THE unhinged and even threatening reaction to Peter Dutton proves he’s right to raise issues with Muslim Lebanese immigration.
And it proves the Immigration Minister was also right to call it out, before we import even more refugees who could put Australians in danger.
Oops. Too late. See the extraordinary crime wave we’ve since imported with Sudanese refugees as well? The carjackings, home invasions and brazen thefts?
Will we never learn?
Andrew Bolt, on his Sky News show last week, Dutton finally admitted that prime minister Malcolm Fraser in 1976 made a dangerous mistake by lowering our entry requirements and letting in many illiterate and unqualified Muslims fleeing Lebanon’s civil war. Yes, Dutton conceded, “Fraser did make mistakes in bringing some people in the 1970s and we’re seeing that today”.
The New South Wales Government is offering free training programs to Iraqi and Syrian refugees resettled in the state, in an effort to help them join the workforce.
Needless to mention that the NSW government has nothing to offer, because nothing is “free”. The NSW gubmint is forcing taxpayersto pay for their own demise.
Key points:
Last year, the Federal Government announced it would take an extra 12,000 refugees from Iraq and Syria
Almost 4,000 of them have already been resettled in NSW
Most are living with relatives in western Sydney and are getting help to find jobs
New Zealand: Muslim cleric removed from Federation of Islamic Associations for anti-Semitic remarks
Robert Spencer:
“Dr Sahib was the secretary of one of the federation’s committees. He retains his role as the president of the Al-Taqwa mosque.”
Why? Either the Muslims of New Zealand approve of his anti-Semitic remarks, or they don’t. This reaction is equivocal.
Meanwhile, what will New Zealand authorities do when they discover that the Qur’an depicts the Jews as fabricating things and falsely ascribing them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181, 5:64); loving to listen to lies (5:41); disobeying Allah and never observing his commands (5:13); disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); and more?
“Controversial cleric stood down by Islamic Federation,” RNZ, November 23, 2016:
A Muslim cleric criticised for anti-Semitic speeches at an Auckland mosque has been permanently stood down from his role in the Federation of Islamic Associations (FIANZ).
The speeches made by Shaykh Dr Mohammed Anwar Sahib at the Al-Taqwa mosque, in Manukau, have been widely condemned, but the cleric said he had been misinterpreted.
Can you imagine how it feels to be governed by a political clown gallery that throws hundreds of millions of dollars at the weather and finances Mohammedan headbangers to pull the islamic wool over the eyes and ears of taxpaying Australians?
Wrong guy for the job? Muslim leader responsible for ‘de-radicalising’ prisoners claims there has NEVER been a terrorist attack in Australia – says Lindt Cafe siege being branded terrorism was ‘Islamophobic’
Islamic leader Kuranda Seyit said there’s not been terror attack in Australia
Claims Man Haron Monis, Farhad Jabar and Numan Haider mentally ill
Said the Sydney siege was not an act of terror but a copycat attack
Deakin University Global Islamic Politics professor Greg Barton disagreed
Said siege, Curtis Cheng’s murder, and Haider stabbing all terror related
An Islamic leader involved in de-radicalising Muslim prisoners has claimed there has never been a terrorist attack in Australia.
Kuranda Seyit said the Lindt Cafe siege in Sydney, the murder of NSW Police employee Curtis Cheng by Farhad Jabar and Numan Haider’s attack on counter-terrorism officers were acts of people who were ‘mentally unstable’.
Mr Seyit, who runs the Forum on Australia’s Islamic Relations, also said he believes any Muslim who commits a crime is automatically branded a terrorist, which is Islamophobic and ‘grossly unfair’ to the wider community.
Islamic leader Kuranda Seyit has claimed there has never been a terrorist attack in Australia
Paramedics seen here removing injured hostages from the Sydney siege in December 2014
Oh for f*kcs sake, Mohammedans throw hissy fits and then cry victimhood, haven’t we learned that lesson yet? Anne Aly’s fanatical frenzy is the standard modus operandi of all Islamic agitprops. Put her on the stand and let her prove that there are indeed death threats! Check her phone records, go after her and don’t let her off the hook for that mendacious grievance theatre that keeps the authorities busy with her BS!
Labor MP Anne Aly and family receive death threats after Peter Dutton comments. Labor MP Anne Aly has told Parliament she received death threats after she condemned Immigration Minister Peter Dutton’s comments about Lebanese-Muslims.
