people according to their race, just as some say they are not provoking Mr Turnbull.

And they insist there is a welter of support in the broad electorate for the changes.

“It’s certainly not a top-of-mind issue for most members of the public,” senator and former Institute of Public Affairs campaigner James Patterson said on ABC radio last night.

“But that doesn’t mean it’s not an important issue and it certainly doesn’t mean that it’s an issue that is never raised with members of Parliament.

Australia’s first female Muslim MP wants to change 18C race laws to include religion – so it is illegal to insult followers of Islam

 

  • The nation’s first female Muslim federal MP wants religion covered in race laws
  • Dr Anne Aly wants section 18C of Racial Discrimination Act to be broadened
  • She argued the existing law didn’t cover people calling someone a ‘dirty Muslim’ 
  • But she said if someone calling a person a ‘dirty Arab’ would fall under 18C law

 

Australia is a democracy and secular country where religion and politics are separated.

Islam however is a totalitarian ideology which has mosque, state and military all included.

“Australia’s first female federal Muslim MP Anne Aly wants racial discrimination laws broadened so it is illegal to insult followers of Islam.

Dr Aly’s call to amend racial discrimination laws to include religion comes a week after Victoria’s Multicultural Affairs Minister Robin Scott threatened to strengthen state laws that already curb the right to criticise religion.

Religious vilification laws potentially threaten secular values and open the door to blasphemy cases if they are legally exploited by religious groups.”

This is how Islam takes hold, infiltrates and then dominates societies.

Muslim MP Anne Aly wants race discrimination laws to cover Islam slurs
Australia’s first female Muslim federal MP Anne Aly wants racial discrimination laws tightened so it’s illegal to insult followers of Islam. She wants religion to be…
DAILYMAIL.CO.UK
18C changes ‘should cover complaints already lodged’, Turnbull told
Malcolm Turnbull during question time yesterday. Picture: Gary Ramage

Malcolm Turnbull is being urged to ensure that proposed changes to section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act knock out vexatious or frivolous complaints already lodged with the Human Rights Commission.

The Senate committee reviewing the government’s shake-up to section 18C of the act will also encourage the government to provide greater guidance for the courts in interpreting the meaning of the word “harass”.

As the government attempts to overhaul section 18C, West Australian Labor MP Anne Aly yesterday said there was scope for a future Labor government to extend the section to better protect Muslims, warning that anti-Islamic sentiment had become “a new form of racism”.

The Prime Minister is proposing to reform section 18C by making it unlawful to “harass” or “intimidate” someone on the basis of their race, colour, or national or ethnic origin, and is also pushing for procedural changes at the AHRC.

The government’s Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 will be debated today.

A bloc of Labor, Greens and crossbench senators look certain to defeat the government’s changes to the wording of section 18C, which currently makes it unlawful to “offend,” “insult” or “humiliate” someone on the basis of their race, but have an open mind to supporting process changes to streamline the handling of complaints at the commission.

As the crossbench yesterday pressed the government to split its bill, opposition legal affairs spokesman Mark Dreyfus left the door open to adopting 18C-style laws as the benchmark standard of acceptable speech in Labor’s promised consolidation of federal anti-discrimination laws.

Dr Aly told The Australian there was “scope to reassess” extending section 18C, warning that the debate about racism now “extends to religion”.

She cited cases of Muslim women having their hijabs ripped off and people being abused in the streets.

She lies. Whenever she opens her mouth she lies.

“I find it a little bit strange that someone can call you a ‘dirty Arab’ and that be covered under the bill, but if they called you a dirty Muslim, you’re not covered (under 18C),” she said. “I think there’s scope there. I’d like to see that discussion happen because I think we have definitely seen an increase in anti-Islamic rhetoric.”

That would be the least of our problems, considering all the nasty words the Mohammedans have in store for the disbelievers.

Continue reading Anne Aly seeks to strengthen 18C by introducing Islamic blasphemy laws

Hijabbery, a new symbol of resistance and feminism against … Trump!

Islam’s Culture War Sets Sight on Multi-Billion Dollar Beauty Industry

by Shireen Qudosi  •  March 28, 2017

  • The long game of Western Muslims averse to Western values, was largely unaffected by an altered political landscape as they transitioned to a new arena: culture.
  • “[F]ashion is one of the outlets in which we can start that cultural shift in today’s society to normalize the hijab in America.” — Melanie Elturk, CEO of Haute Hijab.
  • Beautiful Nura Afia in an advertising campaign is a far more appealing and consumer-friendly alternative to CAIR’s Nihad Awad or the political complexities of the Muslim Brotherhood. The face has changed but the message is constant.
  • Here you have the two faces of Islamist thought, one which underscores the myth of peace while privately exiling dissenting voices as ignorant, racist or bigoted. Meanwhile, CoverGirl and other brands upholding the hijab as a new standard of beauty, ignore the hijab’s very ugly origins.
Left: Marks & Spencer’s Paisley Print Burkini. Right: An outfit from the Dolce & Gabbana Abaya and Hijab Collection.

As 2016 drew to a close, many people were on the edge of their seats after a defining presidential election between one choice (Clinton) who stood for the status quo and the other (Trump), seen as the harbinger of a resolute victory against radical Islam. For many Muslims, there was a third choice. Unanchored to the changing tides of elections, the long game of Western Muslims who are averse to Western values was largely unaffected by an altered political landscape. They had transitioned to a new arena: culture.

In 2016, the élite fashion label Dolce and Gabbana launched an “Abaya and Hijab Collection.” Months later, at New York Fashion Week, a sartorial Mecca, hosted the first catwalk spotlighting models fully donned in hijabs.

Islamist influence is now using Western culture to solidify Islamist values in society’s more coveted circles: fashion and beauty.

Continue Reading Article

Since the election of Trump, the hijab has emerged as a new symbol of resistance and feminism.
Hijab becomes symbol of resistance, feminism in the age of Trump
“No one forced me to dress this way.”–USATODAY.COM
.
Make July 1 International Burn Hijab Day

Sandra Solomon is an apostate from Islam. She was raised in Saudi Arabia, and now lives in Canada.

In the following video Ms. Solomon talks about the oppression of women under Islam, and especially the requirement that they wear hijab. She proposes that July 1st be declared “International Burn Hijab Day”.–Many thanks to Vlad Tepes & GoV for recording and uploading this video.