Saudi Foreign Affairs Minister Answers question about ISIS, DAESH

Munich 2016 security conference saudi arabia foreign minister

Listen to Soddy Barbaria’s al Jubeir,  grand master of taqiyya and Islam-apologies:

In response to a question generalizing Islam’s role in the Islamic State (ISIS), Saudi Foreign Minster Abdel al-Jubeir claims that every religion has extremist “perverts and psychopaths” that seek to hi-jack them, and that categorizing extremists and moderates in any religion is dangerous.

No one tried to set al-Jubair straight. No one bothered to tell al Jubair that Islam is the religion of hijackers, that we are not concerned about  other  extremist “perverts and psychopaths”,  and that the world is in fear of Islam.

Al Jubair invokes the KKK. But the KKK doesn’t claim to be Christian and its members don’t quote from the bible. Besides, they are nothing but a marginal group. If they had a billion members, things might be different.

Yes the Qu’ran says “you have your faith and I have mine”, which is a Meccan verse from the days when Muhammad had no power. Later, in Medina, where Muhammad became a powerful warlord, it became “kill the unbelievers wherever you find them”. The previous verse is abrogated and serves only to confuse gullible kafirs. The later verse is the one that matters.

No, in Saudi Arabia no one is free to practice their faith unless they are sunni Muslims; non Muslims are not allowed to visit Mecca. That is not “a sign of great tolerance”, that is barbarian intolerance.

Then he cites the “innocent soul” verse, 5:32, which is a warning to Jews not to kill  Muslims, because only Muslims are innocent. Al Jubeir conveniently ignores the the next verse Quran 5:33.

There is no compassion or mercy in this. The OT says indeed ‘an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth’, but no one in the west lives by the OT and again, nobody bothered to tell al Jubair.

But no, they let him go on, with his “I caution people…”  which is a threat, and with his gibberish about “the Islamic civilisation that preserved… whatever Muslims say it preserved… blah blah…

No. Islam preserved nothing. Islam destroyed all the remnants of the Jahiliyya, and then it destroyed the evidence that remained. That is a constant throughout 1400 years of Islamic history, and the Islamic state, “Dash”, did exactly that in Palmyra.  The history of the Greeks and Rome was not “passed on” by Muslims, and the “Islamic Arab civilisation” did not connect China with Europe. Islam did not “preserve Aristotle and Sokrates” and it did not “pass it on to the west. These are fantastic Arab fairytales, and we should not give Arab savages the light of day for peddling these lies.

More of al Jubair, if you can stand it:

Continue reading Soddy Barbaria’s Adel al-Jubeir, grand master of taqiyya and Islamo-apologies…

FRENCH activists have begun what they call a fightback against mass migration to a squalid camp in Calais.

By ZOIE O’BRIEN/Express

Continue reading ‘This is our house’ Clashes in Calais as protestors block migrant routes to the jungle

Jonathan Power and the “Expressio Unius…” by Hugh Fitzgerald

(“… to express one thing is to exclude another.”)

Here’s a guy who sold out to the Arabs. He tells us that Karen Armstrong is “an authority” (of what?) and peddles  the “Islam is defensive” meme. He fantasises about “murderous bombs” and suggests “Islam is not violent because most Muslims don’t commit acts of violence”

Mohammed’s last order was to “respect and give gifts (bribery) to the foreign delegations as you have seen me dealing with them.”

Bribery to further the ends of Islam is normative Islam, rather than an aberration.

Jonathan Power, a well-known foreign-affairs columnist for the past 30 years, whose work now appears in 40 papers, has latterly become a prominent Defender of the Faith (that faith being Islam), and has just produced one more of those bizarre defenses of Islam that we long-suffering Infidels keep receiving, world without end.

In his latest piece, Power asks rhetorically “Is Islam Violent?” and attempts to convince readers that the only conceivable answer, in a world reeling from Muslim violence everywhere you turn, is the counterintuitive “No.”

In his very first paragraph, Power offers what is clearly meant to demonstrate that he recognizes that some examples of Muslim violence can be found, and he lists a few for us. It’s not a list, however, intended to suggest that “this is only a small sample” of Muslim violence, but rather, a disingenuous attempt to disarm potential critics. It’s what he leaves out that’s important.