Mr Dutton singled out the Lebanese-Muslin community earlier this week, saying most people charged with terror-related offences came from the background. Dr Aly, the first Muslim woman to be elected to Parliament and an expert in counter-terrorism, said the Immigration Minister’s comments were “extremely disappointing” and feared they were made in malice. She said the comments prompted death threats directed towards her family.
“I don’t worry about myself because in this place I am afforded the protections that not many people are afforded,” she said.
“But these were death threats against my family.
“Someone came out and said they would like to kill my family. Where are my rights?”
During a debate on equality, Dr Aly asked if a right to free speech was worth more than her right to be protected.
If the international community wants to see Israel make dangerous concessions, then they, and they alone, must ensure that Israel has a united and pragmatic peace partner.
This should be Israel’s basic demand: that a united Palestinian political leadership will recognize the right of all the citizens of the Jewish State of Israel to live in peace and security, alongside the State of Palestine.
It is that simple. That is all it takes.
The notion that the creation of a state of Palestine will herald everlasting peace is naïve in the extreme.
After 50 years of a two-state failure, the French and other diplomats, in their duplicitously-named “peace initiative,” have no other idea for how to settle the Palestinian problem, except to behave like parched men trudging across a burning desert toward a distant mirage that they think is an oasis paradise. It is not, and the same diplomats will take no responsibility for cleaning up the dangerous outcome of such a disaster.
The international community is pressuring Israel to make wholesale concessions in territory and security, risking social and political upheaval, to grant the so-called Palestinians a state of their own.
The sole criterion for making this happen is for the international community to accept the Palestinian precondition of forcing Israel withdraw to pre-1967 lines, which are the 1949 armistice lines and not a defined border.
Whenever I approach a European diplomat with the following questions, none of them can give me an answer:
1) What happens when a new emboldened Palestinian government continues calls for the liberation of the “rest of Palestine”? (More)
Fatah official:
Trump’s “true face” – “Zionist and racist”
Op-ed in official PA daily:
Trump is “a most problematic man…
eccentric, aggressive, racist,
and rash in his responses because he is short-tempered and undiplomatic”
l
PA Ambassador to the UN:
If Trump moves the embassy to Jerusalem,
that is an “aggression” and “an attack”
l
PLO official:
“What we heard before the elections
is not what we will hear after the elections”
Nan Jacques Zilberdik
Following the election of Donald Trump as the next US president, Palestinian leaders and others have reacted to the choice of the American people and voiced their opinions and expectations of Trump.
Deputy Secretary of the Fatah Central Committee Jibril Rajoub commented on Trump’s “true” nature, categorizing him as a “Zionist and racist”:
Is there really “no religious rationale” for terrorism, as Barack Obama has said? In this new video, I show why that is a false assumption that leads to wrong and repeatedly failed policies.
Leading Sunni scholar Sheikh Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi said, with regard to the fatwa he issued in the past permitting Palestinians to carry out suicide operations: “I do not consider them permitted today.” Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi, head of the International Union of Muslim Scholars and a prominent spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, explained: “I permitted them because the Palestinians had a need to defend themselves, so that the Israelis and their supporters would not kill them. I permitted [these operations] because of this necessity, and now the necessity is over.” Sheikh Qaradhawi was interviewed by Saudi scholar Sheikh Salman Al-Ouda on Hiwar TV on November 18.
Tell the truth about Mohammedan criminality and watch them go apeshit. Quite a spectacle. Do you think we should be ruled by 200.000 criminal Mohammedans? Ruby Hamad certainly does. She wants Peter Dutton sacked for calling out Mohammedan criminality.
An elected representative cannot be allowed to collectively blame more than 200,000 of his fellow citizens. But here we are, long past the age of reason.—SMH.COM.AU|BY RUBY HAMAD
Why blame us if you won’t take lessons?
Andrew Bolt
Fairfax columnist Ruby Hamad rages that racist Australia has robbed her of her heritage: “I stopped reading, writing, and speaking Arabic; this poetic gift of my ancestors is now largely lost to me and I grieve it every day.”
But there is a very strange thing about her claim.
If she grieves “every day” at her lack of Arabic, why doesn’t she simply enrol in language lessons? Here’s just one of many courses, offered in her home city and subsidised by the taxpayers of this allegedly racist country.