Here’s that first paragraph:

Is Islam violent? ISIS in Syria and Iraq. In Pakistan, there is the Lashkar-e-Taiba, and the attempted murderer of the schoolgirl, Malala Yousafzai. Immigrant Moroccan men roughly pushing women and fondling them in the crowd in Cologne. Murderous bombs in Paris.

Let’s take those sentences and incomplete sentences, one by one.

Continue reading Jonathan Power and the “Expressio Unius…”

It is frustrating to see that Westerners place their concepts of tolerance over and above quoranic teachings. This is based on ignorance.

Islam doesn’t work that way:

Qur’an 9:29—Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Read the above again, and again, until the coin drops. Then continue to read the article from Eileen F. Tolansky, here some excerpts:

If you don’t want to eat bacon, then don’t eat bacon.

If you don’t want to drink alcohol, then don’t drink alcohol.

If you don’t want to wear pig costumes, then don’t.

You get it now? We are simply suggesting Muslims should tolerate us. They won’t. They have to fight us because we don’t believe like they do; we don’t hold forbidden what allah has forbidden, we are not submitting and we are not subdued. Not yet. That gives them the right to wage jihad to ‘defend’ Islam.

Continue reading Enough with the Double Standards for Muslims

David Wood of Answering Muslims fact-checks the viral video “10 Lies You Were Told about Islam,” which (surprise, surprise) turns out to be full of lies itself.

In other news:

Qatari Educational Software to Girls: Not Wearing Hijab Defies Allah, Brings You Closer to Satan

INN

The Al Jazeera TV channel first went on the air towards the end of 1996, advertising itself as “Opinion and the Other Opinion,” and purporting to create a new kind of media presence in the Arab world, one that would not simply repeat government propaganda – as did all the other existing government channels. It soon became clear, however, that this channel, which advertised itself as being objective, was infected with very specific agendas, especially with regard to the Muslim Brotherhood and its terrorist offshoots, and most especially when it came to Hamas. In fact, Al Jazeera’s staff is wholeheartedly committed to helping these organizations thrive.

Recently, we were privileged to hear an admission of guilt from the chief newscaster, the first man ever to appear on Al Jazeera’s screen and the man who has the greatest influence on Al Jazeera’s agenda – except for the Emir of Qatar, who funds the channel. He is Jamal Rian, a Jordanian-Palestinian born in Tul Karem. This past December, he appeared on a program called “We are Al Jazeera” in which a broadcaster talks about himself for half an hour, telling the audience about his family, where he was born and raised, his hobbies and professional background.

During Rian’s half hour, he said the following, concerning an interview he conducted with me during the regular news broadcast on June 1, 2008, about eight years ago, the day the government of Israel decided to built a few hundred apartments at Har Homa and Pisgat Ze’ev in the Jerusalem area.

The original interview is here:

(Note: the parentheses contain my comments)

“Mistakenly, there are broadcasting stations that ask me why Al Jazeera hosts Israelis. On the contrary, I am one of those who encourage that. Yes. I feel that when we have an Israeli guest on our news program, he is my prey, and when he presents his narrative, I can refute it. (Note that Rian admits that he does not interview Israelis objectively, but sees them as prey). Al Jazeera is based on ‘Opinion and the Other Opinion,’ but without hearing the other side’s voice, we are unconvincing. Of course, when it comes to the Palestinian problem, I feel that I provide a stage for defending the Palestinian cause.”

“Sometimes, of course, there are personally difficult situations when I am interviewing Israelis (that is, when he doesn’t succeed in ‘devouring’ the Israeli). Let me give you an example (from June 2008): I had a professor from Bar Ilan University, named Mordechai Kedar, and the interview’s objective was to talk about the reasons for continued [Israeli] settlement in the West Bank and settlement expansion in Jerusalem and other places. I posed the question: ‘What’s the point?’ and he answered: ‘Jerusalem belongs to the Jews. Period. It is our capital and has been forever. You Arabs and Muslims [must realize], I was already in Jerusalem when your forefathers drank wine, buried girls alive and worshipped idols. So why should we even discuss it? It has been our city for 3000 years and will be ours forever.’