Moreover, it turns out that Hamad does indeed speak some Arabic, but has not troubled to improve it:
Why is her failure our fault? Is this part of the victim culture that seems far too strong in the Muslim Lebanese?
A timely reminder, often posted on this site, once again:
Stop, for god’s sake stop, importing trouble and Muslim immigrants, as a whole, necessarily mean trouble, in all lands where the political and legal institutions, and social arrangements, are flatly contradicted by the Shari’a. Muslims are obligated to change or tear down those institutions, in order to remove all “obstacles to Islam.” It is not special or individual malice that prompts that attitude. That is their duty, a central duty. Why not come to fully and soberly understand that duty, and out of a minimal sense of self-preservation, cease to import those into our lands (America, Canada, Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Australia, and every other place that has so generously admitted, under a twisted definition of “refugees,” people who do not, and can not, wish our ways or institutions or constitutions well.– Hugh Fitzgerald
“Peter Dutton Suggests Fraser Government Made Mistake by Resettling Lebanese Refugees”.
Dear ABC: he did not say “Lebanese refugees”. He clearly indicated that he was referring specifically to Lebanese Muslim “refugees”, and to them alone. But, given recent experience, he could have drawn attention to the various kinds of unpleasantness that also seem to be happening rather a lot in connection with Muslims – whether immigrants or ‘refugees’ – of backgrounds other than Lebanese. – CM
“Immigration Minister Peter Dutton has suggested that the Fraser government made a mistake by resettling Lebanese refugees.
No. Not “by resettling Lebanese refugees”, BUT “by resettling Lebanese Muslims who claimed to be refugees”. – CM
‘Mr Dutton last week stated that former prime minister Malcolm Fraser “did make mistakes in bringing some people in” as part of his immigration policies in the 1970s.
Which caused freshly elected Member for Cowan, Anne Aly, (a Mohammedan agitprop) to throw hissy fits, something that reminds us of what Sir Winston Churchill called the ‘fanatical frenzy that is more dangerous than rabies in a dog….’
The Member for Cowan (pictured) reacted angrily to the Immigration Minister’s comments during a parliamentary debate on Monday in the House of Representatives
‘When pressed on those comments during Question Time on Monday, Mr Dutton singled out people of Lebanese-Muslim background.
Labor politician Anne Aly (left) has been photographed gesturing furiously at George Christensen after Peter Dutton said he would call out extremism if he saw it
And in so doing he is stating nothing but demonstrable fact. For more – much more – detail, written from the point of view fo an experienced law enforcement officer who saw it all as it happened, on just how much trouble and expense those Muslims from Lebanon started causing (and have continued to cause) for their Australian infidel hosts, from the moment they first stepped foot in this country, one may consult retired policeman Tim Priest’s classic article, “The Rise of Middle Eastern Crime in Australia”, which should in fact have been called “The Rise of Muslim Organised Crime in Australia”. We have had to create the Middle Eastern Organised Crime Squad specifically to deal with the phenomenon; and the vast, vast majority of MOMAs “Men of Middle Eastern Or Mediterranean Appearance” who get arrested by this squad, and brought to trial, are Muslim, rather than Christian or Jewish.
A group of Islamists did not break the law when they formed ‘sharia police’ street patrols, telling people to stop drinking, gambling and listening to music, a German court has ruled.
The ultra-conservative group, formed by German convert Sven Lau, sparked outrage in 2014 when it held patrols in the western city of Wuppertal in 2014.
They wore orange vests bearing the words ‘Sharia Police’.
Islamist preacher Sven Lau led the ultra-conservative group, which wore orange vests wearing the words Sharia Police
.
But prosecutors at the city’s district court could not prove that seven accused members had broken the law.
A ban on political uniforms would only be breached if the outfits worn were ‘suggestively militant or intimidating’ – but court officials ruled they were not threatening, and that one witness thought the men were part of a batchelor party.
The same court had already thrown out the case last year, but was overruled on appeal by a higher court, which agreed with prosecutors that the ban on uniforms could be applied in this case.
The court ruled the vests, like the one shown in this image, did not break laws governing wearing political uniforms
.
Monday’s verdict is not yet final and may still be appealed.
Paramedics seen here removing injured hostages from the Sydney siege in December 2014
Islamist preacher Sven Lau led the ultra-conservative group, which wore orange vests wearing the words Sharia Police