“(Jamal continues): I said to him: ‘If we want to talk about history, you cannot erase Jerusalem from the Koran.’ Of course, he is a Ph.d. and understands things, like that the name of Jerusalem does not appear in the Koran – really and truly, Jerusalem is not mentioned in the Koran, but Allah came to my aid that moment and I said to him (to Kedar): ‘Glory is to him who made his servant go (Koran, Chap 17:1) mentions El Aksa.'”(But then I [Kedar] stressed once again that Jerusalem is not mentioned in the Koran – even once!).

Below is Rian’s “half hour” during which he talks about the 2008 interview:

The significance of these two minutes is that Al Jazeera‘s chief broadcaster has still not recovered from the fact that he did not succeed in “devouring” an interviewed Israeli – me, that is – during a live broadcast. What is interesting is that he remembers entire sentences that were uttered eight years ago, what I said and what he said. It seems that those few minutes were quite traumatic for him.

Why does Israel allow this hostile channel to work from within the country, why allow its reporters to spread anti-Israeli propaganda from within the Knesset?

Continue reading Mordechai Kedar: Al Jazeera’s deceit exposed. What now, Israel?

Jennifer Oriel/The Australian

Australian multiculturalism has limits. Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir tested them and lost to a freelance journalist who refused to resile.

After being directed to sit behind men at a Hizb ut-Tahrir lecture, Alison Bevege filed a sex discrimination complaint. Last week, it was upheld by the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

This is a victory for freethinkers worldwide and affirms Australia’s place in the enlightened world. But the question must be asked why, in the 21st century, women in the West should need to go to court to fight against being sent to the back of the room six decades after Rosa Parks ­refused to be sent to the back of the bus.

Hizb ut-Tahrir is one of several Islamist groups in the West reported for sending women to the rear at public events. The Daily Telegraph reported that at a University of Western Sydney lecture by the group, women were ushered through a back door while men were offered front row seats.

Continue reading Alison Bevege v Hizb ut-Tahrir: victory for women and reason

Times of Israel via Vlad Tepes

BUENOS AIRES — A Jewish man died Tuesday after being stabbed repeatedly in a suspected anti-Semitic attack in Uruguay.

David Fremd, a 54-year-old local businessman, was attacked in the western Uruguayan city of Paysandu, on the border with neighboring Argentina.

One of his three sons was also injured in the attack, but his wounds are reportedly not life-threatening.

Fremd was a local representative of the Uruguayan Jewish umbrella group. His family suspects that the attack was religiously motivated, according to a report by local news outlet Subraydo.

His suspected assailant, a 35-year-old man with a criminal record, reportedly shouted “Allahu Akbar” before stabbing him, the local El Pais newspaper said.

I hope it wasn’t one of these guys:

‘Send Us Back’: Former Guantanamo Detainees Are Camping Out at the US Embassy in Uruguay

Former Guantanamo Bay prisoners who were accepted with much fanfare as refugees in Uruguay are now openly rejecting their host and camping out in front of the US Embassy.

They’ve set up the camp in the capital of Montevideo and say that if Uruguay and the US can’t improve their living conditions, they should be returned to “Guantanamo, Syria, or anywhere else,” one of the refugees said.

Continue reading Allahu akbaring Mustard stabs Jew to death in Uruguay

The Telegraph’s Allison Pearson writes:

Anyone who has stopped to look at a carpet in Turkey knows how it goes. First, the crazy opening price. You shake your head and walk away. Ahmet coaxes you into his shop with smiles and voluble assurances: “Byooutiful lady, pliiss, I give you verrayy gud prayce!”

Then, apple tea. Seated on a low bench, nursing your scalding glass, you are invited to admire the perfection of the rug, hand-woven by blind children in Turkmenistan, which you are so strangely refusing to buy.

At this point, summoning what remains of your willpower, you try to leave the shop. You promise Ahmet that you are going to think about his rug and return.

This is why the Turks refer scathingly to British tourists as “maybe later”. They have grown wise to our evasive, apologetic ways. They know that “maybe later” is English for “never”.

So, before you get to the door, Ahmet begins unrolling several other rugs with a lot of grunting and mopping of brow. At this point, a young boy may be summoned to help, adding to the pathos of the scene. Or, there is the nuclear option: kittens.

Continue reading Rug Rats